The Theory Of Everything: February 2007

Sunday, February 18, 2007

EVEN MORE ON FREE ENERGY! lol. ridiculous!

Nazi UFOs - How They Fly - The German Tesla Anti-Gravity And Free Energy Program

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3017194771837860523&q=free+energy+technology

William Lyne on the secret technologies surrounding the Nazi flying disc projects. 2004 also see http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2065575878829141177

ASTEROIDS MY A$#!!!

This is just unbelievable. "TOP SCIENTISTS!" just announced that an asteroid threat may be about to obliterate us all... in 2036.... COME OOON! Guess who's advocating this?

You guessed it. The U.N. Otherwise known as the butt of the U.S. You want to know what I think? I think this is just a pretext for launching major weaponry into space, weaponizing a region that is supposed to be left free of weapons technology.

And my personal opinion is that peace should reign supreme. Hell, I love a good fight, don't we all. But I still believe that in the end, that type of violent interaction which threatens lives and futures, is meant for baboons, gorillas, rams, and peacocks. Humans have progressed far enough that war has become more of an inherent peice of the proverbial "tail" left in our DNA. Something that really has little more necessity.

I can prove that, but first, read this:

http://news.aol.com/topnews/articles/_a/un-urged-to-take-on-asteroid-threat/20070218175909990002?ncid=NWS00010000000001

Updated:2007-02-18 18:01:41
U.N. Urged to Take On Asteroid Threat
By Irene Klotz
Reuters
SAN FRANCISCO (Feb. 18) - An asteroid may come uncomfortably close to Earth in 2036 and the United Nations should assume responsibility for a space mission to deflect it, a group of astronauts, engineers and scientists said on Saturday.

An asteroid is shown in an illustration. Astronomers are monitering an asteroid named Apophis, which has a 1 in 45,000 chance of striking Earth on April 13, 2036.

Astronomers are monitoring an asteroid named Apophis, which has a 1 in 45,000 chance of striking Earth on April 13, 2036. Although the odds of an impact by this particular asteroid are low, a recent congressional mandate for NASA to upgrade its tracking of near-Earth asteroids is expected to uncover hundreds, if not thousands of threatening space rocks in the near future, former astronaut Rusty Schweickart said. "It's not just Apophis we're looking at. Every country is at risk. We need a set of general principles to deal with this issue," Schweickart, a member of the Apollo 9 crew that orbited the earth in March 1969, told an American Association for the Advancement of Science conference in San Francisco.

------------------------

Ok, so basically, they just disproved the claim they made.

ASTEROID TO STRIKE US!... then... really... there is a really low probability of "that" particular asteroid or any other from striking us. the real statistics of an asteroid striking earth is:
low....

That's because:
--- (http://miac.uqac.ca/MIAC/impactearth.htm)
While we would, on average, expect one such dramatic impact every ten million years, our state of ignorance of the population of near earth objects (NEOs) is such that we have no guarantee that it will not happen during our lifetime. Also, we would expect that a 50 to 100 m sized object, still capable of generating dangerous tsunamis, would strike Earth every century or so (the last such event occurred in June, 1908 in Tunguska in Siberia). A land impact of a more modest object can also cause severe destruction, through earth shocks and firestorms. One can estimate the approximate area of devastation from such objects by using the relationship area of devastation (in square km) =3D 400 x (kinetic energy in terms of megatons of TNT)2/3. A 500 m object would be expected to devastate an area comparable to Ontario plus Quebec.

Point is, I'm ready to leave and go to sleep, so remember this, it's claimed that most of the ufo events involving blunt openness in their intent have been because we were attempting to place nuclear or other weapons systems into space. .

.... Universal Law # ? -- NO WEAPONS SHALL TRAVEL FORTH FROM ANY TERRESTRIAL BODY TO ANY OTHER BODY, CELESTIAL OR OTHER. WAR IS ANTITHESIS OF PROGRESS AND LIFE! PROGRESS AND LIFE IS ALL WE HAVE!

Those who promote war are imbeciles and probably broke. Why do you think the U.S is constantly at war? Because people are attacking them? NO! people are threatening their pencil thin money sources. research it yourselves people. I've got to go.

FRANK!

MicroCredit and the Developing world

The developing world is truly turning around. Finally finding something that I thought of when I was 17. I developed the idea of micro funds, allowing those with little cash, little demand, to get funds and invest it intelligently into their community. Cut off extraneous trading sources and trap the money into the minimal economy, only allowing them to expand once they reach sufficient magnitude and the entire community is well cared for.

All humans deserve a chance to live. Even though it's believed that this world WAS only developed to support 500 million humans, I think technology can change anything.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3461235311058141227&q=secret+african+societies

Breaking Through: Grameen Foundation USA Microfinance Programs

Grameen Foundation USA with Rooy Media LLC 16 min 24 sec - Mar 1, 2006 all » microfinance, a proven poverty reduction program. Since 1997, Grameen Foundation USA has been working across the globe to help them pull themselves from poverty by starting, sustaining or expand tiny businesses. Breaking Through gives you a glimpse of what this has meant for millions throughout Africa, Asia, the Americas and the Middle East. Narrated by acclaimed actress Blair Brown and produced by the social-issue media company Rooy Media LLC, the 16-minute documentary introduces you to our front line partners and some of the families whose lives have changed through microfinance. We encourage you to share this film with your friends so that they can learn more about the power of microfinance. GFUSA is grateful to Robert and Lore Eichfeld and Richard S. and Lois Gunther for their support of this project. «

Wow! Free Energy. Jury Agrees... Bye Bye Oil!

ON TO A NEW WORLD!

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5992850975411321376&q=steorn+free+energy+technology+duration%3Amedium

Steorn Jury Selection/Interview with Forum members

Steorn is an Irish company, who claimed to have developed a technology that produces free, clean and limitless energy. Sean and Richard ... all » of Steorn talk about the Jury selection, a group of scientists chosen to validate the technology. The clip also contains interviews with some steorn.net forum members, who were at a party held by the company. «

IT'S ALL COMINGN APART!

The oil barons world is crumbling around them. Free Energy sources are arriving from EVERYWHERE! It's swift, and somewhat hilarous. Because all these non rich, non super scientific everyday Americans are finding free energy sources. Our own government has been assaulting them with all due evil. but here again, another "alleged" free energy source that won't be accepted by judge, or by judicial system.

--- (http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=9017605454948856429&q=steorn+free+energy+technology+duration%3Amedium&hl=en)

Steorn has developed all-magnet motor technology which produces free energy. The company's CEO, Sean McCarthy talks about their invention, the reactions from the public and the jury that will test their claim.

9/11 conspiracy theory, alien technology, clean free energy technology, politics, politician, world news, the revolution,

putting up all of those different leads is the only way that I could bring people to my website. Google is great because it can really allow you to post so easily with websites, but you can't have a direct link which people can go to.

I've been really trying to plug this, because it's truly damning for the bush administration and those that are behind the scenes.

So, I know. "Americans hate to read." Enjoy, because this is HUGE! mainly text, sorry, but its big news.

Friday, February 16, 2007

Free Energy

---here's how to develop a free energy device -- this is the final result of 30 years of research, very similar to what tesla accomplished. waves are longitudinal. when they break loose, they are longitudina wavesl, when tied up, they split in 2 waves, one is acting on electron, go sideways, travel down wires, following newtons 3rd law of gravity within nucleus. he and his associates have filed a patent on circular and longitudinal waves to flow energy frreely in *tesla fashion and use it separately in a load to power a load. called displacement. split normal current, dq, dt, = dc dt, and mass slippage of processing electrons currents down wire, and used barrier, invented by* bill fogul, stops mass flow (work flow, rate of energy loss within circuit), allows only flow past semi conducter, *1992 - uses free energy flow which does not disperse, conventional theory recognizes displacement as pure energy transport withiout displacement or losses
if he runs displacement current throu primary of step up transformer produces garden variety magnetic feild and stores free energy in magnetic feild. which couples to secondary, which coulples to electrons in that circuit load, which doesnt restrain them. pumps electrons in load conventionally and power load. has absolute conservatuion of load but does not conserve work loss, or dissapation. takes in conventioannly throug power source through ossilater power source or a/c, could do d/c, strip off and block component of current responsible for loss, take displacement current , couple it , gahter and place it through magnetic feild, couple it through other feild, discharge through other load completely separartely, none of load discharge current goes through source, yes, you can do over unity system. he just told the world how to build a free enrgy machine. DAMN! i'm using it.

This stuff is OUT THERE! go online to google video and look for it!

Theory of Everything (26)

Time for you to act don't you think?

If we don't fix this by 2007, we're done. 2012 is the end date

Theory of Everything (25)

--DR. ERIC R. PIANKA--

(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Pianka) - Eric R. Pianka (born 23 January 1939) is an American biologist, best known for his contributions to herpetology and evolutionary ecology. He is nicknamed "The Lizard Man".
Eric R. Pianka was born in Siskiyou County along the California-Oregon border in 1939. At age 13, he was seriously injured in a bazooka blast in the front yard of his childhood home in Yreka, California.[1] His left leg became gangrenous, and he lost 10 cm of his tibia, as well as the terminal digit of the middle finger on his right hand. Pianka's childhood injury left him with a short and partially paralyzed leg. In later life, his short leg resulted in spinal scoliosis and cervical spondylosis (an S-shaped spine and a pinched brachial nerve between neck vertebrae).[1]
He graduated from Carleton College (B.A., 1960) and earned his Ph.D. from the University of Washington in 1965. He went on to do postdoctoral work with the famed ecologist Robert MacArthur at Princeton University. This period, during which he worked closely with the temporarily studentless MacArthur, had a major influence on Pianka's thinking (Pianka and Vitt, 2003). Together, the two ecologists discussed the basic theoretical aspects of community ecology. The fruits of their collaboration included the classic paper "On optimal use of a patchy environment" (MacArthur and Pianka, 1966). Pianka frequently mentions MacArthur in his lectures and keeps a webpage for his deceased mentor and colleague.[2] In some ways, Pianka's own research program expands upon and continues the work that he and MacArthur began.
Since 1968, Pianka has been on the faculty of the University of Texas at Austin. Despite his injuries, he is one of the world's most accomplished field ecologists and has performed extensive ecological investigations on vertebrate communities in three desert systems on three continents: the Great Basin, Mojave, and Sonora Deserts in North America; the Kalahari in Africa; and the Great Victoria desert in Western Australia. His monographic treatment of this work is a landmark ecological synthesis (Pianka, 1986). Pianka's interests are broad, and his research includes empirical and theoretical components of natural history, systematics, community and landscape ecology [3]. His current work focuses on lizard communities in Australia. This research includes projects on the phylogeny and ecology of a number of groups of Australian lizards and an extensive study of the unique biotic landscape produced by Australian brush fires.[4] In his research, Pianka combines traditional field biological methods with recent technological innovations in statistical analysis, phylogenetic reconstruction, and imaging of the Earth's surface in attempts to answer major questions about evolution and ecology.
Pianka has trained a number of successful scientists. Twelve of his former graduate students are professors at major universities, among them Kirk Winemiller, a professor at Texas A&M University [5] and Raymond Huey, a professor at the University of Washington [6]. Additionally, he teaches a range of popular undergraduate courses; he received an award for excellence in teaching from UT Austin in 1999.[7]
Pianka was a 1978 Guggenheim Fellow, a 1981 American Association for the Advancement of Science Fellow, and a 1990 Fulbright Senior Research Scholar. He has received numerous awards, and at least three species, one lizard and two lizard parasites, are named after him.[8]. A symposium in his honor was held by the Herpetologist's League in 2004. The American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists passed a resolution on the word "Piankafication" to describe Pianka's influence on evolutionary biology and ecology at their business meeting in 2004.[9] In this resolution, they note that he has had "vast and immeasurable influence on several fields of evolutionary ecology" and that his "years in the field have set the standard for both natural history and for ecological studies, resulting in publications that have lain the foundation for research programs..."
Pianka has produced over a hundred scientific papers, many of them highly cited and influential, and a classic textbook, Evolutionary Ecology.[10] He also writes for the general public, and his book "Lizards-Windows to the Evolution of Diversity," coauthored with longtime collaborator Laurie Vitt, won both the Robert W. Hamilton Faculty Author Award at The University of Texas at Austin and the Oklahoma Book Award from the Oklahoma Center for the Book.[11]

[edit] Controversy
Main article: Mims-Pianka controversy
Pianka's March, 2006 acceptance speech for the 2006 Distinguished Texas Scientist award by the The Texas Academy of Science resulted in controversy in the popular press when Forrest Mims claimed that Pianka had advocated genocide.[12] This report was reported in prisonplanet.com. [13] Mims' affiliate at the Discovery Institute, William Dembski, then informed the Department of Homeland Security because he and Mims felt that Pianka's speech fomented bioterrorism.[14] This resulted in the Federal Bureau of Investigation interviewing Pianka in Austin.[15]
Pianka has stated that Mims took his statements out of context and that Pianka was stating what would happen from biological principles alone if present human population trends continue, and that he was not in any way advocating for it to happen. The host of the speech, the Texas Academy of Sciences, has released a statement stating that "many of Dr. Pianka's statements have been severely misconstrued* and sensationalized

(http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2006/040406_b_depopulation.htm) - Professor's "Kill 90% of Population" Comments Echo UN, Elite NGO policiesMainstream media first spike, then distort reality of the story
Steve Watson / Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones April 4 2006
Related: Top Scientist Advocates Mass Culling 90% Of Human Population
Alex Jones yesterday interviewed Dr Forrest M. Mims, III, the Editor of Citizen Scientist Magazine and Chairman of the Environmental Science Section of the Texas Academy of Science. The discussion centered around the controversial University of Texas professor who advocates the mass death of 90% of the world's human population.
Dr. Eric R. Pianka gave a speech to the Texas Academy of Science last month in which he advocated the need to exterminate 90% of the population through the airborne ebola virus. Pianka's chilling comments, and their enthusiastic reception again underscore the elite's agenda to enact horrifying measures of population control.
Standing in front of a slide of human skulls, Pianka gleefully advocated airborne ebola as his preferred method of exterminating the necessary 90% of humans, choosing it over AIDS because of its faster kill period. Ebola victims suffer the most tortuous deaths imaginable as the virus kills by liquefying the internal organs. The body literally dissolves as the victim writhes in pain bleeding from every orifice.
Pianka was later presented with a distinguished scientist award by the Academy. Pianka is no crackpot. He has given lectures to prestigious universities worldwide.
The reason he is being awarded is because he is simply espousing the views that have been put forward by UN agencies such as the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), WHO and UNICEF and international NGO's such as the International Planned Parenthood Federation, as well as The US Government for the last 35 years.
We have previously documented the elite's hideous interest in depopulation techniques, an interest that mirrors the nightmare eugenics visions of Nazi scientists in the 1940s.
Pianka suggests that we should begin to sterilize the human population now, a call that has previously been put forward by Henry Kissinger in a declassified document of the National Security Council (1974) entitled "The Implications of World-wide Population Growth on the Security and External Interests of the United States".
This document lists as a priority birth-rate control in 13 key countries in the Third World, especially in South America. Extraordinary resources were allotted to the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) to implement the policy of birth-rate control.
It also contains sections entitled:
Creating Conditions Conducive to Fertility Decline, which calls for, amongst other things, "reducing infant and child mortality"
Concentration on Education and Indoctrination of The Rising Generation of Children Regarding the Desirability of Smaller Family Size
Utilization of Mass Media and Satellite Communications Systems for Family Planning
The memorandum also includes a section that lauds abortion and states that " -- It would be unwise to restrict abortion research for the following reasons: 1) The persistent and ubiquitous nature of abortion. 2) Widespread lack of safe abortion techniques..."
The memorandum basically stresses the need to offer increased aid for third world countries that agree to implement programs of sterilization and depopulation.
The document contains too many hideous quotes to mention here, read it for yourself by clicking here.
Kissinger also prepared a depopulation manifesto for President Jimmy Carter called 'Global 2000' which detailed using food as a weapon to depopulate the third world.
The United Nations Population Fund directly supports policies such as that of the "one child policy" in Communist China which encapsulates coercive and enforced abortion.
In 2002 Secretary of State Colin Powell stated in a letter to Congress:
"Regrettably, the PRC has in place a regime of severe penalties on women who have unapproved births. This regime plainly operates to coerce pregnant women to have abortions in order to avoid the penalties and therefore amounts to a ‘program of coercive abortion.’ Regardless of the modest size of UNFPA’s budget in China or any benefits its programs provide, UNFPA's support of, and involvement in, China's population-planning activities allows the Chinese government to implement more effectively its program of coercive abortion."
Yet The UNPFA seem to think this is a great thing
"China has had the most successful family planning policy in the history of mankind in terms of quantity and with that, China has done mankind a favour," United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) representative Sven Burmester said last week. —10/11/99 Agence France-Presse
Under the Regan Administration legislation sponsored by then-Rep. Jack Kemp (NY) and then-Sen. Bob Kasten (WI) ensured funding to the UNPFA was cut off for these very reasons. Yet is was no surprise when In 1993, the Clinton Administration dramatically revised the official interpretation of the "Kemp-Kasten amendment" in order to facilitate U.S. funding of UNFPA, thus making available $14.5 million.
In May 2003, the House Committee on International Relations narrowly adopted an an amendment by Rep. Joseph Crowley (D-NY) revoking the ban on such participation with the UNPFA. The amendment earmarked $100 million for UNFPA over the next two years.
There are countless other instances of depopulation programs, too numerous to go into in this brief article. We urge our readers to research them and expose them further.
Dr Pianka's comments are merely echoes of the elite lust for a Malthusian social Darwinist control mechanism. They wish to use the excuse of having to "save the earth" in order to take away freedom and implement a massive authoritarian control grid.
Amazingly the audience of fellow scientists and students present at Dr Pianka's presentation in Texas actually applauded, cheered and laughed approvingly.
Dr Forrest Mims, who has been valiantly trying to expose Pianka's hideous calls, commented that he wrote to Pianka - or "Dr Death" as he has been dubbed - and asked for an explanation as to why he wanted to see a worldwide epidemic that would only kill Africans. Pianka responded by saying he was not racially prejudice and wanted to see 90% of all races exterminated.
"He wants an equal opportunity killer virus" Mims said.
Mims further quoted Pianka as having said that "We need to sterilize everybody on the earth and make the antidote freely available to anyone willing to work for it".
According to Mims, Pianka also praised China's "one child policy" stating that "China was able to turn the corner and become the leading world super power because they have a police state and they are able to force people to stop re-producing."
"The only difference between Pianka and Hitler is that Hitler stated he wanted to kill five and a half million people, this guy is saying he wants to kill five and a half billion people." Mims went on to say.
Mims also revealed that at another lecture, Pianka had a cuddly toy,much like the one pictured below, shaped like the ebola virus which he fawned over.
As stated in yesterday's article however, Pianka's doomsday warning of the population bomb, for which Mims claims he presented no evidence whatsoever, is complete pseudo-science. Populations in developed countries are declining and only in third world countries is it expanding dramatically. Industrialization itself levels out population trends and even despite this world population models routinely show that the earth's population will level out at 9 billion in 2050 and slowly decline after that. "The population of the most developed countries will remain virtually unchanged at 1.2 billion until 2050," states a United Nations report. The UN population policies seem to be in direct contradiction to THEIR OWN FINDINGS.
Conservation International's own study revealed that 46% of the earth's surface was an untouched wilderness, that is land areas not including sea. It is commonly accepted that the entire world population could all fit into the state of Texas and each have an acre of their own land.
Once a country industrializes there is an average of a 1.6 child rate per household, so the western world population is actually in decline. That trend has also been witnessed in areas of Asia like Japan and South Korea. The UN has stated that the population will peak at 9 billion and then begin declining.
In his attempts to alert the world to Pianka, Mims approached the Associated Press who spiked the story despite it being extremely newsworthy.
The story was picked up by Jamie Mobley of the The Seguin Gazette-Enterprise, yet when Mims produced this article to the AP they responded with the comment:
"We can't carry such an important story if it is just done by a small time newspaper"
Mims stressed that "These people are part of the dark ages of the media, they need to realize that it is the radio and the web that are carrying the ball. The newspapers are way behind the times, the Associated Press said they would call today, they have not called."
Today the AP has produced an article that completely distorts the reality of what Dr "Death" Pianka has been lecturing about.
The AP suggests that Pianka has back-peddled and said that he was only trying to warn against epidemic occurring due to overpopulation completely. This contradicts his clear statement that airborne ebola should be used to eliminate 90% of the human population. He is not warning against a disease epidemic, he is advocating one and the Associated Press has displayed yellow journalism in not pointing out this disconnect.
The AP states:
A University of Texas biology professor has been targeted by talk radio, bloggers and vitriolic e-mails - including a death threat - after a published report that he advocated death for most of the population as a means of saving the Earth.
This is NOT the story, the story is that the man WANTS TO KILL 90% OF PEOPLE ON THE PLANET.
Forrest Mims, pictured above, ended the interview by warning that if indeed the students of Pianka agree with his views, they could become scientists in the future and seriously research and hope to implement such policies.
Mims cited that the 1918 flu virus that caused a mass epidemic has recently been re-created. There are also other MORE DEADLY viruses in existence in labs across the world. If someone wanted to release these in order to "save the world" they wouldn't have to spend years creating the means to do it.
Mims ended the interview by warning that if indeed the students of Pianka agree with his views, they could become scientists in the future and seriously research and hope to implement such policies.
Mims stated that he is "deeply disturbed" with the scientific community:
"I interviewed the student who became a convert to this for 45 minutes and sir, you are absolutely correct, there are people out there who are willing to do this"
Listen to the interview with Forrest Mims at prisonplanet.tv
talks about plans to builld conmpact concentration camps in u.s-----pianka at u.t. transcript released about police state like china to carry out population reduction. holy shit.
() -
--damn, turns out the communists and radical arabs were BOTH funded by the U.S!
() -

---bill and gates foundation. i always wondered why a human as evil as gates would ever give all that hard earned money away. (study - i hate you bill gates!)radio clip-google.
--jesus christ, (i'm a christian, and will be until the day i die, but its well known that jesus wasn't born on the day of dec 31st, but in august. also, his real name is Jmmanueal
--aids (i know you didnt know, i didnt say it becuase it would distort your idea about the document i just wrote, but i'm black, if the truth behind aids is true that they created and propogated it upon africans, then i'd have to take up arms, IMMEDIATELY, because thats monstrous -- population control. look... i can't believe that one , i'd have to fight )
--back to S3 or area 51, are aliens real? alien aircraft, alien autopsy, alien interview, alien construction of earth,
--thermonuclear attacks against iran, russia, china,north korea, already planned, by the "strangeloves", the neo-cons, \
---new fake 9/11, new gulf of tonkin, to bring in europe. the task of us is to educate the us and the world. becuase guesss what, we're already supposed to be in a major dictatorship. it was only beacuse of a ---general i dont know of but will reasearch that disregarded orders to send fighter craft to destroy the plane supposed to hit the white house. guess what, if that would hjave happened, when i was 15, i would have been living in a major dictatorship today. because thats when 9/11 happened, bush screwed up, we were saved, this is in a sense, our SECOND CHANCE! oh my god! now, i'm christian, i dont use my lords name in vein, btu my god. we were saved. by a general who wouldnt follow orders, and now we're slowly realizing all the shit that is in the world

top 10 reasons for thinkin hijacking are fake and that our gov't would do this -- for those still reading who still aren't convinced
--names do not appear on any passenger manifest (show me proof)
9. non subject to autopsy (none)
8. 5 to 7 have turned up alive and well, in the middle east, interviewed by the bbc and the gaurdian newpapers (what the fuck?)
7. fbi, has not revised its list, (quite surprising) read book by david ray griffin - ommissions and distortions, read it, i have to
6. a special agent of fbi, known as flagg, knew immediately the nhames of all hijackers, because mohammed atta, when in oregon and flew to wherever, lugagge had terrorist manual and list of all hijackers,.... COME OOOONNN. preposterous. 5. 6..7 of these guys are alive and well, THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO BE DEAD!
5. they could not have flown these planes, -- training backgrounds were researched, they couldnt even fly a cesna
4. the cell phone calls could not have been made at the altitudes that they were flown.. IMPOSSIBLE. passenger mark bingham. "mom, this is mark bingham, you believe me don't you?" THE SHIT FUCK?
3. during trial of 20th hijackers zacarias mossaui, passengers discussing breaking down door with drink cart. this is a cockpit voice recording. they do not record voices in the passenger compartmetn..... HA!
2. last words attributed to hijackers they said "alla akbaar", alla akbaar, god is great, god is great. but muslim memmbers of 9/11 truth, they're supposed to say "there is but one god alla, and mohommad is his profit.
1. zakarias mossaui, for not coming forward, about to recieeve life or death, 1. a year before, april last, he confessed to different plot, plot to fly plane into white house, in order to get release of terrorist sheik, he denied any 9/11 wrongdoing. but he's still imploicated into 9/11, he had no obligation to come forward, even if he had been implicated. we have a thing claled the 5th amendment. 2. an agent said he'd been following (fbi), he testified that he told his superiors about suspicions 70 times..... direct policy. you fucking think of a reason why the man was ignored 70 times. they were used as chess peices for use when the gov't commited these dastardky attacks.
(this was from talker with Alex Jones at American Scholars Symposium on google video)
----the cia has taken out the heads of gov'ts all over the world all the time. they're not beneath this type of statement of force. just take a peak at this documentary on the venezuelan coup of hugo chavez, (other leaders) just take a look at this - google video - THE REVOLUTION WILL NOT BE TELEVISED
concluding statements ---
---now i realize i'm a compromised fellow. i've gotten so much information in my head now
its probably rotten info that no regular tax payign citizen (which , btw, income tax is unconstitutional, i couldnt believe that either), i know i couldnt now go on some good republican news program like bill o' reilly's wonderful and very open idea forum to talk about my "opinions" . It's sad how when you have so much facts, people mistake a tidal wave for a cup of liquid(the liquid in question being urine)
the majjority of individuals living in new york now at least consider 9/11 to be an inside job, the dams are braking, the worm is turning,t he shock effect is wearing off. come on. wake up with me, i'm lonely right now. i can't believe i've found out all this ridiculous unsurmoutably unbelievable sickenign truth. i HATE that its true. i just want to go to work, come home, have a family and know that all the things inbetween, i decided, because i was free. i was free to travel, no one watched me. big brother, no one
any private investigator, any person with rudimentary investigatory skills can figure out that this was a cover up. an egregious crime was committed against us.
"i remember a video of a man asking those who were in the collapse, in the toxic cloud, to raise their hand and stand up. he then said... "in five years, those individuals standing will be dead".... they sat back down"... its heartrenching.. gutwrenching. just to know.
This nation is in so deep people, if you studied like we did and saw the corruption, you'd see just what a conspiracy theory was. People, when i tell you every leader you pick to lead you will be worthless, believe me. The last symbol of freedom and good old americana was Kennedy, believe it or not. He knew what this gov't did (as do all presidents), but he actually decided to CHANGE things. Every president that's been elected since Kennedy has ignored the federal reserve board... I'd call that treason if there ever was such a thing. People, the Federal Reserve is like a bad doctor doing a sketch routine, dropping the thermometer, wiping it on his sleave, blowing it, laughing, and telling you to lie face down, lets check your temp with "dis hurr rectull termomuturr". It's deadly serious. As i mentioned earlier, the nations dealing with us are going to eventually ask for their money back. And that's when America will either be faced with a major recession of epic proportions or All out Global War. If the latter, thank God for The Strategic Defense Initiative, otherwise known as Star Wars. Thank God. Because the presidents we have KNOW about this and they're not changing it.meaning again, that they either are under the payroll of these guys, are frightened to death, are puppets, or are complicitly going along with it, wanting their share of the spoils from us unsuspecting taxpayers. Either way, they're NOT on our side, meaning it was useless of you to vote for them... or in other cases to think about voting and stating your opinion of them. It's ridiculous people. wake up.
This is a audio recording of the Alex Jones show. Recorded 09-25-06. Open Borders , Murderers , Cancers and Viruses in the Vaccines , ... all » NWO New World Order , Illuminati , Elites , 9/11 911 9-11 Sept 11 2001 01 was an inside Job , WTC , World trade Center , World War , FBI , Al-Qaeda , Osama Bin Laden , 1993 World Trade Center Bombings , WTC , Lebanon, Israel , Zion , Syria , Iraq , Iran , the Middle East , Pandemics , Viruses , Bio Weapons , Anthrax , Detention Camps , Gun Confiscation , Martial Law , the Government Running Secret Experiments on its own People , Mainstream Media Liars , Bush , Clinton , CIA , NSA , IRS , Illuminati , Secret Government , Drug War , Genetic Engineering , Mind Control , Mandatory Vaccination , Eugenics , Brain Damage Viral Attacks , Police Low IQ Requirements , Freedom Initiative , Water Contamination , La Conquista , Chaos , Warrantless Searches , New American Century , SPP , NASCO , NAFTA Super Highway , Big Brother , Wire Tap , Surveillance , Warren Buffet , Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation , Tax Shelter , Tax Free , Open Borders , Corporate Welfare , Ford Foundation , Rockefeller , Cancer , Virus , Tortue , Terror , Terrorist , Globalists , Spin «
last voice:
--- i'm an investment banker, i know that when somethings too popular, you sell, because its about to come craashing down. I remember when John F. Kennedy was having his shoes cleaned when the cleaner looked up and said, hey, how's about those (stocks in question)?. .. they're pretty great eh?... kennedy immediately went home and sold his stock in the company in question.... the following days later the stock came crashign down.
well its funny, because steven jones says , rather humourously the same thing, he was getting his car checked when his automechanic looked to him and said, hey, i read your papers, and did you hear about the cia papers? about this 9/11. the pentagon released these tapes that supposedly show airline 77 going into the pentagon. he said... i couldnt see anyplanes, and i dont know what they're doing to us. steve says..."well, what about my car"... the mechanic - "well wait a minute. did you know that within minutes, they seized from a gas station, they seized surveillnace tapes and a hotel and surveilance tapes. and he said its bizarre. i want to see those tapes!". Tallk about a cover up. people are aware of a cover up. that means that the people are in for a very RUDE awakeneing, the children of the sleeping giant will be quite angry to have found out that their parents were trying to smother them in their sleep... we are many, we are mighty. you may know even KNOW about the terreible misdeads and the cards in play today. but i promise to you... no. i SWEAR to you that soon you will hear those fateful footsteps inching toward your bed. there will suddenly be realization and a sad, swift catching up on your part. be happy that the general and the "aliens" are working on our side, the side of the good, the ones that simply want to live and be left alone. you will have no choice when the "levees" break, when the dam comes crashing down, just realize that some people awoke earlier and fought that battle prematurely, and so yes, you will be able to sleep another night.
I care about what you do really, but i know you'll fight too late and too feably. i'm already in play. i cannot help any of you in any of your future endeavors, this world is now forever changed, the end of the holy roman... excuse me. american empiire.. but please go to the leader of the american movement
alex jones-- good guy
david icke ---crazy as hell, but you can't deny his knowledge, he's obviously on to something that is so psychophantic, and so monstrous that to ignore its existence is almost as ignorant as denying the elephant in the room
alan russo -- nice guy
terrorstorm -- the knowledge
(there are about 19 people in the know, and a few other people who probably took part in the attack)
in the future, there is likely to be a nuclear attack on iran. they're just waiting for another 9/11 event. we can NOT let this happen, that will be the begginning of the end.
did you know that there is a connection now, of highways, being constructed starting from mexico, to be completed in canada, that will completely transform the dynamic in this country.
---saying that george bush in the "security president" is nothing but the cruelest of foolish asssertions.
I have reason to believe the next attack will be this year. 2007. they've prepared, they're ready. we're fucked. looks like we'll be fighting, instead of politely inferring our hopes and beliefs of freedom.

Alex Jones Police State Version 3.0
--Did you know how often NWO new world order has been used? noone can seem to beleive the fact that its a reality. president bush actually used it more than once in a state of the union address.
Go and check on the web "nations seek new world order centered on UN not US --- There is a 31 page document titled "Manifesto for world dictatorship" smh.com.au -----
---- guess what. official, south korean newspaper released papers about what a threat north korea is. the n. koreans fired taipodong missiles that actually HIT alaska! our 49th state! and the u.s. gov't didnt report it. and they threaten to nuke the u.s. all the time. and we're supposed to believe that iraq is more dangerous?
---- and are we supposed to believe that iran is really on the warpath to develop these weapons themselves. turns out. i wasn't wrong, just incomplete. the bbc reported that not only did russia and other proliferate nuclear technology to the iranians, but the u.k were selling this material to the iranina gov't. "U.K "sells" bomb material to iran. monday 23, september 2002!!!!!, also check out "US is putting N Korea's finger on the nuclear trigger."
-----weapons technology proliferation to china "washington times" insight magazine "high tech transfers to china continue" under bush administration.
---UK taxpayers forcced to pay millions for Iraq arms --- chemical and biological.... loool.
----US supplies germs to Iraq --
------gulf war veterans suing companies for chemical exports. -- they were forced to destroy the plants where the chemical arms were housed and even thought their chemicla detectors went off, they were ignored.
---media bypass - mossad exposed in phony "palestenian al qaeda" caper. check it out (senate for research on globalism - "isreali roots of hamas are being exposed" - by dean andromudus) (infowars.com - the british asked me to make bombs for the ira, told me i had the prime ministers blessings, then tried to kill me--confessions of a spy)
---patriot act 2... the end of america. lol. you have to read it to believe it
---constitutional scholars have been saying its worse, center for accuracy and reporting said that this patriot 2 is basically the end of america. so much for the expirement, its over. now its time to perhaps make a new state that works. repeating the same mistakes.
---ALEx wrote resolution, towns from utah to florida have passed resolution. other towns have passed resolutions have passed it that are larger to restrict this legislation.
----we are on the verge of a global transformation. all we need is a major global crisis and the world will accept the new world order -- david rockefeller
---we are not moving towards a police state.... we are in one..
---like morpheus says, all i can do is offer you the blue pill or the red pill, i dont know what's going to happen, all i can offer you is the truth.
----don't even think twice abuot it. we're all on the list now. lol. i'm on the list. Antonio D'juan Franklin, 6'7 African American Male. 19 yr.s 5/12/1987 is already listed in their directories. now, you can sit quietly on the sidelines, or you can fight and restore the republic.
---they can't stand if you stand against them. your neighbor's a cop, witha black ... walk up and give em info every day. when they suck their pension funds dry. greg pellot gave us the documents about the pension funds -- joseph sickelus, world bank head quit over this to give info. research and clarify. RESIST TYRANNY!
-----seizing dictatorial power -- search for that headline from news sources. appartently they're already seizing and killing us.
---bush doesn't exempt citizens from the reach of cia from killing us!!!! AL QAEDA IS A CIA CREATIOIN!
too many families have been affected by wrongful death. this system and htis country has tore apart our families, and my families. you can't have a black familiy and be together. How many more funerals do we have to go to, and how many scenes of the crime do we have to watch them chalk out black figures on the concrete before we realize that the only way that we can get out of this predicament is to struggle to survive. if we want to change, we haev to fight for it. aint nobody gonna give it to us, we just gonna have to take it. ---tupac.
---a multi star general resigned because he refused to torture "terrorists" in afghanistan. 6-8,000 pakistani or afghanistani "cream" were flown out of afgahnistan by u.s. they were obviously cia operatives.
---they admit that subject died at interogation. allen dirschwitch admits this stuff!
---putting out cigarettes on testicales, "the ethics of torture should not be the issue"-- what the hell ppl? abc, sunday morning herald, they all admit u.s. reverting to torture.
---kids have died in public schools who were "restrained" -- courts have been agreeing ,
---dr. charles t. sell - who admitted waco fraud, has been grabbed and been forcibly drugged.
---holy fuck, in china, they actually ADMIT to eating babies... they show artist cutting baby brain into segments and they consume it. ... they advoccate how nutritious cannabalism is...
---- I mean, you've got to be kidding me. they aren't even subtle or secretive about it anymore.j people, we haev entered the dictatorial ages. they now openly admit that yes, they are preparing a new world order ..but don't take my word for it. ----"The eye is watching-- by joe sansone -

Top of Form 1
USA TODAYThe Eye Is Watching = IAOWed Nov 20 01:23:45 2002208.152.73.12The Eye Is WatchingBy Joe Sansone In J.R.R. Tolkien’s fantastic work of fiction, The Lord Of The Rings, the dark lord Sauron, not yet able to maintain a physical form, attempting to dominate middle earth, is depicted as an evil eye. Able to penetrate time, space, and the human mind, the evil force sought to dominate "Middle Earth".In a bizarre and frightening case of life imitating art, the United States defense department has created an office that seeks those same limitless powers as Tolkien’s dark lord. The Information Awareness Office (IAO) seeks what it calls "Total Information Awareness". The agency has even adopted the new world order symbol of the pyramid with the all knowing eye hovering above it that is seen on the back of a one dollar Federal Reserve note. Taking the symbolism a step further, the eye casts its rays down upon the planet earth.

Bottom of Form 1
-----ok, for all those who don't believe in symbols or whatever, alex jones actually researched every company on the fortune 500's symbols. 80-90, out of those, 40+ had an all seeing eye, and some even had a tripple 6 ...hidden in the middle! COME ON! WHY DID I HAVE TO BECOME AN ADULT AND HAVE TO FIGHT THESE GUYS! shyiiit. why did I have to be born during the GoG Magog shit...lol. hey, by the way, did you know that in bohemian grove, bush sr. labels himself magog........ DO YOU KNOW WHO ***11***MAGOG IS!??? for all those christians..take up arms!

(http://www.commondreams.org/views02/1114-08.htm)--Published on Thursday, November 14, 2002 by the New York Times --You Are a Suspect --by William Safire
WASHINGTON — If the Homeland Security Act is not amended before passage, here is what will happen to you:
Every purchase you make with a credit card, every magazine subscription you buy and medical prescription you fill, every Web site you visit and e-mail you send or receive, every academic grade you receive, every bank deposit you make, every trip you book and every event you attend — all these transactions and communications will go into what the Defense Department describes as "a virtual, centralized grand database."
To this computerized dossier on your private life from commercial sources, add every piece of information that government has about you — passport application, driver's license and bridge toll records, judicial and divorce records, complaints from nosy neighbors to the F.B.I., your lifetime paper trail plus the latest hidden camera surveillance — and you have the supersnoop's dream: a "Total Information Awareness" about every U.S. citizen.
This is not some far-out Orwellian scenario. It is what will happen to your personal freedom in the next few weeks if John Poindexter gets the unprecedented power he seeks.
Remember Poindexter? Brilliant man, first in his class at the Naval Academy, later earned a doctorate in physics, rose to national security adviser under President Ronald Reagan. He had this brilliant idea of secretly selling missiles to Iran to pay ransom for hostages, and with the illicit proceeds to illegally support contras in Nicaragua.
A jury convicted Poindexter in 1990 on five felony counts of misleading Congress and making false statements, but an appeals court overturned the verdict because Congress had given him immunity for his testimony. He famously asserted, "The buck stops here," arguing that the White House staff, and not the president, was responsible for fateful decisions that might prove embarrassing.
This ring-knocking master of deceit is back again with a plan even more scandalous than Iran-contra. He heads the "Information Awareness Office" in the otherwise excellent Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, which spawned the Internet and stealth aircraft technology. Poindexter is now realizing his 20-year dream: getting the "data-mining" power to snoop on every public and private act of every American.
Even the hastily passed U.S.A. Patriot Act, which widened the scope of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and weakened 15 privacy laws, raised requirements for the government to report secret eavesdropping to Congress and the courts. But Poindexter's assault on individual privacy rides roughshod over such oversight.
He is determined to break down the wall between commercial snooping and secret government intrusion. The disgraced admiral dismisses such necessary differentiation as bureaucratic "stovepiping." And he has been given a $200 million budget to create computer dossiers on 300 million Americans.
When George W. Bush was running for president, he stood foursquare in defense of each person's medical, financial and communications privacy. But Poindexter, whose contempt for the restraints of oversight drew the Reagan administration into its most serious blunder, is still operating on the presumption that on such a sweeping theft of privacy rights, the buck ends with him and not with the president.
This time, however, he has been seizing power in the open. In the past week John Markoff of The Times, followed by Robert O'Harrow of The Washington Post, have revealed the extent of Poindexter's operation, but editorialists have not grasped its undermining of the Freedom of Information Act.
Political awareness can overcome "Total Information Awareness," the combined force of commercial and government snooping. In a similar overreach, Attorney General Ashcroft tried his Terrorism Information and Prevention System (TIPS), but public outrage at the use of gossips and postal workers as snoops caused the House to shoot it down. The Senate should now do the same to this other exploitation of fear.
The Latin motto over Poindexter"s new Pentagon office reads "Scientia Est Potentia" — "knowledge is power." Exactly: the government's infinite knowledge about you is its power over you. "We're just as concerned as the next person with protecting privacy," this brilliant mind blandly assured The Post. A jury found he spoke falsely before.

-------ARE YOU LISTENING!?? YOU'RE 2 YEARS AWAY FROM HAVING YOUR COUSIN SHIPPED OFF TO FUCKING NEVADA AT SOME CONCENTRATION OR DETENTION CAMP! he spoke out against the president, an actionable offense. will you let him or her get carted off? what happens when you start researching on the web too late about this? YOUR NOT GOING TO FIND ANYTHING! because internet 2.0 will be up andn running, and you're not going to be able to access anything. you'll be living in china. shit.
-------i mean, the list goes on and on, (human bar code -- jason garett -------pentagon plans personal computer that would peck at americans personal data by john markoft------human bar code by clyde wayne craws jr. and this is from credible news sources, not us KOOKS AND NUTS! people, how loud do we have to yell to wake you up? i mean, you realize that the guy who always yells foul in conspiracy theory applicatsions on the web always attempts to warn the public of misdeads, he's always trying to help, the least you could do would be to double check his accusation and claim for yourself, to do a little research, if only to debunk him. PLEEASE! DEBUNK ME! PROVE THAT THIS ISN'T A GROSS VIOLATION OF YOUR RIGHTS! pleease. PROVE THAT THE TERRORIST THREAT HASN'T BEEN COMPLETELY MANUFACTURED! since the 1980's the terrorist attacks around the globe have actually gone DOWN! the big ones you hear about on the news are usually from major organizations or the cialqaeda! COME ON! no terrorist from third world country can move through these cities with impunity and major weaponry and explosives and synchronicity like these new "terrorists" do! be real, i mean, just you try to sneak into india with a plastic bea bea gun! you'll be hung! its a joke, loook at these statistics and articles
Despite the hype, terrorism is in decline
A friend just emailed me a copy of Paul Robinson's article 'The good news about terrorism". While it was published in the Spectator in April, his commentary is still highly relevant and worth a read. Robinson is a Lecturer in Security Studies at the University of Hull in the UK."We are facing the gravest threat that this nation has ever faced.’ Elizabeth I, speaking of the Spanish Armada? Winston Churchill, in the aftermath of Dunkirk? No. Home Office minister Baroness Scotland on Newsnight, justifying the new Prevention of Terrorism Act by reference to the threat from al-Qa’eda."‘Hang on,’ I said to myself on hearing the Baroness, ‘that can’t be right.’ My mum can remember lying in bed hearing bombs drop, and she once saw a V1 go over and heard the engine cut out as she watched.Robinson argues that vested interests in the defence establishment have pulled off a confidence trick to convince us to live in fear, by in large to justify their own existence. "The collapse of the Warsaw Pact eliminated the need for 90 per cent of our armed forces" and a good deal other military spending to boot...."Far from being more dangerous, the world is safer now than ever before; and far from being an ever-growing problem, terrorism has been in sharp decline for over a decade. This is not a matter of opinion. It is provable.The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (Sipri) and Canada’s Project Ploughshares both annually track the number of armed conflicts taking place worldwide. Sipri counts only those which result in 1,000 deaths or more in a given year, so its figures are slightly lower. Even so, it agrees with Project Ploughshares that the amount of fighting on the planet is declining. According to Sipri, there were only 19 conflicts in 2003, down from 33 in 1991. With its broader definition, Project Ploughshares reports a decline to 36 in 2003 from a peak of 44 in 1995.More good news follows, I’m afraid. Battle-related deaths rose slightly from 15,000 in 2002 to 20,000 in 2003 because of the Iraq war, but even these figures are substantially down from the annual tolls of 40,000 to 100,000 during the Cold War. Global military expenditure also fell by 11 per cent in real terms between 1992 and 2000, and the Congressional Research Service in Washington notes that international arms sales fell from £22.8 billion in 2000 to £14.3 billion in 2003. In short, there are fewer wars, fewer arms sales and fewer people dying, each year, than at any time since the second world war.Robinson also denies that global terrorism poses a new and unprecedented threat to our security. He uses figures from the Rand Corporation MIPT (Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism) database to show there was a big peak in terrorism in the late 1970s and early '80s, followed by a steady decline ever since. "During the 1980s, the number of international terrorist incidents worldwide averaged about 360 a year. By the year 2000, it was down to just 100....Bluntly, terrorism is a declining problem, despite our best efforts to provoke it."---It also should be pointed out that conservative Republicians attempted to whip up fears about international terrorism when Reagan took office in 1981. Libya became the official punching bag. Qaddafi may have been a thug, but most importantly he did not have the military capability to effectively fight back against US aggression. Unlike the USSR Qaddafi did not possess nuclear weapons.Perhaps the worst failure of the current foreign policy of the Bush administration is that it is teaching Iraq, Iran and North Korea that possession of nuclear weapons and other WMDs represent the only defence that will prevent a US invasion. In those countries, fear is rebounding on the US.

(http://www.buzzflash.com/farrell/05/12/far05003.html) - Tired of Being Lied to? Modern History You Can't Afford to Ignore
Part III: 2001- 2005
by Maureen Farrell
2001
"All men having power ought to be mistrusted." ~James Madison
January: Gary Hart and Warren Rudman, co-chairs of the U.S. Commission on National Security, brief Bush administration officials on the looming terror threat. On Sept. 12, 2001, Hart tells Salon that Congress appeared to be ready to act on the commission's recommendations, but Bush said, "'Please wait, we're going to turn this over to the vice president. We believe FEMA is competent to coordinate this effort." The Sept. 11 Commission's recommendations are similarly ignored. "God help us if we have another attack," chairman Thomas Kean says more than four years later, after the government fails to implement many of the recommendations made in July, 2004.
February: During a visit to Cairo, Colin Powell admits that Saddam Hussein "has not developed any significant capability with respect to weapons of mass destruction" and is "unable to project conventional power against his neighbors."
April
A report entitled, "Strategic Energy Policy Challenges For The 21st Century," commissioned by former Secretary of State James Baker, is presented to Vice President Dick Cheney. The study examines America's looming energy crisis and suggests 'military intervention' as a potential remedy.
In April and May, intelligence reports bearing the headlines, "Bin Laden planning multiple operations," "Bin Laden network's plans advancing" and "Bin Laden threats are real" are presented to President Bush.

MORE ON ALEX JONES POLICE STATE 3.0
----scientist develop microchip for brain - chip copies brain section responsible for memory, mood, -reuters/bbc --- florida firm seeks to microchip americans - ohio man files suit against marriot - hidden camera found in bathroom -- road camera's raise tickets and arrests --note.. they've got cameras on the road for you accidentally crossing the street during yellow light, but they dont have camera's on the border. ----
--------i mean, this is.its its ita..its.. i mean. come.. i ... i mean.. come on.. wh...oh shit.
---for the growing number of millions of people convicted of misdemeanors, its now being made so that those who have a misdemeanor can't carry gun. its being made ILLEGAL! they're trying to take away all of our guns. did you notice how they're tryin to make more and more people do illegal things that werent illegal before? SHIT
-----Dyncorp and Halliburton Sex Slave Scandal Won't Go Away
Submitted by OneOfBillions on Tue, 01/03/2006 - 9:46pm. Bush administration
Halliburton, Dyncorp lobbyists stall law banning human trafficking and sex slavery
Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones January 1 2006
Almost a year after Representative Cynthia McKinney was told by Donald Rumsfeld that it was not the policy of the Bush administration to reward companies that engage in human trafficking with government contracts, the scandal continues to sweep up innocent children who are sold into a life of slavery at the behest of Halliburton subsidiaries , Dyncorp and other transnational corporations with close ties to the establishment elite.
On March 11th 2005, McKinney grilled Secretary Rumsfeld and General Myers on the Dyncorp scandal.
"Mr. Secretary, I watched President Bush deliver a moving speech at the United Nations in September 2003, in which he mentioned the crisis of the sex trade. The President called for the punishment of those involved in this horrible business. But at the very moment of that speech, DynCorp was exposed for having been involved in the buying and selling of young women and children. While all of this was going on, DynCorp kept the Pentagon contract to administer the smallpox and anthrax vaccines, and is now working on a plague vaccine through the Joint Vaccine Acquisition Program. Mr. Secretary, is it [the] policy of the U.S. Government to reward companies that traffic in women and little girls?"

Sites and figures for me to research--
---alien info, john lear etc.. -- http://www.alienshift.com/id84.html
--- waco texas plot, scam, gov't cover-up, etc --- http://www.serendipity.li/waco/waco_his.html
--- 9/11 conspiracy to be looked at by jim marrs -- http://www.jerrypippin.com/UFO_Files_jim_marrs.htm
--- so called black planet nibiru that is supposedly coming towards earth again... wuh?
--- what caused the roswell crashes? - i suppose it was tesla's laser device. BAM. i love you tesla, you bastard, thank god your dead
--- philidelphia project, what is it?
--- http://dark-truth.blogspot.com/
**********TOP SECRET!!!!!!***********FREE ENERGY!(HOLD SECRET)---here's how to develop a free energy device -- this is the final result of 30 years of research, very similar to what tesla accomplished. waves are longitudinal. when they break loose, they are longitudina wavesl, when tied up, they split in 2 waves, one is acting on electron, go sideways, travel down wires, following newtons 3rd law of gravity within nucleus. he and his associates have filed a patent on circular and longitudinal waves to flow energy frreely in *tesla fashion and use it separately in a load to power a load. called displacement. split normal current, dq, dt, = dc dt, and mass slippage of processing electrons currents down wire, and used barrier, invented by* bill fogul, stops mass flow (work flow, rate of energy loss within circuit), allows only flow past semi conducter, *1992 - uses free energy flow which does not disperse, conventional theory recognizes displacement as pure energy transport withiout displacement or losses
if he runs displacement current throu primary of step up transformer produces garden variety magnetic feild and stores free energy in magnetic feild. which couples to secondary, which coulples to electrons in that circuit load, which doesnt restrain them. pumps electrons in load conventionally and power load. has absolute conservatuion of load but does not conserve work loss, or dissapation. takes in conventioannly throug power source through ossilater power source or a/c, could do d/c, strip off and block component of current responsible for loss, take displacement current , couple it , gahter and place it through magnetic feild, couple it through other feild, discharge through other load completely separartely, none of load discharge current goes through source, yes, you can do over unity system. he just told the world how to build a free enrgy machine. DAMN! i'm using it.
---google video - The Disclosure Project: The Truth about UFO's
---*charles holt(check out the frequency of ufo reports) mr. holt was a retired general who couldn't keep his mouth shut*(http://ncas.sawco.com/condon/text/case27.htm)
---- an alternative theory about 9/11 --- http://www.countercurrents.org/us-ruijter170806.htm
------- jim cramer, the investment guru.
--------(http://news.aol.com/topnews/articles/_a/bush-submits-29-trillion-spending-plan/20070205072309990001)Bush Submits $2.9 Trillion Spending Plan --President's Budget Pinches Domestic Programs ---By ANDREW TAYLOR --AP -------WASHINGTON (Feb. 5) - President Bush unveiled a $2.9 trillion budget Monday that rewards the Pentagon with a record $50 billion budget hike but pinches programs cherished by Democrats, including health research and heating subsidies for the poor
-------money masters - plan that proves gold is not the major standard. research it. there is major ongoing debate currently. their plans advocates debt free fiat system.
----- scott ritter,
----seymore barishka.
-----wsws.org. "political bombshell from brasinski", seeking pretext to strike iran. the administration was provoking iraq to shoot into a plane. - involved in trilateral commission, afghanistan war, started soviet conflict in afghanistan to start mujahadinn and export it.
---terrorstorm provides evidence that the british gov't was involved in its own 7/7 attacks.
---isreali connections of 9/11
----wihte slavery admitted by dinacorp and other corporations and talked aobut on fox and media networkds. bush had to say "i'm not a dictator", following what he joked when he said "if this was a dictatorship, mhy job would be a lot easier... so long as i'm the dictator", or something like that. his own lawyer says he is the law, he can do whatever he wants.
----ben livingston - father of modern weather control - how they could've stopped those hurricanes.
----george orwell - all his predictions on evil gov't
---- golden gate bridge is a suspected target, also silverstein, the slimy fuck who bought the wtc's he just bought sears tower. look out. it's obviously coming down. and if it does, i need to buy a gun.
----rfid. identification cards, implants.
----serpico... what is it? maybe about corrupt cops with money
----alex jones - http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=the+order+of+death&hl=en -------- prison state 1, 2 and 3. WHOOO - the order of death (the secret rulers of the world)(dark secrets of bohemian grove) ( arnold swarzenegger was tapped to become governore there. gay occultists)chad savage, gay porno star allegedly serviced high powered leaders. "the washington times" - homosexual prostitiution inquiry ensnares VIP's with reagan, bush --- they had to slow down due to all the diseases(aids)**herb caen used to write about in the san francisco chronicle** they were getting. our presidents???....gay??/ the same guys who allegedly don't support gay marriage? (henry kissinger, amery griffin, sam f. buckley jr.) (central threads of the thinkings of theese mystery schools were formed to guide the secrets of medicine, agriculture, architeecture) they felt that these technologies had to be held. but over time they abused their power. today, they are the pentagon and cia, holding new technologies from us.
^^^^^^^^^^THEY CALL GEORGE BUSH SENIOR MAGOG! HOLY SHIT!
---the fuck is a free speech zone?
----blackwater?
-----allistor crowley, dubbed himself "the beast"
----intelligence quotient, James R. Flynn, the flynn effect, etc..
---NyTeCRaWLeRx Nov 2, 2006 Mark as SpamNew World Order Detox videos.....Freedom to FascismLoose ChangeDenial Stops HereWho Killed John O'NeillAmerican BlackoutEnd of SuburbiaTruth and Lies of 9/11TerrorstormOil FactorIraq for SaleALL CAN BE FOUND ON GOOGLE AND TORRENTSPY. WHO KILLED JOHN O'NEILL IS THE BEST IN MY OPINION. DETOX YOURSELVES FROM THE NWO'S PROPAGANDA MACHINE!!!!
--- (http://suitcaseman.gnn.tv/blogs/11182/Tarpley_Says_Rogue_Network_Behind_911) - other sites of interest911 truth 911 cooperative 911 Blogger 911 Research 911 Citizen’s Watch Scholars for 911 Truth Physics 911 911 Timeline.net Farewell to Justice Mark Lane The Trial of Clay L. Shaw Who Killed President Kennedy?Harold Weisberg JFK Digital Library JFK Assassination Reports and Records Download Videos Al Qaeda Doesn’t Exist Oklahoma and 911 Videos Snowshoe Films September 11th Videos Confronting the Evidence Stephen E. Jones Controlled Demolitions Video Former AF Pilot Bob Bowman Video Improbable Collapse A New Standard for Deception by Kevin Ryan The Enemy is Inside the Gates Kevin Ryan, Underwriters Laboratory How Our Governments Use Terrorism to Control Us FBI Foreknowledge 93 WTC Plot Flight 93 Questions Hunt the Boeing Philip Zelikow Headed 911 Commission Probes How the FBI Protected Al Quada’s 9/11 Hijacking Trainor Project Constellation U.S. Small Arms Shipments Iraq For Sale: The War Profiteers U.S. Scatters Bases to Control Eurasia Fallujah bombing massacre video Iraqi Taxi Driver Stole Wood Palestinian loss of land 1946-2000 The Angry Arab News Service Rana Al-Aiouby Iran Maps JFK on Secret Societies From Freedom to Fascism Meet the Carlyle Group The CFR and the Trilateral Commission Council on Foreign Relations Tarpley’s Unauthorized Biography of George Bush White House Tapes 9/11 Synthetic Terrorism Made in USA
-----(http://www.politicalfriendster.com/showPerson.php?id=2&name=Dick-Cheney) - -political friend finder, interesting site, providing instances of connections.
- (http://www.takeourworldback.com/zionistcrimes.htm#nineeleven) - A Comprehensive History of Zionist Crimes
Revised January 31, 2007

Quotes -
---In times of universal deceit, telling the truth will be revolutionary. -- george orwell.
--- nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a mans character, give him power
-- abraham lincoln
--- commerce with all nations, alliance with none, should be our motto - thomas jefferson
--- educate and inform the whole mass of the people, they are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty. -- thomas jefferson
---- they who can give up essential liberty, to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety - benjamin franklin
--- --recognize what is in your site, and that which is hidden from you will become plain to you. For there is nothing hidden which will not become manifest. jesus the gospel of thomas
---to punish me for my contempt for authority. fate made me an authority myself. albert einstein
--a new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it. - the godfather of quantum physics, max planck
---it is dangerous to be right, when the gov't is wrong. - voltaire
---"The basic tool for the manipulation of reality is the manipulation of words. If you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use the words."---Philip K.Dick http://www.philipkdickfans.com/weirdo.htm
--- kit green, jim marrs, eric julian (et visitation, flew craft, etc..)
*david ??? i don't remember his name.
lizette larkin - communicates with extreterrestrials. aliens are completeliy...... alien. we can' think or do like them.
---** (elipton, or elypton weapons, soviet weapon holdings, 3 other nations have it, check it out-- zirinofsky)
--This is the end of the childhood of the alien race. it is time for us to become adults in transitioning to the space age. I TELL you, because if you do not, you will surely perish, in the softest of instances.-- antonio franklin 2/3/07
---research tom beardon(baredon) "they be the wolf, and you be the rabbit"
---A state of war only serves as an excuse for domestic tyranny. Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn---Our pseudo-democratic governments are in reality fascist:"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism since it is the merger of state and corporate power."--Benito Mussolini
---We're not a democracy. It's a terrible misunderstanding and a slander to the idea of democracy to call us that. In reality, we're a plutocracy: a government by the wealthy." -----Ramsey Clark, former U.S. Attorney General
But that's the whole point of corporatism: to try and remove the public from making decisions over their own fate, to limit the public arena, to control opinion, to make sure that the fundamental decisions that determine how the world is going to be run —which include production, commerce, distribution, thought, social policy, foreign policy, everything—are not in the hands of the public, but rather in the hands of highly concentrated private power. In effect, tyranny unaccountable to the public.— Professor Noam Chomsky, interviewed in Corporate Watch
"As political theorist Michael Parenti points out, historians often overlook Fascism's economic agenda--the partnership between Big Capital and Big Government--in their analysis of its authoritarian social program. Indeed, according to Bertram Gross in his startlingly prescient Friendly Fascism (1980), it is possible to achieve fascist goals within an ostensibly democratic society."---Richard Heinberg http://www.nexusmagazine.com//corporations.html
"It is weakness rather than wickedness which renders men unfit to be trusted with unlimited power." -- John Adams, 1788
"If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, it expects what never was and never will be. "Thomas Jefferson
"There is one safeguard known generally to the wise, which is an advantage and security to all, but especially to democracies as against despots. What is it? Distrust." -- Demosthenes: Philippic 2, sect. 24
"What the government is good at is collecting taxes, taking away your freedoms and killing people. It's not good at much else." -- Tom Clancy on Kudlow and Cramer 9/2/03
"It's important to realize that whenever you give power to politicians or bureaucrats, it will be used for what they want, not for what you want."-- Harry Browne
"Just because you do not take an interest in politics doesn't mean politics won't take an interest in you." -- Pericles, 430 B.C.
"Give government the weapons to fight your enemy and it will use them against you." -- Harry Browne
"Give a good man great powers and crooks grab his job." -- Rick Gaber
"Overload the police with victimless crimes and other minutiae and eventually only creeps and bullies remain cops." -- Rick Gaber
"Power draws the corrupted; absolute power would draw the absolutely corrupted." -- Colin Barth
"The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws." -- Tacitus, Roman senator and historian (A.D. c.56-c.115)
"The more prohibitions there are, the poorer the people will be. The more laws are promulgated, the more thieves and bandits there will be." -- Lao-tzu, The Tao Te Ching (believed written in China, 6th century BC).
"An oppressive government is much worse than a man-eating tiger." -- Kong Fu-Dzuh ("Confucious")
"A moderate is either someone who has no moral code of his own, or if he does, then he's someone who doesn't have the guts to take sides between good and evil." -- Rick Gaber
"Intellect annuls Fate. So far as a man thinks, he is free....The revelation of Thought takes man out of servitude into freedom." -- Ralph Waldo Emerson, "Fate"
"Democracy is defended in 3 stages. Ballot Box, Jury Box, Cartridge Box." -- Ambrose Bierce
"Socialism, like the ancient ideas from which it springs, confuses the distinction between government and society. As a result of this, every time we object to a thing being done by government, the socialists conclude that we object to its being done at all." --Frederic Bastiat, ca. 1837
"The State is the coldest of all cold monsters, and coldly it tells lies, and this lie drones on from its mouth: 'I, the State, am the people'." -- Friedrich Nietzsche, Thus spoke Zarathustra, 1883
"People constantly speak of 'the government' doing this or that, as they might speak of God doing it. But the government is really nothing but a group of men, and usually they are very inferior men." -- H.L. Mencken
"Government, when it is examined, turns out to be nothing more nor less than a group of fallible men with the political force to act as though they were infallible." -- Robert LeFevre, in his essay, Aggression is Wrong
"Crime does not pay … as well as politics. " --Alfred E. Newman
Democracy is when two wolves and a sheep vote on what they will have for lunch. http://www.wealth4freedom.com/truth/chapter1.htm
"Politics is a means of preventing people from taking part in what properly concerns them." Paul Valery (1871-1945)
"When we give government the power to make medical decisions for us, we, in essence, accept that the state owns our bodies." ~U.S. Representative Ron Paul
"...somebody has to take governments' place, and business seems to me to be a logical entity to do it." - David Rockefeller - Newsweek International, Feb 1 1999.
"Government is big business, with the face of democracy."--Jim West
"President George Bush held a Washinton dinner...for 2,000 of his closest friends...(it) was sponsored by the tobacco and oil industries. But the big bash was the one given by Vice President Dick Cheney....The guests were lobbyists for the nuclear power, natural gas and oil industries."--Toby Moore (Daily Express 24 May 2001)
Obvious in vaccine world:Vaccine Conflict of Interest quotes
Just a few media stories:Monsanto employees and government regulatory agencies employees are the same people Bush Nominates Drug-Industry Insider To Head Office of Management and Budget US drug companies help pay for Bush inauguration
Which is why people are cynical over governments:"Government is actually the worst failure of civilized man. There has never been a really good one, and even those that are most tolerable are arbitrary, cruel, grasping, and unintelligent. --H. L. Mencken
"Every decent man is ashamed of the government he lives under." -H. L. Mencken
"It is hard to imagine a more stupid or more dangerous way of making decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people who pay no price for being wrong." --Thomas Sowell
"...the world is governed by very different personages to what is imagined by those who are not themselves behind the scenes." - Benjamin Disraeli (1801-1884) Prime Minister of Britain
"The Establishment decided Thatcher's ideas were safer with a strong Blair government than with a weak Major government. We are given all these personalities to choose between to disguise the fact that the policies are the same."--Tony Benn (Sunday Times Oct 6, 2002)
"The planet is being controlled, to an alarming extent, by elites, or, as I call them, cartels. There are many cartels, but 7 are the most powerful. They evolve, they learn from one another, they both compete and cooperate. Unfortunately, the trend is more towards cooperation. These 7 cartels represent the following areas: GOVERNMENT, MILITARY, INTELLIGENCE, ENERGY, MONEY, MEDIA, AND MEDICAL.....I came to this map of cartels through my own research on the medical monopoly. That's where it started, in 1986. .. Once you understand these cartel elites, you can begin to separate out information into loose layers of importance, as in, which layer of the control game are we talking about? Because it's all about layers. And at most layers, the players are forwarding agendas which they do not realize fit into higher and more destructive agendas."--Jon Rappoport
"The constitution has broken down. We have no enemies except the ones we select and direct towards the nearest nuclear bombs. They need an enemy to provoke, a diversion. This is the mentality of tenth-rate people who are in politics because corporate America likes them. They are malleable. They give them contracts to build missile shields that will never work. It's deeply corrupt."--Gore Vidal (Observer magazine 12 Aug 2001)
"The State is the coldest of all cold monsters." [Nietzche]
While the State exists, there can be no freedom. When there is freedom there will be no State.
Lenin, "State and Revolution", 1919
"Effectively they said we were either dotty or lying. For 13 years the authorities have said this whole thing is just in our minds."--Elizabeth Sigmund, Camelford resident
"Believe nothing until it has been officially denied."--Claud Cockburn
"The art of government is the organisation of idolatry."--George Bernard Shaw.
"Democracy allows mediocrity to rise to the top."
"He knows nothing; and he thinks he knows everything. That points clearly to a political career."--George Bernard Shaw.
"A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul. -- George Bernard Shaw (1944)
"Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard."--HL Mencken.
"During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." - George Orwell
"Every great advance in natural knowledge has involved the absolute rejection of authority."--TH Huxley.
"Power does not corrupt men; fools, however, if they get into a position of power, corrupt power."--George Bernard Shaw.
"The minority is sometimes right; the majority always wrong."----George Bernard Shaw.

---
---

go listen to whitney houston's renditino of the star spangled banner, and you won't e able to say that you don't lolve this country
I LOVE THIS GOD-DAMNED COUNTRY! but it sure has fucked me in the ass.
Fourth Quarter Crunch--- we have to win, this is OUR country now.
--- ok, i know your asking "if this IS true, which i now believe, what do i do? well, first i'd go to those freedom fighters already on the ground and see what they're up to. check out alex jones, and others. but i want to part with these words. ... People....whoever may get their hands on this... this is OUR country...and ALL OF OUR planet.... you're here. you're reading this. no matter what race, color, creed, noo matter how racist you are, no matter how pompous you are. you could be smarter than me, you MAY look better than me... (very unlikely), you may be able to take me down, one on one... but what we have in common is that we can FEEL.. we can SEE! this PEACE.. go outside... look ... smell it.. FEEL IT! FREEDOM! LIBERTY!
*****USE THE ALEX JONES FIRE ANT ANALOGY, CRAWL UP THE LEG, YOU'LL GET THE PHEREMONES AND WE'LL ALL BITE!
--- I call to those blacks who are racist... who hate "whites", who hate "mexicans" for all that you feel they've done or said to you. that your so broke.. that your so assaulted.. i'm telling you, that simple anger is not only outdated but misguided.. it's over. i'll speak to you from the voice of a man who's went from being homeless, loveless, weak.. 18 years old.. used my brain and got a peice of the pie, on his own, no ones help. you need to let that stuff go. i came from the botttom of the bottom, from the ghetto, now i own my own home... at 19.... bought it lump sum. you can do it too. whaat i'm gettting at is that we're at a new point in our history. but you're done if you don't stand up to this tyranny ahead of you. listen. i've met, i know people who sell drugs, cops who have accused me, tihs is ridiculous simply because THEY'RE the ones who gave it to us. you have to see that the future i have for myself thats available to you, will NEVER come true if you dont stand united with your brothers.. whites...asians... hispanics..arabs....ALL OF US!
---I call to those whites who are indignant, who hate stupid people who don't seethings the way you do. who don't see truth as it is... i hope you arent stupid yourself. because if you can't look at what i've written through massive research, you made the same dead wrong mistake. I call to those whites who are racist, against blacks or hispanics... who are pissed aabout minute issues, social security, crime, overpopulation, if only you knew that all the things you're angry abuot were forced upon you by your own people. i'm sure you'd realize you should be disgusted by that gov't, your fathers and grandfathers have done, and what they're planning to do. we must stand united , we must realize we're more similar than different and that we're in the same sinking boat. how fast would you change your mind on that sinking ship when you realized there are broken peiced of rafts that all of you have to put together. only then can you safely make it back to shore.. lousy metaphor, but GODDAMNIT! see the truth for yourself!
--- I call to those hispanics who are angry about being treated like second grade cattle! who see their land as beingn occupied by a foreign force! who just want a peice of the american pie! If only you knew the truth, you'd see just how foolish your anger is .. if only you knew that what you grew up in mexico or other southern american countries looking at billboards saying "california is yours!" or "viva la rasa", those billboards were funded directly by american moguls. they baited you here. they played on your emotions. but once the veil is lifted from your eyes, you'll see the world for what it really is. but you're here. your OUR brothers now. we understand we all have differences, we all have flaws, but we're all in the same country and land now. we much fight together.

(when this is all done and complete, email to todd (c. wurster) at todd @ stopthenau.org-- tell him how great a job he did
---the absence of evidence is not evidence of absense. (it is evidence that has been denied the american people. - sgt. cliffard stone

---Look, I don't care how crazy anything i say is, i research because at all times, i want to know the truth. that's it, no fame, no fortune, truth. that's what gets my hard.(erect) (edit)
---for all those that want to call me names... I hate you, yeah. but aside from jokes, i want to admit, i'm just a lowly regular guy who read a lot about these events, instances, theories, crackpot ideas, etc, and i tried my best to keep an open mind at all times. Understand that i've done my best, whehter it be enough, or not, to gather as many ideas for and against, research and do myy own digging and analysis to come to any conclusion that i may have. I want to steer clear of accepting anything too swiftly, my only defense is that i believe that which i believe. when i feel in my stomach that it is true, it still may not be, but with the knowledge i have, its the best i could do. at least until you prove otherwise, which i wuold be extremely happy to listen to and accept and erase any ideas i know have, if you do. This is my version of reality, and i expect..no..i HOPE everyone else has their own version of reality as well, some with more mathematical, physical applcations, some with more spiritual, even more theoretical. Either way, we should all admit that jthis is a forum where ideas are given, are harvested, in hopes to serve. I am in no way showcasing that i have more info and knowledge than you. in fact i could give a damn what you think, i'm working for the betterment of my future and more importantly for the future of my children who are yet to exist. That is the bane of all humans existences. we want a better life for our children, and theirs. The only path towards that is knowing as much as one can, as i intend to do. there are many ways to truth, many paths, roads, and along the way are many ways and reasons to tell another person that their way is wrong. instead, maybe you should insist to them a better, easier way to the end goal, while realizing that you have your own path to follow as well, and you truly don't know the actual destination.
**1** -- (http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article2072.htm) - (THE IRON FIST OF TACTICAL NUKES, HIDDEN IN THE VELVET GLOVE OF STORIES ABOUT FUEL-AIR BOMBS, MOABS AND BUNKER-BUSTERS:The detonation of the new "massive bomb" is a ploy to disguise the use of Nuclear Weapons by the US in the event of an attack on Iraq? ) by George Paxinos - "A report that claims to have evidence supporting the assertion that the united states used a form of nuclear explosive, neutron bomb, on an underground bunker in iraq to destroy troops. It details that the effects of nuclear radiatioin were felt throughout the arab and asian world"
***2*** -- (--http://www.rense.com/general44/sevenjewishamericans.htm --- Seven Jewish Americans -Control Most US Media-From John Whitley-11-21-3)"Today, seven Jewish Americans run the vast majority of US television networks, the printed press, the Hollywood movie industry, the book publishing industry, and the recording industry. Most of these industries are bundled into huge media conglomerates run by the following seven individuals: Gerald Levin, CEO and Director of AOL Time Warner --------
Michael Eisner, Chairman and CEO of the Walt Disney Company
Edgar Bronfman, Sr., Chairman of Seagram Company Ltd
Edgar Bronfman, Jr, President and CEO of Seagram Company Ltd and head of Universal Studios
Sumner Redstone, Chairman and CEO of Viacom, Inc
Dennis Dammerman, Vice Chairman of General Electric
Peter Chernin, President and Co-COO of News Corporation Limited
Those seven Jewish men collectively control ABC, NBC, CBS, the Turner Broadcasting System, CNN, MTV, Universal Studios, MCA Records, Geffen Records, DGC Records, GRP Records, Rising Tide Records, Curb/Universal Records, and Interscope Records.
**3** -- (http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/01/12/politics/main2355951.shtml) - U.S. Forces Fighting Iranians In Iraq- Former Assistant Secretary Of State: New Efforts Against Iran Significantly Raise Stakes-- "...U.S. officials tell CBS News that American forces have begun an aggressive and mostly secret ground campaign against networks of Iranians that had been operating with virtual impunity inside Iraq. ....The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff told Congress on Friday that Iranians are now on the target list. ..."Twice in the last two or three weeks, in pursuit of those networks, when we have gone and captured those cells, we've captured Iranians," said Gen. Peter Pace. .....According to U.S. military figures, 198 American and British soldiers have been killed, and more than 600 wounded by advanced explosive devices manufactured in Iran and smuggled in through the southern marshes and along the Tigris River. Attempts to disrupt these networks, combined with the decision to send a second aircraft carrier to the Persian Gulf as a warning to Iran, significantly raises the stakes, according to former Assistant Secretary of State Martin Indyk. ......"It's going to have, you would expect, some rather serious consequences," he said.
**4** nations ask u.s. for their money back, pay up, the dollar is a reserve currency, not actual currency, like gold, diamonds, drugs. u.s. said no. changed rules.
**5*** owners of american big companies own cocain and other drug crops. they;ve gotten in trouble because of it.
**6** HUGO chavez ouster and immediate reinstatement to power. because of his stances, carried out by venezuela's old gaurd and cia.
THE REVOLUTION WILL NOT BE TELEVISED - THE REVOLUTION WILL NOT BE TELEVISED DIRECTED AND PHOTOGRAPHED BY KIM BARTLEY AND DONNACHA O'BRIAIN IRELAND, 2003 74 MINUTES IN ... all » SPANISH WITH ENGLISH SUBTITLES -- HUGO CHAVEZ ELECTED PRESIDENT OF VENEZUELA IN 1998, IS A COLORFUL, UNPREDICTABLE FOLK HERO, beloved by his nation's working class and a tough-as-nails, quixotic opponent to the power structure that would see him deposed. Two independent filmmakers were inside the presidential palace on April 11, 2002, when he was forcibly removed from office. They were also present 48 hours later when, remarkably, he returned to power amid cheering aides. Their film records what was probably history's shortest-lived coup d'état. It's a unique document about political muscle and an extraordinary portrait of the man The Wall Street Journal credits with making Venezuela "Washington‚s biggest Latin American headache after the old standby, Cuba." «
****7****** prove that drugs were another reason to invade countries like afghanistan
***8*** Downing Street Memo (http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/lieofthecentury.html)
1
The Secret Downing Street Memo
-----
SECRET AND STRICTLY PERSONAL - UK EYES ONLY
DAVID MANNING
From: Matthew Rycroft
Date: 23 July 2002
S 195 /02
cc: Defence Secretary, Foreign Secretary, Attorney-General, Sir Richard Wilson, John Scarlett, Francis Richards,
CDS, C, Jonathan Powell, Sally Morgan, Alastair Campbell
IRAQ: PRIME MINISTER’S MEETING, 23 JULY
Copy addressees and you met the Prime Minister on 23 July to discuss Iraq.
This record is extremely sensitive. No further copies should be made. It should be shown only to those with a
genuine need to know its contents.
John Scarlett summarised the intelligence and latest JIC assessment. Saddam’s regime was tough and based on
extreme fear. The only way to overthrow it was likely to be by massive military action. Saddam was worried
and expected an attack, probably by air and land, but he was not convinced that it would be immediate or overwhelming.
His regime expected their neighbours to line up with the US. Saddam knew that regular army morale
was poor. Real support for Saddam among the public was probably narrowly based.
C reported on his recent talks in Washington. There was a perceptible shift in attitude. Military action was now
seen as inevitable. Bush wanted to remove Saddam, through military action, justifi ed by the conjunction of terrorism
and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were being fi xed around the policy. The NSC had no patience
with the UN route, and no enthusiasm for publishing material on the Iraqi regime’s record. There was little
discussion in Washington of the aftermath after military action.
CDS said that military planners would brief CENTCOM on 1-2 August, Rumsfeld on 3 August and Bush on 4
August.
The two broad US options were:
(a) Generated Start. A slow build-up of 250,000 US troops, a short (72 hour) air campaign, then a move up to
Baghdad from the south. Lead time of 90 days (30 days preparation plus 60 days deployment to Kuwait).
(b) Running Start. Use forces already in theatre (3 x 6,000), continuous air campaign, initiated by an Iraqi casus
belli. Total lead time of 60 days with the air campaign beginning even earlier. A hazardous option.
The US saw the UK (and Kuwait) as essential, with basing in Diego Garcia and Cyprus critical for either option.
Turkey and other Gulf states were also important, but less vital. The three main options for UK involvement
were:
(i) Basing in Diego Garcia and Cyprus, plus three SF squadrons.
(ii) As above, with maritime and air assets in addition.
2
(iii) As above, plus a land contribution of up to 40,000, perhaps with a discrete role in Northern Iraq entering
from Turkey, tying down two Iraqi divisions.
The Defence Secretary said that the US had already begun "spikes of activity" to put pressure on the regime.
No decisions had been taken, but he thought the most likely timing in US minds for military action to begin was
January, with the timeline beginning 30 days before the US Congressional elections.
The Foreign Secretary said he would discuss this with Colin Powell this week. It seemed clear that Bush had
made up his mind to take military action, even if the timing was not yet decided. But the case was thin. Saddam
was not threatening his neighbours, and his WMD capability was less than that of Libya, North Korea or Iran.
We should work up a plan for an ultimatum to Saddam to allow back in the UN weapons inspectors. This would
also help with the legal justifi cation for the use of force.
The Attorney-General said that the desire for regime change was not a legal base for military action. There were
three possible legal bases: self-defence, humanitarian intervention, or UNSC authorisation. The fi rst and second
could not be the base in this case. Relying on UNSCR 1205 of three years ago would be diffi cult. The situation
might of course change.
The Prime Minister said that it would make a big difference politically and legally if Saddam refused to allow in
the UN inspectors. Regime change and WMD were linked in the sense that it was the regime that was producing
the WMD. There were different strategies for dealing with Libya and Iran. If the political context were right,
people would support regime change. The two key issues were whether the military plan worked and whether
we had the political strategy to give the military plan the space to work.
On the fi rst, CDS said that we did not know yet if the US battleplan was workable. The military were continuing
to ask lots of questions.
For instance, what were the consequences, if Saddam used WMD on day one, or if Baghdad did not collapse
and urban warfi ghting began? You said that Saddam could also use his WMD on Kuwait. Or on Israel, added
the Defence Secretary.
The Foreign Secretary thought the US would not go ahead with a military plan unless convinced that it was a
winning strategy. On this, US and UK interests converged. But on the political strategy, there could be US/UK
differences. Despite US resistance, we should explore discreetly the ultimatum. Saddam would continue to play
hard-ball with the UN.
John Scarlett assessed that Saddam would allow the inspectors back in only when he thought the threat of military
action was real.
The Defence Secretary said that if the Prime Minister wanted UK military involvement, he would need to
decide this early. He cautioned that many in the US did not think it worth going down the ultimatum route. It
would be important for the Prime Minister to set out the political context to Bush.
Conclusions:
(a) We should work on the assumption that the UK would take part in any military action. But we needed a
fuller picture of US planning before we could take any fi rm decisions. CDS should tell the US military that we
were considering a range of options.
3
(b) The Prime Minister would revert on the question of whether funds could be spent in preparation for this
operation.
(c) CDS would send the Prime Minister full details of the proposed military campaign and possible UK contributions
by the end of the week.
(d) The Foreign Secretary would send the Prime Minister the background on the UN inspectors, and discreetly
work up the ultimatum to Saddam.
He would also send the Prime Minister advice on the positions of countries in the region especially Turkey, and
of the key EU member states.
(e) John Scarlett would send the Prime Minister a full intelligence update.
(f) We must not ignore the legal issues: the Attorney-General would consider legal advice with FCO/MOD legal
advisers.
(I have written separately to commission this follow-up work.)
MATTHEW RYCROFT
(Rycroft was a Downing Street foreign policy aide)
***9*** report and research the white house paying major media networkds to do posiitve spins. they also bug journalists without warrnats to find things to pressure them to do positive spin and accept the bribes. HOLY FUUUUUUHH.
***10*** feb 29th, day the bill of rights were overturned, I have to research it.
**11** explain magog to these imbeciles

********** People don't \know... they wonder why the Pnac and illuminate that wants to kill so many humans... i thought alex knew or understood but was simply angry and was pro human... turns out they don't fully know..
ok.. people, it may be hard to swallow, but earth was basically terroformed, created, by an alien race. they genetically created humanity and whats worse, they made this planet capable of sustaining only 500 million humans... there are currently 7 billion. there will be probably 9 billion when this information comes out.

Theory of Everything (24)

FOR THE defenders of gov't,
some say sure, there was a little incompetence by our gov't, but why did you go off into that crazy shit? well if there was even a little incompetence, then why weren't there any consequences for these failures? no courtmartials, no impeachments,. those who allowed this to happend were given medals of freedom and PROMOTED. do your own research. i'm appalled myself, i started as one of you, but sadly, i started doing research. and i fell down this hole to a cesspool of truth. It's not as if its comfortable here
--why iraq? why osama bin laden? why not saudi arabia? what about israel?
MOST OF THE TERRORISTS IN QUESTION WERE ON U.S. PAYROLL AND OVER HALF A DOZEN ARE STILL ALLIIIIVE!!!!.
--nothing about american soveriegnty, starting a new imperialist regime.
look at the state of the world. a sole superpower looms, its completely awakened and alert, snatching the life out of the large and defenseless, poised to bite the rest.
who should i look up and research if i want ot at least keep an eye on the real behind the scenes or up front "bad guys"
--Our Real King and Omnipotent Leader - David Rockefeller - what he's responsible for. council of thte americas. the america's society. the forum of the america. the institue of interational economics, trilateral commission. chairman ameritus of the cfr which cheney once served as board member. (it's probably not even him, he's to out in the open and available. he's an idiot, making his intentions known. ...maybe he's here to call the current populations bluff. he believes in human perserverance, tenacity, spirit, intelligence, but knows we are in an obvious collisionn coiurse with history so challenges us openly. ... maybe i'm an idiot also, putting this guy in a good light.)
- (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Rockefeller) -
David Rockefeller, Sr. (born June 12, 1915) is a prominent American banker, philanthropist, world statesman, and the current patriarch of the renowned Rockefeller family. He is the youngest and only surviving son and grandson, respectively, of the prominent philanthropist John D. Rockefeller, Jr. and the billionaire oil tycoon John D. Rockefeller, founder of Standard Oil. His five deceased siblings are: Abby, John D. 3rd, Nelson, Laurance and Winthrop.
The consummate networker
Bilderberg and Trilateral Commission
A committed globalist ("world citizen"), due to the strong influence of his father, he had at an early age further spread his connections when he was invited to attend the inaugural (and subsequently highly influential) Bilderberg Group meetings, starting with the Holland gathering in 1954. He has been a consistent attendee through the decades and has been a member of the "steering committee", which determines the invitation list for the upcoming annual meetings. These have frequently included prominent national figures who have gone on to be elected as political leaders of their respective countries.
Rockefeller maintains that, although Bilderberg's role is not to resolve disputes, because of the wide-ranging experience of the various attendees participants are 'free to report on what they have heard' to their respective heads of government.[25]
It was a dissatisfaction with the failure of this group to include Japan that subsequently led to him forming the Trilateral Commission (TC) in July 1973, influenced by, among others, Zbigniew Brzezinski, the National Security Advisor under Carter and the author of Between Two Ages: America's Role in the Technetronic Era, published in 1970. They discussed forming the organization at a Bilderberg Group meeting in Belgium in 1972; Brzezinski subsequently became the inaugural US director. The Commission also launched its own magazine, the Trialogue.
It held the founding session of its Executive Committee in Tokyo in October, 1973. In May 1975, the first plenary meeting of all of the Commission's regional groups – North America, Europe and Japan, comprising some 300 members – took place in Kyoto. In its Third Annual Report, released in mid-1976, the Commission noted that there was a "noticeably increased emphasis on trilateral ties as the cornerstone of American foreign policy".[26]
This Commission was to come under media scrutiny (and become the focus ever after of conspiracy theorists) when it was later disclosed that Carter appointed 26 former Commission members (who must resign before taking up government positions) to senior positions in his Administration. Moreover, it also came out that Carter himself was a former Trilateral member. (The Clinton Administration, by contrast, had close to a dozen Commission members, including Clinton himself; both Gerald Ford and George Bush Sr were also Trilateralists.)[27]
An important aspect of the Commission is their delegations visiting foreign leaders. In 1989, to cite just one instance, Rockefeller visited the then USSR at the head of a high-powered Commission delegation which included Henry Kissinger, former French President Giscard d'Estaing, former Japanese Prime Minister Yasuhiro Nakasone, and William Hyland, editor of the CFR's prestigious journal Foreign Affairs. In their meeting with Mikhail Gorbachev, the delegation sought and received an explanation on how the USSR would integrate into the world economy. The information thus gained through such delegations is then relayed back in reports to both the TC members and, where appropriate, to US political leaders.[28]
Some positions held/institutions founded during his lifetime
Chairman/Honorary Chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations (Chairman: (1970-1985);
Chairman of the Chase Manhattan Bank (1969-1981);
Founder and Chairman/Honorary Chairman of the Trilateral Commission (1973-);
An original U.S. founding member, life member, and member of the Steering Committee of the Bilderberg Group (1954-);
Founding Chairman of the Partnership for New York City (PFNYC) (1979-1988);
Board Director, B. F. Goodrich & Co. (1956-64); Equitable Life Assurance Society of US (1960-65);
Chairman/Chairman Emeritus of the Museum of Modern Art (1948-, Chairman: 1962-1972, 1987-1993);
Founder and Chairman/Honorary Chairman of the Council of the Americas (1963-);
Honorary Chairman and Life Trustee of The Rockefeller University (Chairman: 1950-1975);
Trustee/Life Trustee of the University of Chicago (1947-1962, 1966-);
Director of the Peterson Institute (Formerly: The Institute for International Economics);
President of the Harvard College Board of Overseers (1954-1960, 1962-1968);
President of the Board of Overseas Study at Harvard University;
Member, American Friends of the London School of Economics;
Co-founder and Chairman of the Chase International Advisory Committee;
Chairman, Chase International Investment Corporation (1961-1975);
Class A Director of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York;
Chairman of the New York Chamber of Commerce and Industry;
Director of the New York Clearing House (1971-1978);
Founder and Chairman of the Center for Inter-American Relations (CIAR) (Cultural adjunct of the Council of the Americas, 1965);
Founder and Chairman/Honorary Chairman of the Americas Society;
Co-founder of the Chairman's Latin American Advisory Council;
Founder of the Forum of the Americas;
Honorary Chairman of the Japan Society;
Chairman of the Downtown-Lower Manhattan Association;
Director of the World Trade Center Memorial Foundation;
Co-founder of The Business Committee for the Arts (BAC) (1967);
Chairman of Morningside Heights, Inc.;
Board member of the Commerce Committee for the Alliance for Progress (1961);
Founder of the Emergency Committee for American Trade;
Director of the Overseas Development Council;
Member of Reagan's President's Commission on Executive Exchange (1981);
Director of the US-USSR Trade and Economic Council;
Vice-Chairman of the Advisory Council for US-China Trade;
Founder of the Emergency Committee on American Trade (ECAT);
Vice-Chairman of the Advisory Council on Japan-United States Economic Relations;
Chairman of the US Advisory Committee on Reform of the International Monetary System;
Founding member/Honorary member of the Commission on White House Fellows (1964-1965);
A Trustee of the John F. Kennedy Library;
An Honorary Trustee of International House of New York;
A Trustee of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (1947-1960);
Primary Founder/US Executive Committee, Dartmouth Conference;
Founder and Chairman of the International Executive Service Corps (IESC) (Chairman: 1964-1968);
Co-founder of the Synergos affiliated Global Philanthropists Circle;
Honorary Advisor/International Advisor of Praemium Imperiale;
Member of the Peace Parks Foundation;
Trustee of Historic Hudson Valley (1981-);
Chairman of the Stone Barns Restoration Corporation;
Chairman of Rockefeller Financial Services;
Chairman, The Rockefeller Group Inc. (1983-1995);
Chairman, Rockefeller Center Properties Inc. (1985-1992);
Co-founder and advisory trustee of the Rockefeller Brothers Fund (RBF) (1940) (Chairman: 1981-1987);
Co-founder of the Rockefeller Family Fund (RFF) (1967);
Founder of the David Rockefeller Fund (1989);
Founded and funded the David Rockefeller Global Development Fund (RBF) (2006);
Founded the David Rockefeller Graduate Program at Rockefeller University;
Co-founded, funded and on the Advisory Committee of the David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies (DRCLAS) at Harvard (1994-).
(Sources: Who's Who 2006, 158th Annual Edition, London: A & C Black Publishers Ltd; Rockefeller Archive Center website: Biographical details; Will Banyan, The Proud Internationalist, (pdf, 2006), Martin Frost website; Memoirs, 2002.)
Awards
Presidential Medal of Freedom (1998);
U.S. Legion of Merit;
U.S. Legion of Honor;
Italian Order of Merit;
Order of the Cedar, Lebanon;
U.S. Army Commendation Ribbon;
Order of the Southern Cross, Brazil;
Order of Scared Treasure, Japan (1991);
George C. Marshall Foundation Award (1999);
Andrew Carnegie Medal of Philanthropy (2001);
The Grand Croix of the Legion d'Honneur (2000);
Duncan Phillips Medal from The Phillips Collection;
C. Walter Nichols Award, New York University (1970);
Order of the White Elephant and Order of the Crown, Thailand;
World Brotherhood Award, Jewish Theological Seminary (1953);
Medal of Honor for City Planning, American Institute of Architects (1968);
World Monuments Fund's Hadrian Award (For preservation of Art and Architecture);
National Institute of Social Sciences Gold Medal Award (1967 -awarded to all 5 brothers);
United States Council for International Business (USCIB) International Leadership Award (1983);
The Hundred Year Association of New York's Gold Medal Award: "In recognition of outstanding contributions to the City of New York" (1965).
[edit] Quotations
"For David Rockefeller, the Presidency of the United States would be a demotion." - The standard joke in America for a time in the 1970's, as quoted in Harr & Johnson The Rockefeller Conscience; An American Family in Public and in Private (1991) (p.217).
"Not armies, not nations, have advanced the race; but here and there, in the course of ages, an individual has stood up and cast his shadow over the world." A quotation from 19th-century clergyman Edwin H. Chapin (1814 -1880) selected by Carla Hills, former U.S. Trade Representative, to demonstrate Rockefeller's many contributions to 'causes that benefit us all', at a Panel Discussion on his Memoirs in 2002. - Quoted by Will Banyan in his 2006 study: The Proud Internationalist.
The journalist Bill Moyers, a former speechwriter for president Johnson, in his 1980 TV special, The World of David Rockefeller, described the plutocrat respectively as "the unelected if indisputable chairman of the American Establishment" and "one of the most powerful, influential and richest men in America", who "sits at the hub of a vast network of financiers, industrialists and politicians whose reach encircles the globe." - Quoted by Will Banyan in his 2006 study: The Proud Internationalist.
"I think without internationalists like you, the international system we have been trying to build, the international system we have today, wouldn't be here." - UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan, at a book signing for "Memoirs" at the UN headquarters in New York, in 2002, quoted in Will Banyan: The Proud Internationalist.
"David Rockefeller is like the Medicis, his shadowy yet powerful political role one of the 'secret things' of Washington, DC. There is a range of anecdotal evidence to support this assessment. In 1999, for example, the Irish rock star Bono (from U2), then trying to secure support for Third World debt relief, received an important lesson about the US power structure from then CFR President Leslie Gelb. He had explained to Bono 'the great chain of influence' — from David Rockefeller to UN Ambassador Richard Holbrooke to US Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin to former Chairman of the Fed, Paul Volcker to a number of key Republicans — that led from Wall Street to Washington and back again. Gelb, though, disputed Bono's suspicion that there must be an 'Elvis' — a 'single figure with enough clout' to achieve anything in the US political system — and informed him that 'he would need the support of every one of these American dignitaries'. Sure enough, Bono, working with Bobby Shriver, met with World Bank President James Wolfensohn, Paul Volcker and then with David Rockefeller.
After Volcker came Rockefeller, the wise old man of Wall Street, and former Chairman of Chase Manhattan Bank. 'That meeting went really well,' Bobby [Shriver] remembers, 'We discussed then-current initiatives and problems with these. We corresponded back and forth for several months.'" - From Will Banyan's 2006 study: The Proud Internationalist (see External Links below).
"For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." - From his "Memoirs" (p.405).

Henry Kissinger:
() -
(research, library of congress, declassified, 1993, henry a. kissinger, implications of worldwide population growth, for u.s. securities and overseas interests. dec 10, 1974,

- why not only is BILL O' REILLY AN ASSHOLE, he may work for the gov't! --
() -
I HHAAAATE this guy. I've seen behind the scenes candid camera moments that just proves this guy is the lowest of the low, the dumbest of the dumb. if he was any more numb skulled, I'd be constructing a builing on this block of rocks. I dont eventhink that, if I showed him the proof, evidence, literally got bush and co. to come up and tell him one by one that they were indeed responsible for some of the worst crimes against humanity in our history, he STILL wouldnt believe it. too bad. This is the problem we face, people like him, who although they may actually be good guys, smart guys, they're immune to truth anywhere and everywhere.
O'Reilly's public beliefs and points of view

Political affiliation
On his January 10, 2000 show, O'Reilly claimed he was an Independent, but the New York Daily News reported on December 6, 2000, that he was registered as a Republican in Nassau County, New York, from 1994 to 2000. After the Daily News questioned O'Reilly on the matter, he re-registered as an Independent in 2001.[25]
O'Reilly disagrees with a common claim that he is a conservative, preferring to call himself a traditionalist and a populist. In his book The O'Reilly Factor, he describes his political affiliation this way: "You might be wondering if whether I'm conservative, liberal, libertarian, or exactly what... See, I don't want to fit any of those labels, because I believe that the truth doesn't have labels. When I see corruption, I try to expose it. When I see exploitation, I try to fight it. That's my political position."[26]

The Iraq war
Speaking on ABC's Good Morning America on 18 March 2003, O'Reilly made the following promise: "If the Americans go in and overthrow Saddam Hussein and it's clean, he has nothing, I will apologize to the nation, and I will not trust the Bush administration again."[27]HYPERLINK \l "_note-22"[28]HYPERLINK \l "_note-23"[29]
In another appearance on the same program on 10 February 2004, O'Reilly responded to repeated requests for him to honor his pledge: "My analysis was wrong and I'm sorry. I was wrong. I'm not pleased about it at all." With regard to never again trusting the current U.S. government, he said, "I am much more skeptical of the Bush administration now than I was at that time."[27] He has continued to publicly support the U.S. invasion of Iraq, while criticizing the Bush administration's handling of it, often giving rhetorical advice to the administration.
After reading a poll showing that only 2% of the Iraqi people viewed the US Forces as liberators and 55% preferred that they leave, O'Reilly said they are a "prehistoric" group and he has no respect for them. He added: "we cannot intervene in the Muslim world ever again. What we can do is bomb the living daylights out of them (...) no more ground troops, no more hearts and minds, ain't going to work."[30]

Terrorism
O'Reilly supports coercive measures to extract information from detainees at Guantanamo Bay, which he visited on two occasions. He has said that claims that, in comparison to torture procedures used under the regimes of dictators such as Adolf Hitler and Pol Pot, the U.S.'s tactics are not torture and are beneficial even when involving physical techniques.[31]
He also thinks that detainees should be judged under military tribunals, but not protected under the Geneva Convention because the convention requires combatants to wear a uniform, although this is not the only reason given.[31]
He has been critical of politicians such as Democratic Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and private citizens such as financier George Soros for wanting to try terror suspects in civilian courts.[32]

Politics
O'Reilly said of the Bill Clinton impeachment that it "was not about sex. This is about honesty and cruelty. For Mr. Clinton, it was about undermining the justice system."[33] In the same article he points out that Gary Condit a Democratic congressman, who had an affair with Chandra Levy prior to her disappearance and death, should be held at the same standard when it comes to inappropriate behavior.
O'Reilly has repeatedly claimed throughout the years that Clinton had the IRS audit him.[34]
In the 2004 presidential election he implied his support for George W. Bush, but also complimented John Kerry. During an interview on The Daily Show, O'Reilly told host Jon Stewart that he had yet to make up his mind on who he was going to vote for. He called the "Swift Vets and POWs for Truth" campaign criticizing Kerry's military record "terrible."[35] He is also cited as saying that most of those who voted for Kerry did so as a vote against Bush, stating that the Democratic party has been "hijacked by the left" and that they suffer losses because of this.[36]
O'Reilly does not endorse candidates directly, but he will generally advise viewers and listeners not to vote for a candidate that he opposes.[37] In 2004 he urged his viewers to vote against Democratic senate candidate Betty Castor in Florida because of her attack of the show for their investigation of Sami Al-Arian, an instructor at the University of South Florida where Castor was president. Al-Arian was later arrested by the FBI.[38]
O'Reilly has been critical of former attorney general Janet Reno, calling her "perhaps the worst attorney general in history" for allowing the FBI to become a "disorganized mess" and not prosecuting corporate criminals. However, he later praised former Attorney General John Ashcroft for going after the Arthur Andersen accounting firm, as well as Enron, WorldCom, Sam Waksal of Imclone and Martha Stewart.[39]
O'Reilly has criticized Democratic Senator Hillary Clinton and her running for president in 2008. In an interview with Jay Leno he said, "I just feel that Hillary is a socialist, and I'm paying enough tax. Hillary wants to take my money [and] your money ... and give it to strangers. There's something about that that offends me." He pointed out that she had voted for every single spending bill that year. In the same interview, he accused her of running as a political carpetbagger, and said that she intends to abolish the Electoral College in favor of popular vote, claiming that it would be done only to give her an advantage in the presidential race.[40]

Secularism and the "elite media"
In 2003, O'Reilly criticized the Los Angeles Times for endorsing then-governor Gray Davis, who was running against Arnold Schwarzenegger in a recall election. He said that he "has never seen a newspaper try to destroy someone as aggressively as the Times is doing." He made the claim that Californians have canceled their subscriptions due to the "extreme left-wing bias" of the newspaper. At the same time, he felt that Davis and the "Democratic machine" were equally corrupt and had to be removed.[41] However, in the same segment, O'Reilly mentioned that the "corrupt GOP" that was once in power in his home of Nassau County, New York should also have been removed, and that the new Democrat in charge had been doing a good job.
He has criticized the funding of left-wing interests by George Soros and Peter Lewis. O'Reilly supported California Proposition 73 because it required parental notification for underage girls seeking an abortion. "[T]he left-wing media has been able to convince millions of Americans that the government knows what's best for families, not the parents," he said.[42]
He has commented extensively on the gay marriage issue that erupted in San Francisco, and has criticized Schwarzenegger and Bush for not speaking out against the issue.[43]
He has supported the mention of intelligent design in schools and considers the National Academy of Sciences and the American Association for the Advancement of Science opposition to be fascist.[44]
O'Reilly has been critical of the ACLU, calling it "the most dangerous organization in the United States of America". He has called them a fascist organization in response to their threatened lawsuit against Los Angeles County for failing to remove a cross from its official seal.[45]
He regularly criticizes jurists in controversial cases as "activist judges." He uses the issue of gay marriage to support his point. "The folks decide that by voting and, in the case of gay marriage, the folks have decided. And that decision should be respected."[46]
O'Reilly has taken to using the abbreviation "S-P", for "Secular Progressive", as a shorthand way of referring to that general political category. However, neither Webster's Dictionary nor dictionary.com recognize the existence of such a category. [47]

Crime and punishment

The prison system
O'Reilly has called the current U.S. prison system too lenient, and has said that criminals have too many privileges like television and cigarettes, as well as access to drugs and sex. He has commented on support for military style labor camps for the nation's worst criminals as an alternative to the current prison system. He proposes a gulag style prison located in Alaska where such criminals would be forced to work eight hours a day, six days a week. Visitation would be limited to a few visitors a year. Punishment would be enforced through food rationing and solitary confinement. In his view, this could also replace the death penalty, to which he is opposed.[48]

The Mexican border
He has supported stricter border controls, including placement of the National Guard troops on the US-Mexican border and has criticized Bush for not allocating enough resources to make border security effective. He also criticized Ronald Reagan's act of amnesty, claiming that it made the supposed immigration problem worse.[49]

Gun control
O'Reilly supports gun control.[35] However, he also voiced support for private gun ownership after Hurricane Katrina.[50]

Jessica's Law
O'Reilly is a strong proponent of stricter penalties for child molesters. He has vehemently supported Jessica's Law and criticizes what he believes to be lenient treatment of those convicted of child molestation.[51] He has also criticized the law's detractors.[52] He has endorsed politicians like Republican Doug Forrester in the 2005 New Jersey gubernatorial election, suggesting that Jon Corzine, a Democrat, would be less likely to support a national version of the law.[53]
O'Reilly has been particularly critical of the Debra LaFave case, in which she was convicted of having sex with a 14-year-old boy but was only sentenced to house arrest and seven years' probation.[54]
He criticizes many politicians who oppose mandatory minimum sentences for child molesters. Specifically, he points out Massachusetts House Speaker Salvatore DiMasi, Wyoming Governor Dave Freudenthal, Senator Brian Frosh of Maryland, Tennessee Governor Phil Bredesen, former Idaho Governor Dirk Kempthorne. He has also called Vermont, Hawaii, Montana, Maine and Utah a "child predator-friendly states".[54]

Fiscal issues
O'Reilly is a frequent critic of government welfare and poverty programs. He is also critical of the estate tax which taxes up to 46 percent of estates which, under current federal law, are valued over $2 million. However, he does not differentiate between the marginal tax rate (46%) and the effective tax rate (roughly 9%). [55]According to the IRS, the estate tax in its "current form only affects the wealthiest 2% of all Americans", or approximately 52,000 estates. http://www.irs.gov/businesses/small/article/0,,id=108143,00.html
O'Reilly has said French unemployment and subsequent riots are the "common effects of socialist thinking". He says the French unemployment rate is high because of entitlements sanctioned by the French government, and that these entitlements make employers hesitant to hire young employees for fear that they will be stuck with an underperforming worker while being required to give them benefits and extensive vacation time.[56]
He says he supports income-based affirmative action as opposed to race-related affirmative action.[57]
He said that much of the chaos following Hurricane Katrina occurred because roughly 10 percent of the population cannot sustain itself. He has said that much of the funds doled out under entitlement programs is wasted on alcohol and drugs.[58]

Environmental issues
O'Reilly generally supports the science behind global warming, although he has said that it is not entirely certain that fossil fuels are the cause. Nonetheless, he has expressed support for a long-term strategy to curb fossil fuel use. He has said he would not support the Kyoto Treaty for economic reasons, but supports the use of fewer polluting agents, more conservation, and "tons more innovation" such as tax credits for alternative fuels.[59]
O'Reilly has also stated his belief that the United States is not doing enough to make it independent of foreign oil. "If Brazil can develop an ethanol industry that makes it completely independent of foreign oil, then the USA can."[60]

Controversies
Main article: Criticism of Bill O'Reilly
Over the years, there have been several controversial issues highlighted in O'Reilly's print and broadcast work. He is involved in many disputes with figures and sources (both liberal and conservative) including Al Franken, Michael Savage, George Clooney, Joe Scarborough, Jon Stewart, Keith Olbermann, Tucker Carlson, David Letterman, Neal Boortz, Michael Kinsley, Bill Maher and Ludacris.
On his prompting, Fox News sued Al Franken over his book, Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them: A Fair and Balanced Look at the Right, claiming that the book's satirical mockery of the network and of O'Reilly himself was a copyright violation. The title was critical of O'Reilly, among many others, and an unflattering image of O'Reilly from the show was included on the cover, along with Ann Coulter, Dick Cheney, and George W. Bush. The counter-argument in the suit was the book was a parody and could not be mistaken for a Fox News publication. On August 22, 2003, U.S. District Judge Denny Chin denied Fox's request for an injunction to block the publication of Franken's book, characterizing the network's claim as "wholly without merit, both factually and legally." Three days later, Fox filed papers to drop its lawsuit.
O'Reilly is frequently challenged by his critics, who question his accuracy on issues such as the Malmedy massacre, his claim that Inside Edition won two Peabody Awards when it was actually a single Polk award (won after he left the show);[61] He has also discussed controversial topics such as his annual reports on the Secularization of Christmas, which he calls the "War on Christmas".[62]
He has been quoted as saying that Rush Limbaugh is an entertainer and should not be cited for hard facts, whereas O'Reilly himself is a journalist.[35]
The media watch group, Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting, has published a book entitled The "Oh Really?" Factor, by author Peter Hart (ISBN 158322601X). The book catalogues what are argued to be distortions and inaccuracies on the part of O'Reilly.
In January 2007, O'Reilly on The O'Reilly Factor stated that a Missouri pre-teen, Shawn Hornbeck, who was abducted and held prisoner for four years by an alleged child molester had "liked ... his circumstances" and had "a lot more fun" than with "his old parents".
On the January 24, 2007 edition of The O'Reilly Factor O'Reilly said that he was personally responsible for effecting the dismissal of the Roman Catholic Cardinal Archbishop of Boston. "I claim credit for getting Cardinal Law booted out of this country," O'Reilly said, without providing any further details.[citation needed]
The Comedy Central program The Colbert Report, hosted by Stephen Colbert, parodies The O'Reilly Factor. Colbert has called his character (who is based on an amalgam of personalities, though primarily O'Reilly) a "well-intentioned, poorly informed, high-status idiot." On January 18, 2007 the two shows "collided" for the first time, with cross-promotional visits, as Colbert made a special appearance on The O'Reilly Factor, and later that night O'Reilly made a guest visit to The Colbert Report. The two gently mocked each other, with Colbert using some of the same jokes in both "interviews". After Colbert's appearance, O'Reilly conducted a "review" of their dialogue, with remarks by Bernard Goldberg and Jane Hall. At the end of his own show, Colbert showed the audience a microwave oven he claimed to have lifted from the show's greenroom. The origin of the oven was later confirmed by an Associated Press article. [63]

---- david cole
--- (http://bostonreview.net/BR27.6/cole.html) - Their Liberties, Our Security1
Democracy and double standards
David Cole
To those who pit Americans against immigrants and citizens against non-citizens, to those who scare peace-loving people with phantoms of lost liberty, my message is this: Your tactics only aid terrorists, for they erode our national unity and diminish our resolve. They give ammunition to America’s enemies, and pause to America’s friends. —Attorney General John Ashcroft, 6 December 2001
I. Introduction
8 On January 24, 2002, the United States military transported John Walker Lindh, a young American raised in Marin County, California, and captured with the Taliban on the battlefields of Afghanistan, to Alexandria, Virginia, where he was to be indicted in a civilian criminal court for conspiring to kill Americans. White House spokesman Ari Fleischer announced that "the great strength of America is he will now have his day in court." Represented by some of the best criminal defense attorneys in the country, Lindh raised substantial constitutional challenges to his prosecution, and the government ultimately dropped its most serious charges against him in exchange for a plea agreement.
At the same time, the military was holding 158 foreign-born Taliban and al Qaeda prisoners at a military base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, in eight-foot-by-eight-foot chain-link cages. A widely circulated press photo depicted the prisoners bound and shackled, with bags covering their heads and eyes, kneeling on the ground before U.S. soldiers. They were (and still are) held incommunicado, without charges, without access to lawyers, and without any judicial review. President George W. Bush announced that he categorically determined that the Guantanamo detainees were not entitled to the protections accorded prisoners of war under the Geneva Conventions, and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld dismissed concerns about their treatment with the assertion that they were "being treated vastly better than they treated anybody else over the last several years." Two months earlier, the president had issued a military order providing that al Qaeda members and other noncitizens could be tried by military tribunals, in which the military would act as prosecutor, judge, jury, and executioner, without any appeal to a civilian court.
The difference between the treatment afforded John Walker Lindh and his fellow Taliban and al Qaeda prisoners held at Guantanamo appeared to rest on the fact that Lindh was, as the press nicknamed him, "the American Taliban." When Attorney General John Ashcroft announced the charges against Lindh, a reporter asked why Lindh was being tried in an ordinary criminal court rather than before a military tribunal. Ashcroft explained that because Lindh was a United States citizen, he was not subject to the military tribunals created by President Bush’s order. As a purely legal matter, the president could have made U.S. citizens subject to military commissions; citizens have been tried in military tribunals before, and the Supreme Court expressly upheld such treatment as recently as World War II. But the president chose to limit his order to noncitizens. Several months later, however, military justice was extended to U.S. citizens, as the government asserted the right to hold two citizens—Yaser Hamdi, captured in Afghanistan, and José Padilla, arrested at O’Hare Airport in May on suspicion that he might be planning to set off a radioactive "dirty bomb"—as "enemy combatants," without charges, without counsel, without trial, and without judicial review.
Both the president’s initial choice to limit military justice to foreign nationals and his subsequent extension of that authority to U.S. citizens are emblematic of how we have responded to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. While there has been much talk about the need to sacrifice liberty for a greater sense of security, in practice we have at least initially selectively sacrificed noncitizens’ liberties while retaining basic protections for citizens. All too often, we have sought to avoid the difficult trade-offs between liberty and security by striking an illegitimate balance, sacrificing the liberties of noncitizens in furtherance of the citizenry’s purported security. Because noncitizens have no vote, and thus no direct voice in the democratic process, they are an especially vulnerable minority. And in the heat of the nationalistic and nativist fervor engendered by war, noncitizens’ interests are even less likely to weigh in the balance.
Some maintain that a "double standard" for citizens and noncitizens is perfectly justified. The attacks of September 11 were perpetrated by nineteen Arab noncitizens, and we have reason to believe that other Arab noncitizens are associated with the attackers and will seek to attack again. Citizens, it is said, are presumptively loyal; noncitizens are not. Thus, it is not irrational to focus on Arab noncitizens. Moreover, on a normative level, if citizens and noncitizens were treated identically, citizenship itself might be rendered meaningless. The very essence of war involves the drawing of lines in the sand between citizens of our nation and those against whom we are fighting. Surely in that setting it makes sense to treat noncitizens differently from citizens.
I will argue that such reasoning should be resisted on three grounds. First, it is normatively and constitutionally wrong: the basic rights at stake—political freedom, due process, and equal protection of the laws—are not limited to citizens, but apply to all "persons" subject to our laws. Second, it undermines our security interests: employing a double standard with respect to the basic rights accorded citizens and noncitizens is likely to be counterproductive at home and abroad because it compromises our legitimacy in both spheres. And third, it will pave the way for future inroads on citizens’ liberties: as the government’s treatment of Padilla and Hamdi has already illustrated, the tactic of trading immigrants’ rights for citizens’ security is misleading, for what we let our government do to immigrants creates precedents for how it treats citizens.
In short, when we balance liberty and security, we should do so in ways that respect the equal dignity and basic human rights of all persons and not succumb to the temptation of purchasing security at the expense of noncitizens’ basic rights. The true test of justice in a democratic society is not how it treats those with a political voice, but how it treats those who have no voice in the democratic process.
--who are our real enemeies people. its widely known, the real people in power are the ones you never hear about and see.

---the criminal bush family.
(http://www.oldamericancentury.org/bushco/bush_crime_family.htm) - The Bush Crime Family Tree
George Walker, GW's great-grandfather, set up the takeover of the Hamburg-America Line, a cover for I.G. Farben's Nazi espionage unit in the United States. In Germany, I.G. Farben was most famous for putting the gas in gas chambers; it was the producer of Zyklon B and other gasses used on victims of the Holocaust. The Bush family was not unaware of the nature of their investment partners. They hired Allen Dulles, the future head of the CIA, to hide the funds they were making from Nazi investments and the funds they were sending to Nazi Germany, rather than divest. It was only in 1942, when the government seized Union Banking Company assets under the Trading With The Enemy Act, that George Walker and Prescott Bush stopped pumping money into Hitler's regime. (1)
Prescott Bush, the president's grandfather. According to classified documents from Dutch intelligence and US government archives, President George W. Bush's grandfather, Prescott Bush made considerable profits off Auschwitz slave labor. In fact, President Bush himself is an heir to these profits from the holocaust which were placed in a blind trust in 1980 by his father, former president George Herbert Walker Bush. (2) On the 20th of October, the government commenced action against the company under the trading with the enemy act. (3) After the seizures in late 1942 of five U.S. enterprises he managed on behalf of Nazi industrialist Fritz Thyssen failed to divest himself of more than a dozen "enemy national" relationships that continued until as late as 1951, newly-discovered U.S. government documents reveal. (4) In 1952, Prescott Bush was elected to the U.S. Senate, with no press accounts about his well-concealed Nazi past.(5)
George Herbert Walker Bush, the presidents father. Bush, as director of the CIA, had funneled enormous amounts of cash to drug runners including Manuel Noriega and helped in the destabilization of Argentina. Bush utilized his own connections to help fund drug runners from Laos to Panama. Most shocking was the so-called "cocaine coup" in Bolivia in June 1980, masterminded by fugitive Nazi Klaus Barbie, "The Butcher Of Lyons." Barbie, who had been previously secreted in Latin America by the CIA, began working closely with the Argentines and used drug money to finance a neo-Nazi cabal, one that succeeded in overthrowing the government. The troops swept through the capital wearing Nazi armbands, according to former DEA agent Mike Levine. George H.W. Bush later facilitated the Iran-contra affair, employing many of the same methods: secretly selling Central American cocaine in America and weapons to Iran while using the profits to fund the contras and to overthrow democratically elected socialists in Central America.(6) as the head of the CIA and later as Vice President, toppled democratically elected regimes in South and Central America and began propping up a dictator by the name of Saddam Hussein in Iraq. Although forbidden by congress to do so, he continued to sell chemical and biological weapons to Saddam even after he used them on villages of innocent civilians. A decade later The United States had to go to war against him and the Bush family again, made millions from it.
Jonathan J. Bush, the Presidents uncle. Jonathan Bush's "Pioneer Profile" in "George W. Bush's $100,000 Club" cites him as the "head" of the Riggs Investment Management Co.; "Bush’s uncle Jonathan ... founded its subsidiary, J. Bush & Co., of which he is chair. He also is an ex-chair of the New York Republican State Finance Committee. Bush credits the investors sent his way by this banker uncle as a key to his 'success' in the Texas oil industry in the early ‘80s." (17)
Jonathan J. Bush, is a top executive at Riggs Bank, which this week agreed to pay a record $25 million in civil fines for violations of law intended to thwart money laundering. Jonathan Bush, who is a major fundraiser for his nephew, was appointed in 2000 to run Riggs Investment Management Co. His association with Riggs began when he headed J. Bush & Co., a New Haven, Conn., company he created in 1970 and built to offer advice on money management. (18)
According to the 5/14/04 New York Times, Federal regulators fined the Riggs National Corporation, the parent company of Riggs Bank, $25 million yesterday for "failing to report suspicious activity, the largest penalty ever assessed against a domestic bank in connection with money laundering. The fine stems from Riggs's failure over at least the last two years to actively monitor suspect financial transfers through Saudi Arabian accounts held by the bank." The 5/14/04 Wall Street Journal reported that of particular concern, Riggs failed to monitor "tens of millions of dollars in cash withdrawals from accounts related to the Saudi Arabian embassy," including "suspicious incidents involving dozens of sequentially numbered cashier's checks and international drafts written by Saudi officials, including Saudi Ambassador Prince Bandar bin Sultan." According to the 4/18/04 Washington Post, Saudi Prince Bandar's wife, Princess Haifa al-Faisal, "may have used a Riggs account to donate money to a charity that then gave some of it to the Sept. 11 terrorists."(...)According to the nonprofit Texans for Public Justice, Jonathan Bush is the President and CEO of Riggs Investment Management - a major arm of Riggs Bank. He is also the uncle of President George W. Bush. The President "credits the investors sent his way by this banker uncle as a key to his 'success' in the Texas oil industry in the early '80s." According to Public Citizen, the uncle Jonathan was a Bush Pioneer, having raised more than $100,000 for his nephew in 2000.(19)
Neil Bush, the president's brother. Central player of the 1980'ssavings and loan scandal, he ran a savings and loan into the ground while shoveling millions of its taxpayer-backed dollars into the pockets of two deadbeat partners. Neil served as a director of Silverado Banking, Savings and Loan in Denver, Colorado, from 1985 until 1988. During that time, the now-dead thrift made over $200 million in loans to Neil's two partners in JNB Exploration, Neil's abysmally unsuccessful oil company. Federal regulators determined that, while Silverado was pumping loans to Neil's two associates, Neil was completely dependent on the two men for his income. The failure of Silverado -- its closure delayed until after the 1988 election -- cost taxpayers about $1 billion. After Silverado failed, Neil started a new oil company, Apex Energy. This time, his money came from a $2.35 million loan through a Small Business Administration program. When news of this reached the press in March 1991, the SBA discovered that the companies through which the loan was approved were technically insolvent, and it gave them up to thirty months to "self-liquidate." This meant that Apex would have to repay its SBA-guaranteed loans. Neil took this as his cue to move on, and he left Apex -- and its debts -- for others to worry about. (7) update: Neil Bush made $171,370 in one day. The fact that he was a former consultant to the company whose stock he dumped is just a coincidence
Marvin Bush, the president's brother was on the board of directors of a company providing electronic security for the World Trade Center, Dulles International Airport and United Airlines, according to public records. The company was backed by an investment firm, the Kuwait-American Corp., also linked for years to the Bush family. The security company, formerly named Securacom and now named Stratesec, is in Sterling, Va.. Its CEO, Barry McDaniel, said the company had a ``completion contract" to handle some of the security at the World Trade Center ``up to the day the buildings fell down." The suite in which Marvin Bush was annually re-elected, according to public records, is located in the Watergate in space leased to the Saudi government. The company now holds shareholder meetings in space leased by the Kuwaiti government there.(8) (9) more
Jeb Bush, the president's brother. After graduating from The University of Texas, Jeb Bush served a short apprenticeship at the Venezuelan branch of Texas Commerce Bank in Caracas before settling in Miami, in 1980, to work on his father's unsuccessful primary bid against Ronald Reagan. Shortly after arriving in Miami, Jeb was hired by Cuban-American developer Armando Codina to work at his Miami development company as an agent leasing office space. A couple of years later, Jeb and Codina became business partners, and in 1985 they purchased an office building in a deal partly financed by a savings and loan that later failed.The $4.56 million loan, from Broward Federal Savings in Sunrise, Florida, was granted in such a way that neither Codina's nor Bush's name appeared on the loan papers as the borrowers. A third man, J. Edward Houston, borrowed the $4.56 million from Broward and then re-lent it to the Bush partnership. When federal regulators closed Broward Savings in 1988, they found the loan, which had been secured by the Bush partnership, in default. As Jeb's father was finishing his second term as vice-president and running for the presidency, federal regulators had two options: to get Jeb Bush and his partner to repay the loan, or to foreclose on their office building. But regulators came up with a third solution. After reappraising the building, regulators decided it wasn't worth as much as was owed for it. The regulators reduced the amount owed by Bush and his partner from $4.56 million to just $500,000. The pair paid that amount and were allowed to keep their office building. Taxpayers picked up the tab for the unpaid $4 million. (10)
He also rigged an election that you may have heard about. Thousands of eligible voters were disallowed the right to vote in predominantly democratic regions. Between May 1999 and Election Day 2000, two Florida secretaries of state - Sandra Mortham and Katherine Harris, both protégées of Governor Jeb Bush- ordered 57,700 "ex-felons," who are prohibited from voting by state law, to be removed from voter rolls. (In the thirty-five states where former felons can vote, roughly 90 percent vote Democratic.) A company now owned by ChoicePoint of Atlanta, was paid $4.3 million for its work, replacing a firm that charged $5,700 per year for the same service.Two of these "scrub lists," as officials called them, were distributed to counties in the months before the election with orders to remove the voters named. Together the lists comprised nearly 1 percent of Florida?s electorate and nearly 3 percent of its African-American voters. Neither DBT nor the state conducted any further research to verify the matches. DBT, which frequently is hired by the F.B.I. to conduct manhunts, originally proposed using address histories and financial records to confirm the names, but the state declined the cross-checks. (11)
George W. Bush, second appointed president of the United States.
• 1979-83: Fifty Bush family investors and friends, led by uncle Jonathan, a New York Republican Party official and an investment manager, fork over $4.7 million to set up young Bush in a company called Arbusto. It's a flop, and in 1982 gets a new name: Bush Exploration.
• 1984: Spectrum 7 Corporation, an Ohio oil exploration outfit owned by Dubya's Yalie pal William DeWitt Jr., buys out Bush Exploration, setting up young Bush as CEO at $75,000 a year and giving him 1.1 million shares of the firm's stock. Another flop. The company's fortunes soon sink, with $400,000 in losses and a debt of $3 million.
• 1986: In the nick of time, Bush and partners merge the failing Spectrum with Harken Oil, a Dallas exploration company, with a $2 million stock purchase. Bush puts up about $500,000 and gets a $120,000 annual consulting fee along with $131,250 in stock options. Harken is a small outfit, looking for oil opportunities within the U.S. Then out of the blue comes Harvard Management Corporation, an investment adviser for Harvard University's endowment portfolio. It pumps millions into the venture.
• 1990: Although Harken has no international expertise, it gets the attention of the Bahrain National Oil Company, which unexpectedly appears on the scene and bypasses big oil's Amoco and Chevron to sign a production agreement with the little Texas concern. The contract grants Harken exclusive rights to what seems to be a promising offshore area squeezed between two productive tracts owned by Saudi Arabia and Qatar. The Wall Street Journal speculates Bahrain was trying to cozy up to Daddy Bush, who was plotting an assault on Iraq after Saddam Hussein seized Kuwait.
Bass Enterprises Production Company finances the Bahrain drilling with $25 million, and Harvard Management raises its investment. A couple of members of the Fort Worth Bass family have places on Team 100, an elite business group contributing to the Republican National Committee.
In June, Harken drills two dry holes in Bahrain. The future looks bleak. Dubya dumps two-thirds of his Harken holdings (212,140 shares), for $848,560. He uses some of this money to buy into the Texas Rangers baseball club. This is a lot of stock to dump on the market all at once, and brokers say it was purchased by an unnamed institutional investor.
That August, Harken posts a loss of $23 million.
• January 1991: Daddy Bush attacks Iraq.
• February 1991: Dubya, as the official in charge at Harken, reports his big stock sale to the SEC—eight months late.
• April 1991: The SEC begins an investigation into Harken dealings. Chairman Richard Breeden, who had been appointed by the senior Bush and served him as an economic policy adviser, hails from Baker & Botts, a big Texas oil law firm where he was a partner. Inside the SEC, James Doty, general counsel and the official in charge of any litigation that might come out of the Harken investigation, is another alumnus of Baker & Botts. And as a private attorney, before joining the government, Doty represented the younger Bush in matters related to Dubya's ownership of the Rangers.
• 1993: The SEC ends its Harken investigation following perfunctory interviews.
The good people of Baker & Botts continued looking out for Shrub. Since 1993, Breeden, Doty, and other lawyers there have given him $182,050 for his various political campaigns, making the firm one of his biggest supporters.(12)
Upon appointment as president, Bush appoints 6 Iran-contra defendants to his staff, (13) fills the upper levels of the White house and pentagon with senior members of the PNAC (14) including his speech writer, chief advisor, secretary of defense, and vice president. Uses the terrorist attacks of 9-11 (16) to illegally invade and occupy Iraq under the false pretense of imminent threat (15) and reaps billions for Cheney's Halliburton, Rumsfeld's Bechtel, and his own family's Carlyle group.
newsweek article on Bush/Nazi connectionHYPERLINK "http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article3713.htm"
"Bush - Nazi Dealings Continued Until 1951" - Federal Documents
Karl Rove's grandfather was Karl Heinz Roverer, the Gauleiter of Oldenburg. Roverer was Reich-Statthalter---Nazi State Party Chairman---for his region. He was also a partner and senior engineer in the Roverer Sud-Deutche Ingenieurburo A. G. engineering firm, which built the Birkenau death camp,
Still, that's ancient history. Surely bush wouldn't be repeating the actions of fascist dictators. Or would he?
(1) http://www.disinfo.com/archive/pages/dossier/id195/pg1/ (2) http://www.clamormagazine.org/features/issue14.3_feature.html (3) http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article3713.htm (4) http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=39&contentid=997 (5) http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=39&contentid=963&page=2 (6) http://www.oldamericancentury.org/bushcontra.htm (7) http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/1992/09/bushboys.html (8) http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0204-06.htm (9) http://www.disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=Marvin_Bush (10) http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/BushFV.html#p2 (11) http://www.gregpalast.com/detail.cfm?artid=122&row=1 (12) http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/0228/ridgeway.php (13) http://www.blythe.org/nytransfer-subs/Central_America/Iran-Contra_Felons_Get_Good_Jobs_from_Bush (14) http://www.oldamericancentury.org/pnac.htm (15) http://babelogue.citypages.com:8080/sperry/stories/storyReader$526 (16) http://www.thememoryhole.org/911/ (17) http://www.disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=Jonathan_Bush (18) http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A28396-2004May14?language=printer (19) http://www.davidsirota.com/2004/05/bushs-uncle-is-executive-at-bank-fined.html Related: Alfred Mendes outlines the history of America's beloved First Family and some of their choice friends. HYPERLINK "http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article11337.htm"Behind George W, there are four generations of Bushes and Walkers devoted first to using political networks to pile up and protect personal fortunes and, latterly, to using absolutely any means to gain office, not because they want to do good, but because they are what passes in American for hereditary aristocrats. Bush family is profiting from the No Child Left Behind Act How members of the Bush family have made money off the Bush Presidency

--- the rumsfelds "All men having power ought to be mistrusted." ~James Madison

() -

(http://www.globalsecurity.org/org/news/2001/010226-rummy.htm) - **research - Darth Rumsfeld
Don Rumsfeld developed his foreign policy in the early 1970s, under President Gerald Ford. It was bad then. It's worse now. BY JASON VEST; Washington-based journalist JASON VEST is a contributing editor to In These Times and Regardie's. Since Donald Rumsfeld's appointment as secretary of defense was announced on December 28, approbatory phrases have been the order of the day. The Washington Post cast him as "elder statesman," while The New York Times characterized him as a "tough-minded manager." At his January 11 confirmation hearing, the servile aria started by the press was taken up by the Senate Armed Services Committee: Save for a few pointed questions on fiscal oversight by Republican Senator John McCain of Arizona and Senator Robert Byrd, the West Virginia Democrat, Rumsfeld's hearing could have passed for a mannerly colloquy of academics discussing the future of defense. On January 20, moments after George W. Bush was sworn in, Donald Rumsfeld -- "Rummy," as he is known to his friends -- was confirmed by the Senate. To longtime defense policy observers and arms control advocates, watching the restoration of Rumsfeld to the Pentagon has been disconcerting. Though genuflected to by the Washington press corps and political establishment as a genteel graybeard, the real Rumsfeld may be, in fact, much closer to Darth Vader, both on defense issues and as a practitioner of politics. "The notion that he's a gray eminence," laments William Hartung, the World Policy Institute's veteran defense analyst and a longtime Rumsfeld watcher, "is, in large part, based on press laziness."

(http://politicalhumor.about.com/cs/quotethis/a/rumsfeldquotes.htm) - Donald Rumsfeld Quotes
From Daniel Kurtzman,Your Guide to Political Humor.FREE Newsletter. Sign Up Now!
Memorable Quotes by Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld
"I would not say that the future is necessarily less predictable than the past. I think the past was not predictable when it started.""We do know of certain knowledge that he [Osama Bin Laden] is either in Afghanistan, or in some other country, or dead.""We know where they are. They're in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat." –on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction"Death has a tendency to encourage a depressing view of war.""Freedom's untidy, and free people are free to make mistakes and commit crimes and do bad things." –on looting in Iraq after the U.S. invasion, adding "stuff happens""As you know, you go to war with the army you have, not the army you might want or wish to have at a later time.""[Osama Bin Laden is] either alive and well or alive and not too well or not alive." "I am not going to give you a number for it because it's not my business to do intelligent work." -asked to estimate the number of Iraqi insurgents while testifying before Congress"I believe what I said yesterday.
I don't know what I said, but I know what I think, and, well, I assume it's what I said.""Needless to say, the President is correct. Whatever it was he said.""Reports that say that something hasn't happened are always interesting to me, because as we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns -- the ones we don't know we don't know.""If I said yes, that would then suggest that that might be the only place where it might be done which would not be accurate, necessarily accurate. It might also not be inaccurate, but I'm disinclined to mislead anyone.""There's another way to phrase that and that is that the absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence. It is basically saying the same thing in a different way. Simply because you do not have evidence that something does exist does not mean that you have evidence that it doesn't exist." -on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction"It is unknowable how long that conflict [the war in Iraq] will last. It could last six days, six weeks. I doubt six months." -in Feb. 2003"Well, um, you know, something's neither good nor bad but thinking makes it so, I suppose, as Shakespeare said.""Secretary Powell and I agree on every single issue that has ever been before this administration except for those instances where Colin's still learning." "Learn to say 'I don't know.' If used when appropriate, it will be often." "I don't know what the facts are but somebody's certainly going to sit down with him and find out what he knows that they may not know, and make sure he knows what they know that he may not know.""I'm not into this detail stuff. I'm more concepty.""I don't do quagmires.""I don't do diplomacy.""I don't do foreign policy.""I don't do predictions.""I don't do numbers.""I don't do book reviews.""Now, settle down, settle down. Hell, I'm an old man, it's early in the morning and I'm gathering my thoughts here.""If I know the answer I'll tell you the answer, and if I don't, I'll just respond, cleverly.""Oh, Lord. I didn't mean to say anything quotable."

(http://www.alternet.org/story/44213/) - The War Crimes Case Against Donald Rumsfeld
By Marjorie Cohn, AlterNet. Posted November 13, 2006.
Although Bush has immunized Rumsfeld and others from prosecution in the International Criminal Court, they could be tried in any country under the well-established principle of universal jurisdiction.

---Come on people!!! Big Business will never let this happen . . .
[Report this comment] Posted by: JCR on Nov 13, 2006 8:32 AM
The primary reason that Rummy the Butcher, Dumya and The Dick won't be prosecuted is because they all enjoy the unequivocal support of corporate America. It's quite touching the way Alternet readers like to throw around "subpoena power" while naively ignoring what they already know: there is only ONE ultimate power in the US - BIG BIZ. If Exxon, Wal-Mart, Halliburton, Pfizer and Northrup say no then the answer is no - it's as simple as that.The US government and Big Biz have been in bed together for some time now and their grotesque progeny is a Prozac pushing, weapons dealing, Jaclyn Smith wearing pimp eating a Big Mac behind the wheel of a Hummer; and Bush, Cheney and Rummy created them. What makes you think they are going to turn on them now?

(http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82/) - The Death Kiss -
Shaking Hands: Iraqi President Saddam Hussein greets Donald Rumsfeld, then special envoy of President Ronald Reagan, in Baghdad on December 20, 1983

(http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/6218485.stm) - Saddam Hussein executed in Iraq
The former Iraqi leader, Saddam Hussein, has been hanged in northern Baghdad for crimes against humanity.
.

() -

(http://writ.news.findlaw.com/dean/20060421.html) - The two faces of Rumsfeld
2000: director of a company which wins $200m contract to sell nuclear reactors to North Korea 2002: declares North Korea a terrorist state, part of the axis of evil and a target for regime change Randeep RameshFriday May 9, 2003The Guardian
Donald Rumsfeld, the US defence secretary, sat on the board of a company which three years ago sold two light water nuclear reactors to North Korea - a country he now regards as part of the "axis of evil" and which has been targeted for regime change by Washington because of its efforts to build nuclear weapons.
Mr Rumsfeld was a non-executive director of ABB, a European engineering giant based in Zurich, when it won a $200m (£125m) contract to provide the design and key components for the reactors. The current defence secretary sat on the board from 1990 to 2001, earning $190,000 a year. He left to join the Bush administration.

(http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/25/rumsfeld-consultant/) - RUMSFELD ISN'T GOING AWAY - Rumfeld Remains Defense Department ‘Consultant,’ Opens ‘Transition Office’ Near Pentagon
Former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld "has left the Pentagon, but not the Defense Department." The Washington Times reports:
On Jan. 4, Mr. Rumsfeld opened a government-provided transition office in Arlington and has seven Pentagon-paid staffers working for him, a Pentagon official said.
The Pentagon lists Mr. Rumsfeld as a "nonpaid consultant," a status he needs in order to review secret and top-secret documents, the official said.
The Times reports that Rumsfeld has brought with him close adviser Stephen Cambone, a fierce advocate of the Iraq war and the chief planner of questionable interrogation tactics at military and CIA detention sites around the world.
Rumsfeld’s new office is reportedly raising eyebrows at the Pentagon:
The Pentagon official said former secretaries are entitled to a transition office to sort papers, some of which can be taken with them for a library, for archives or to write a book.
The transition office has raised some eyebrows inside the Pentagon. Some question the size of the staff, which includes two military officers and two enlisted men. They also ask why the sorting could not have been done from the time Mr. Rumsfeld resigned Nov. 8 to when he left the building Dec. 18.
Rumsfeld’s predecessors, William Cohen and William Perry, both returned to private life immediately after leaving the Defense Department. Cohen had "two military personnel…sort through his papers for about six weeks," while Perry had his papers mailed via compact disk to Stanford University.

(http://rc3.org/2005/11/donald_rumsfeld_is_evil.php) - November 30, 2005
Donald Rumsfeld is evil
Larry Johnson flags an excerpt from a Department of Defense press conference with Donald Rumsfeld and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Peter Pace. I'll snip out an even smaller bit of the excerpt, you don't even need to see the question being answered:
PACE: It is absolutely responsibility of every U.S. service member if they see inhumane treatment being conducted, to intervene, to stop it. . . .
RUMSFELD: I don't think you mean they have an obligation to physically stop it, it's to report it.
PACE: If they are physically present when inhumane treatment is taking place, sir, they have an obligation to try to stop it.
Want an explanation of why we torture and who's responsible? There it is in a nutshell.

(http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Donald_Rumsfeld) - The 9/11 Souvenir
John Solomon, writing March 12, 2004, for the Associated Press, reported that "Rumsfeld Kept 9-11 Souvenir", an act which BuzzFlash characterizes as both "macabre and disgusting."
"The Justice Department investigation that criticized FBI agents for taking souvenirs from the World Trade Center site also found that Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and a high-ranking FBI official kept items from the Sept. 11 attack scenes.
"The final investigatory report said the Justice Department inspector general confirmed Rumsfeld 'has a piece of the airplane that flew into the Pentagon.'
"The Justice Department investigation also collected testimony that Pasquale D'Amuro, FBI Director Robert Mueller's executive assistant director for terrorism until last summer, asked a supervisory agent to 'obtain a half dozen items from the WTC debris so the items could be given to dignitaries.'"

(http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15674303/site/newsweek/) - A Warrior Lays Down His Arms
Donald Rumsfeld set out to transform the military. Things didn't quite work out as planned.
Flying High: Rumsfeld in Baghdad in 2004

By John Barry and Michael Hirsh
Newsweek
Nov. 20, 2006 issue - There weren't many people in the Pentagon brave enough to give bad news to Donald Rumsfeld. Jim Roche, though, was one. The Air Force secretary and his boss shared Chicago roots and Washington ties going back 30 years—and, like Rummy, the white-haired Roche had made a lot of money in business. In the fall of 2002 it was becoming clear inside the Pentagon that George W. Bush intended to invade Iraq. A worried Roche dragooned the then Army secretary, Thomas White, to join him for a frank talk with Rumsfeld, according to a knowledgeable source who asked for anonymity because he was describing a private conversation. With some trepidation, the pair marched up to Rummy's elaborate dark-paneled office in the E-Ring, the power corridor of the Pentagon. "Don, you do realize that Iraq could be another Vietnam?" Roche asked. Rumsfeld, a political survivor of the Watergate era whose main goal was to exorcise the ghost of Vietnam forever—restoring American power and prestige in the world—was outraged at the very suggestion. "Vietnam? You think you have to tell me about Vietnam?" Rumsfeld sputtered. "Of course it won't be Vietnam. We are going to go in, overthrow Saddam, get out. That's it." Then he waved them out of his office
Now Rumsfeld himself has been thrown out after six stormy years, a chastened if still-proud man who will spend the rest of his days grappling with the judgment of history. His tenure at the Pentagon is thick with irony. The squinty-eyed tough guy whom Bush once described as a "matinee idol," the podium wit who declared "I don't do quagmires," is now viewed as the author of one of the worst quagmires in American history. The "forward-leaning" ex-wrestler who wanted to project American strength abroad may now be blamed by historians for revealing the limits of American power—and weakening the nation's position in the critical Middle East.
When Rumsfeld arrived to take over the Pentagon for the second time in January 2001 he acted like a man on a mission. Rumsfeld came equipped with a glittering résumé: Princeton wrestling captain. Naval aviator. Congressman at 30. White House chief of staff at 42. Defense secretary at 43 (the youngest ever, way back in 1975). Fortune 500 CEO and turnaround specialist. And with 30 years of global experience, Rumsfeld had a clear vision for Defense. He wanted to draw down America's giant cold-war garrisons around the world and transform the U.S. military into a high-tech, "agile" force suited for expeditionary warfare around the globe
Rumsfeld actually achieved a good part of this vision. He elevated the role and size of Special Forces, turning them into a separate worldwide command. He gave Special Operations—the global SWAT teams of the 21st century—the lead in the war against terrorism. He changed the way the Army and Navy operate worldwide, making both services more nimble. Finally, Rumsfeld began a profound shift of America's basic military approach to threats abroad, away from the old requirement of fighting three wars simultaneously (for example, in North Korea, Europe and the Mideast) and toward a new force organized to face unknowable contingencies.
But much of that transformational work may be forgotten in the history books. Instead, largely thanks to Iraq, Rumsfeld will likely go down as an erratic and arrogant manager who sullied America's reputation by allowing interrogation abuses at Abu Ghraib and other U.S.-run detention centers abroad; who haughtily dismissed advice from U.S. generals and senators alike to put in enough troops (in part because he didn't want another Vietnam), and who preferred to deny the reality of the Iraqi insurgency rather than confront it. Bush, in announcing Rumsfeld's departure last week, called him "a superb leader in a time of change." But that is a distinctly minority view in Washington, where it is hard to find any defenders of Rumsfeld, either Democrat or Republican. "He will be seen as the Robert McNamara of this generation," says retired Lt. Gen. William Odom, referring to the Vietnam-era Defense chief who has spent the last 40 years trying live down the carnage that occurred on his watch

(http://www.buzzflash.com/farrell/04/05/far04017.html) - Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and the Manchurian Candidate
by Maureen Farrell
"I am writing this from Frederick, Maryland. I've just been filming, for Channel 4, a press conference in which the son of a CIA officer who died in suspicious circumstances presented his evidence that vice-president Dick Cheney and defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld were, in 1975, when part of the Gerald Ford administration, involved in a cover-up of the events surrounding his father's death. The press conference was due to have been two weeks ago, but when the son, Eric Olson, called the New York Times to invite them, they said, "Whoa! Do you really want to release such complex information to a bunch of journalists who'll probably screw it up? Let us do it properly instead."
I must try this ruse sometime. It worked on Olson. He postponed the press conference. The New York Times finally called him and said, "We missed Watergate because we thought it was just a small, unimportant break-in." What they seemed to mean was they believed his evidence but they couldn't decide if it was a huge, government-toppling White House cover-up of a murder, or a small, unimportant White House cover-up of a murder, the kind of stuff that doesn't mean much.. . "
-- Jon Ronson, The Guardian, August 17, 2002
In the summer of 2003 (back when President Bush was renouncing the use of torture [New Yorker]) author Douglas Valentine reminded us why blind trust in any government official or agency has historically been a bad idea. "The war on terror, and its ‘homeland security’ counterpart are flip sides of the same coin," he wrote. "They are the same ideology applied to foreign and domestic policy. But like CIA agent Alden Pyle in The Quiet American, their evil intention is wrapped in a complex matrix of transparent lies." [CounterPunch.org]
Drawing uncomfortable conclusions about the Bush administration’s secret agenda, Valentine also pointed to Miramax's Vietnam-era love story which had been put on hold following Sept. 11 due to its "anti-American" content -- a content that wasn’t so much anti-American as anti-CIA. "Horrendous acts were, for propaganda purposes, often made to look as if they had been committed by the enemy," Valentine wrote, of the CIA’s brutal underhanded activities that both the Quiet American and history underscore.
More than 40 years ago, another film spawned similar qualms. United Artists was nervous about releasing The Manchurian Candidate because, as screen writer George Axelrod put it, "They didn't want to make it because they thought that it was un-American."
A wildly imaginative political thriller which sprang from Richard Condon’s 1959 best-selling novel, The Manchurian Candidate is the story of a brainwashed military veteran who unwittingly becomes a programmed assassin to further the political ambitions of his cold and manipulative mother. "Ironically," the Washington Post revealed, "it was a phone call from President Kennedy -- made at [Frank] Sinatra's request -- that persuaded Arthur Krim, then head of United Artists and also the national finance chairman of the Democratic Party, to change his mind and start production.
(An additional irony, which may be more curious than telling but is entirely in keeping with the tone of the film, is that it was [director John] Frankenheimer who drove Robert Kennedy to the hotel in California the night he was assassinated.)" [Washington Post]

(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Rumsfeld) - Rumsfeld family tie is first victim of war
By Tony Paterson
Last Updated: 1:45am GMT 09/02/2003
The American defence chief Donald Rumsfeld has been disowned by his anti-war relatives in north Germany, reports Tony Paterson
The Rumsfelds of Weyhe-Sudweyhe, an unremarkable red-brick suburb of Bremen, were once proud of their long-lost cousin, America's secretary of state for defence - but no longer.
Like many Germans, they are appalled by Donald Rumsfeld's hawkish attitude to military action against Saddam Hussein. About 18,000 anti-war demonstrators marched through Munich yesterday to protest at his presence at an international security conference - chanting slogans such as "No room for Rumsfeld!"
"We think it is dreadful that Donald Rumsfeld is out there pushing for a war against Iraq," Karin Cecere (nee Rumsfeld), 59, said from her two-up, two-down home last week. "We are embarrassed to be related to him," she told The Telegraph. Margarete Rumsfeld, her 85-year-old mother, was equally dismissive: "We don't have much to do with him anymore. Nowadays he's just the American defence secretary to us, but for God's sake, he'd better not start a war," she added.
They used to feel differently. Twenty-five years ago, the German Rumsfelds were thrilled to welcome Mr Rumsfeld - then the United States ambassador to Nato stationed in Brussels - into their extended family.
Like many Americans keen to trace their European antecedents, Mr Rumsfeld had made contact with the Weyhe-Sudweyhe Rumsfelds, a branch of the family with whom his near relations had lost touch since his great-great-grandfather, Heinrich, emigrated to America during the 19th century.
Mr Rumsfeld paid three visits to Dietrich Rumsfeld, a bricklayer, and his wife Margarete in their small artisan's cottage. On the last occasion, they greeted him with chicken soup and roast pork for lunch "It was a really pleasant family gathering, almost like a wedding," said Mrs Cecere last week. "Mr Rumsfeld seemed a genuinely nice man. It is such a shame about his war ambitions."
She had grown up, she said, during the Second World War and her instincts were to search for a solution to the deadlock with Saddam that did not involve military action. "I was born in the war and saw its aftermath, and my mother went through it," she said. "There must be a peaceful way of solving the Iraq problem."
This change of heart over their Rumsfeld cousin reflects the mood in Germany. More than 60 per cent of Germans oppose a war and the US defence secretary has become a hate figure for the country's peace movement.
His desire to topple Saddam by force is at odds with the Social Democrat-led government of Chancellor Gerhard Schröder, which is directly opposed to war in Iraq.
Even before his arrival in Germany yesterday, Mr Rumsfeld had faced fierce criticism from senior German government officials for describing France and Germany as "old Europe".
Last week he caused further outrage when he told the House Armed Services Committee in Washington that Germany, like "Libya and Cuba", had indicated that it "did not want to help in any way" the international efforts to tackle Iraq.
The German government attempted to play down the criticism. "Mr Rumsfeld is like he is. I can say no more," said Joschka Fischer, the foreign minister. Other senior politicians were more explicit. "Rumsfeld has flipped out - his behaviour is impossible," said Klaus Kinkel, a Free Democrat and former foreign minister.
Some Germans have misgivings, however, that their country's hard line against war with Iraq may backfire - especially if, as widely predicted, France drops its own objections at the last minute and joins in military action.
Angela Merkel, the leader of the Christian Democrats, yesterday became the first opposition figure to call for Germany to become involved. "If it is impossible to solve the situation peacefully then Germany has to take part in a military operation," she said, accusing Mr Schröder's government of "spreading ill-will and confusion" in Nato.
In Munich Mr Rumsfeld sought to dispel the furore over his own comments by claiming that he had intended the phrase "old Europe" as a term of affection, like that of "old friends".
He admitted that he was sometimes inclined to be blunt - but blamed it on his German roots. "My family originates from northern Germany. People there are well known for their direct and clear manner of speaking."
His explanation did not impress most Germans - least of all his cousins in Weyhe-Sudweyhe. Mrs Cecere said: "We're all in favour of plain-speaking but our relation goes just too far."

---cheney
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dick_cheney) - Richard Bruce Cheney (born January 30, 1941) is the 46th and current Vice President of the United States, serving under President George W. Bush. Previously, he served as White House Chief of Staff, member of the U.S. House of Representatives from Wyoming, and Secretary of Defense. In the private sector, he was the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Halliburton Energy Services; he is still a major stockholder. On June 29, 2002, he briefly assumed the powers and duties of the presidency as Acting President when Mr. Bush underwent a medical exam involving anesthetics.
(http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/dickcheney/) - the fifth estate: The Unauthorized Biography of Dick Cheney ORIGINALLY AIRED: Wednesday October 6, 2004 at 9pm on CBC-TV REPEATING: Thursday May 26, 2005 at 10pm ET/PT on CBC Newsworld
American Vice-President Dick Cheney has walked the corridors of world power for three decades. Cheney's remarkable life story involves the relentless accumulation of power in every form. Elected for a second term, he continues to be one of the most powerful and well-connected men in the world. The fifth estate will show how he accomplished this, what it involved in terms of costs for others and what history's judgement could be.
(http://hnn.us/articles/6936.html) - 8-30-04
Why Dick Cheney Deserves an "F" in History
By Robert E. May
Mr. May, is a professor of History at Purdue University and a writer for the History News Service.
In a critique of John Kerry's presidential candidacy, Vice President Dick Cheney invoked historical memory to mock Kerry's call for a "more sensitive" war on terrorism. Cheney told a Dayton, Ohio, gathering on Aug. 12 that none of America's victories in war can be attributed to "being sensitive."To support his point, he summoned some of the heavy guns of America's wartime leadership: Presidents Abraham Lincoln and Franklin D. Roosevelt, Generals U.S. Grant, Dwight D. Eisenhower and Douglas MacArthur.It turns out that Cheney is dead wrong. It was their very sensitivity in conducting war that made Lincoln, Roosevelt, Grant and Eisenhower great wartime leaders. Let's start with Lincoln. In the Civil War's early going, the Lincoln administration restrained its armies from all-out war in the hope that conciliatory policies might induce the Confederate states to rejoin the Union, or might at least ensure that the four border slave states still in the Union (Kentucky, Delaware, Maryland and Missouri) would not secede also.Not only were orders issued for the protection of civilian property in the South, but Lincoln, always "sensitive" to the knowledge that effective war-making means much more than simply engaging the enemy, countermanded emancipation efforts by Union generals, despite his own hatred of slavery. Lincoln overruled Gen. John C. Fremont's declaration freeing the slaves of active enemy supporters in Missouri, a particularly telling move, given Fremont's stature as a former presidential candidate of Lincoln's party. Lincoln shrewdly waited to issue his Emancipation Proclamation until Union armies had substantially secured the four border states.Cheney could learn much from Lincoln's sensitivity, as he presses today's war on terrorism, especially among Muslim populations who regard the United States with hostility. Not only did Lincoln manage to keep four slave states in the Union, gaining control of invaluable industrial and agricultural resources within their borders, but approximately 300,000 slave-state residents, including many thousands from states in the Confederacy, actually fought for the Union army.Grant's record also reveals the baseless nature of Cheney's claim. When Robert E. Lee's Army of Northern Virginia surrendered to Grant near the end of the war, Grant allowed Lee and his men to return to their homes on parole with their horses and provided the Confederates with rations. Rather than unnecessarily humiliate his Confederate enemies, Grant "sensitively" allowed Lee and his fellow officers to keep their side arms, even though the Civil War was still being waged by Confederate forces in other locales.In World War II, the United States also fought more sensitively than Cheney suggests, despite the American record of relentless saturation bombing and resort to nuclear weapons, as well as the savage nature of much of the fighting in the Pacific against Japan. President Roosevelt talked about "total victory" in wartime pronouncements and demanded the "unconditional surrender" of Germany, Japan and Italy. Yet to end the fighting with Italy and obtain Italy's collaboration with the Allies, he abandoned his tough policy. Italy surrendered under an elaborate protocol from which the term "unconditional" had been intentionally removed.Cheney also misrepresents Gen. Eisenhower, one of the most sensitive and successful coalition commanders of all time. Cheney forgets that Ike diverted U.S. and British forces approaching the German capital of Berlin from the west in 1945 to avert the possibility of an accidental collision with allied Soviet forces moving in on Berlin from the east. He also forgets that to accommodate their British allies' strategic interests (as well as for logistical reasons), Eisenhower and other U.S. military leaders deferred from 1942 to 1944 their desired cross-channel invasion against Hitler. Successful coalition warfare requires restraint and compromise -- "sensitivity," in Cheney's terms.Many other chapters in our military history make the same point that successful commanders wage war by carefully weighing their options. For instance, Gen. Winfield Scott's American army was able to conquer the enemy capital, Mexico City, in 1847, effectually ending the U.S.-Mexican War, because Scott's campaign had been based on tactical finesse and restraint toward enemy civilians. Scott's army frequently bypassed enemy strongholds, thus isolating them, and marched under strict orders to protect civilian property, especially Catholic churches. As a result, Scott's vastly outnumbered forces of fewer than 7,000 effective troops never faced a mass uprising. Unlike U.S.commanders in Iraq today, Scott didn't offend the religious sensibilities of native peoples.Only Douglas MacArthur merits Cheney's praise as being "insensitive." But did this make him effective? MacArthur almost lost the Korean War by his insensitive decision to cross the 38th parallel into North Korea, despite strong signals from Chinese leaders that they would enter the war on North Korea's side if that happened. Chinese troops nearly drove U.S. forces off the entire Korean Peninsula before the situation stabilized.It's not surprising that the vice president should sample history for political advantage in a heated campaign. But his remarks suggest that his historical understanding is superficial. If Cheney's views reflect the Bush administration's perspective as a whole, they may go far to explain why the current administration has foundered so noticeably in Iraq, Afghanistan and other venues of its "war on terrorism."
Comments -
May deserves an I for not reading modern historians (#40990)by rick matlick on September 1, 2004 at 7:03 AM
Mr. May would do well to read Victor Davis Hanson (Soul of Battle) and Walter Russell Mead (Special Providence). The sensitivity he lauds actually cost millions of lives. It took the definitely insensitive Sherman and Patton to actually end the wars sooner. The shorter the war the less people die. Uncle Billy and Blood and Guts knew this and were ruthless in engaging the enemy while suffering less casualties than any other units.
-MacArthur could be Sensitive, too. (#40876)by Jonathan Dresner on August 30, 2004 at 1:41 PM
Actually, MacArthur's greatest moments were acts of great cultural sensitivity. First, he realized that Japanese battle tactics made 'island-hopping' more efficient than a more traditional 'clean-sweep' progress. Second, and more importantly, his handling of the Occupation of Japan was a marvelous mixture of radical insensitivity (the dramatic changes made to Japanese politics and law) leveraged with great cultural subtlety (using existing Japanese institutions and attitudes including the Emperor).So Cheney gets no credit at all.....

(http://www.tvnewslies.org/html/cheney_s_secrets.html) - Dick Cheney - The "Ground Zero of Corruption"in the Bush/PNAC administration.What was Dick Cheney doing on the morning of September 11th, 2001?Click here!
TVNL COMMENT, October, 2005: While the American news media finally discovered that Dick Cheney might not be the nicest person in the world, we would like to remind you that we have been warning people about this man since early 2003. Cheney and his PNAC warriors have taken control of US foreign policy, intelligence services and military so that they can proceed with their agenda. His fingerprints are all over the events of 9/11 and the motive for this was so nicely stated by his organization when they described how a "new Pearl Harbor" would the only way anyone would support such an agenda. BEFORE YOU DENY ANY OF THIS AND DEFEND THIS DEVIL INCARNATE, DO SOME RESEARCH!
Cheney’s Energy Meetings, Iraq Oil & 9/11 - A TVNL Reminder
OF SPECIAL NOTE: ‘Cheney cabal hijacked US foreign policy’ - Vice-President Dick Cheney and a handful of others had hijacked the government's foreign policy apparatus, deciding in secret to carry out policies that had left the US weaker and more isolated in the world, the top aide to former Secretary of State Colin Powell claimed on Wednesday. - In a scathing attack on the record of President George W. Bush, Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson, chief of staff to Mr Powell until last January, said: "What I saw was a cabal between the vice-president of the United States, Richard Cheney, and the secretary of defense, Donald Rumsfeld, on critical issues that made decisions that the bureaucracy did not know were being made. - "Now it is paying the consequences of making those decisions in secret, but far more telling to me is America is paying the consequences." - Mr Wilkerson said former president George H.W. Bush "one of the finest presidents we have ever had" understood how to make foreign policy work. In contrast, he said, his son was "not versed in international relations and not too much interested in them either".
Former Head Of Star Wars Program Says Cheney Main 911 Suspect - Dr. Robert M. Bowman, Lt. Col., USAF, ret., the former head of the Star Wars missile defense program under Presidents Ford and Carter has gone public to say that the official version of 9/11 is a conspiracy theory and his main suspect for the architect of the attack is Vice President Dick Cheney. - He said it is plausible that the entire chain of military command were unaware of what was taking place and were used as tools by the people pulling the strings behind the attack.
-----more on 9/11 significance
Some of these drill were scheduled for later in the year but Dick Cheney rescheduled them and made sure that they all took place on the same day. This was unprecedented.
The war games involved live fly exercises, and electronic drills where fake blips were placed on radar screens. Cheney was in charge of a communications system that superseded those of the FAA, NORAD and NEADS. Some of the drills possibly included remote control planes.
Dick Cheney is member of the Project for a New American Century. This is an organization of political ideologues (neocons) who wrote detailed plans than included invading Afghanistan, Iraq & the middle east. Their goal is ensure America is the only super power in the world. You can research their work for it is public information. Members of PNAC include Donald Rumsfeld and more than ten members of the Bush foreign & defense policy teams. In their documentation they openly state that the public and Congress would not accept their agenda and that the transition would be a slow one "absent a catalyzing and catastrophic event like a New Pearl Harbor!"
Cheney was in a position to have the air defense agencies stand down.
From from September 2000 to June 2001, 67 planes steered off course. All 67 times our air defense systems worked as they should, and interceptors were launched. You may remember this happening when Payne Stewart and his crew died in flight. On September 11th, 2001, when Dick Cheney was running his war games, 4 jet airliners were supposedly hijacked, and all our systems that have worked flawlessly 67 times that year, failed. Coincidence?
While these facts seem to incriminate Cheney, all you can do within reason is ask these questions:
Was Cheney in a position to have the defense systems stand down?
Did Cheney, a member of PNAC, a group who expressed the fact that their agenda would be better accepted if we had a "new Pearl Harbor", have a motive? Did he benefit from the events?
Could the events have been an accident? Could the drills have gone bad?
Why did the 9/11 Commission Report omit the information about the drills, making only 1 mention of them in a single footnote. The report only mentioned 1 drill, and falsely described it as a drill to defend against Russian Bombers. In the age of ICBMs, are we to believe that we have to practice defending the nation against Russian bombers in the north eastern portion of the US?
Why have the news media neglected to inform the public of Cheney’s actions that day?
Why did Bush and Cheney insist on being questioned by the commission together, without being taped, without taking an oath and with no records kept?
If you did not know this information, you have to ask yourself why it is not common knowledge? You also have to ask what else don’t you know?
In the years following the event, have you ever heard from the people who you were told committed these acts? Or, have you only been told why this happened by the people who want you to believe their story.
Use your common sense. Do you think the global intelligence powers failed this badly? Do you think men who could barely pilot a 2 seat plane can navigate across several states and find their target? Are you that gullible? Have some self respect, and think before you believe what you are told.

--rice
(http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=condoleeza+rice+knew+about+9%2F11) - Condoleezza Rice (born November 14, 1954) is the 66th United States Secretary of State, and the second in the administration of President George W. Bush to hold the office. She succeeded Colin Powell on January 26, 2005, after his resignation. Rice is the first African American woman, second African American (after Powell), and second woman (after Madeleine Albright) to serve as Secretary of State.
Condoleezza Rice was Bush's National Security Advisor during his first term (2001–2005). Before joining the Bush administration, she was a Professor of political science at Stanford University where she served as Provost from 1993 to 1999.
During the administration of George H. W. Bush, Rice also served as the Soviet and East European Affairs Advisor during the dissolution of the Soviet Union and German reunification.
Rice's role as advisor to the President and chief diplomat for the United States during a period of intense criticism of America's War on Terror has made her a controversial figure, although she currently has the highest public approval and favorability ratings of any administration official.[1]HYPERLINK \l "_note-1"[2]
In 2004 and 2005, she was ranked as the most powerful woman in the world by Forbes magazine and number two in 2006. She is also one of only two African Americans to have been repeatedly ranked among the world's 100 most influential people by Time magazine.

(http://whereisthemoney.org/hotseat/condoleezzarice.htm) - An Open Letter to Condoleezza RiceRe: 9-11 investigation and Commission testimony ... You knew. You kept silent. They died.
by Catherine Austin FittsFormer Assistant Secretary of Housing, Bush I
Hon. Condoleezza Rice National Security AdvisorThe White House1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NWWashington, DC 20500
April 9, 2004
Dear Ms. Rice:
I am writing to communicate four points regarding your testimony yesterday under oath before the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States.
Point #1: You are a liar.
Attorney General Ashcroft sits on the National Security Council. Warned by his FBI security detail, the head of law enforcement for the United States knew to avoid commercial airlines on September 11, 2001.
It was your job as National Security Advisor to make sure that the people who flew on American Airlines Flight 11, United Airlines Flight 175, United Airlines Flight 93 and American Airlines Flight 77 had the benefit of the same warnings as those they paid to protect us.
You knew. You kept silent. They died.
You had numerous warnings of the risks of 9-11 – sufficient to let the American people know and use their best judgment as to how to protect themselves from a possible attack. It was your job as National Security Advisor to make sure that the people in the South Tower of the World Trade Center had the knowledge they needed to evacuate their building upon seeing the North Tower hit by a plane.
You knew. You kept silent. They died.
Point #2: Your motives are transparent.
The World Trade Center is in the heart of New York City – one of the great financial capitals of the world. The Pentagon is in the heart of Washington -- the appropriation and accounting capital for the US federal budget and credit and the US Treasury – the largest issuer of securities in the world.
Unlike many other terrorist attacks, these attacks killed people whose family, friends and neighbors understand how these financial systems work. Victim families, friends and the residents of the communities directly harmed can calculate who made money on 9-11 profiteering. They can trace the flow of money into the 2004 Presidential campaign coffers from the profits your supporters made as a result of 9-11 profiteering. They can calculate how 9-11 profiteering connects to the financing and silence of corporate media.
Those personally impacted and the global researchers they network with have the intellectual power and personal courage to ask and answer, "Cui Bono?" (Who Benefits?) They understand that your success as National Security Advisor is as a direct result of your failure to stop 9-11. They can see how your lies about 9-11 made money for the investment syndicate that put you in power and for the buyers of US Treasury securities who are so richly paid to finance the US military, intelligence and enforcement apparatus and the defense contractors and oil interests it serves.
All the campaign ads in the world can not now convince the American people that you have their best interests at heart.
Point #3: You are going down.
The richest and most powerful people in the world pay for performance. They pay you to make the US governmental apparatus look legitimate while they use it to centralize economic and political power. That means they need liars who are better at lying than you.
The myth that you had no idea that Americans deserved to be warned about the risks of flying or planes being used as weapons is now in the dust heap with the notion that the United States attacked Iraq and our soldiers are dying to protect us from Iraqi weapons of mass destruction.
Your lies of 9-11 – like your lies about the Iraqi war – have been profitable for the military-banking complex you represent. These lies, however, have not misled the crowd. The American people and global citizens are looking for the truth. We demand the changes that will give meaning and honor to those who died on 9-11 and in the ensuing wars. We demand an end to further bloodshed. We demand a refund of all that you and your backers have stolen from those of us who remain alive.
Point #4: You are guilty of criminal gross negligence.
If you want to catch a terrorist today, you need look no further than your own mirror.
Many Americans gather this weekend to give thanks that Jesus died for our sins and gave us the covenant of grace. In the spirit of our Lord's crucifixion and resurrection, may God have mercy on your soul.
Sincerely Yours,
Catherine Austin FittsFormer Assistant Secretary of Housing, Bush IPresidentSolari, Inc.\

---2000 pnac report involvement - dick cheney, jeb bush, rumsfeld, paul wolfowitz, I. lewis libby, undersecretary of state, john bolton,
---pnac is a neoconservative thinktank founded in 1997. let me break it down. neo= new, conservative= one(group) who follows doctrines contrived from the relatively bullminded mentality that things should remain the way they are, i.e, america should remain the most powerful nation state on the planet, whites should remain the sole adherents of ultimate power, gas should remain the dominant fuel source on the planet, the draft should remain innoprative;, one being conserved, restrained, placid, but strong. i.e, the sleeping giant, that all americas should love, but now, a new doctrine emerged following the breakdown of the soviet union and the potential rise of china. neo-conservativism=maintain that american remains as it is, the most powerful, most loved, etc, BUT,.... by whatever means necessary. the very notion is completely redundant and backwards. its like saying, i'm a basketball player, since i'm lebron james, i'm the best, we're the best, i see the europeans getting WAAY too good, so, let me consolidate my base and think again. to be the best, NEO-basketball player, i'll change the rules and make sure no other basketball players can play in an arena like the one i play in. soo, i love basketballs ethical boundaries, hell, i'm already strong and built like a friggin oxe, but you know what, screw-it, lets legalize steroid like drugs ... who cares what ppl think, its for the good of the NBA. ok, now what? lets jeopardize other players and take over all their key skill points, so we flatten the tires of all the players around us, say that its the other euro teams that did it as a joke, or against us, of course, its absurd and they didn't do it, but the NBA said it, so lets go, we go and sabotage their entire league, score one. score two, game. its similar to that, of course, but much more sinister and deep rooted. in fact, its so deep rooted, its almost comical. i mean, to tell you the truth, sitting here now, knowing what i know, i'd think if i were you, 'what a friggin KOOK! becuase the things your saying is.... absolutely... its... its... I CAN'T EVEN THINK OF A WAY TO SAY IT'. i should slap myself. ... but i'm not... because this is true, and the gov't is already 'slapping' us with all the necessary lies and propoganda to get us to go along with their own plans. Plans that they probably developed whilst sipping tea or coffee, sharing plates full of caviar, talking about stock options, hedges, mutuals, bank loans and which politician made a fool of himself insinuating that lowering the interest rates would help his poor county. I ask, where do these white guys come up with the notion that they can completely decide the course of humanity for the foreseeable future. I mean, come on, they probably see themselves as doing this for the common good... right? its all misplaced ideas in the hands of the powerful and wealthy...right?... no.. sorry, but have you ever heard of a satanist? how about cabalist? ok.. you know this one, how about gangs? gang memberss, the ones who go around shooting up "foo's" who step in2 dey coh'nah, o' da muda fukkin block"... i know you can identify with that, ok, wouldnt you say the main characterisitincs of a gang is, undue violence against all the people of those who disrespect, steal from, hurt; both accidental and intended, or are simply not members of their territory? AND, well placed gang symbols and signs posted onto every visible corner of every single square inch of space you're likely to look towards....well .... before i get to deep into this, i'd like to say, I DIDNT COME UP WITH THIS STUFF! its said that the real world is often much stranger than science fiction, and this shit my friends, pushes that notion to extreme heights.
ok, here it is, you know that starbucks coffee cup? that dollar bill triangle? the aol symbol? all that? what if i told you its gang symbols? sent to identify to other possible members their association. if you 'fukk" wit dem, dey gonna buss a cap in yo ass"... and what type of caps? well, first they'll destroy your credibility, just try getting that job at that office you were so excited about when they put out letters to any and all those in power, who know those in power, who know those in places, who know people who own businesses, who control their board of directors who knows the boss thats friends with your boss, who tells you what the heck to do.... how do you plan on getting a job when they send a letter to him telling him the incident the two of you face.... that's his pal, his..homee. his... roll dog, who puts the same symbols up (satanic symbol of starbucks coffee), (notorious bill gates , he's smarter than you can imagine, and he graduated from harvard, i dont know about skull and bones, ill research, but he knows things and he's a BIIIG member of their gang) i won't get into his venture to help all those poor people, but i just hope you get the jist.
---most powerful family in world, rockefellers
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rockefellers) - Rockefeller family
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Rockefellers)
Jump to: navigation, search
The Rockefeller family, founded by John Davison Rockefeller (1839-1937) ("Senior") and his brother William Rockefeller (1841-1922), is an American industrial, banking, and philanthropic family of French-German-American origin that made the world's largest private fortune in the oil business during the late 19th century, primarily through the Standard Oil Company.[1] The family is also known for its long association with and financial interest in the Chase Manhattan Bank, now JP Morgan Chase.
Descendants of John Davison Rockefeller
To the sixth-generation, with 21 still living in the fourth (the Cousins). The total number of blood relative descendants as of 2006 is about 150.
Elizabeth "Bessie" Rockefeller Strong (1866–1906) (m.1889) Charles Augustus Strong (1862–1940)
Margaret Strong (1897–1985) (m.1st.1927) George de Cuevas (1885–1961); (m.2nd.1977) Raimundo de Larrain
Alice Rockefeller (1869–1870)
Alta Rockefeller Prentice (1871–1962) (m.1901) Ezra Parmelee Prentice (1863–1955)
John Rockefeller Prentice (1902–1972) (m.1941) Abra Cantrill (1912–1972)
Abra Prentice Wilkin (born 1942)
Mary Adeline Prentice Gilbert (1907–1981) (m.1937) Benjamin Davis Gilbert (1907–)
Spelman Prentice (1911) (m.3rd.1972) Mimi Walters
Pamela Prentice (1938)
Peter Spelman Prentice (1940)
Alexandra Sartell Prentice (1962)
Peter Parmalee Bens (1987)
Erik Carl Bens (1996)
Sarah Prentice Bens (1997)
Michael Andrew Prentice (1964)
Alta Rockefeller Prentice (1942)
Michael Sartell Prentice (1944)
Edith Rockefeller McCormick (1872–1937) (m.1895) Harold Fowler McCormick
John Rockefeller McCormick (1897–1901)
Editha McCormick (1903–1904)
Harold Fowler McCormick, Jr. (1898–1973) (m.1931) Anne "Fifi" Potter Stillman (1879–1969)
Muriel McCormick (1902–1959) (m.1931) Elisha Dyer Hubbard (1906–)
Mathilde McCormick (1905–1947) (m.1923) Max Oser (1877–1942)
Anita Oser Pauling
John Davison Rockefeller, Jr. (1874–1960) (m.1901) Abigail "Abby" Greene Aldrich
Abby Rockefeller Mauzé (1903–1976)
Abby Rockefeller Milton O'Neill (born 1928)
George Dorr O'Neill Jr. (1950)
Abby O'Neill (1953)
David Milton O'Neill (1955)
Catharine Mauze O'Neill (1958)
Wendy Harrison O'Neill (1962)
Peter Meriwether O'Neill (1962)
Marilyn Ellen Milton Simpson (1931–1980)
Laura Knickerbacker Simpson (1954)
Abby Rockefeller Simpson (1958)
Sandra Ferry Rockefeller (1935)
John D. Rockefeller 3rd (1906–1978) (m.1932) Blanchette Ferry Hooker
John Davison ("Jay") Rockefeller IV (1937)
John Davison ("Jamie") Rockefeller V (1969)
Laura Chandler Rockefeller (2000)
Sophia Percy Rockefeller (?)
Valerie Blanchette Rockefeller Wayne (1971)
Charles Percy Rockefeller (1973)
Justin Aldrich Rockefeller (1979)
Sandra Rockefeller Ferry (1943)
John Christian Rockefeller Ferry (1984)
Jamie Aldrich Rockefeller Ferry (1990)
Hope Aldrich Rockefeller (1946)
David Hooker Spencer (1961)
Benjamin Murray Spencer (1964)
Theodore Spencer (1966)
Alida Rockefeller Messinger (1949)
Eric John Dayton (1980)
Andrew Rockefeller Dayton (1983)
Eliza Davison Messinger (1990)
Nelson Aldrich Rockefeller (1908–1979) (m.1st.1930) Mary Todhunter Clark (m.2nd.1963) Margaretta Fitler Murphy
Rodman Rockefeller (1932–2000)
Meile Louise Rockefeller (1955)
Peter Clark Rockefeller (1957)
Stuart Alexander Rockefeller (1960)
Michael Sorum Rockefeller (1964)
Ann Clark Rockefeller Roberts (1934)
Clare Marie Pierson (1956)
Joseph Anthony Pierson (1957)
Mary Louise Pierson (1959)
Rachel Ann Pierson (1960)
Steven Clark Rockefeller (1936)
Steven Clark Rockefeller, Jr. (1960)
Steven C. Rockefeller III (?)
Christian Rockefeller (?)
Kayla Rockefeller (?)
Ingrid Rasmussen Rockefeller (1963)
Jennifer Rasmussen Rockefeller (1964)
Laura Selene Rockefeller (1981)
Michael Rockefeller (1938–1961)
Mary Clark Rockefeller (1938)
Geoffrey Strawbridge (1963)
Michael Strawbridge (1965)
Sabrina Strawbridge (1968)
Nelson Rockefeller, Jr. (1964)
Mark Fitler Rockefeller (1967)
Laurance Spelman Rockefeller (1910–2004) (m.1934) Mary French
Laura Spelman Rockefeller Chasin (1936)
Peter Rockefeller Case (1961)
Matthew Owen Case (1964)
Jessica Case (1967)
Marion French Rockefeller (1938)
Rachel French Weber (1967)
Elizabeth Parmly Weber (1970)
Dr. Lucy Rockefeller Waletzky (1941)
Jacob Peter Waletzky (1971-2001)
Naomi French Waletzky (1976)
Laurance Rockefeller, Jr. (1944) (m. 1982) Wendy Gordon
Wyatt Gordon Rockefeller (1985)
Ryan Rockefeller (1988)
Winthrop Rockefeller (1912–1973) (m.1st.1948) Barbara "Bobo" Sears (m.2nd.1956) Jeannette Edris
Winthrop Paul Rockefeller (1948–2006)
Andrea Davidson Rockefeller (1972)
Katherine Cluett Sage Rockefeller (1974)
Winthrop Paul Rockefeller Jr. (1976)
William Rockefeller
Colin Rockefeller
John Rockefeller
Louis Rockefeller
Grace Rockefeller
David Rockefeller (1915) (m.1940) Margaret McGrath
David Rockefeller, Jr. (1941)
Ariana Newell Rockefeller (1982)
Camilla Rockefeller (1985)
Abby Aldrich Rockefeller (1943)
Christopher Rockefeller Lindstrom (1980)
Neva Rockefeller Goodwin (1944)
David Walter Kaiser (1969)
Miranda Margaret Duncan (Kaiser) (1971)
Peggy Dulany (1947)
Michael Dulany Quattrone (1977)
Richard Gilder Rockefeller (1949)
Clayton Anderson Rockefeller (1978)
Rebecca Anderson Rockefeller (1980)
Eileen McGrath Rockefeller (1952)
Adam Rockefeller Growald (1985)
Daniel Growald (1987)
----germans that came to america after war
---hey, did you know bush and kerry were cousins?

(http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/03/04/politics/main604163.shtml) - Bush, Kerry & Hefner: Odd Cousins
CBS) By David Paul Kuhn, CBSNews.com Chief Political Writer

President George W. Bush and Sen. John Kerry are related. Well, sort of. They're ninth cousins, twice removed. So what's a little competition between family? The two presidential contenders also share a widely known common relative, Playboy founder Hugh Hefner, who is the ninth cousin of both men (the number nine is a coincidence). Twice removed from Mr. Bush, Hefner is a slightly closer relation to Kerry, only once removed. "Well I feel closer to Senator Kerry," Hefner chuckled, over the phone from the Playboy Mansion in Los Angeles. "You know I'm an 11th generation direct descendent of William Bradford, who came over on the Mayflower, a direct descendent of a puritan," Hefner continued proudly, finding no irony in the fact. "I suppose that it is not a big surprise but it is certainly unique to be a relation to both candidates." Previous research released last month found that Mr. Bush and his de facto Democratic challenger were 16th cousins. Now the two candidates expected to compete in one of the bitterest and certainly longest general elections in decades are nearly twice as close as first thought. Like brothers, more or less; well, more less than more. "You never know, they may be closer, this is only what has been connected so far," said Bruce Harrison, who heads a group called Millisecond Publishing which puts out a line of ancestral history CDs from Waimea, Hawaii. "I hope it means that people will be nicer to each other and you always hope for a nicer campaign."
(http://www.infowars.com/print/Secret_societies/vladtree.htm) - Evil Seed: Bush and Kerry are Related to Dracula (Vlad the Impaler)

--- oddly, also both cousins were part of skull and bones.

(http://www.infowars.com/print/Secret_societies/kerry_bush_sb.htm) - Tim Russert asks the President Sunday (2/08/2004) about Skull and Bones and the President confirms he is a member by saying he can't talk about. Part of the transcript below.
President Bush: Politics. I mean, this is—you know, if you close your eyes and listen carefully to what you just said, it sounds like the year 2000 all over again.
Russert: You were both in Skull and Bones, the secret society.
President Bush: It's so secret we can't talk about it.
Russert: What does that mean for America? The conspiracy theorists are going to go wild.
President Bush: I'm sure they are. I don't know. I haven't seen the (unintel) yet. (Laughs)
Russert: Number 322.
President Bush: First of all, he's not the nominee, and I look forward

---pat robertson
my own personal opinion is that he's a fake and an idiot, or, he's got really good sources and is completely immersed into the thought of relating his sources information to theology.
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pat_robertson#_note-63) - Books
Robertson's books have been both successful and controversial. The Secret Kingdom, Answers to 100 of Life's Most Probing Questions, and The New World Order were each in their respective year of publication the number one religious book in America. [citation needed]
Robertson's tome The New World Order was described as a 'catch all for conspiracy theories' by Christian academic Don Wilkey:
Pat Robertson’s work, NEW WORLD ORDER, is a catch all for conspiracy theories. It combines the paranoia of the Old Right with modern versions. A summary of Robertson’s book is found on page 177 in which Pat says a conspiracy has existed in the world working through Freemasonry and a secret Order of the Illuminati, a group combining Masons and Jewish Bankers.[6]
Ephraim Radner also accuses Robertson of espousing anti-semitic beliefs in the same book:
In his published writings, especially his 1991 book The New World Order, Pat Robertson has propagated theories about a worldwide Jewish conspiracy. Michael Land raised the issue in February in the New York Times Book Review, and in April Jacob Heilbrun, writing in the New York Review of Books, cited chapter and verse of Robertson's borrowings from well-known anti-Semitic works.[7]
Global warming
In 2006 Robertson became a global warming "convert." One source attributes this conversion to the 2006 North American heat wave.[8] On August 3, 2006, he said on his 700 Club show:
But I tell you stay in doors ladies and gentleman. Stay cool. Get fans or whatever. And the poor, they need emergency fans and ice to cool down — the number of people dead. I have not been one who believed in the global warming. But I tell you, they are making a convert out of me as these blistering summers. They have broken heat records in a number of cities already this year and broken all-time records and it is getting hotter and the ice caps are melting and there is a build up of carbon dioxide in the air. We really need to address the burning of fossil fuels. If we are contributing to the destruction of the planet we need to do [something] about it.
As recently as October of 2005, Robertson (then a disbeliever in global warming), accused the National Association of Evangelicals of teaming up with "far left environmentalists" in stating that global warming was caused by humans and needed to be mitigated.[3]
Now, however, Robertson's current position on global warming puts him at odds with President George Bush who pulled out of the international Kyoto Protocol in 2001, which sets limits on emissions to curb global warming.[4] Robertson is viewed by one million viewers and often sets the conservative political agenda on national issues[citation needed].
Hugo Chávez
On the August 22, 2005 broadcast of The 700 Club, Robertson said of Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez, "I don't know about this doctrine of assassination, but if he thinks we're trying to assassinate him, I think that we really ought to go ahead and do it. It's a whole lot cheaper than starting a war, and I don’t think any oil shipments will stop." Robertson also said that Chávez was "going to make Venezuela a launching pad for communist infiltration and Muslim extremism all over the continent" and called the elected leader an "out-of-control dictator... a dangerous enemy to our south, controlling a huge pool of oil that could hurt us very badly."[28]
Assassinations of heads of state have been against U.S. policy since an executive order against them was issued in 1976; in response, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said that "our department doesn't do that kind of thing." Bernardo Álvarez, Venezuela's ambassador to the U.S., demanded a stronger condemnation from the White House and that the United States "respect our country and its president."
On the August 24 edition of The 700 Club, Robertson asserted that he hadn't actually called for Chávez's assassination, but that there were other ways of "taking him out", such as having special forces carry out a kidnapping. Robertson explicitly denied having used the word "assassination", though the word "assassinate" was present in his initial statement.[29]HYPERLINK \l "_note-mediamattersassass"[28] Later that day, he issued a written statement in which he said, "Is it right to call for assassination? No, and I apologize for that statement. I spoke in frustration that we should accommodate the man who thinks the U.S. is out to kill him". However, he continued to justify his original stance on the potential threat Chávez posed to U.S. interests.[30]
On Sunday, August 28, 2005, Chávez called on the U.S. Justice Department to investigate the matter: "My government is going to take legal action in the United States," he said in a televised speech. "If the U.S. government does not take the necessary steps, we will denounce the U.S. government at the United Nations and the Organization of American States".[31]
On February 2, 2006 edition of Hannity and Colmes, Pat Robertson once again called for Chavez's assassination. When Colmes asked Robertson "Do you want him taken out?", Robertson replied "Not now, but one day, one day, one day."[32]
2007 terror attack prediction
On January 2, 2007, during the 700 Club show, Robertson said that God spoke to him and told him that "mass killings" were to come during 2007, due to a terrorist attack on the United States. He added "The Lord didn't say nuclear. But I do believe it will be something like that."[66]
- (http://www.geocities.com/capitolhill/7027/patrobertson.html) - "When I said during my presidential bid that I would only bring Christians and Jews into the government, I hit a firestorm. `What do you mean?' the media challenged me. `You're not going to bring atheists into the government? How dare you maintain that those who believe in the Judeo-Christian values are better qualified to govern America than Hindus and Muslims?' My simple answer is, `Yes, they are.'"
-from Pat Robertson's "The New World Order," page 218.
Pat's Mass-Murdering Friends
That's right, even Pat Robertson has friends. Three of them include the now-deceased dictator of Zaire Mobutu Sese Seko (also known as the Great Leopard), Jorge Serrano, former dictator of Guatemala, and Frederick Chiluba, the ruler of Zambia.
Mobutu was a sadistic, murderous, dictator who kept his country's people in poverty while he became one the richest men in the world. He could have cured all of his nation's ills with a personal check. Under his rule, Zaire was a country with very little personal freedom; public demonstrations were illegal, journalists were murdered by the state, and most religious groups were banned. The US State Department banned Mobutu from the country after he applied for a visa to come to Washington and improve his image.
Why would Pat support such a man? In a word, money. Zaire is a resource-rich country, and Pat saw an opportunity to partner with Mobutu to start a diamond mining operation. Pat started a company called the African Development Company, and began shipping diamond mining equipment to Zaire using the non-profit CBN's Operation Blessing aircraft. Check out the news page for more on this. Meanwhile, he also tried to get the State Department to lift the ban on Mobutu's visa. Many people tried to get Robertson to stop his support of Mobutu, but he refused. Instead, he became very friendly with Mobutu; at one point, he flew to Zaire on Mobutu's jet, took in a cruise on his yacht, and dined at the presidential mansion. Fortunately enough, the ADC was a failure, and Mobutu is now dead after being deposed by a rebellion.
Robertson's greed and fanaticism have led him to acquaint himself with a strange bunch. It is apparent that he will befriend anyone who can either make him some money or supports his theocratic goals. How Pat can on the one hand say that he doesn't want a theocracy, and then call a theocracy a model for the world is beyond me.

---free masons
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freemasonry) - Freemasonry is a fraternal organization whose membership is held together by shared moral and metaphysical ideals and—in most of its branches—by a constitutional declaration of belief in a Supreme Being.[1]
The fraternity uses the metaphor of operative stonemasons' tools and implements, against the allegorical backdrop of the building of the Temple of King Solomon, to convey what is most generally defined as "a system of morality veiled in allegory and illustrated by symbols."[2]
While it has often been called a "Secret Society", it is more correct to say that it is an esoteric society, in that certain aspects are private;[3] From many quarters, Freemasons have stated that Freemasonry has, in the 21st century, become less a secret society and more of a "society with secrets."[4]HYPERLINK \l "_note-2"[5]HYPERLINK \l "_note-YQA"[6] Most modern Freemasons regard the traditional concern over secrecy as a demonstration of their ability to keep a promise[7] and a concern over the privacy of their own affairs.[8] "Lodge meetings, like meetings of many other social and professional associations, are private occasions open only to members."[9]HYPERLINK \l "_note-5"[10] The private aspects of modern Freemasonry deal with the modes of recognition amongst members and elements within the ritual.[11]HYPERLINK \l "_note-YQA"[6]
While there have been many disclosures and exposés dating as far back as the eighteenth century, Freemasons caution that these often lack the proper context for true understanding, may be outdated for various reasons,[12] or could be outright hoaxes on the part of the author.[9] Freemasons are proud of their heritage and are happy to share it, offering spokesmen, briefings for the media, and providing talks to interested groups upon request.[9]
Political opposition
See also: Anti-Masonry and Freemasonry under totalitarian regimes
Freemasonry has long been a target associated with the New World Order and other "agents", such as the Illuminati, seen by conspiracy theorists as either bent on world domination or already secretly in control of world politics. Historically it has attracted criticism - and suppression - from both the politically extreme right (e.g. Nazi Germany)[54]HYPERLINK \l "_note-39"[55] and the extreme left (e.g. the former Communist states in Eastern Europe). The Fraternity has encountered both applause for "founding", and opposition for supposedly thwarting, liberal democracy (such as the United States of America).
In some countries anti-Masonry is often related to anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism. Professor Andrew Prescott, of the University of Sheffield, writes: "Since at least the time of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, anti-semitism has gone hand in hand with anti-masonry, so it is not surprising that allegations that 11 September was a Zionist plot have been accompanied by suggestions that the attacks were inspired by a masonic world order."[56]
In 1799 English Freemasonry almost came to a halt due to Parliamentary proclamation. In the wake of the French Revolution, the Unlawful Societies Act, 1799 banned any meetings of groups that required their members to take an oath or obligation.[57] The Grand Masters of both the Moderns and the Antients Grand Lodges called on the Prime Minister William Pitt, (who was not a Freemason) and explained to him that Freemasonry was a supporter of the law and lawfully constituted authority and was much involved in charitable work. As a result Freemasonry was specifically exempted from the terms of the Act, provided that each Private Lodge's Secretary placed with the local "Clerk of the Peace" a list of the members of his Lodge once a year.[57] This continued until 1967 when the obligation of the provision was rescinded by Parliament.[57] Regular Freemasonry inserted into its core ritual a formal obligation: to be quiet and peaceable citizens, true to the lawful government of the country in which they live, and not to countenance disloyalty or rebellion.[19] A Freemason makes a further obligation, before being made Master of his Lodge, to pay a proper respect to the civil magistrates.[19] The words may be varied across Grand Lodges, but the sense in the obligation taken is always there in regular Freemasonry.
Freemasonry in America faced political pressure following the disappearance of anti-Masonic agitator William Morgan in 1826. Reportage of the "Morgan Affair" helped fuel an Anti-Masonic movement, culminating in the formation of a short lived Anti-Masonic Party which fielded candidates for the Presidential elections of 1828 and 1832.
Even in modern democracies, Freemasonry is still sometimes accused of being a network where individuals engage in cronyism, using their Masonic connections for political influence and shady business dealings. This is officially and explicitly deplored in Freemasonry.[19] It is also charged that men become Freemasons through patronage or that they are offered incentives to join. This is not the case; no one lodge member may control membership in the lodge and in order to start the process of becoming a Freemason, an individual must ask to join the Fraternity "freely and without persuasion."[19]
In Italy, Freemasonry has become linked to a scandal concerning the Propaganda Due Lodge (aka P2). This Lodge was Chartered by the Grande Oriente d'Italia in 1877, as a Lodge for visiting Masons unable to attend their own lodges. Under Licio Gelli’s leadership, in the late 1970s, the P2 Lodge became involved in the financial scandals that nearly bankrupted the Vatican Bank. However, by this time the lodge was operating independently and irregularly; as the Grand Lodge d'Italia had revoked its charter in 1976.[58] By 1982 the scandal became public knowledge and Gelli was formally expelled from Freemasonry.
The UK Labour government, in the late 1990s and early 2000s, attempted to require all members of fraternal organisations who are public officials to make their affiliation public.[59]HYPERLINK \l "_note-42"[60] This was challenged under European human rights legislation, and the government in enacting the European Convention on Human Rights into UK law,[61] had to curtail the scope of their requirements.[62] Arrangements for the declaration of Freemasonry membership have been established for the current Lay Magistracy, Judiciary, and voluntary registration was introduced in 1999 for the Police Service.[63] Decisions on whether information should be released are the responsibility of the public authority receiving the request, on a case-by-case basis, acting in accordance with the principles of the Freedom of Information Act, 2000.[64]

---symbols-pentagrams, triangles -

(http://thebiggestsecretpict.online.fr/nwo.htm) - The Biggest Secret Forum
NWO photoalbumClick on a picture to enlarge it. Some picts can't be enlarged.
\aol, starbucks, lightning bult, power of lucifer in harry potter scar

---16 members of the current bush administration are members of pnac.
elliot abrams repre of mid east affairs
richard armitage - former deputy secretary of state - you may remember him frmo the valerie plame scandal
john r. bolton - u.s ambassador to the u.n - previously the undersecretary for arms control and interational security affairs
dick cheney - vice president of the u.s.
one of the founding members of pnac
seth cropsey - director of the international broadcasting bureau
paula dobriansky - undersecretary of state for global affairs
francis fukuyama - council member on the presidents council on bioethics
bruce jackson - president of the u.s. committee on nato
zalmay khalilzad - u.s. ambassador to iraq
I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby - chief of staff for the vice president - indicted by grand jury for obstruction of justice, false statements, and perjury - he resigned in 2005
peter w. rodman - assistant secretary of defense for international security
donald rumsfeld - secretary of defense - a founding member of pnac
randy scheunemann - member of the u.s. committe on nato, project on transitional democracies and international republican institute
paul wolfowitz, president of the world bank
www.cfr.org. neaer top of page, rt hand side, click on annual reports link. date back to 1999. 2006 on on center of page. scroll down to membership link. pdf file open. membership profile section will be available to you. click on washington program link, talks about cfr's influence it has on our nations leadership. biz execs make up 32 percent of membership. top gov't officials make up 11 percent.
---spp - security and prosperity partnership.
--no_northamericanunion.com
---these plans have been in the making for years.

---NOW... WHO? IS THE MOST POWERFUL MAN IN THE WORLD? REALLY? WHO IS THAT SUPREME PUPPETMASTER?
After careful digging, i've found a person that may indeed be the one who holds considerable, if not to us, seemingly infinite power of all instatnces of governance over the governing body which houses the american juggernaught.
so yes.... People of the world... I think i've found him....( revised- nope. he aint the guy)
David Addington -
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Addington) - David S. Addington (b. January 22, 1957, Washington, D.C.), chief of staff and former legal counsel to Vice President Dick Cheney. He was appointed to replace Lewis "Scooter" Libby as Cheney's chief of staff upon Libby's resignation on October 28, 2005.[1] He was described by U.S. News and World Report as "the most powerful man you've never heard of".[2]
Vice-President's office
After working for Vice President Cheney, Addington was very influential in many different areas of policy. He authored or helped to shape many of the most controversial policies of the Bush administration.[2] Addington's influence strongly reflects his hawkish views on U.S. foreign policy, a position he had apparently already committed to as a teenager during the late phase of the Vietnam War in the early 1970s.[4]
Addington has consistently advocated that under the Constitution, the president has unlimited powers as commander in chief during wartime. In October 2005, Addington was tapped to become the vice president's chief of staff, replacing I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, who had resigned after being indicted on charges of perjury and obstruction of justice. He is the legal force behind over 750 signing statements President Bush has added to bills passed by Congress. Addington was a legal advisor to President Reagan who advised that such signing statements be used to exempt President Reagan in the Iran-Contra scandal.
For instance, he helped to shape an August 2002 opinion from the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel that said torture might be justified in some cases.[5] He advocates scaling back the authority of lawyers in the uniformed services. He consistently advocates the expansion of presidential powers and Unitary Executive theory, nearly absolute deference to the Executive branch from Congress and the Judiciary.
Addington was mentioned by title in "Scooter" I. Lewis Libby Jr.'s indictment for five felony charges related to the Plame affair, regarding the leak of the identity of a CIA officer.[6]

(http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/060529/29addington.htm) - Cheney's Guy
He's barely known outside Washington's corridors of power, but David Addington is the most powerful man you've never heard of. Here's why:
By Chitra Ragavan
5/29/06
The "invisible hand." Much of the criticism that has been directed at these measures has focused on Vice President Dick Cheney. In fact, however, it is a largely anonymous government lawyer, who now serves as Cheney's chief of staff, who has served as the ramrod driving the Bush administration's most secretive and controversial counterterrorism measures through the bureaucracy. David Addington was a key advocate of the Brown v. Board and more than 750 other signing statements the administration has issued since taking office--a record that far outstrips that of any other president.
- The signing statements are just one tool that Addington and a small cadre of ultraconservative lawyers at the heart of the Bush administration are employing to prosecute the war on terrorism. Little known outside the West Wing and the inner sanctums of the CIA, the Pentagon, and the State Department, Addington is a genial colleague who also possesses an explosive temper that he does not hesitate to direct at those who oppose him. Addington, says an admiring former White House official, is "the most powerful person no one has never heard of."
Name one significant action taken by the Bush White House after 9/11, and chances are better than even that Addington had a role in it. So ubiquitous is he that one Justice Department lawyer calls Addington "Adam Smith's invisible hand" in national security matters. The White House assertion--later proved false--that Saddam Hussein tried to buy nuclear precursors from Niger to advance a banned weapons program? Addington helped vet that. The effort to discredit a former ambassador who publicly dismissed the Niger claim as baseless, by disclosing the name of his wife, a covert CIA officer? Addington was right in the middle of that, too, though he has not been accused of wrongdoing.
-In national security circles, Addington is viewed as such a force of nature that one former government lawyer nicknamed him "Keyser Soze," after the ruthless crime boss in the thriller The Usual Suspects. "He seems to have his hand in everything," says a former Justice Department official, "and he has these incredible powers, energy, reserves in an obsessive, zealot's kind of way." Addington declined repeated requests to be interviewed for this story.
Addington's admirers say he is being demonized unfairly. "This is a new war, an unconventional war," says an informal Cheney adviser, Mary Matalin. "When you are making new policy to meet new challenges, you are going to get vicious opposition."
Few would have predicted that Addington, 49, would become such a lightning rod. Tall, bearded, and imposing, Addington has the look, says former White House associate counsel Bradford Berenson, of "a rumpled bureaucrat crossed with a CIA spook." The son of a career military official, Addington was born and raised in the nation's capital and was in the eighth or ninth grade when he read Catherine Drinker Bowen's Miracle at Philadelphia: The Story of the Constitutional Convention, May to September 1787.

(http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/060529/29addington_5.htm) - Win or lose, those who know him say Addington simply outworks his adversaries. Even when lightning caused a fire that nearly destroyed his home, Addington missed just a day of work. His office piled high with paperwork, eschewing a secretary, Addington is impossible to reach by phone, but he E-mails colleagues at all hours of the day and night about urgent government business and, sometimes, his own arcane intellectual pursuits, like British high court decisions and Australian Supreme Court rulings. "It's clear," says a former White House official, "that he has a wellspring of information to back up that wellspring of opinion." Addington's capacity to absorb complex information is legendary. "My joke about David Addington is this is a guy who can throw the U.S. budget in the air," says Gribbin, "and before it hits the ground, mark it with up with his red pen."
A voracious consumer of information, Addington keeps tabs on judicial selections, U.S. attorney nominations, and political polls. He is, says his former colleague Nancy Dorn, "granular" and "microscopic," adding: "There was no issue too small, his eyes would catch it. It used to drive me crazy. But that's what you need."
Addington's position in Cheney's office--at "the sausage end of the sausage-making machine," as one former Justice official describes it--allows him to wield enormous influence because he is typically the second-to-last lawyer to vet documents be-fore they land on the president's desk. "David was exceptionally good," says Cunningham, the former deputy legal adviser to the National Security Council, "at keeping his powder dry until the last minute." Addington's bottom line, those who know him say, is ensuring that even if the administration loses on a policy issue, the principle of executive power is protected. "He was very disciplined about knowing and articulating the difference," says Cunningham, "between constitutional legal issues and policy issues."

[edit] War crimes prosecution
In November 2006, the German government received a complaint seeking the prosecution of Mr. Addington for alleged war crimes.[1]

--Quote from me, 1/30/07, Antonio Franklin, Isikii - " my main concern, thought is: what is america going to say once we defeat bush? its going to be similar to german citizens' dumb dogged looks after hitler was defeated. What did you do to stop this madman? what did you do to bring him to power and to support his military. of course you'll say, there was nothing i could do... and of course you'd be wrong. It's going to be sad watching your statements as you plead that you thought he was such a good guy, nothing seemed wrong on the surface of the table.. my plate... WELL JUST LOOK OUTSIDE THE BOWL! the world is on fire, and the pyromaniacs behind this global arson is the united states government!"

what else do we have to think about and say "OH THAT'S PREPOSTEROUS"...well fuck... i can't believe i've been sucked into this shit either.... fuck.... i hate life now.
--free energy -- check out on google.com video - Equinox - It Runs on Water (Free Energy - 1995) - and the many people in america that have been killed for creating it.

---nikola tesla--- more tech. the u.s. gov't has kept his tech hidden, if one were to get even a minute peice of his research could bring a weak, ailing nation to pure prosperity -- it just turns out that most scientists today aren't smart enough. (talk about the backwardness of high society science) zero point energy. ---google video--Tom Talks Tesla - Rare Interview With Tom Bearden On The Forgotten Work Of Tesla (one man thinks he's responsible for the tunguska explosion by the scalar wave force, i believe) he's right, vacuum is free energy, zero point is true energy source, i dont know abotu time being the energy source. (elipton, or elypton weapons, soviet weapon holdings, 3 other nations have it, check it out-- zirinofsky)
---radio technology, the great unifier, who do you think "invented" or found radio tech. NIKOLA. guess who they say did.. some loser. i mean, anyone who's anyone who's studied scientific theory and watches as technology progress as slowly as it does, its almost a QUADRILLION to 1 that multiple nations around the world will all of a sudden ALL develop this radical, military, society altering communication device. nikola, again, the greatest mind of all found it and because of its world changing effects, he gave it to multiple nations, in hopes to curve singular dominance, as he'd done prior. bvut again, this is all speculation, i could be wrong. but the evidence proves otherwise.

---stanley meyer - the creater of a new zero point energy source. he has a secret power source even better than what he shows. its amazing. ** secret** capture and torture him for info

---gary webb - killed, research him. dark alliance. etc..
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Webb) - Gary Webb (August 31, 1955 – December 10, 2004) was a Pulitzer Prize-winning American investigative journalist, best known for his 1996 "Dark Alliance" investigative report series, written for the San Jose Mercury News. In the three-part series (later published as a book), Webb investigated Nicaraguans linked to the CIA-backed Contras who had allegedly distributed crack cocaine into Los Angeles and funneled profits to the Contras. Webb also alleged that this influx of Nicaraguan supplied cocaine sparked and significantly fueled the widespread crack epidemic that swept through urban areas. Webb's reporting generated a large controversy and the Mercury News backed away from the story, effectively ending Webb's career as a mainstream media journalist.
-- DARK ALLIANCE -- In August of 1996 the San Jose Mercury News published Webb's "Dark Alliance", a 20,000 word, three-part investigative series which alleged that Nicaraguan drug traffickers had sold and distributed crack cocaine in Los Angeles during the 1980s, and that drug profits were used to fund the CIA-supported Nicaraguan Contras. Webb never asserted that the CIA directly aided drug dealers to raise money for the Contras, but he did document that the CIA was aware of the cocaine transactions and the large shipments of cocaine into the U.S. by the Contra personnel (Webb's 1999 book, Dark Alliance, substantiated these allegations with copious references).
"Dark Alliance" received national attention. At the height of the interest, the web version of it on San Jose Mercury News website received 1.3 million hits a day. According to the Columbia Journalism Review, the series became "the most talked-about piece of journalism in 1996 and arguably the most famous -- some would say infamous -- set of articles of the decade."[2]
Webb supported his story with documents obtained through the Freedom of Information Act, including a 450-page declassified version of an October 1998 report by CIA Inspector General Frederick Hitz. According to Webb and his supporters, the evidence demonstrates that White House officials, including Oliver North, knew about and supported using money from drug trafficking to fund the contras, and these officials neglected to pass any information along to the DEA. The 1988 report from the Senate Subcommittee on Narcotics, Terrorism and International Operations of the Committee on Foreign Relations led by Sen. John Kerry commented that there were "serious questions as to whether or not US officials involved in Central America failed to address the drug issue for fear of jeopardizing the war effort against Nicaragua." [1]
Almost immediately, denials began to emerge of the assertions Webb made in "Dark Alliance". Reports in the Washington Post (Oct 4, 1996), Los Angeles Times, and New York Times (Oct 21, 1996), tried to debunk the link between the Contras and the crack epidemic.
Post ombudsman Geneva Overholser agreed with critics that her paper's response to Webb's series showed "misdirected zeal" and "more passion for sniffing out the flaws in San Jose's answer than for sniffing out a better answer themselves."[3] Richard Thieme argued in an opinion piece that the major news outlets focused on attacking Webb or less relevant parts of the story, leaving Webb's thesis largely intact. [2]
Overholser concluded there was "[s]trong previous evidence that the CIA at least chose to overlook contra involvement in the drug trade.... Would that we had welcomed the surge of public interest as an occasion to return to a subject the Post and the public had given short shrift. Alas, dismissing someone else's story as old news comes more naturally." [3]
Robert Parry, who in 1985 became the first reporter to accuse the Contras of involvement in drug trafficking,[4] wrote that the Post's denunciation of Webb was ironic, because the paper "had long pooh-poohed earlier allegations that the Contras were implicated in drug shipments" but now "the newspaper was finally accepting the reality of Contra cocaine trafficking, albeit in a backhanded way." [4]
In response to these attacks, Webb created a web site that contained primary documents, transcripts, and audio interviews.
By January 1997, Webb's editors no longer contacted him about his stories. In March, Webb was informed that the paper was going to address the readers about his series.
On May 11, 1997, Mercury News executive editor Jerry Ceppos published an editorial describing the series as an "important work" and "solidly documented," but criticized the series for: a reliance on one interpretation of complicated, sometimes-conflicting pieces of evidence; failing to estimate the amount of money involved; for oversimplifying the crack epidemic; and for creating impressions that were open to misinterpretation through imprecise language and graphics. [5] Webb was reassigned to a suburban bureau 150 miles from his home. Because of the long commute, Webb quit the paper in December 1997. His marriage had by then fallen apart, and his career was destroyed.
On December 18, 1997, The Washington Post and The New York Times reported that CIA Inspector General Frederick Hitz's investigation found no links between the CIA and the cocaine traffickers.
Webb alleged that the 1997 backlash was a form of media manipulation. "The government side of the story is coming through the Los Angeles Times, the New York Times, the Washington Post," Webb stated. "They use the giant corporate press rather than saying anything directly. If you work through friendly reporters on major newspapers, it comes off as the New York Times saying it and not a mouthpiece of the CIA." [5]
James Aucoin, a communications professor who specializes in the history of investigative reporting, wrote: "In the case of Gary Webb's charges against the CIA and the Contras, the major dailies came after him. Media institutions are now part of the establishment and they have a lot invested in that establishment." [5]

[edit] Investigations
Facing increasing public scrutiny from the fallout after Webb's "Dark Alliance" series, the CIA conducted its own internal investigations. Investigative journalist Robert Parry credits Webb for being responsible for the following government investigations into the Reagan-Bush administration's conduct of the Contra war:
On December 10, 1996, Los Angeles County Sheriff Sherman Block announced the conclusion of his investigation into the issue, publishing a summary of the investigation at a press conference. He announced at the press conference that the inquiry had cleared the CIA of involvement in cocaine trafficking to Los Angeles: "We have found no evidence that the government was involved in drug trafficking in South-Central." Nevertheless, the report included information that supported some of the charges. Charles Rappleye reported in the L.A. Weekly that Block's "unequivocal statement is not backed up by the report itself, which raises many questions." [6] Much of the LASD investigation centered on allegations made in a postscript article to the newspaper's "Dark Alliance" series.

----so now, bill gates doesn't have to pay taxes, that gates associatino crap, preposterous. you think a WHITE man who fought that hard to get the wealth he got is just going to sit down and give it away? TO AFRICANS! hell, most people think africans and blacks have about 20 years left if any before their extinct. they're not giving them anything!

--area 51, I must say that my favorite scientist is nikola tesla. i believe he had the most powerful mind any human has ever had. He literally created earthquakes simply with his mind! look it up. he developed a special wave generation device that forced objects to move by focusing electro-magnetic beams, causing a small level earthquake that he received quite a tongue lashing about. Anyway, he developed a whole slew of technology that is still top secret that only the gov't has in use. one of which is the famed "death ray". I believe that this is the weapon that the u.s . gov't is now using to target alien races unfortunate enough to be caught by its ray. they destroyed te crafts, many of which have videos on the google video. i believe that they hold the surviving aliens captive.
in addition, einstein is nowhere near my favorite. he's not even that spectacular, i mean.. go ahead, do your research. what information did he come up with that was really relavent to mankind or that hasn't been reputed yet? i bet you won't find any. he has only acheived the fame that he holds because he is jewish and they have quite the stranglehold on the media. note, i have no problem with jewish people,. i've only recently begun to understand their true power in the world. (re-iterate that)-- heck, i went to a meeting once that was supposed to be anti-war, pro freedom, blah blah lbah. and during the meeting, crazy old fat white guy stood up and was like, "YEAH! AND WHAT ABOUT ISREAL! WE SHOULD WIPE EM OFF THE FACE O' DA OYF(earth)"... i was appalled, this is about bringing troops home and saving those helpless iraqi's from crazy white boys. hell, i KNOW white ppl, i've lived with em my WHOLE LIFE! lol. i even have white family members, they're crazy as hell, look at eminem and dick cheney, always killin stuff,... or talkin about killin stuff... but back to the story. i stood up and looked him in the eye and asked... ok ..... that's just stupid.. even if they WERE ...guilty of committing ANY crimes.. (which i had yet to investigate or really, to care of-every race is guilty of murder, theft, crime--we should strive for continual peace), how would you either wipe them out, or put them into a new place on earth? either way is impossible. there are now 5 million or more people living in the state of isreal, and the logistical task of moving them costs WAY more than any of you could imagine. AND, i suggest you go ahead and TRY wiping them out... they have the 3 most powerful army on planet earth! STUPID!" of course i didnt add stupid. but i did shake his hand after we had ended the meeting and we talked and all that. point is.. i support everyone and try to look at things from a purely rational point of view. i only state things radically after completely determining it. research, etc. but i've come to learn other things, )

--- Light speed - i've always knownn we could go faster than light. this man has his own theory as to why that is true, and although i can't speculate as to whether it is or is not true, it made sense... only when it make sense easily is it real. if you ask me. otherwise its retarded.-Evidence: The Case For NASA UFO's - Part 1 , Evidence: The Case For NASA UFO's - Part 2 by david sereda. very smart man, i admire him, have got to send him a formal letter of thanks for opening up my mind and providing evidence about acheiving faster than light travel and the amphibious alien connection. (participants and help toward the making of that program - dr. earl van landingham, dr. joseph nuth III, dr. louis a. frank, dr. edgar mitchell, dr. james oberg) also (mr. dan akroyd (actor), mr. john lyons, ms. shawn mussell, mr. david ballard, mr. steve okurland)

-- hutchison effect - the secret to levitation, low energy, to zero energy earth based propulstion. new transport craft!
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hutchison_Effect) - The Hutchison effect is a name given to a collection of alleged natural phenomena that John Hutchison claims to have discovered in 1979.
Hutchison claims that while trying to duplicate experiments done by Nikola Tesla, he discovered a number of strange phenomena, including:
levitation of heavy objects
fusion of dissimilar materials such as metal and wood
the anomalous heating of metals without burning adjacent material
the spontaneous fracturing of metals
changes in the crystalline structure and physical properties of metals.
disappearing metal samples
All these phenomena are jointly grouped under the name Hutchison Effect (HE). Supporters like Mark Solis, his former webmaster, maintain that none can be the result of known physical phenomena, such as electromagnetism.[1]
Hutchison and his supporters surmise that these phenomena arise from zero-point energy or the Casimir effect.

[edit] Scientific opinion
There is no acceptance of Hutchison's claims among mainstream scientists, nor even those who study non-mainstream physics. In a posting to the newsgroup sci.physics.research, Marc Millis, who formerly ran the now defunct Breakthrough Propulsion Physics Program for NASA, wrote:
This "Hutchison Effect" has been claimed for years, without any independent verification - ever. In fact, its originator can't even replicated [sic] it on demand. This has been investigated more than once, been part of documentaries on the discovery channel, but still never seems to pass critical muster. This is in the category of folklore. In general, the "American Antigravity" web site caters to such folklore and its enthusiasts.
– Marc G. Millis[2]

--interdimensional travel
() -
interdimensional travel involves the movement of an object from one dimension to another. usually, in our experience, this isn't as difficult as you'd presume, and mostly is a frame of thought.my thinking is that the travel to other higher dimensions for a lower dimension requires high amounts of energy dissipation, which evidences itself as either gaps and holes in energy signatures - black holes, air pockets. , or vast repositories of energy into a space where it should be. major heat, explosion, etc. as you can tell, i really don't know. that's a realm of physics i am not equipped to answer.
Let's look at dimensions
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimension) - In common usage, a dimension (Latin, "measured out") is a parameter or measurement required to define the characteristics of an object—i.e. length, width, and height or size and shape. In mathematics, dimensions are the parameters required to describe the position and relevant characteristics of any object within a conceptual space —where the dimensions of a space are the total number of different parameters used for all possible objects considered in the model. Generalizations of this concept are possible and different fields of study will define their spaces by their own relevant dimensions, and use these spaces as frameworks upon which all other study (in that area) is based. In specialized contexts, units of measurement may sometimes be "dimensions"—meters or feet in geographical space models, or cost and price in models of a local economy.
For example, locating a point on a plane (e.g. a city on a map of the Earth) requires two parameters — latitude and longitude. The corresponding space has therefore two dimensions, its dimension is two, and this space is said to be 2-dimensional (2D). Locating the exact position of an aircraft in flight (relative to the Earth) requires another dimension (altitude), hence the position of the aircraft can be rendered in a three-dimensional space (3D).
If time is added as a 3rd or 4th dimension (to a 2D or 3D space, respectively), then the aircraft's estimated "speed" may be calculated from a comparison between the times associated with any two positions. For common uses, simply using "speed" (as a dimension) is a useful way of condensing (or translating) the more abstract time dimension, even if "speed" is not a dimension, but rather a calculation based on two dimensions. Adding the three Euler angles, for a total 6 dimensions, allows the current degrees of freedom —orientation and trajectory —of the aircraft to be known.
Theoretical physics often experiments with dimensions - adding more, or changing their properties - in order to describe unusual conceptual models of space, in order to help better describe concept of quantum mechanics —ie. the 'physics beneath the visible physical world.' This concept has been borrowed in science fiction as a metaphorical device, where an "alternate dimension" (ie. 'alternate universe' or 'plane of existence') describes Extraterrestrial places, species, and cultures which function in various different and unusual ways from human culture.
The physical dimensions are the parameters required to answer the question where and when some event happened or will happen; for instance: When did Napoleon die? — On the 5 May 1821 at Saint Helena (15°56′ S 5°42′ W). They play a fundamental role in our perception of the world around us. According to Immanuel Kant, we actually do not perceive them but they form the frame in which we perceive events; they form the a priori background in which events are perceived.

Additional dimensions
Theories such as string theory and m theory predict that the space we live in has in fact 10 or 11 dimensions, respectively, but that the universe measured along these additional dimensions is subatomic in size. As a result, we perceive only the three spatial dimensions that have macroscopic size.

--- the nummos,
talked about by the dogon, a fishlike alien race, perhaps the presence or reason for the massive amount of water bodies striking the earth, perhaps healing the ozone. hmm... water creatures. somethin glike stargates(HEY WAIT! USO! unidentified submerged objects! lol.l holy shit! i can't bleieve all this. how many alien races actually are HERE on earth? how weird. jesus walked over water,. mastery of water. the sirius mystery. and what about noah, the forewarning of the comet or water bombardment supposed to come to earth? what about the parting of the red sea . mastery of water. wow.
- (http://www.themasterofspeech.com/nummo.html) - The Nummo(Also Pronounced Nommo)In The Master Of Speech, Shannon Dorey describes the appearance of the alien Nummo who were thought to have originally come from the Sirius star system. The descriptions presented in the book were based on information presented by the Dogon elder, Ogotemmêli. After they left Earth, Dorey believes the Nummo went to the Pleiades and it was from there that they returned a second time to Earth. Both star systems play a significant role in the mythology. Ogotemmêli described the Nummo as being amphibious and self fertilizing. They were green, serpent, lizard and fish like beings who were more comfortable in water than on land. They had red eyes and sharp pointed teeth. They were also described as being like chameleons, with some having casques and other horns. Dorey believed that these unusual descriptions were one of the most significant aspects of this mythology. She felt that if the Nummo had been created from the imagination, these beings would have been more human like in appearance. It was the fact the Nummo were described as being so different physically from humans that reinforced their authenticity. Dorey thinks this was the main reason why the existence of these beings has been historically denied. The Nummo's physical characteristics were what humans would normally associate with an inferior species. The fact Ogotemmêli talked about these snake, lizard and fish like Nummo as being more superior to humans must have seemed unthinkable in 1946. It is probable however that any alien being that visited Earth would be very different from animals that have evolved on this planet. According to scientists like Carl Sagan, alien creatures would probably not look anything like us because creatures generally evolve in relation to their own planet's environment. Sagan wrote in Cosmos that the possibility of finding intelligent life on another planet was probable but that the possibility of finding aliens who were like us was not. In the mythology the androgynous Nummo were identified as being female because their androgynous appearance tended to appear more feminine than masculine. They were identified with the goddess in world mythology and were symbolized by the sun. Because they were also self fertilizing, they were identified as being virgin goddesses. The virgin goddess was a notable theme in Greek mythology and the virgin birth can be attributed to both the self-fertilizing Nummo and their ability to perform biological engineering. They were identified with Athena in Greek mythology and Neith and Isis in Egyptian mythology. In the Mayan and Aztec cultures they were identified with the sacred serpent. It was from descriptions given by Ogotemmêli that the true physical and spiritual makeup of these beings came alive. In the book, Dorey shows pictures of ancient Ubaid artifacts that depicted the Nummo as they were described by Ogotemmêli. These statues date from 4500 BCE. and were uncovered in southern Iraq from the ancient village of Ur. Follow the link if you would like to purchase, The Master Of Speech. If you would like to contact the author, email sd@themasterofspeech.com or go here if you would like to read a sample chapter.

Genetic EngineeringIn The Master Of Speech, Shannon Dorey reveals that alien beings called Nummo created humans through genetic engineering. Dorey's information is based on a detailed analysis of the Dogon religion that was recorded by Marcel Griaule in 1946 in Conversations With Ogotemmêli. Dorey believes that because the Dogon religion was first presented in 1946, it is not surprising that Griaule and other anthropologists of the time missed the symbolism in the mythology related to DNA. Scientists didn't even start to think about DNA until the early 1950s when British scientists like Rosalind Franklin began to do research into this area. Franklin produced the first photo of DNA that became the basis for the eventual discovery of DNA by James Watson and Francis Crick in 1953.The first introduction of DNA in the Dogon religion was with the mention of the fibrous skirt. In the religion DNA was identified with a fibrous skirt because of the visual representation of DNA as being like the fibres of a skirt. The fibres were the "essence of the Nummo". They represented the DNA of the Nummo. Ogotemmêli made reference to the fact the Nummo made "two strands" from the fibres of "plants already created in the heavenly region". The Earth was "naked and speechless" and the Nummo wanted to put an end to this disorder. They made one strand for the front and one for the back. Ogotemmêli explained the purpose of the skirt, however, wasn't just for modesty but for the ordering of the universe. He made reference to the "helicoids sign" and "the fibres" that "fell in coils". Dorey shows this actual DNA strand to show that its visual representation is like the description by Ogotemmêli of the two strands falling in coils.
This picture shows the hydrogen bonds visually looking like broken lines between the double-stranded helix. Ogotemmêli described the hydrogen bonds as a "helicoids sign in the form of an undulating broken line". The Nummo changed the Earth animals who were "naked and speechless" by using the "fibres" or the DNA from the Nummo's world. The lack of intelligence on the Earth was identified as "disorder" that the Nummo wanted to end. By combining their DNA with the Earth animals they ordered the universe. Ogotemmêli made reference to the fact that masked men still wore these "tendrils" hanging down to their feet. These "tendrils" or "fibres" were an important aspect of the mythology. Dorey believes the fibrous skirt is used to represent DNA because of its dual meaning. Once the Earth animals were genetically engineered to become intelligent they were no longer naked and uncivilized like animals. Instead they become civilized and wore a fibrous skirt. In other words through the Nummo's DNA the animals became intelligent. Ogotemmêli referred to the Earth as being "naked and speechless" which is how animals are defined. So by connecting with the Nummo, the animals became clothed and they learned to speak. Dorey explains that the first important symbol found in Ogotemmêli's conversation with Griaule is the symbol of the "word" itself. The "word" was used as a metaphor for the DNA of the biologically engineered humans. This was because speech was synonymous with intelligence and the only way the Earth animals were able to speak was when their DNA was combined with the Nummo's DNA. The "word" was a key symbol and was used throughout to describe the three different versions of the biologically engineered humans. Dorey relates the Dogon use of the "word" as a symbol of DNA to the passage found in the biblical book of John. It is written, "In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was with God in the beginning. John 1:1 ... The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us." John 1:14 In this passage from the book of John it says the "word became flesh and made his dwelling among us." In Dogon mythology the "word" was symbolic of DNA. In this passage the "word" or the DNA became flesh. In Dogon mythology it was the DNA of "the Master of Speech" that was supposed to provide hope for humanity and correct the mistakes made from the first experiment.The Dogon religion is analyzed in detail in The Master Of Speech. If you would like to purchase this book Click Here. If you would like to contact the author, email sd@themasterofspeech.com or if you would like to read a sample chapter Click Here.
World MythologyIn The Master of Speech, Shannon Dorey reveals that the Dogon religion is the base religion from which all other world mythologies including Christianity have emanated. Dorey believes Dogon mythology is the oldest mythology in existence in the world today and may even predate the world flood. According to the Dogon, the alien Nummo, who were thought to have come from either the Sirius star system or the Pleiades, combined their DNA with the animals of Earth to create humans. The Nummo were identified as being self-fertilizing and amphibious. They were also green, fish, serpent, and lizard like beings. In the mythology the androgynous Nummo were identified as being female because their androgynous appearance tended to appear more feminine than masculine. They were identified with the goddess in world mythology and were symbolized by the sun. Because they were also self fertilizing, they were identified as virgin goddesses. The virgin goddess was a notable theme in Greek mythology and the virgin birth can be attributed to both the self-fertilizing Nummo and their ability to perform biological engineering. The Nummo were identified with Athena in Greek mythology and Neith and Isis in Egyptian mythology. The androgynous Nummo were also said to have been immortal. According to Dorey, immortality for the Nummo was what is known today as reincarnation. When they died and were reborn they had knowledge of a previous existence. Death for them was described by the Dogon teacher, Ogotemmêli, as being like a snake who sheds its skin. Dorey talked about how androgyny represented wholeness in world myths. It was indicative of the Ying and Yang, the two opposing forces in the universe united together. Dogon mythology discusses the differences between the self fertilizing androgynous Nummo and the single-sexed humans. The mythology tells of the failed biological experiment that caused the birth of the male jackal. He was born single sexed instead of androgynous and was severed from the spiritual essence of the Nummo. As is discussed in The Master Of Speech, the Dogon religion connects human spirituality with the Earth itself. It talks about an evolutionary debt that has to be paid to the Earth because humans were artificially created instead of having evolved naturally. Once this debt is paid, humans will regain their immortality and their lost connection with all plants and animals on the Earth. Dorey believes that the most significant message that is represented in this mythology is the fact that our biological essence, meaning our DNA, is connected to our spiritual essence, which is connected to the Earth itself. The Nummo made a terrible mistake in the biological engineering of humans. The experiment failed and ended up dooming humans to an existence of mortality. Dorey shows how the spiritual Nummo were identified with the serpent in the Bible, who advised Eve to eat the apple from the tree of knowledge. Once Eve ate the apple she became knowledgeable but lost her immortality. The symbol of the fish has always been identified with Christianity. In Dogon mythology it was the DNA of the Master of Speech that was supposed to provide hope for humanity. This hermaphroditic being was half fish and half human. This figure was eventually turned into a male and identified with Jesus Christ by later male dominated societies. In the bible Jesus was seen walking on water and on the Pope's ring is a hall of fishes. In the mythology, the androgynous Master of Speech was sacrificed so that humans would eventually evolve into immortal beings. The problems that developed as a result of these spiritual beings interfering with the Earth's natural evolution were catastrophic. The failed crossbreeding experiment and the cataclysm that resulted are found in the history of people from North America to India. These different stories and myths are talked about in The Master Of Speech. One aspect that determined the age of this mythology was its symbolism. According to Dorey, the fact the Nummo or goddess was identified with the sun, and the male jackal was symbolic of the moon was significant. In Occidental Mythology, Joseph Campbell talked about the reversal of these symbols which became suppressed by the intrusive patriarchal warrior tribesmen whose traditions came down to us in the Old Testament and New Testaments and in the myths of Greece. Campbell called it solarization where the male became associated with the sun and the female with the moon. This would suggest that Dogon religion is older than Judaism, Christianity, and the Greek mythologies.This mythology is analyzed in detail by Shannon Dorey in The Master Of Speech. Follow the link if you would like to purchase, The Master Of Speech. If you would like to contact the author, email sd@themasterofspeech.com or go here if you would like to read a sample chapter.

----could it be that the gov't is feeding us shows like stargate, battlestar, star trek, independence day? etc??
unlikely., conpiracy theories are usually based on the corroboration or collaboration of ideals that have been concentrated into a source for distribution. I.E, a director meets a few guys who know about gov't secret, they talk a bit about it, the director is intrigued, he does a little more research on it, and he decides to compose it into a film.
------

-------(more on jews) (maybe i should say how much i like jews, so i don't get pinched. turns out they're more powerful than i'd originally guessed-- if you don't believe me on how powerful these people are. just look at what our PRESIDENT said to them... the oh, so adorable clinton(not), said in a speech in isreal, regarding the current upheavel or ..something, il dont remember that "if their is any conflict that involves isreal, we'll be a definite support. i'd personally get a gun, hop into the ditches, and start shooting, in the cause for the jewish state."...... THE PRESIDENT! ... SAID THAT SHIT!..... loool. i wish he felt so powerfully abuot blacks! too bad we have the lowest iq and can't become more proficient in accounting and banking---------anyways, I've just read some really condemning evidence that maybe distorts other info i have. at present i've reveiewed the victor ostrovsky book "by way of deception: we shall make war"... a very bone chilling expose on the secret jewish spy agencies work. what's really crazy is the info posted about the media STRANGLEHOLD he recognizes they have on north american media. Mr. Ostrovsky is actually a former mossad agent, very smart gentleman, one of the youngest louitenants in the isreali armed forces to be promoted and an expert on arms. He tells that becuase of his own beliefs and defense of justice and the "right things to do", he refused once, joining but evenutally did. After his three years of training and subsequent missions he partook in, he painted a grim portrait of exactlyt he type of power they had and have. my questions are ----- he reports that the mossad had to do with not only the libyan/u.s. breakdown in relations, but the iraqi dictatorship being weakened through their cannon fodder/cloak and dagger deceit of the americans. now... that sort of distorts my thinking. what alex jones proposes through his research is that the illuminati or other org's had been developing plans for a nwo for years now and were simply waiting for things to fall into place, or to find a hole to attack their initial targets (afghanistan, all the stans really, iraq, iran, the oil peninsula) BUT... ostrovsky states that the mossad, these...very wicked chess-players made the actual plans to use their hold on the media and their "bought memmbers of congress" to profess how evil iraq was.. who was it? ..... or.. maybe, even though the jewish are extremely clever and have a powerful hand in the military, the americans simply used that extra 'push" by the mossad as cannon fodder..hmm... i can't say. this sort of throws everything out of wack, EVEN THOUGH, most of what i said can be researched and you can simply get the confusing facts for yourself. either way, i always look for the end result. and the end picture isn't rosy.

----guys in the know,
william cooper --
(http://www.thewatcherfiles.com/william_cooper.htm) - WILLIAM COOPER
One of the first to begin exposing the Government for what it truly is, William Cooper was killed by authorities on 11/5/2001.~ Author of "Behold a Pale Horse"
THE SECRET GOVERNMENT The Origin, Identity, and Purpose of MJ-12 by William Cooper During the years following WW II the Government of the United States was confronted with a series of events which were to change beyond prediction its future and with it the future of humanity. More...
OPERATION MAJORITY by William Cooper This file contain the absolute true information regarding the alien presence on earth and the US Governments involvement with the aliens. More...
TRUTH ABOUT A.I.D.S.
by William Cooper
I have already revealed that I saw that AIDS was man made to eleminate
the undesirable elements of society while I was attached to Naval
Security and Intelligence.
More...
A COVENANT OF DEATH
by William Cooper
"We have been taught lies.
Reality is not at all what we perceive it to be. We cannot survive any
longer by hanging onto the falsehoods of the past."
The Government Signs Treaties with the Aliens..
More...
"...History is replete with whispers of secret societies...
The oldest is the Brotherhood of the Snake, also called the Brotherhood
of the Dragon, and it still exists under many different names. The
Brotherhood of the Snake is devoted to guarding the 'secrets of the
ages' and the recognition of Lucifer as the one and only true God...
It's secret symbol is the all-seeing eye in the pyramid."

"...the heart of the Bilderberg Group consists of 39 total members of
the Illuminati. The three committees are made up exclusively of members
of all different secret groups that make up the Illuminati, the
FREEMASONS, the VATICAN, and the BLACK NOBILITY. This committee works
year round in offices in Switzerland.

"Cooper states that he has traced the history of the nefarious
Illuminati all the way back to the Ancient Temple of Wisdom in Cairo,
long before the birth of Christ. 'The Illuminati exist today under many
different names and many different occupations.' Cooper told us. 'They
practice Hegalian conflict/resolution. They appear to oppose each other
at the bottom ranks, but at the highest levels they are actually
organizing and controlling the conflict which they have created to
produce the solution that they seek.

"'The Illuminati are extremely powerful, very wealthy men. They believe
that they are the guardians of the secrets of the ages. They believe
that the vast majority of people would not know what to do with the
real knowledge and the real truth and the real science -- and would, in
fact, misuse them all. They further believe that everything that they
do is for the ultimate betterment and survival of humankind -- even if
it means killing two billion people to reach their goal...'"
-William Cooper
page information gleaned from http://www.mentalstimulation.com/pupp/sitemap.htm
google video ufo's and underground bases - i hate the website and the crappy alien pic, but he has great information.

---tyrone powers -
() -
admits to obstruction of justice powers

---John Lear (b. 1942) is an accomplished former pilot and well-known UFOlogist. He is the son of aviation pioneer and inventor Bill Lear.
(http://www.ufomind.com/area51/people/lear/) - Contact
Works by Lear
Aliens at Area 51. Lear's famous 1987 posting claiming aliens were at a vast underground installation at Groom Lake and that they were eating humans. This claim was made before he met Bob Lazar. (43K)
Original Statement. Dec. 29, 1987
Revised Statement. Aug. 25, 1988
Update by Lear. May 14, 1990
Rebuttal by Craig McCann, Jan. 31, 1988
The O.H. Krill Papers are said to be the fiction work of John Lear and John Grace. Confirmation needed.
Lear Letter about Greys describing his theory in Dec. 1987.
Articles about Lear
UFO's, Aliens and "Ex"-intelligence Agents: Who's Fooling Whom. Conspiracy buff Lars Hansson "exposes" Lear, Bill Cooper and the JFK assassination in a lengthy document. [Part 1 (149k) Part 2 (202k)]
In newsgroup posting Lear calls affidavit "50% B.S." [source]
From UFO Cover-up and Theories Page...
Mentioned in Cosmic Grand Deception.
Mentioned in The Government and the Greys
Mentioned in And There was War in Heaven
Relationships
Opponents and Critics
Bill Cooper. Although once allies, they had a falling out. Unconfirmed anecnote: Lear says that he invented the "O.H. Krill" papers as a joke, but was disturbed when Cooper started citing them as truth.
Lars Hansson. Lived in Lear's house for a short time, then wrote conspiracy treatise against him (above).
Associates and Allies
Bob Lazar. Knew Lazar before Lazar's alleged employment at "Area S-4." Accompanied Lazar is early saucer-watching expedition. Lazar says: "Well, John Lear's a nice guy. I like him, but he does have the tendency to add about fifteen percent color to stories, and if a story goes through him twice, it's thirty percent, and it doesn't stop."
Positions
"My father disinherited me because I was critical of the design of the LearFan. I felt there were a number of major design flaws and I told him so. He died in 1978 and the LearFan Corporation filed bankruptcy in 1984 with debts totaling 492 million dollars." [source]
Reviews
Gene Huff: "John has no level of skepticism, no problem solving capability, and no memory. He commands respect because he's a pilot and he's Bill Lear's son." [source] -- For Lear evaluations of Huff, see Gene Huff page.
Events & Exchanges
Gene Huff calls Lear many nasty names on alt.conspiracy.area51, Jan/Feb 1996. [source]
Photos
Lear as a younger airline pilot. From video UFO: Secrets of the Black World.
Lear reading Playboy. Posted to alt.conspiracy.area51 by Gene Huff, 2/1/96, with caption: "You know the funny is, is that Lear isn't even looking at a picture..."
Miscellaneous
Profile of William Lear, Lear Jet founder and father of John.
Claims
In his speeches, Lear says there are 80 different species of aliens visiting earth.
Lear is generally pessimistic about the future, suggesting that the alien presence is sinister and that there is little chance that the government will reveal its UFO knowledge.
Lear appears to have backed off from the his earlier "aliens are eating humans at Area 51" claims and now sticks fairly close to the Lazar gospel. However, his Lazar stories tend to include more personal interpretation than Lazar's own telling.
Skeptic's View
Lear endorses nearly every UFO claim as real, no matter how loony, thus his judgement is unreliable.
Supporter's View
Lear does tend to go overboard at times, but his sources of information, including Bob Lazar, are basically sound.

----larrs hannson -
(http://www.ufomind.com/area51/people/lear/hansson.html) - UFO's, Aliens and "Ex"-intelligence Agents: Who's Fooling Whom
The Inside Story of John Lear, Bill Cooper and "The Greatest Cover-Up in Human History"
An Affidavit by Lars C. Hansson
July 18, 1991
- Part One: LEAR AND LOATHING IN LAS VEGAS
(with apologies to Dr. Hunter S. Thompson)
Although I knew it would somehow be inevitable, I have been very reluctant to commit what follows to hard copy for a number of reasons. Throughout years of uncovering all manner of lies, treachery, deceit and betrayal by criminal elements within the government of our country and its client regimes around the world, I have subscribed to an unspoken code of "honor among thieves" -- that is, to respect and protect the identity of sources who have finally chosen to "come clean," often at great peril to themselves or their families. What has been held reluctantly in confidence emerges now only after the repeated blatant and sniggering violation of that code by John Lear himself.
Despite Lear's cultivated image as a swashbuckling pilot and serious UFO researcher, he is, in my opinion, and others', an irresponsible, self-centered, loutish thrill-seeker who truly has no business in the latter field, and questionable competence in the former, given his record of hard-drinking and womanizing, at least during the time I associated with him from 1988-1990. Lest I be accused of self-righteousness in this regard, I have never pretended to sanctity, but have certainly interacted with Lear and the others mentioned herein with utmost integrity, while he has not hesitated to portray me publicly in a much different light. Because of the magnitude of the issues he has succeeded in forcing before the world's attention, I believe that it is long past the time when the public should know more of the truth about Lear which he has so desperately been attempting to conceal. I sincerely regret that I waited this long to bring it to their attention myself.
For someone who has made such an effort to "wake up the masses" to the looming peril of takeover by "grey aliens from Zeta Reticuli," which he has claimed are ensconced in underground havens in the Nevada desert, the man has accomplished an even more masterful cover-up of the looming peril of martial law under the fascist masters he has willingly served for over two decades.
The only reason I have reluctantly chosen not to publicize Lear's involvement in the activities I am about to disclose until now was that I had little doubt that his family would almost certainly suffer severe negative repercussions, particularly considering some of the principals involved.
As much as I detest melodrama, the revelations contained herein constitute a very real threat to the reputations, and the very lives of a number of innocent people as well as the participants. I realize also that exposure of some of the more sordid aspects will likely bring embarrassment and discomfort to others ensnared in the situation. I regret this probable turn of events tremendously, but after considerable soul-searching have concluded that the larger issues compel me to make these disclosures. I am truly sorry, but their boy has had numerous opportunities to rectify the errors and has deliberately chosen instead to magnify them. C'est la guerre.
I am not making these disclosures out of fear, or in a limp-wristed attempt to embarrass or "get back" at John Lear. I could have chosen any number of other less-public ways to do that long before now if that had been my desire. Rather, I believe that it is crucial that the American people be informed of these details in order to fully appreciate the magnitude of the sell-out of this once-great nation which has taken place at the hands of the weapons merchants and their willing operatives and transportation agents, such as Lear. While a few concerned citizens are still asking "Where was George?" on October 19 and 20, 1980 when a shameful deal was being made in Paris with the Iranians to keep the American hostages until the precise moment Ronald Reagan was inaugurated, I am compelled by conscience to inform them more fully on those who handled the actual payoff. This payoff has been estimated by those in the know to ultimately total upwards of $82 billion in illegal weapons transfers over a period of nearly a decade.
On a more personal level, I am also intent on making it clear to all concerned that I am aware of the threats Lear has been making -- including his obsession with having me killed, according to one mutual acquaintance.
Since I made his threats public, he has claimed that I am a "Walter Mitty" who would like to flatter myself that someone cared enough to feel threatened by my disclosures.
I believe, however, that Lear's fear has been genuine for some time that I will expose his complete fraudulence on the UFO issue, and his participation in such treasonous and criminal flight operations over a number of years.
In this regard, it is almost a given that Lear might already have quietly made calls to his cronies in the "trade" to whine and snivel about the numerous secrets he bragged about to me. Have no doubt whatsoever, that any of these people would kill unhesitatingly to continue covering up many of the things Lear bantered about openly to me, though he was fully aware of my professional and political orientation from the very outset of our contact with each other. After failing to receive so much as an acknowledgment from various media and law enforcement contacts to whom I made some of this information available over the last three years, I have been heartened recently to see the harsh light of scrutiny finally beginning to fall on such depredations by the few honest people in power, and the rats beginning to squirm. I have no illusions about the possible repercussions: As my fellow investigator John Judge has said many times, "You can either face this shit standing up or on your knees." And as Barbara Honegger and others have documented, George Bush's "kinder, gentler nation" has already entailed a large and growing number of mysterious fatalities.
Despite the sincerity of my investigative efforts throughout this period, my role and motivation have been repeatedly distorted by those with an axe to grind, or mayhem to conceal. I have found inspiration to continue from the old pilot's adage, "When you're receiving flak, it means you're probably over the target!" which my friend and mentor Lt. Col. James Bo Gritz is fond of using to exhort his audiences to valor in the face of increasing corruption and persecution by those in power at present. Even John Hancock had more fearless compatriots beside him than some of the wimps, wannabees, liars and backstabbers I have mistakenly chosen to associate with in the past, all of whom, like Lear and Cooper, claim allegiance to the truth and preserving our cherished constitutional freedoms -- before they "duck and cover." Nor do I have any illusions as to my "reward" for bearing such a message, but given the inherent risks in working on all my investigations, especially as I have with Gritz in publicizing high-level U.S. Government involvement in drug trafficking, political destabilizations and assassinations, such a consideration has obviously been secondary.
Although I have been following the UFO phenomenon for 25 years (and fairly intensely for the last three years), I do not pretend to be any kind of expert on the subject. My focus in this article will be primarily on more mundane issues related to personal credibility and provable criminal and/or treasonous actions on the part of the individuals named above. Those who are hoping to learn here whether or not Bill Cooper and John Lear and others are telling the truth about whether there really are UFOs and/or aliens at Area S-4 of the Nevada Test Site, as they and others have alleged, or whether MJ-12 really exists or is another elaborate fabrication of the intelligence agencies, will have to look elsewhere. I do not know for a fact that either or both of them are working in any capacity for any intelligence agency, but whether they are or not, they certainly deserve distinguished disinformation service medals. Whatever insights I may have acquired on the subject of UFOs over the last three years, it is not my purpose to discuss them in any great detail here. I have little doubt, however, that exposure of Lear's involvement in the operations I am about to describe will ultimately surface direct connections all the way into the highest levels of the U.S. Intelligence Community and beyond.
And I have little doubt, as well, that whatever the truth is about the reality of advanced-propulsion aircraft, the intelligence agencies are massively involved in spewing disinformation to confuse the issue as much as possible. John Judge has referred to UFOs as "Unrecognized Fascist Observatories," and if I had to place a bet, I'd say he's far closer to the mark than Lear or Cooper. In retrospect, as you will clearly see in what follows, I believe it is no coincidence at all that Lear emerged from the shadows to start beating the UFO drum in early 1987 just in time to distract public attention from the Iran/Contra scandal which was beginning to unravel and from Lt. Col. Bo Gritz's revelations about the complicity of high-level U.S. officials in the heroin trade -- the same officials who were responsible for the return of our POWs and MIAs from Southeast Asia.

--- bob lazar
(http://www.ufomind.com/area51/people/lazar/) - Bob Lazar
Claims to have worked with alien craft at "Area S-4" in Nevada
Analysis by Glenn Campbell
This page is no longer actively maintained (after 1996). You may find useful information here, but expired links will not be repaired, and new information will not be added. See our standard Lazar Links Page for newest links, latest theories and responses from the Lazar camp.
Lazar offers an interesting, intelligent, unverifiable story surrounded by lies....
Bob Lazar claims to have worked with alien spacecraft at a secret U.S. Government facility at Papoose Lake, about 80 miles north of Las Vegas. Lazar intially made his claims on a local Las Vegas television station in Nov. 1989. He says he worked at a facility called "Area S-4" at Papoose Dry Lake, south of the known government air base at Area 51, in late 1988 and early 1989. There he says he saw nine flying saucers housed in hangars built into a hillside. Lazar says he had hands-on experience with one of the craft and he can describe its propulsion system in detail. Lazar says he read briefing papers about the alien presence but that he saw no aliens himself (aside from a fleeting glimpse of a small figure through a window at the facility).
The core story is, almost by definition, unverifiable, since no one can go to Papoose Lake to check it out. The only thing we can investigate are the claims that surround it. If Lazar does not tell the truth about the things we can verify, how can we trust the things we can't verify?
Lazar has lied about his educational credentials and his position at Los Alamos. He claims that his records have vanished and that the government has turned him into a "non-person", but there are no specific records that can't be accounted for. Only his educational records are missing, which plainly never existed to begin with. All evidence indicates that Lazar worked at Los Alamos as a repair technician, not as a senior scientist as he claimed. There is also no evidence that Lazar has ever visited Area 51, which unlike the S-4 claim, can at least be checked out "off the record" through former Area 51 workers. Lazar says he travelled to "S-4" by way of Area 51 on daily 737 flights that hundreds of other workers take. Although he says that Area 51 was only a transfer point for him, he has been unable describe the arrivals area or what you see when you first get off the plane.
The simplest theory to explain the Lazar story is that it is completely false and that he concocted it initally to fool John Lear, who had been telling extravagant aliens-at-Area-51 stories for a couple of years before Lazar arrived. Lazar could have simply fed back to Lear a more rational version of what Lear wanted to hear. Other more complex theories say that Lazar is recounting a real flying saucer experience that actually took place elsewhere or in different circumstances, or that he is a dupe or willing participant in some complicated U.S. Government or foreign government plan. (For example, it could have been attempt by the Soviets to probe or disrupt activities at Area 51. Is so, this would not have been the most convoluted deception of the Cold War.) Motivation for the fraud remains murky, as Lazar and his primary supporter Gene Huff have ignored or sabotaged many opportunities for financial gain from the story. (Although movie options and the saucer model kit have made the story profitable for him, Lazar seems disinterested in pursuing deals.) Thanks to Huff's aggressive attacks on anyone who questions the story, it is hard to find many Lazar supporters left in the UFO community, even among those who want desperately to believe.
All lies and mismanagement aside, Lazar's is a fascinating tale, compelling even as fiction. Its restraint and long-term internal consistancy remain impressive. Lazar's straightforward explanations of his experiences, his healthy skepticism of other UFO claims and his early willingness to submit to hypnosis and a polygraph test remain intriguing. (The test was inconclusive, and the professional hypnotist believes Lazar's emotional responses to his recalled S-4 experiences were not faked.) Ultimately, Lazar's claims have prompted the world to ask, "What is out there at Area 51?"

bob hamilton,
() -

linda molten, one on one,
() -

Theory of Everything (23)

pnac documents,
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PNAC) - Project for the New American Century
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from PNAC)
Jump to: navigation, search
The Project for the New American Century (PNAC) is a US political neo-conservative think tank, based in Washington, DC co-founded by William Kristol and Robert Kagan. The group was established in early 1997 as a non-profit organization. The chairman is William Kristol, editor of the Weekly Standard and a regular guest on the Fox News Channel. The group is an initiative of the New Citizenship Project, a 501(c)(3) organization that has been funded by the Sarah Scaife Foundation, the John M. Olin Foundation and the Bradley Foundation.[1]
Critics allege the controversial organization proposes military and economic space, cyberspace, and global domination by the United States, so as to establish and maintain US dominance in world affairs, what Theodore Roosevelt termed a Pax Americana. Some have argued the US-led invasion of Iraq in March of 2003 was the first step in furthering these plans.
PNAC was a major advocate for the United States' 2003 invasion of Iraq. The invasion formed a centerpiece of the group's neoconservative agenda. Complications with the invasion have contributed to PNAC's decline along with the decline of the larger neoconservative foreign policy movement. PNAC now only has one employee and is seen as nearly defunct.[1]

Members
The present active contributers are Gary Schmitt and Ellen Bork.
Former members include prominent members of the Republican Party and the Bush Administration, including Richard Armitage, William J. Bennett, Jeb Bush, Ellen Bork (the daughter of Robert Bork), Dick Cheney, Zalmay Khalilzad, Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Richard Perle, former U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, and Paul Wolfowitz. Many of the organization's ideas, and its members, are associated with the neoconservative movement. PNAC, at one point, had seven full-time staff members, in addition to its board of directors. It now has one full-time staffer.
Other former members include:
Gary Bauer, former presidential candidate, president of American Values
Abram Shulsky, former Director of Office of Special Plans, member of PNAC, mentored by Leo Strauss.
William J. Bennett, former Secretary of Education and Director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy, co-founder of Empower America, author of the Book of Virtues.
Rudy Boschwitz, former US Senator from Minnesota
Jeb Bush, governor of Florida
Eliot A. Cohen, professor of strategic studies at Johns Hopkins University
Thomas Donnelly, director of communications, Lockheed Martin
Steve Forbes, multi-millionaire publisher of Forbes Magazine, former presidential candidate
Aaron Friedberg, director of the Center of International Studies
Frank Gaffney, columnist, founder of Center for Security Policy
Reuel Marc Gerecht, director of the Middle East Initiative
Fred Ikle, Center for Strategic and International Studies
Donald Kagan, Yale University professor, conservative columnist with various State Department ties
Jeane Kirkpatrick, former U.S. ambassador
Charles Krauthammer, conservative columnist
William Kristol, a PNAC founder and chairman, editor of the Weekly Standard
Christopher Maletz
Daniel McKivergan
Richard Perle, a PNAC founder, formerly of the Defense Policy Board, fellow of the American Enterprise Institute
Norman Podhoretz, Hudson Institute
Dan Quayle, former vice-president
Stephen Rosen, Beton Michael Kaneb Professor of National Security and Military Affairs, Harvard University
Henry Rowen, former president of Rand Corporation
George Weigel, political commentator
R. James Woolsey, former director of the Central Intelligence Agency for President Bill Clinton, vice-president at Booz Allen Hamilton
Vin Weber, Minnesota congressman

[edit] Core views and beliefs
The PNAC Web site states the group's "fundamental propositions", which are[2]
"American leadership is both good for America and good for the world."
"such leadership requires military strength, diplomatic energy and commitment to moral principle"
"too few political leaders today are making the case for global leadership."
The PNAC also made a statement of principles at their 1997 inception.[3]
As the 20th century draws to a close, the United States stands as the world's pre-eminent power. Having led the West to victory in the Cold War, America faces an opportunity and a challenge: Does the United States have the vision to build upon the achievements of past decades? Does the United States have the resolve to shape a new century favorable to American principles and interests?
The group advocates "a policy of military strength and moral clarity" which includes:
A significant increase of US military spending.
Strengthening ties with US allies and challenging regimes hostile to US interests and values.
Promoting the cause of American political and economic power outside the US.
Preserving and extending an international order friendly to US security, prosperity and principles.
The group had long called for the United States to abandon the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty between the US and the Soviet Union, from which the US withdrew in 2002. They also propose controlling the new "international commons" of outer space and "cyberspace" and pave the way for the creation of a new military service — U.S. Space Forces — with the mission of space control. In 1998, Donald Rumsfeld chaired a bipartisan commission on the US Ballistic Missile Threat toward advancement of these goals. It is unclear how "space control" will affect US adherence to the Outer Space Treaty. President George W. Bush stated in his address to the nation on September 11, 2006 [4] that the war on terror "will set the course for this new century and determine the destiny of millions across the world."

[edit] PNAC report: Rebuilding America's Defenses
In September 2000, the PNAC issued a 90-page report entitled Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategies, Forces, and Resources For A New Century,[5] proceeding "from the belief that America should seek to preserve and extend its position of global leadership by maintaining the preeminence of U.S. military forces." The report has been the subject of much analysis and criticism.
The group states that when diplomacy or sanctions fail, the United States must be prepared to take military action. PNAC argues that the current Cold War deployment of forces is obsolete. Defense spending and force deployment must reflect the post-Cold War duties that US forces are obligated to perform. Constabulary duties such as peacekeeping in the Balkans and the enforcement of the No Fly Zones in Iraq have put a strain upon, and reduced the readiness of US forces. The PNAC recommends the forward redeployment of US forces at new strategically placed permanent military bases in Southeast Europe and Southeast Asia. Permanent bases ease the strain on US forces, allowing readiness to be maintained and the carrier fleet to be reduced. Furthermore, PNAC advocates that the US-globalized military should be enlarged, equipped and restructured for the "constabulary" roles associated with shaping the security in critical regions of the world.

[edit] Chairman and Executive Director
William Kristol taught politics at the University of Pennsylvania and Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government. In 1985 he went to Washington and later served as chief of staff to Secretary of Education William Bennett under President Ronald Reagan, and Vice President Dan Quayle during the Bush administration.
Kristol led the Project for the Republican Future, where he helped create the strategy which produced the 1994 Republican congressional victory. He started The Weekly Standard in 1995, and now serves as its editor and publisher. He is also a political contributor for the Fox News Channel and serves as a regular contributor to Special Report with Brit Hume.

[edit] Position on the Iraq invasion and occupation
In 1998, following perceived Iraqi unwillingness to co-operate with UN weapons inspections, members of the PNAC, including former defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz, wrote to President Bill Clinton urging him to remove Saddam Hussein from power using US diplomatic, political and military power. The letter argued that Saddam would pose a threat to the United States, its Middle East allies and oil resources in the region if he succeeded in maintaining his stockpile of Weapons of Mass Destruction. The letter also stated "we can no longer depend on our partners in the Gulf War to continue to uphold the sanctions or to punish Saddam when he blocks or evades UN inspections" and "American policy cannot continue to be crippled by a misguided insistence on unanimity in the UN Security Council." The letter argues that an Iraq war would be justified by Hussein's defiance of UN "containment" policy and his persistent threat to US interests.
The 2000 Rebuilding America's Defenses report recommends improved planning. The report states that "while the unresolved conflict in Iraq provides the immediate justification [for US military presence], the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein" and "Over the long term, Iran may well prove as large a threat to U.S. interests in the Gulf as Iraq has. And even should U.S.-Iranian relations improve, retaining forward-based forces in the region would still be an essential element in U.S. security strategy given the longstanding American interests in the region".

[edit] Controversy
The PNAC has been the subject of considerable criticism and controversy, both among members of the left and right. Critics dispute the premise that US "world leadership" is desirable for the world or even for the United States itself. The PNAC's harshest critics claim it represents a disturbing step towards total world subjugation by the United States, motivated by an imperial and globalist agenda of global US military expansionism and dominance. Critics of the United States' international relations take issue with the PNAC's unabashed position of maintaining the nation's privileged position as sole world superpower. Some critics even assert that the fall of the Soviet Union indicates an end to the era of 'superpowers' and therefore any concept of military hegemony or ascendancy is overrated. Military might is not power in itself, say the critics; it requires huge financial commitments, strong domestic and international support, plus skillful management to be considered worthwhile.[6]HYPERLINK \l "_note-6"[7] PNAC position papers and other documents contain few references on building or maintaining any of these requirements. [8]
Supporters of the project reply that the PNAC's goals are not fundamentally different from past conservative foreign policy assessments. US conservatives have traditionally favored a militarily strong United States, and advocated the country take aggressive positions when its interests are threatened. Supporters thus see the PNAC as the target of conspiracy theories, mainly motivated by the left. [citation needed]
A line frequently quoted by critics from Rebuilding America's Defenses (September 2000) famously refers to the possibility of a "catastrophic and catalyzing event — like a new Pearl Harbor (PDF)".[9] This quote appears in Chapter V, entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force", which discusses the perceived need for the Department of Defense to "move more aggressively to experiment with new technologies and operational concepts".[10] The full quote is as follows: "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event — like a new Pearl Harbor." Some have used this quote as evidence for their belief the US government was complicit in the 9/11 terrorist attacks. (See the article 9/11 conspiracy theories for further information on this topic.)
Critics will often quote another excerpt from the document, "...advanced forms of biological warfare that can target specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool", as evidence of a violently racist lean[citation needed]; since certain populations (i.e. Iranian Muslims vs. Saudi Arabs) will carry higher frequencies of a certain genotype[11], a biological weapon that is only active in that particular genotype will target one race over another. This occurs via "race-specific elicitors" produced by the pathogen which are only operational in certain host genotypes.[12]HYPERLINK \l "_note-12"[13] South Africa before the end of apartheid also researched such race-specific biological weapons, without success. Though it must be said that this desire, while technologically sinister, is merely the latest development in a long-held human desire to eliminate their enemies more efficiently. (And provide proof of the enemy's "difference" to boot.)

[edit] Criticisms of position on the Iraq invasion and occupation
Many critics of the US-led invasion of Iraq claim the US' "bullying" of the international community into supporting the 2003 Iraq war, and the fact that the war went ahead despite much international criticism, stem from the positions of prominent conservatives in the Bush administration. Some critics of the Bush administration see the 1998 letter to President Clinton as a "smoking gun",[14] showing that the invasion of Iraq was a foregone conclusion. These critics see the letter as evidence of Rumsfeld's, Wolfowitz's and Richard Perle's opinions, five years prior to the Iraq invasion. Other signatories of the letter include John Bolton and Zalmay Khalilzad, as of this writing the United States' ambassadors to the United Nations and Iraq, respectively. Rory Bremner, citing the letter, said "that's what they want — regime change — and nothing, not Blair, not the UN, not Hans Blix, not France, Germany, Russia, China, not the threat of terrorism, or Arab reservations, or lack of evidence, or the Peace March, not even our own brave Jack Straw is going to stand in their way."[15] George Monbiot, citing the letter, said "to pretend that this battle begins and ends in Iraq requires a willful denial of the context in which it occurs. That context is a blunt attempt by the superpower to reshape the world to suit itself."[16]

rogue network, -(http://suitcaseman.gnn.tv/blogs/11182/Tarpley_Says_Rogue_Network_Behind_911) - Webster Tarpley speaksWatch this very short video.
Webster Tarpley was asked about the role of the neo-cons in perpetrating 911, and he said that Cheney and Wolfowicz may very well be conduits of the rogue network, which runs the United States. Tarpley said that there is an invisible government, which is alive and well, and the neo-cons are a part of it. But Tarpley said you have to look deeper at the network, which has been around significantly longer than the neo-cons.
deep state, -
the fifth column, -
many crap words to describe what we're aware of. READ IT! YOU'LL SEE!
the foundation of all mental illness is the avoidance of legitemate suffering - carl jung

why haven't the done aerial raids on the opium and drug feilds in turkey, arabia, iran, mexico, colombia, south america, africa? BECAUSE, drugs is the LARGEST provider of cheap labor, major income int he WORLD. why wouldnt whites be a part of it. why not the u.s.. of course they are
what else?

free mason - the symbol is the all seeing eye, u.s. is the first and only completely free mason gov't on the planet.

now, lets talk about paganism, which is the basis of free masonry, you have to realize that their idea of a get together is an orgy... and they don't allow women into their circle

(check this out on the web - google - Shadows in motion - Exposing the New World Order )
dajjal is the one eye symbolized universally. he will be the one who conquers the world. or so they say,. turns out, i'm the guy noted as the young dark prince. LOL. yeah, i'm always underplayed, but i opposed the arab world and unite the entire black population. WOOHOO.

-- "new" laws, restricting our civil liberties, enacted to protect us from the "terrorists" yet our borders remain wide open and threats go ignored... why? closed borders do not facilitate the spp agenda.

--"Pretext For The North American Union (NAU): Part 3 The Media (Amero, TTC & I.D.) "
book 1984 - predicting world woudl be divided into 3 world empires. orwell.

---dr. jerome corsi - minutemanproject.com / freedom of information act request. 1,000 pages on that website. a fundemental rewriting of our lives. in which america is being replaced with north american. you'll be issued a biometric traveler trusted card, mexican, canadian, americans, wehre 30 million more mexicans want in, and they'll be just allowed in. the AMERO, replacing the dollar. WHAT THE FUUUCK?super nafta highway up and down the spine of america. dr. corsi found all this shit out. media won't even announce it. watch it!

---Pretext For The North American Union (NAU): Part 4 Policy Makers (CFR) , check on google.com video

----Other Issues
REALLY BIG ISSUE UPDATE---

CONSTITUTIONAL BREACHES --- why that peice of paper means less and less by those who have the monetary power to influence those who understand little about it.

"A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government" — Edward Abbey Chronicles of Dissent .
---(constitution founded 1776, but on friday september 29th, .... the day america died. the bill of rights were overturned.****10***)

- PATRIOT ACT I
- (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USA_PATRIOT_Act) - USA PATRIOT Act
The Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (Public Law 107-56), known as USA PATRIOT Act or simply the Patriot Act, is an American act which President George W. Bush signed into law on October 26, 2001. The Act passed in the Senate by a vote of 98 to 1, and in the House by a vote of 357 to 66. Although the bill enjoyed widespread Congressional and Presidential support it is a very controversial federal legislation.
Originally passed after the September 11, 2001 attacks on the World Trade Centers in New York, New York; the Act (full text) was formed in response to the terrorist attacks against the United States, and dramatically expanded the authority of American law enforcement for the stated purpose of fighting terrorism in the United States and abroad. It has also been used to detect and prosecute other alleged potential crimes, such as providing false information on terrorism. Federal courts declared some sections unconstitutional because they interfere with civil liberties. It was renewed on March 2, 2006 with a vote of 89 to 11 in the Senate and on March 7 280 to 138 in the House. The renewal was signed into law by President Bush on March 9, 2006.
Some of the more controversial provisions of USA PATRIOT act were largely inspired by the RICO act, which restricted due process for individuals involved in organized crime, racketeering, and drug trafficking. The USA PATRIOT Act essentially extended the qualifications to those involved in terrorism.[citation --USA PATRIOT Act Titles Title I: Enhancing Domestic Security against Terrorism Title II: Enhanced Surveillance Procedures Title III: International Money Laundering Abatement and Anti-terrorist Financing Act of 2001 Title IV: Protecting the border Title V: Removing obstacles to investigating terrorism Title VI: Providing for victims of terrorism, public safety officers and their families Title VII: Increased information sharing for critical infrastructure protection Title VIII: Strengthening the criminal laws against terrorism Title IX: Improved intelligence Title X: Miscellaneous-

PATRIOT ACT 2 LOOMS!
"The Domestic Security Enhancement Act of 2003." The more than 100 new provisions
- (http://www.alternet.org/story/15541/) - Get Ready for PATRIOT II
By Matt Welch, AlterNet. Posted April 2, 2003.
While war news dominates, Ashcroft is ready to batten down the homeland's hatches with a draconian list of curbs on civil liberties.
The "fog of war" obscures more than just news from the battlefield. It also provides cover for radical domestic legislation, especially ill-considered liberty-for-security swaps, which have been historically popular at the onset of major conflicts.
The last time allied bombs fell over a foreign capital, the Bush Administration rammed through the USA PATRIOT Act, a clever acronym for maximum with-us-or-against-us leverage (the full name is "Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism").
Remarkably, this 342-page law was written, passed (by a 98-1 vote in the U.S. Senate) and signed into law within seven weeks of the Sept. 11 terrorist attack. As a result, the government gained new power to wiretap phones, confiscate property of suspected terrorists, spy on its own citizens without judicial review, conduct secret searches, snoop on the reading habits of library users, and so General John Ashcroft wants to finish the job. On Jan. 10, 2003, he sent around a draft of PATRIOT II; this time, called "The Domestic Security Enhancement Act of 2003." The more than 100 new provisions, Justice Department spokesperson Mark Corallo told the Village Voice recently, "will be filling in the holes" of PATRIOT I, "refining things that will enable us to do our job."
Though Ashcroft and his mouthpieces have issued repeated denials that the draft represents anything like a finished proposal, the Voice reported that: "Corallo confirmed ... that such measures were coming soon."
You can read the entire 87-page draft here. Constitutional watchdog Nat Hentoff has called it "the most radical government plan in our history to remove from Americans their liberties under the Bill of Rights." Some of DSEA's more draconian provisions:
Americans could have their citizenship revoked, if found to have contributed "material support" to organizations deemed by the government, even retroactively, to be "terrorist." As Hentoff wrote in the Feb. 28 Village Voice: "Until now, in our law, an American could only lose his or her citizenship by declaring a clear intent to abandon it. But -- and read this carefully from the new bill -- 'the intent to relinquish nationality need not be manifested in words, but can be inferred from conduct.'" (Italics Hentoff's.)
Legal permanent residents (like, say, my French wife), could be deported instantaneously, without a criminal charge or even evidence, if the Attorney General considers them a threat to national security. If they commit minor, non-terrorist offenses, they can still be booted out, without so much as a day in court, because the law would exempt habeas corpus review in some cases. As the American Civil Liberties Union stated in its long brief against the DSEA, "Congress has not exempted any person from habeas corpus -- a protection guaranteed by the Constitution -- since the Civil War."
The government would be instructed to build a mammoth database of citizen DNA information, aimed at "detecting, investigating, prosecuting, preventing or responding to terrorist activities." Samples could be collected without a court order; one need only be suspected of wrongdoing by a law enforcement officer. Those refusing the cheek-swab could be fined $200,000 and jailed for a year. "Because no federal genetic privacy law regulates DNA databases, privacy advocates fear that the data they contain could be misused," Wired News reported March 31. "People with 'flawed' DNA have already suffered genetic discrimination at the hands of employers, insurance companies and the government."
Authorities could wiretap anybody for 15 days, and snoop on anyone's Internet usage (including chat and email), all without obtaining a warrant.
The government would be specifically instructed not to release any information about detainees held on suspicion of terrorist activities, until they are actually charged with a crime. Or, as Hentoff put it, "for the first time in U.S. history, secret arrests will be specifically permitted."
Businesses that rat on their customers to the Feds -- even if the information violates privacy agreements, or is, in fact, dead wrong -- would be granted immunity. "Such immunity," the ACLU contended, "could provide an incentive for neighbor to spy on neighbor and pose problems similar to those inherent in Attorney General Ashcroft's Operation TIPS."
Police officers carrying out illegal searches would also be granted legal immunity if they were just carrying out orders.
Federal "consent decrees" limiting local law enforcement agencies' abilities to spy on citizens in their jurisdiction would be rolled back. As Howard Simon, executive director of Florida's ACLU, noted in a March 19 column in the Sarasota Herald Tribune: "The restrictions on political surveillance were hard-fought victories for civil liberties during the 1970s."
American citizens could be subject to secret surveillance by their own government on behalf of foreign countries, including dictatorships.
The death penalty would be expanded to cover 15 new offenses.
And many of PATRIOT I's "sunset provisions" -- stipulating that the expanded new enforcement powers would be rescinded in 2005 -- would be erased from the books, cementing Ashcroft's rushed legislation in the law books. As UPI noted March 10, "These sunset provisions were a concession to critics of the bill in Congress."
I wouldn't be writing this article today had an alarmed Justice Department staffer not leaked the draft to the Center for Public Integrity in early February. Ashcroft, up to that point, had repeatedly refused to even discuss what his lawyers might be cooking up. But if 10,000 residents of Los Angeles had been vaporized by a "suitcase nuke" in late January, it is reasonable to assume that the then-secret proposal would have been speed-delivered for a congressional vote, even though Congress has not so far participated in drafting the legislation (which is, after all, its Constitutional role).
As a result of the leak, and the ensuing bad press, opposition to the measure has had time to gather momentum before the first bomb was dropped on Saddam's bunker. Some of the criticism has originated from the right side of the political spectrum -- a March 17 open letter to Congress was signed not only by the ACLU and People for the American Way, but the cultural-conservative think tank Free Congress Foundation, the Gun Owners of America, the American Conservative Union, and more.
One does not have to believe that Ashcroft is a Constitution-shredding ghoul to find these measures alarming, improper and possibly illegal. Glancing over the list above, and at the other DSEA literature, I can see multiple ways in which a Fed with a grudge could legally ruin my life. Removing checks and balances on law enforcement assumes perfect behavior on the part of the police.
Safeguarding civil liberties is an unpopular project in the most placid of times. Since Sept. 11, the Bush Administration has shown that it will push the envelope on nearly every restriction it considers to be impeding its prosecution of the war on terrorism. This single-minded drive requires extreme vigilance, before the fog of war becomes toxic.
Detailed critiques of the Patriot II draft have been prepared by the ACLU and the Center for Public Integrity. The Lawyers Committee for Human Rights also has a useful 98-page report on post-Sept. 11 civil liberties, and the Electronic Privacy Information Center maintains an outstanding PATRIOT-related site.
Matt Welch is the Los Angeles correspondent for the National Post, and an editor of the L.A. Examiner. He also maintains a weblog about current events.

WHAT OTHERS THINK ABOUT IT! -
(http://www.aclu.org/safefree/general/17383leg20030328.html) - ACLU Fact Sheet on PATRIOT Act II (3/28/2003)
Justice Department Contemplates Seeking More Sweeping PowersBill Would Further Erode Limits on Antiterror Powers
Less than two years after Congress passed the USA PATRIOT Act, giving new, sweeping powers to the federal government to conduct investigations and surveillance inside the United States, the Justice Department is contemplating another chilling grab of authority and further diminution of constitutional checks and balances on law enforcement.
With the Domestic Security Enhancement Act the Administration would seek "to take the Patriot Act's antiterror powers several steps further."[1] Dubbed "Patriot Act 2," the legislation would grant additional sweeping powers to the government, eliminating or weakening remaining limits on government surveillance, wiretapping, detention and prosecution.
I. Patriot Act 2: An Overview
"An American citizen suspected of being part of a terrorist conspiracy could be held by investigators without anyone being notified. He could simply disappear."
New York Times MagazineFebruary 23, 2003
The government would no longer be required to disclose the identity of anyone, even an American citizen, detained in connection with a terror investigation - until criminal charges are filed, no matter how long that takes (sec 201).
Current court limits on local police spying on religious and political activity would be repealed (sec. 312).
The government would be allowed to obtain credit records and library records without a warrant (secs. 126, 128, 129).
Wiretaps without any court order for up to 15 days after terror attack would be permissible. (sec. 103).
Release of information about health/safety hazards posed by chemical and other plants would be restricted (sec. 202).
The reach of an already overbroad definition of terrorism would be expanded - individuals engaged in civil disobedience could risk losing their citizenship (sec. 501); their organization could be subject to wiretapping (secs. 120, 121) and asset seizure (secs. 428, 428).
Americans could be extradited, searched and wiretapped at the behest of foreign nations, whether or not treaties allow it (sec. 321, 322).
Lawful immigrants would be stripped of the right to a fair deportation hearing and federal courts would not be allowed to review immigration rulings (secs. 503, 504).
II. A Frighteningly Freer Hand Against ? Us
At the core of the American experiment is liberty, the freedom secured through Constitutional rights of individuals and limitations on government power. So under our Constitution, government powers are subject to limits by the courts, the Congress and the people.
Patriot Act 2 Offers A False Solution, a Less Safe Nation
Our system's checks and balances not only ensure that the government does not violate the rights of law-abiding citizens, they also help maintain the legitimacy of law enforcement. Actions viewed as arbitrary, capricious or improper sow the seeds of mistrust among communities that might otherwise cooperate with authorities. Limits also force the government to use their limited resources more wisely - that is, pursuing real criminals using proven investigative techniques.
The bitter irony is that the Patriot Act 2 could make our nation more vulnerable to terrorism, a view held by many experts:
As Coleen Rowley - the FBI special agent named by Time Magazine as a person of the year for blowing the whistle on pre 9/11 intelligence failures - observed in a letter to Director Robert Mueller:
The vast majority of the one thousand plus persons "detained" in the wake of 9-11 did not turn out to be terrorists. . . . [A]fter 9-11, headquarters encouraged more and more detentions for what seem to be essentially PR purposes. Field offices were required to report daily the number of detentions in order to supply grist for statements on our progress in fighting terrorism.[2]
In late 2001 senior intelligence specialists wrote that the use of racial profiling and other investigative techniques that intrude on civil liberties could undermine security by distracting security officials from less clumsy and more reliable forms of individual suspicion.[3]
At least eight former high-ranking FBI officials, many from the Reagan and Bush administrations, criticized anti-terrorism proposals that violate civil liberties, saying they were likely to be ineffective and to distract from proven investigative techniques.[4]
How Patriot Act 2 Weakens Checks and Balances
The Federal Courts. The First and Fourth Amendments place important limits on the government's ability to conduct searches, wiretap, obtain records and spy on religious and political activity.[5] In general, the government must first demonstrate to a court that it has probable cause to believe evidence may be found that is relevant to a crime or related to a threat from a foreign power. Under the Constitution, the government may only detain persons under the supervision of a court.
In addition, an important post-Watergate era law requires the government to get court approval before conducting wiretapping, searches or surveillance for national security purposes. Before the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) of 1978 was enacted,[6] lack of judicial oversight had lead to famous abuses of power, including the wiretapping of Martin Luther King, Jr. and the secret political surveillance conducted by the Nixon White House.
The Patriot Act II would make major changes in FISA:
Standards for court approval of searches and surveillance would be lowered - in many cases, making such review no longer meaningful;
A new defense would be created, shielding wiretappers acting without a court order from prosecution, so long as they had authorization from senior officials (sec. 106).
U.S. Congress. Under current law, the government may extradite an individual to face trial in foreign courts only if an extradition treaty, ratified by the Senate, allows for extradition for the particular crime. Likewise, the government may not conduct searches and wiretaps on behalf of a foreign nation unless the Senate has approved a Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty.
Under the draft bill, Americans could be extradited without a treaty or in excess of limits imposed by a treaty, and could be subject to foreign-directed searches and wiretaps (secs. 321, 322). Courts would no longer have the authority to review extradition requests to see if the foreign nation's legal system provides basic fairness - even from dictatorial, brutal or corrupt regimes (sec. 322).
A Free Press. In a democracy, the people rely on a free press to be able to make wise decisions. The bill would deny the press, and the public, access to the following important information:
Arrests of terrorism suspects who have not been charged with a crime (sec. 201) - which might include material witness detainees, immigration detainees, or Americans citizens or others labeled "enemy combatants" by the President;
Grand jury proceedings in connection with terror investigation (sec. 206);
Public information about health and safety hazards of chemical and other plants (sec. 202).
III. Targeting Ordinary People, Not Terrorists
The draft bill would do more than erode certain fundamental rights of suspects and defendants. It would grant the government powers that could be directed at ordinary people.
Protestors - On the Right and Left. Under the Patriot Act, any individual or group that breaks the law with the intent of influencing the government can be labeled a terrorist if their activities are "dangerous to human life."[7] Under that definition, diverse "direct-action" organizations, including Operation Rescue or the World Trade Organization protestors, could be labeled "terrorist organizations."
The draft exacerbates the reach of the definition by using it to trigger new antiterror powers:
Wiretapping authority (secs. 120, 121)
Civil asset forfeiture powers (sec. 427, 428)
New death penalties (sec. 411)
Unprecedented power of the government to revoke American citizenship even of native-born Americans and detain them indefinitely (sec. 501)
Consider this: An overzealous attorney general in an administration that favored abortion rights could label a pro-life organization that engaged in "direct action" as a domestic terrorist group. The government could then wiretap calls, seize property, and strip supporters of U.S. citizenship.[8]
Community and Environmental Groups. Organizations rely on open records laws to protect their communities against risks to health and safety from power, chemical or other plants. These facilities currently are required to complete a "worst case scenario" under the Clean Air Act.[9] Patriot Act 2 would impose extraordinary restrictions on access to these scenarios (sec. 202).
Churches, Synagogues, Mosques and Other Religious and Community Groups. Patriot Act 2 would terminate court-ordered limits on political spying by local and state police. Religious and secular organizations that take controversial political positions could face infiltration and surveillance, whether or not they have any connection to terrorism or other crime (sec. 312).
Library Users. Patriot Act 2 would give the government new powers to issue "administrative subpoenas" and to enforce what it calls "national security letters" to obtain confidential library, Internet and bookstore records - without going to court at all (secs. 128, 129).
Immigrants. The Constitution and laws protect the rights of immigrants to due process of law, requiring the government to provide a fair hearing to anyone the government wants to deport, and giving federal courts the power to review immigration actions. The Supreme Court reaffirmed these basic principles two years ago, stating "Judicial intervention in deportation cases is unquestionably required by the Constitution."[10]
Patriot Act 2 would provide for summary deportations without charges or evidence if the attorney general merely suspects an immigrant may be a risk to national security (sec. 503). Lawful permanent residents who happen to have committed some minor criminal offense in the distant past could be stripped of their right to an immigration hearing and court review, even by the Great Writ of habeas corpus (sec. 504).
IV. Conclusion
Patriot Act 2 is fundamentally flawed because it relies on a false premise - that America can be safer if we do away with basic checks and balances. By undermining the role of the courts, Congress and the press in providing a real check on executive power, Patriot Act 2 directs its ire at the institutions of our democracy instead of at the terrorists that threaten it. In so doing, it threatens to undermine the rights of ordinary people and, ironically, the war against terrorism.
For a detailed section-by-section summary of the entire bill, go to:/safefree/general/17203leg20030214.html

ENDNOTES
[1] Matthew Brzezinksi, "Fortress America," New York Times Magazine, Feb. 23, 2003. For a copy the draft bill visit http://www.dailyrotten.com/source-docs/patriot2draft.html
[2] Full Text of FBI Agent's Letter to Director Mueller, N.Y. Times, March 5, 2003 (letter dated Feb. 26, 2003) (Emphasis added).
[3] Bill Dedman, Memo Warns Against Use of Profiling As Defense, Boston Globe, Oct. 12, 2001.
[4] Jim McGee, Ex-FBI Officials Criticize Tactics on Terrorism; Detention of Suspects Not Effective, They Say, Washington Post, Nov. 28, 2001, at A1
[5] See Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967) (criminal surveillance); United States v. United States District Court ("Keith"), 407 U.S. 297 (1972) (intelligence surveillance).
[6] 50 U.S.C. §§ 1801-63
[7] 18 U.S.C. § 2331.
[8] See, e.g., Zadvydas v. Davis 533 U.S. 678 (2001).
[9] 47 U.S.C. § 7212(r).
[10] INS v. St. Cyr, 533 U.S. 289 (2001)

THE ACTUAL LEGISLATION - (http://www.eff.org/Censorship/Terrorism_militias/patriot2draft.html) -
CONFIDENTIAL -- NOT FOR DISTRIBUTIONDraft--January 9, 2003
DOMESTIC SECURITY ENHANCEMENT ACT OF 2003
SECTION-BY-SECTION ANALYSIS
Title I: Enhancing National Security Authorities
Subtitle A: Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Amendments
Section 101: Individual Terrorists as Foreign Powers.
Under 50 U.S.C. § 1801(a)(4), the definition of "foreign power" includes groups that engage in international terrorism, but does not reach unaffiliated individuals who do so. As a result, investigations of "lone wolf" terrorists or "sleeper cells" may not be authorized under FISA. Such investigations therefore must proceed under the stricter standards and shorter time periods set forth in Title III, potentially resulting in unnecessary and dangerous delays and greater administrative burden. This provision would expand FISA's definition of "foreign power" to include all persons, regardless of whether they are affiliated with an international terrorist group, who engage in international terrorism.
Section 102: Clandestine Intelligence Activities by Agent of a Foreign Power.
FISA currently defines "agent of a foreign power" to include a person who knowingly engages in clandestine intelligence gathering activities on behalf of a foreign power--but only if those activities "involve or may involve a violation of" federal criminal law. Requiring the additional showing that the intelligence gathering violates the laws of the United States is both unnecessary and counterproductive, as such activities threaten the national security regardless of whether they are illegal. This provision would expand the definitions contained in 50 U.S.C. § 1801(b)(2)(A) & (B). Any person who engages in clandestine intelligence gathering activities for a foreign power would qualify as an "agent of a foreign power," regardless of whether those activities are federal crimes.
Section 103: Strengthening Wartime Authorities Under FISA.
Under 50 U.S.C. §§ 1811, 1829 & 1844, the Attorney General may authorize, without the prior approval of the FISA Court, electronic surveillance, physical searches, or the use of pen registers for a period of 15 days following a congressional declaration of war. This wartime exception is unnecessarily narrow; it may be invoked only when Congress formally has declared war, a rare event in the nation's history and something that has not occurred in more than sixty years. This provision would expand FISA's wartime exception by allowing the wartime exception
1

CONFIDENTIAL -- NOT FOR DISTRIBUTIONDraft--January 9, 2003
to be invoked after Congress authorizes the use of military force, or after the United States has suffered an attack creating an national emergency.
Section 104: Strengthening FISA's Presidential Authorization Exception.
50 U.S.C. § 1802 allows the Attorney General to authorize electronic surveillance for up to a year, without the FISA Court's prior approval, in two narrow circumstances: (1) if the surveillance is are directed solely at communications between foreign powers; or (2) if the surveillance is directed solely at the acquisition of technical intelligence, other than spoken communications, from property under the exclusive control of a foreign power. In addition, the Attorney General must certify that there is no substantial likelihood that such surveillance will acquire the communications of U.S. persons. (In essence, § 1802 authorizes the surveillance of communications between foreign governments, and between a foreign government and its embassy.) Section 1802 is of limited use, however, because it explicitly prohibits efforts to acquire spoken communications. (No such limitation exists in the parallel exception for physical searches, 50 U.S.C. § 1822(a), under which agents presumably could infiltrate a foreign power's property for the purpose of overhearing conversations.) This provision would enhance the presidential authorization exception by eliminating the requirement that electronic surveillance cannot be directed at the spoken communications of foreign powers.
Section 105: Law Enforcement Use of FISA Information.
50 U.S.C. § 1806(b) currently prohibits the disclosure of information "for law enforcement purposes" unless the disclosure includes a statement that the information cannot be used in a criminal proceeding without the Attorney General's advance authorization. This provision would amend § 1806(b) to give federal investigators and prosecutors greater flexibility to use FISA-obtained information. Specifically, it would eliminate the requirement that the Attorney General personally approve the use of such information in the criminal context, and would substitute a requirement that such use be approved by the Attorney General, the Deputy Attorney General, the Associate Attorney General, or an Assistant Attorney General designated by the Attorney General.
Section 106: Defense of Reliance on Authorization.
50 U.S.C. § 1809(b) and 1827(b) create a defense for agents who engage in unauthorized surveillance or searches, or who disclose information without authorization, if they were relying on an order issued by the FISA Court. However, there does not appear to be a statutory defense for agents who engage in surveillance or searches pursuant to FISA authorities under which no prior court approval is required--e.g., pursuant to FISA's wartime exception (50 U. S.C. §§ 1811, 1829 & 1844), or FISA's presidential authorization exception (50 U.S.C. § 1802 & 1822(a)). This provision would clarify that the "good faith reliance" defense is available, not just when
2

CONFIDENTIAL -- NOT FOR DISTRIBUTIONDraft--January 9, 2003
agents are acting pursuant to a FISA Court order, but also when they are acting pursuant to a lawful authorization from the President or the Attorney General.
Section 107: Pen Registers in FISA Investigations.
50 U.S.C. § 1842(a)(1) makes FISA pen registers available in investigations of non-U.S. persons to "obtain foreign intelligence information." But for U.S. persons, the standard is much higher: in cases involving U.S. persons, pen registers are only available "to protect against international terrorism or clandestine intelligence activities." Perversely, this appears to be stricter than the standard for pen registers under Title III, which requires only that it be shown that the information "is relevant to an ongoing criminal investigation." 18 U.S.C. § 3123(a)(1). This provision would amend § 1842(a)(1) by eliminating the stricter standard for U.S. persons. Specifically, FISA pen registers would be available in investigations of both U.S. persons and non-U.S. persons whenever they could be used "to obtain foreign intelligence information."
Section 108: Appointed Counsel in Appeals to FISA Court of Review.
Under FISA, proceedings before the FISA Court and the Court of Review are conducted ex parte. As a result, when the Court of Review meets to consider an appeal by the United States, there is no party to defend the judgment of the court below. The FISA Court of Review thus is obliged to interpret sensitive and complicated statutes without the benefit of the adversary process. This provision would amend FISA to permit the FISA Court of Review, in its discretion, to appoint a lawyer, with appropriate security credentials, to defend the judgment of the FISA Court, when the United States appeals a ruling to the FISA Court of Review. It would also provide for the compensation of a lawyer so appointed by the FISA Court of Review.
Sec. 109: Enforcement of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court Orders.
The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act does not specify the means for enforcement of orders issued by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. Thus, for example, if a person refuses to comply with an order of the court to cooperate in the installation of a pen register or trap and trace device under 50 U.S.C. § 1842(d), or an order to produce records under 50 U.S.C. § 1861, existing law provides no clearly defined recourse to secure compliance with the court's order. This section remedies this omission by providing that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court has the same authority as a United States district court to enforce its orders, including the authority to impose contempt sanctions in case of disobedience.
Sec. 110: Technical Correction Related to the USA PATRIOT Act.
3

CONFIDENTIAL -- NOT FOR DISTRIBUTIONDraft--January 9, 2003
Section 204 of the USA PATRIOT Act clarified that intelligence exceptions from the limitations on interception and disclosure of wire, oral, and electronic communications continue to apply, notwithstanding section 216 of the Act. Section 224 sunsetted several provisions of the Act on December 31, 2005. Although section 216 was not included in the sunset provision, section 204's clarifying language was sunsetted. If not corrected, this anomaly will result in the loss of valuable and necessary intelligence exemptions to the pen register and trap and trace provisions after December 31, 2005. This provision would eliminate this anomaly and treat the clarifying language of section 204 the same as section 216.
Sec. 111. International Terrorist Organizations as Foreign Powers.
- MORE ANALYSIS ON THIS CORRUPT PEICE OF CONSTITUTIONAL CONDEMNATION
(http://www.eff.org/Censorship/Terrorism_militias/patriot-act-II-analysis.php) - EFF Analysis of "Patriot II,"
Provisions of the Domestic Security Enhancement Act of 20031 that Impact the Internet and Surveillance
Read the bill
With the full effect of the USA Patriot Act (USAPA) on civil liberties in the United States still unknown, and without a shred of evidence that USAPA was required to help fight terrorism, the Bush Administration has been preparing a second piece of legislation. Tentatively titled the "Domestic Security Enhancement Act of 2003," it was instantly dubbed Patriot II or Son of Patriot. For purposes of this report, it's called USAPA II. Recently Attorney General Ashcroft denied that a bill was in the works, although he admitted that the leaked document is "what we've been thinking."2
Whether or not USAPA II is introduced, it's clear that the Patriot Act is casting a long shadow in Washington, D.C. For instance, Attorney General John Ashcroft recently told the Senate Judiciary Committee that he had authorized more than 170 "emergency" FISA searches since 9/11. In the previous 20 years, attorneys general had only authorized a total of 47 emergency FISA searches.
The first Patriot Act assumes that lack of information caused by laws that restricted government information-gathering was a major reason for the September 11 terrorist attacks. But nothing could be further from the truth. The most objective analysis -- that of the congressional joint inquiry committee focused on the government's failure to "connect the dots."3 It noted poor coordination between the many government agencies responsible for intelligence and counter-intelligence and poor sorting of the information it did have.
Simply collecting more information cannot solve this problem. But USAPA II makes the same mistake: it seeks more power to gather information with less oversight. Meanwhile, more agencies or task forces that you've never heard of are being created.
Let's be frank. The government has an insatiable appetite for data. But the mindless accumulation of data is not intelligence. Intelligence requires focused thinking and focused questions. Instead, we're building a Tower of Babel. If this continues, we'll get the worst of both worlds -- all the disadvantages of widespread privacy invasion with none of the security benefits.

- (http://www.fsrn.org/news/20060929_news.html) - Headlines (5:00)HOUSE PASSES WARRENTLESS WIRETAPPING BILLThe House of Representatives approved legislation last night that would authorize the warrantless wiretapping of telephone and email communications between individuals in the US and abroad. The so-called Electronic Surveillance Modernization Act permits the executive branch to eavesdrop without a court order. The legislation bypasses the FISA court by requiring only the approval of the Attorney General. It also requires the cooperation of telecom companies in surveillance requests and prohibits any form of legal challenge against them for handing over customer data. The bill will now go to the Senate for debate.-
-

-- - Scalar Waves -
- (http://www.prahlad.org/pub/bearden/scalar_wars.htm) - Scalar WarsThe Brave New World of Scalar Electromagneticsby Bill Morgan- New waves discoveredLongitudinal EM energy fills vacuum of space, the time domain of spacetime, time as compressed energy, E=tc2, waves of time, phase conjugate wave pairs
"Electric power is everywhere present in unlimited quantities and can drive the world's machinery without the need of coal, oil, gas, or any other of the common fuels." Nikola Tesla
"At any point and at any time, one can freely and inexpensively extract enormous EM energy flows directly from the active vacuum itself." Tom Bearden
I guess the first thing to try to comprehend is that a "new" kind of electromagnetic (EM) wave has been discovered in the empty vacuum of space which, when engineered, can be an inexhaustible supply of energy in great magnitude at any place in the universe. The word "new" is in quotes because the discovery really goes back to Nikola Tesla and his discovery of what he called "radiant energy." It is also not "new" because the Russians (KGB) have been working on this technology for over 30 years and have weaponized these "new" longitudinal scalar waves to a great degree. These are the weapons Nikita Khrushchev spoke of in January, 1960.
"By 1957-8 the Soviets had progressed to the point of a giant scalar EM accident in the Urals which exploded nearby atomic wastes, devastating the area. They had also progressed to development of great new superweapons using their new energetics - weapons to which Khrushchev referred in 1960 when he informed the Soviet Presidium of a new, fantastic weapon in development, a weapon so powerful that it could wipe out all life on earth if unrestrainedly employed.'" Tom Bearden
After over 30 years of development, and extensive testing around the globe, these new scalar electromagnetic weapons are up and running and ready to go. Tom Bearden, at his website Cheniere, dicusses the history of these new scalar electromagnetic weapons in his paper "Historical Background of Scalar EM Weapons.
which the russians have, tesla granted to them
- What does "Zero Point" mean?
"Boyer traces the historical creation of the vacuum as proceeding in stages in parallel with the historical development of ideas about the vacuum. To paraphrase, he says that in the 17th century, it was thought that a totally empty volume of space could be created by simply removing all matter and, in particular, all gases. That was our first concept of the vacuum. Just get rid of all the gas.
Late in the 19th century, it became apparent that the region still contained thermal radiation. But it seemed that the radiation might be eliminated by cooling. So the second concept of getting a real vacuum is to cool it down to zero temperature. Just go all the way to absolute zero. Then weve got a real vacuum. Right? Well, since then, both theory and experiment have shown that there is a non-thermal radiation in the vacuum and that it persists even if the temperature could be lowered to absolute zero. Therefore, it was simply called the zero point radiation."
Thomas Valone http://www.seaspower.com/InsideZeroPoint.htm

----- The death beam --
(http://www.tldm.org/news4/deathraygun.htm) -
Veronica - Oh, and I see that - Our Lady is showing me now - there are some kind of implements they're using that... it doesn't look like a gun, it looks like a flashlight, but I know it's not a flashlight; it's some object of some kind of a ray they've got. And then - now he's lifting - I see a man in a very odd looking uniform; I don't recognize the uniform. But he's raising high, like this, this ray gun. That's what it is, it's a ray gun. And he's now pushing the trigger, and I see... it looks like long streams of light, but everything it hits just disintegrates and melts. (Veronica groans.) Our Lady - "Russia, My children, has this implement of destruction." (7-25-85)
Shielding is ineffective. The scalar pulse (or continuous wave) can go anywhere gravity can go. It penetrates the steel hull of tanks and armored vehicles. It penetrates underground shelters and bunkers. It penetrates pillboxes and fortifications. Foxholes are no protection. Just shoot through the earth into them. There is no longer any place to hide.
--Brezhnev's unheeded 1975 characterization of these weapons as "more frightening than the mind of ran has ever imagined" has very real justification. There is now a "balance of terror" loose in the world that makes the old MADmen's MAD concept look like a sunny day in Hawaii.
"Each side secretly develops new means of warfare in order to employ them unexpectedly. History knows many examples how the employment of a new weapon initially gave considerable success because the enemy, caught unawares and not knowing the combat capabilities of this weapon, was for some time incapable of effective counteraction" - V. Yo. Savkin, The Basic Principles of Operational Art and Tactics, Moscow, 1972.
NIKOLA TESLA'S - "PARTICLE BEAM WEAPON"FPRIVATE "TYPE=PICT;ALT=Particle Beam Weapon"

Unfortunately, few modern Americans know of the great scientific and engineering achievements of Nikola Tesla. Yet, many of Tesla’s achievements helped the United States reach its high standard of living and obtain its great productive capacity.
Nikola Tesla (1857-1943) was born in Smitjan, Lika, which is now part of Yugoslavia. In 1884, he came to America and became a naturalized U.S. citizen.
He first worked in the Edison plant in Orange, New Jersey. Later he worked with George Westinghouse. Tesla discovered the principle of the rotary magnetic field, applying it in a practical manner in the induction motor. It was Tesla’s design which provided the basis for the millions of electric motors now used all over the world.
In 1899, Tesla established an experimental laboratory in Colorado Springs, Colorado. There Tesla developed a method to transmit power long distances without wires. He lit a bank of 200 carbon filament lamps--consuming about 10 kilowatts at a point 26 miles from the transmission station--using no wires for connection. AS A RESULT OF THESE EXPERIMENTS TESLA DISCOVERED METHODS TO CREATE MASS ALTERAT1ONS IN THE WEATHER BY ELECTRICITY.
Tesla wrote an article titled, "The Problem of Increasing Human Energy" that appeared in the June, 1900 issue of CENTURY MAGAZINE. The article showed the theoretical basis for the current Soviet weather warfare attacks against America. Tesla wrote:
"Stationary waves in the earth...will enable us to attain many important specific results impossible otherwise. For instance, by their use, we may produce at will, from a sending station, an electrical effect in any particular region of the globe. We may send...over the earth a wave, of electricity traveling at any rate we desire, from the pace of a turtle up to lightning speed."
which the americans have, tesla granted to them, checks and balances
--The June, 1976 issue of RADIO-ELECTRONICS MAGAZINE carried an article titled, "Twelve Million Volts." The article reported that Tesla’s experiment in Colorado Springs are the basis for a new form of U.S. Government backed research into nuclear fusion.

------- weather control devices - russia manipulates with scalar wave, u.s. controls with heavy dollars, burly yankee tech. (project skyfire, and project stormfury -- to deplete vietnam ozone layer, etc)
- (http://www.pbs.org/tesla/ll/ll_wendwar.html) - a weapon to end war, charged particle beam weapon, or scalar wave.
- (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weather_control) - Weather control is the act of manipulating or altering certain aspects of the environment to produce desirable changes in weather.

History of weather control
Some American Indians had rituals which they believed could induce rain. The Finnish people, on the other hand, were believed by others to be able to control all weather. Thus Vikings refused to take Finns on their raids by sea. Remnants of this belief lasted well into the modern age, with many ship crews being reluctant to accept Finnish sailors.
U.S. Senate Bill 517 [1]and U.S. House Bill 2995 [2]; two bills that would have allowed experimental weather modification by artificial methods and implemented a national weather modification policy, was cleared from the books at the end of session. Neither ever became law.
The early modern era saw people observe that during battles the firing of cannons and other firearms often initiated precipitation. The first example of practical weather control is the lightning rod.
Project Stormfury was an attempt to weaken tropical cyclones by flying aircraft into storms and seeding the eyewall with silver iodide. The project was run by the United States Government from 1962 to 1983.
Cloud seeding is used in several different countries, including the United States, the People's Republic of China, and Russia. In the People's Republic of China there is actually a perceived dependency upon it in dry regions, which believe they are actually increasing annual rainfall by firing silver iodide rockets into the sky where rain is desired.
In the United States, dry ice or silver iodide may be injected into a cloud by aircraft, or even from the ground, in an attempt to increase rainfall; there are even companies dedicated to this form of weather modification.
Cloud seeding is also used in other areas.

[edit] Weather Control and History
Weather control, as well as "weather tampering", is expressly forbidden dating from at least December 10, 1976, when the "United Nations General Assembly Resolution 31/72, TIAS 9614 Convention (http://www.fas.org/nuke/control/enmod/text/environ2.htm) on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques" was adopted.
The Convention was: Signed in Geneva May 18, 1977; Entered into force October 5, 1978; Ratification by U.S. President December 13, 1979; U.S. ratification deposited at New York January 17, 1980.
A bill to establish a Weather Modification Operations and Research Board, and for other purposes, was introduced on the floor of the United States Senate on March 3, 2005, by Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison.
Because of an actual, natural weather phenomenon, the Gateway Arch has been claimed to be a secret weather-control device[1]. When storms approach the host city St. Louis, Missouri, they sometimes "split", moving around the downtown area. This is probably because, unlike most cities, St. Louis is relatively tall and narrow, on an unusually flat area, and inside a Y between two very large rivers, therefore the wind of the storm accelerates over and around the obstruction of the city, taking some portion of the clouds and rain with it. The premise of the "artificial" splitting of the storm is that a large negative electromagnetic charge is built up in the city, using the Arch as a transmitter. If this were possible, its negative charge might actually repel that of a thunderstorm, though there is no evidence that this is actually the case.
Wilhelm Reich performed cloudbusting experiments in the 1950s to 1960s but the results of which are controversial.

[edit] Current operations
HIPAS has several diverse experimental facilities: a 1-megawatt rf transmitter to produce ELF/VLF (Extremely Low Frequency and Very Low Frequency) electromagnetic (EM) generation by the absorption of radio frequency (rf) power in the arctic ionosphere including ion cyclotron excitation; a 100 kW rf plasma torch used in research on the destruction of hazardous waste; a 2.7 m liquid mirror telescope used with one of several lasers for ionospheric stimulation and measurement; an Incoherent Scatter Radar (a new project using 88 ft. diameter antenna at NOAA Gilmore Creek site 34 km SW of HIPAS as the receiving antenna with the transmitter at HIPAS). HIPAS is in the process of adding a very high power (terawatt) laser (recently obtained from LLNL) to perform laser breakdown experiments in the ionosphere. Two Diesel electric generators (1500 HP 4160 V, 3-phase, 1.2 MVA each) are used to power the experiments. There are a number of computers (PC's ) on site, and a high-speed data line to UAF is available.

[edit] Modern aspirations
There are two factors which make weather control extremely difficult if not fundamentally unattainable. The first is the immense quantity of energy contained in the atmosphere. The second is its turbulence.
Cloud seeding has a mixed history of successes and failures. Critics generally contend that claimed successes occur in conditions which were going to rain anyway.
Conspiracy theorists have suggested that governments use weather control as a weapon (eg via HAARP and/or chemtrails). Although this has not been proven, U.S. Secretary of Defense William Cohen gave credence to the idea at a counterterrorism conference in 1997. [2]

[edit] Ideas to consider for the future
Because this technology hypothetically would allow scheduling and directing weather changes, it would affect the ecosystem and the behaviour of residing organisms. Considering that, its introduction would mandate new legislation to avoid any misuse, abuse and mishandling.
The extent of ecological repercussions following misuse falls within the operating area of such technology. If the area affected were small, the consequences could possibly be repaired. If the affected area were neither especially large nor especially small, substantial changes to it could be passed down to the rest of the ecosystem. If the affected area were large, the devastating results would likely affect the whole ecosystem, possibly making the planet uninhabitable for a very long time.
After such an event, it would be very difficult or impossible to regain the previous state of affairs. Regaining natural balance usually takes time. If help, possibly in the form of even more advanced technology, comes quickly, then regaining a balance similar to the former could be possible.
If this came to pass, the ecosystem as a whole would be affected forever. Some speculate that:
The planet would be uninhabitable to humans, at least temporarily.
The ecosystem could revert to a pre-disaster state, eventually making habitation possible again.
The ecosystem might move in a random direction. The surviving lifeforms unable to adapt quickly enough would die out; those more nimble in adaptation or evolution might thrive.
In some isolated enclaves, previous species that were able to survive would continue to exist, albeit as a minority.
- project stormfury and skyfire
project skyfire - (http://www.springerlink.com/content/7463323245467431/) - Vincent J. Schaefer
Summary More than 70% of forest fires in the northwestern United States are caused by lightening. The Project Skyfire is an attempt to learn more about the atmospheric conditions leading to thunderstorms in this area and to investigate the possibilities of an artificial influence on their development by cloud seeding. The experiences gained with the training of amateur observers as well as the first scientific results of the project are briefly discussed. During the first year of observations, for instance, there was found to exist an intimate relationship between a certain type of fast moving thunderstorms and the intensity and position of the jet stream. Finally, the great economical value of researches in the field of applied meteorology is stressed.

-- haarp (http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/NWO/HAARP.htm) - Haarp: High-Frequency Vandalism in the Sky
Technonet, the protest form of the 1990's: picketing on the information highways. For example, a fast-growing assortment of men and women around the world are using the Internet (started by the U.S. military for information transfer and exchange that would never be interfered with) to draw attention to a questionable military project in Alaska. These Internetting, e-mailing, faxing folks are blowing holes in the U.S. Department of Defense secrecy wall by using the government's own system.
The printed-word part of the protest started when Dennis Specht, an antinuclear activist then living in Alaska, sent a news item to Nexus on the topic of HAARP — the High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program. Then, an Alaskan political activist and science researcher in Anchorage, Nick Begich, networked with Patrick and Gael Crystal Flanagan, who are self-described "technomonks" living in Sedona, Arizona, and was told to check out that same Australian-based magazine. Begich was surprised to see an item from his hometown in Nexus and immediately headed to the local library to dig out the documents cited in the article.
That research led to articles and the book Angels Don't Play this HAARP: Advances in Tesla Technology, which is 230 pages of detailed information on this intrusive project. This article will only give highlights. Despite the amount of research (350 footnotes), at its heart it is a story about ordinary people who took on an extraordinary challenge.
HAARP Boils the Upper Atmosphere
HAARP will zap the upper atmosphere with a focused and steerable electromagnetic beam. It is an advanced model of an "ionospheric heater." (The ionosphere is the electrically charged sphere surrounding Earth's upper atmosphere. It ranges between about 40 to 600 miles above Earth's surface.)
Put simply, the apparatus for HAARP is a reversal of a radio telescope: antennas send out signals instead of receiving. HAARP is the test run for a superpowerful radio-wave beaming technology that lifts areas of the ionosphere by focusing a beam and heating those areas. Electromagnetic waves then bounce back onto Earth and penetrate everything — living and dead. HAARP publicity gives the impression that the High-frequency Active Auroral Research Project is mainly an academic project with the goal of changing the ionosphere to improve communications for our own good. However, other U.S. military documents put it more clearly: HAARP aims to learn how to "exploit the ionosphere for Department of Defense purposes." Communicating with submarines is only one of those purposes.

HURRICANE KATRINA
-
(http://www.infowars.com/articles/science/weather_mod_gov_control_wont_stop_wilma.htm) - Government Weather Control Won't Stop Hurricane Wilma 40-year-old proven technology lies dormant as lives and livelihoods are wrecked
Infowars Network October 21, 2005 By Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones
- Buried under the constantly updated reports of Hurricane Wilma, its increasing or decreasing strength and where it will make landfall, is the reality that the government alr eady has developed technology enabling control and reduction of hurricanes.
However, unsurprisingly they have no shown no willingness to use it to save lives or businesses as we come to the conclusion of what many are calling the most unprecedented hurricane season in history.
Former Naval physicist Ben Livingston briefed President Lyndon B. Johnson on hurricane control technology 40 years ago and continues to try to educate the public on its potential effectiveness today.
During a recent appearance on the Alex Jones Show, Livingston outlined the basics of the technology.
"A hurricane is made up of energy sails and each of those sails adds to the ferocity of it. It was proven in 1974 by an international project that these energy sails exist and that they are the reason that hurricanes can develop and grow move and cause damages. So there's no reason to attack the hurricane in total but just to fly in to the right front quadrant primarily relative to the direction the storm is moving in and seed those energy sails that are converging and making the rain and wind velocity increase in the front part of a hurricane." Livingston asserted.
He went on to explain exactly how to minimize and control the hurricane:
" We would be trying to destroy or at least grossly reduce the velocity in these individual energy sails by seeding the clouds with silver iodide in the top part of the cloud... and those tops would then have so many small droplets in them that the prevailing wind just blows them away and so an energy sail would be neutralized until it can regroup which may be several hours later."
The seeding process may sound complicated but it is not at all. There would be no need for more than two small aircraft at a time to safely fly upwards into the hurricane.
"We're carrying more cloud seeding material on one airplane now, over 800% more on each plane than we had during Project Storm Fury" (The project set up by the US Government to discover how to control hurricanes in the 60s). Livingston added.
Alex put the question to Livingston, if it is so simple to do and the government knows how to do it and has been doing it since the 60s then why did they not attempt to minimize hurricane Katrina?
"This is a long story with a deep history. Back in the mid 50s, 1954 or so, the government allotted the first amount of money for weather modification and weather control practices to the US weather Bureau to the tune of about 30 million dollars." Livingston said.
"Their charge was to employ the most brilliant scientists around the world, and meteorologists and physicists, to work out a concept for reducing damages from hurricanes. What brought that on was that we had three tremendous hurricanes in 1953 and '54 that affected the twelve northeastern states... Basically The National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) was formed to take that responsibility." He went on to say.
With Florida residents now being urged to evacuate and weather experts still unsure of Hurricane Wilma's exact path, how long will it be before public interest peaks in weather control technologies and real pressure is applied to force the government into using them?
We won't be holding our breath.

--FEMA Deliberately Sabotaging Hurricane Relief EffortsMultiple parishes revolt, use armed guards to defend against feds
Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones September 6 2005 -(http://www.infowars.com/articles/new_orleans/fema_deliberately_sabotage_relief_efforts.htm) - Numerous credible sources have come forward with examples of how the Federal Emergency Management Agency is deliberately sabotaging Hurricane Katrina relief efforts in New Orleans. This represents a ruthless attempt on the part of FEMA to impose a federal takeover of the area for their own benefit amid a tragedy that has already claimed anything up to 10,000 lives.
The mainstream media has picked up on this story but is whitewashing it as just another 'failure' of the federal government in dealing with the crisis.
In reality the actions are part of a coordinated campaign to deepen the scope of the disaster in order to force through bumper funding increases for FEMA.
Jefferson Parish President Aaron Broussard (pictured below) appeared on Meet the Press Sunday and broke down in tears as he described FEMA's criminal activities.
"We have been abandoned by our own country. Hurricane Katrina will go down in history as one of the worst storms ever to hit an American coast, but the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina will go down as one of the worst abandonments of Americans on American soil ever in U.S. history."
We had Wal-Mart deliver three trucks of water, trailer trucks of water. FEMA turned them back. They said we didn't need them. This was a week ago. FEMA--we had 1,000 gallons of diesel fuel on a Coast Guard vessel docked in my parish. The Coast Guard said, "Come get the fuel right away." When we got there with our trucks, they got a word. "FEMA says don't give you the fuel." Yesterday--yesterday--FEMA comes in and cuts all of our emergency communication lines. They cut them without notice. Our sheriff, Harry Lee, goes back in, he reconnects the line. He posts armed guards on our line and says, "No one is getting near these lines."
Why would FEMA, an organization supposedly tasked with helping in a time of crisis, deliberately cut police communication lines? This is a blatant example of sabotage and a sick push to make the disaster worse. In carrying out these actions, FEMA are no better than the animals who shot at rescue workers and helicopters.
Watch the video of the Meet the Press interview.
The mission of FEMA has never in reality been to bring people food and water and help in times of crisis. Alex Jones has attended numerous FEMA drills where the whole point of the exercise is to round people up, break up families and institute a brutal police state crackdown.
FEMA need to create a chaotic atmosphere in New Orleans so they can legitimize what they are doing.
We now have multiple reports of police being ordered to guard key infrastructures in order to defend them from FEMA federal agents. Sheriffs in numerous different counties are guarding highways to keep FEMA out. FEMA is being treated as the enemy because they are sabotaging key facilities in an effort to intentionally worsen the already desperate scenes of horror in New Orleans.

----Total Gun Confiscation of Law Abiding Citizens BeginsFederal forces lead criminal gangs of police in America-killing gun grab (http://www.infowars.com/articles/new_orleans/no_gun_grab.htm) - "The balloon has gone up, the shoe has dropped. Anyone doubting the criminal intentions of the social engineer control-freaks in Washington need only look at middle-class neighborhoods being stormed by black-masked wearing jackboots on a mission to steal guns.
This is a precedent setting case for national gun confiscation. This is a clear declaration of war by the Federal Government against the American people. This is exactly how Lexington and Concord started the Revolutionary War in 1775."
– Alex Jones
Infowars.com September 9, 2005By Alex Jones
- The federal government has been chomping at the bit for decades to disarm the American people, and now an amalgamation of state and local police led by the BATF are having their deepest desire fulfilled in New Orleans.
Major newspapers are reporting that in middle-class neighborhoods undamaged by floodwaters paramilitary police are going door-to-door demanding citizens’ firearms.
The New York Times even admitted that this is so that the citizenry cannot resist when they are physically forced to leave their homes.
Most of the residents are contentious nurses and power plant employees who are currently working in key areas of infrastructure. Others refuse to leave because early on they were told they would have to break up their families to do so. Still more refuse to leave and give up beloved family pets.
Hold outs, many of whom have a year’s supply of food and water filters, tell the police, "We’re the people who stopped the looters when you guys were nowhere to be seen in the first six days."
So the Federal Government does a horrible job delivering food and water to people they told to go to the Superdome, and now, almost two weeks later, they say the city is under their control. Their main mission: going door-to-door and confiscating American citizens’ lawfully owned firearms. This is treason. This is sedition against the Constitution and the Bill of Rights and our way of life.
I have been to over 10 urban warfare training drills where the military and the police work together. The national news always reports that it’s disaster relief training, when the truth is that they greedily train to subdue peaceful populations, disarm them and break up families.
Remember back in 1993, when Bill Clinton announced weapon sweeps of public housing without warrants. They did it to the disadvantaged then, and most people didn’t care. Now, they are doing it to the middle-class in plain view of the world.
They’re setting a precedent to take your property, to take your children, to take your guns. The courts have ruled over and over again that the police have no obligation to protect the public. At the same time, police have been trained that there really isn’t a Second Amendment and that Americans really don’t have a right to protect themselves.
This unfolding gun confiscation tragedy stands as a monument to the true intentions of this parasitic government. It wants you disarmed and under heel. It wants slaves – subjects, not citizens.
The law-abiding gun owning citizens of New Orleans are having their life line severed and the American people are witnessing a giant gun confiscation drill.
There should be a howling, screaming the likes of which has never been heard against the Bush administration that is in control of New Orleans. If we let them legitimize gun confiscation for security, they are going to use this all over the country.
Lord Bush is already licking his lips and talking about making Gonzalez, a person who is adamantly anti-gun, his pick to succeed Rehnquist.
All Americans can now count on this: when you're in trouble or when you're in crisis, the "authorities" aren't going to come with aid. They're going to send a squad of goons to take advantage of the situation, take your guns and drag you off to a FEMA camp. This is what we pay taxes for.
----ben livingston -
father of modern weather control - how they could've stopped those hurricanes.

---tesla shell,
Updated to the year 2002-Stunning new revelations about the secret scalar EM wars the media ignores THIS BOOK IS THE ONLY SOURCE FORTHIS INFORMATION - (http://www.cheniere.org/books/part1/teslaweapons.htm) - The Tom BeardenWebsite
Figure 7. Tesla Weapons at Saryshagan
The Saryshagan howitzer actually is a huge Tesla scalar interferometer with four modes of operation. One continuous mode is the Tesla shield, which places a thin, impenetrable hemispherical shell of energy over a large defended area. The 3-dimensional shell is created by interfering two Fourier-expansion, 3-dimensional scalar hemispherical patterns in space so they pair-couple into a dome-like shell of intense, ordinary electromagnetic energy. The air molecules and atoms in the shell are totally ionized and thus highly excited, giving off intense, glowing light. Anything physical which hits the shell receives an enormous discharge of electrical energy and is instantly vaporized -- it goes pfft! like a bug hitting one of the electrical bug killers now so much in vogue.
If several of these hemispherical shells are concentrically stacked, even the gamma radiation and EMP from a high altitude nuclear explosion above the stack cannot penetrate all the shells due to repetitive absorption and reradiation, and scattering in the layered plasmas.
In the continuous shield mode, the Tesla interferometer is fed by a bank of Moray free energy generators, so that enormous energy is available in the shield. A diagram of the Saryshagan-type Tesla howitzer is shown in figure 7. Hal Crawford's fine drawing of the interferometer end of the Tesla howitzer is shown in figure 6. Hal's exceptional rendition of the Tesla shield produced by the howitzer is shown in figure 8

- similar to the "bobbles" described in the science fiction book "peace authority", about a stasis field, that verner vinge thought of.
Figure 9. Tesla Terminal Area Defense System
In the pulse mode, a single intense 3-dimensional scalar phi-field pulse form is fired, using two truncated Fourier transforms, each involving several frequencies, to provide the proper 3-dimensional shape (Figure 10). This is why two scalar antennas separated by a baseline are required. After a time delay calculated for the particular target, a second and faster pulse form of the same shape is fired from the interferometer antennas. The second pulse overtakes the first, catching it over the target zone and pair-coupling with it to instantly form a violent EMP of ordinary vector (Hertzian) electromagnetic energy. There is thus no vector transmission loss between the howitzer and the burst. Further, the coupling time is extremely short, and the energy will appear sharply in an "electromagnetic pulse (EMP)" strikingly similar to the 2-pulsed EMP of a nuclear weapon.
This type weapon is what actually caused the mysterious flashes off the southwest coast of Africa, picked up in 1979 and 1980 by Vela satellites. The second flash, e.g., was in the infrared only, with no visible spectrum. Nuclear flashes do not do that, and neither does superlightning, meteorite strikes, meteors, etc. In addition, one of the scientists at the Arecibo Ionospheric Observatory observed a gravitational wave disturbance -- signature of the truncated Fourier pattern and the time-squeezing effect of the Tesla potential wave -- traveling toward the vicinity of the explosion.

--uso's, unidentified, submerged objects

(http://www.crystalinks.com/usos206.html) - From the History Channel - January 2006:
'Deep Sea UFOs' Aired on Monday, January 23, 2006 at 8:00pm ET - Detailed examination of the little-known phenomenon of USOs, or Unidentified Submerged Objects, an advanced type of UFO that can operate just as efficiently in water as in the atmosphere. These supposed otherworldly vessels have been reported, some believe, as far back as ancient Egypt. Others believe that USOs were reported by Alexander the Great and Christopher Columbus, [who allegedly was caught up in the Bermuda Triangle] and might have been seen in Atlantis.
Highlights of the show included the 1967 Shag Harbour Incident, a government-documented USO crash off the coast of Nova Scotia, Canada, and a trip to the area around Laguna Cartegena in Puerto Rico, a reported hotbed of USO activity. Interviewees included the US Navy's Bruce Maccabee, UCLA's Kathryn Morgan, as well as USO and UFO experts Stanton Friedman, Bill Birnes, and Preston Dennett.
In third dimension - the sci-fi drama series we consider our true reality at the moment - one would have to wonder about the agenda of aliens who live beneath the water - and yet we have come to realize that much is hidden from the public above - so why not below?
- The sightings of UFOs traversing the ocean are not new. On June 18, 1845 according to the Malta Times (Malta is a group of islands in the Mediterranean south of Sicily. A British colony until 1964) "We find the brigantine Victoria some 900 miles east of Adalia, when her crew saw three luminous bodies emerge from the sea into the air. They were visible for ten minutes, flying a half mile from the ship." There were other witnesses who saw this same UFO phenomena from Adalia, Syria and Malta. The luminous bodies each displayed an apparent diameter larger than the size of the full moon.
On March 22, 1870, in the equatorial waters of the Atlantic Ocean, the sailors of the English corvette Lady of the Lake saw a lenticular cloud with a long tail advancing against the wind. This form was visible for an hour, wrote Captain F.W. Banner in the ship's log. The drawing by Banner in his log looked extraordinarily like a flying saucer.
There are thousands of these reported sightings, many with pictures as well. In addition there are reports of bases off the coast of different countries, such as northern South America; Puerto Rico; Russia; under the North Sea; Scotland; Patagonia Coast, Argentina; Azores Islands, Portugal; Spain; Canaries; Canada; Japan; USA; Dominican Republic; Spitzbergen, Norway; Newfoundland, among others.
July 1967 - a Dutch multi-national businessman was contacted in the Oostscheld, below Amsterdam, by extraterrestrial beings who said they came from a place called Iarga, some 11 light years from our sun as we calculate distance. They were observing us from underwater and they allowed this man to visit the spacecraft in its underwater location. This is a very well documented case filling more than 400 pages of a book called UFO Contact From Planet Iarga.
Commander Graham Bethune, U.S. Navy (retired) was flying his military plane from Iceland to Newfoundland on February 10, 1951 when he saw a UFO coming out of the water. He was about 300 miles from his destination, when he and his crew saw a glow on the water like approaching a city at night. "As we approached this glow it turned to a monstrous circle of white lights on the water. Then we saw a yellow halo, small, much smaller than whatever it was launched from, about 15 miles away. As the UFO approached my plane and flew alongside it, we could see the domed craft which had a corona discharge."
A witness for the Disclosure Project, presented at the National Press Club on May 9, 2001 in Washington DC, was Dan Willis, U.S. Navy. He worked in the code room of the communication station in San Francisco. He received a priority message, classified as Secret, from a military ship near Alaska. The ship reported, emerging out of the ocean, near port bow, a brightly glowing, reddish-orange elliptical object approximately 70 feet in diameter. It shot out of the water traveling at about 700 mph. This event was tracked on the ships radar and substantiated.
There are many instances of sightings such as those, documented in the following books - UFO Contact from Undersea by Dr. Virgilio Sanchez-Ocejo (privately published by Wendelle C. Stevens, 1982) ; Underwater and Underground Bases by Dr. Richard Sauder (Adventures Unlimited Press, 2001); and Invisible Residents: A Disquisition upon Certain Matters Maritime, and the Possibility of Intelligent Life under the Waters of This Earth, by Ivan T. Sanderson, 1970 (The World Publishing Company, Cleveland, Ohio). Often underwater bases are allegedly located near areas of deep-water basins, such as the Puerto Rico Trench not far from the sanctuary of the Humpback whales in the Caribbean that we visit every year.

---oct 4, shag harbor. 1967 canadian ufo incident. noted as most important. (http://frankwarren.blogspot.com/2006/09/awesome-or-off-putting-usos.html) -

A USO is an unidentified submerged object which is to the water what UFOs are to the sky. Although USOs are reported far less frequently, they are reported. They're generally seen by fisherman, naval radar or locals in the vicinity of a body of water.One sighting comes from an area just 20 miles south of Malta, where some men were fishing in their own small ship. They saw what they first took to be a monster (which they later described as looking a bit like a black submarine) floating on the water's surface, and panicked. They brought in their nets and started their engine when a bright light flashed from the craft. When it did, several creatures were seen running around on its deck. The men said the creatures were about the size of a ten-year-old boy, and had an apparatus around their waists that could only be seen during the ship's periodic flashes of light. When the small creatures clambered back into their craft, it glowed so bright it couldn't be looked at, and submerged under water.In 1973 a Mississippi fisherman had an encounter with a submerged craft. It was after a month of unusually high UFO sightings, and happened in the Pascagoula river later in the day. The man claims there was a bright metallic object 4-6 feet below the surface. The craft was moving at a speed of 4-6 knots, and was emitting an amber beam of light. In a somewhat funny twist, the fisherman also claims to have had to beat it back with an oar as it kept coming in too close to his boat.A sighting often considered the mother of all USO sightings happened in Nova Scotia's Shag Harbour circa 1967. A 60' ship had been hovering in the air flashing orange-ish lights when it suddenly crashed (or flew) into the harbour. After it submerged, a yellow light could still be seen underwater - moving and leaving a trail of air-bubbles and yellow foam on the surface. The Canadian Coast Guard were called in thinking the crashed craft could have been an airplane. By the time they got there the only sign left was the 80' wide, half mile long trail of yellow foam. A thorough search in the water by divers, and on land for possible missing planes was conducted, but both searches turned up nothing.Other reports claim that a second ship later dove into the water alongside the first. Speculation has it the second ship was helping repair its fallen comrade, and when those repairs were complete, the two ships flew off into the atmosphere. The actual crash had a witness list comprised of at least 11 people, and was reported to the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. In fact, three mounties were on site to see that first ship's yellow light moving about underwater. The ocean is deep and relatively unexplored. Some think USOs to be the inhabitants of the lost Atlantis scoping us out, as opposed to extraterrestrials in for an inter-stellar visit. We think that whatever they are, they add to Earth's mystique - and that makes us a fan.

--- kennedy assassination.
(http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8797525979024486145&q=truth+and+lies+of+9%2F11&hl=en) - google video - 9/11 truth and lies
there's incontrivertable proof he was shot from the front (the driver) check out the video on google - truth and lies of 9/11
in this expose, it proves that the lapd has dealt drugs to those neighborhoods for years. WHOA. and the blacks who were from those neighborhoods were in those meetings DIDNT attack.. in past history. more people have been killed for less. the french chopped off heads and ripped off limbs for less destruction.

---probably never heard of iraq-gate
() -

(check out www.solari.com) --( narconews.com - giordano. journalist)

---we can talk about every single president that lieves, their ideals, stances, position, knowledge, groups, blah blah blah about washington and everything else.

-----Project Camelot: Gordon Novel interview (Video)
Gordon has really seen it all. In his first interview for over a decade, he gives us a glimpse of his role and perspective on a multitude of subjects including:- the Vietnam war- the Waco siege- the JFK assassination- Saddam Hussein and his trial- Majestic and the CIA- UFOs and the 'Extraterrestrial Revolution'- time travel and the attendant paradoxes- the RAM Project (his revolutionary plan to replicate an antigravitic propulsion system, ‘whiteworld’ a source of free energy and transform the economy)- his coming Hollywood trilogy, KINGDOMS COME... and much more.
--he says that he doesn't belieeve there's an underground base in area 51
(his idea of majestic 12 is that they're keeping tech info that we could use for our advancement secret and wants it realeased)
----bill hamilton. wrote a book on time travel, which gordon stated was quite accurate. ..ooooooh. (note, do not release through this medium)
--dr. kit green
---they call star wars - space sheild, now. (look up "protection of investments --commerce" a document that the pentagon will release to you. it talks about full spectrum dominance)
-----

HOLY CRAP-- now that we've established that i've officially lost my good, regular guy statis and that the normal listeners and readers have left, leaving only the conspiracy theorists and penn and teller bullshit crowd who think this is funny and can't wait till i'm done, here's the section just for those who are opposing of most of this shit. which i wish i could be, i'll tell you that. because i sometimes am scared shitless knowing that, the gov't is now going to put me into a terrorist database for possible relocation to a concentration camp. i can't get too successful now, because they watch my computers. .. ALL THE PORN I'VE WATCHED! I'M SCREWED!

--- YEAH, IT GET'S WORSE! More on technology to enslave ourselves. We pay for our lock and chains.
in 2001, they established laws that force companies to put tracking devices into our cell phones. now sattellite track our every movement. it's confirmed, cell phones now track oiur movement.
(u.s. news, your phone is watching you) gps in the cell towers, they watch you, even when it's off.
not only the federal gov't, but the local police will be able to track you.
imagine trying to tell people this 10 years ago that they'd have these giant towers that theyh'll be able to watch and find you.
they'll be able to covertly turn your phones on and listen to you.... WHAT!?

Theory of Everything (22)

---hey, did you guys hear about the brain cracker of the middle east situation? ok, here goes: The u.s. has had ALL major leaders now in power in the mid east in their payroll. you know that they(the nwo) paid and provided weapons to iraq and iran, even after being instrumental in putting these very nations leaders in power. eventually, after kuwait, following truly capital , american style gov't, they began to be TOO capitalistic. they thought they were big dogs, sicne they were getting all these billions, like the UAE, dubai, they misinterpreted their extreme wealth as it being something THEY controlled.. oh no. in fact, their money is political, whites give them their money and the whites giving them their paychecks are wealthy beyond measure. its a problem played out constantly in modern history. so what happened was the kuwaites started selling the oil on the cheap, thinking they'd get a pat on the back, HA! YOU'RE TAKING "THEIR" money away...not yours. so, what happened was their CIA operative, Saddam Hussein was emboldened to attack and filter out these idiots(scripted to retake white oil) and then threatened to get out now, so they can still have these idiots who screwed up their oil under their arm, even more happy, but understanding. suddenly, they realize that there will be such a thing as peak oil. and that every nation eventually wanes. china was on the rise, u.s. on the decline. they can't have that(pnac), but we can't just control or attack iraq without saddam being