History Repeats Itself
ACT 1
It was to be the end of a long, drawn out conflict and occupation. The people were looking for a beacon of light, of hope, and they found one in the most charismatic individual to arise on the political scene in over four decades.
The first black president.
He swept into office, set a worldwide precedent and gave hope to a world suffering from what could have been deemed terminal, psychological depression with maybe a hint of rage, bordering on insurrection. Meeting with a plethora of diametrically opposed dignitaries from the leadership of Europe and business tycoons in the U.S, to the queen, HOPE, was on the horizon.
You could be forgiven for thinking that the year was 2008 and that the president was Barack Obama. In fact, that year was 1957, and the president was Kwame Nkrumah[i].
The parallels between their presidencies, even in this early stage, are hair raising, but the implications of their culminations are frightening.
You see, Kwame Nkrumah was the first black on the continent of Africa to be elected president of the first independent African nation, Ghana. That quickly fell apart though, as forces within and without conspired to turn Ghana from riches to rags, a tale that would play out without pause or exception throughout the entire continent.
When Nkrumah took office, Ghana could have been considered the continents strongest economy with an abundance of natural resources and human ingenuity. That’s not unlike America is viewed today as the strongest economy in the world. No one could see it being anything else. Indeed, the prejudices and stereotypes, which today plague the people of Africa worldwide did not exist and were about to be created, one action at a time by insidious forces bent of destroying all the hopes, energies, and let’s not forget, material wealth that the population owned.
Today, as Obama takes office, the hopes, energies, and just as importantly, the material wealth, that ensures a nation’s stability is being ROBBED, by the EXACT same forces which robbed Africa, creating the destitution that is so popularized in the MSM, or mainstream media, today.
In Ghana it was not necessarily Nkrumah who was at fault, or even at all aware of the high scale looting operation that was occurring. Ghana’s treasury was completely cleaned out by the British[ii], former colonial masters, in the years preceding the independence movement, a movement which the British were well aware of and planned accordingly as every single president, prime minister, and military dictator that came to power was trained in America, Britain, France, other European states[iii], or were trained by the militaries of the colonial powers in Africa and were allowed to assume the mantle of control through force – The rest were assassinated[iv]. Following that, the Americans and other European nations finished that task by manipulating Nkrumah, trained at American Universities with faulty economic notions of how markets worked[v], into accepting ridiculous loans and spending lavishly on projects with no practical purpose for a nation with little to no manufacturing capabilities[vi].
This same process is taking place in America, as we find out that not only has our currency been devalued, but our credit, too, meaning our ability to get loans, has been restricted by the banks as Africa’s was and IS restricted - our leaders were allowed to spend frivolously during the supposed heydays of our economy on useless, wasteful, inane projects - business ventures like Enron damaged not only the base of our economy, but our credit scores and investor confidences, meaning, less wealthy foreigners are willing to trust us with their money, just as in Africa, savings were wasted on projects from Akosombo Dam to buying racing cars with no gas pumps – We’re finding out about the possibility that the American gold supply at Fort Knox has been looted[vii] and that amongst all of this, we are bailing out failed institutions, watching them fail AGAIN, bailing them out AGAIN and repeating the process without fail.
Nkrumah also brought with him from America another flawed ideal – a one continent order, or the dream of PAN AFRICA[viii]. Of course this was destined to fail, as all general, one size fits all approaches to state creation eventually fail[ix]. In fact, it is the worst approach of all, as it saps resources, leaves one open to potential enemies, political parasites, and of course the corrupt, highly intelligent and evil who have always, throughout history existed in all societies who wish for nothing more than to be on top, rule as a king, and suck the population dry. After all, isn’t the 6,000 years of recorded human history the story of us living in squalor, under a totalitarian despot who rules with an iron fist and unmitigated deviance?
So what about the similarities with Obama? That’s right. Obama brings with him the dream of, not just a continent wide order, that’s been done; he brings with him a one WORLD order[x]. And just as preoccupied with that dream as Nkrumah was, Obama has assembled, for all intents and purposes, the mightiest administration that this country has ever seen. It might be noted that the entire point of the establishment of the United States, as George Washington and our founding fathers envisioned it, was for the president to be second to the Congress, and both were to be the subjects of the people. Today, it is completely upside down. The blueprints of Successful government lie in the ability of the people to keep it small, weak, and subservient to the will of the educated and always vigilant population, because as we’ve seen this last decade, an all powerful government will always fail when it comes to the important jobs needing to be taken care of.
“Power corrupts. And Absolute power corrupts, absolutely.”
So, what happened to Kwame’s continent wide order? Ghana’s economy quickly fell into shambles, with per capita income falling by more than one third in the first 25 years after he took power.
By 2005, sub-Saharan Africa accounted for only two per cent of world trade. More than half of all Africans live on less than one dollar a day, the internationally recognized poverty line, and the number of poor people increased by one third from 1990 to 2005.
I am beginning to note with a tremendous amount of trepidation the swelling numbers of unemployed Americans with little to no useful knowledge or trade skills, minimal to zero foreign experience or understanding, a dying industrial, manufacturing base, dwindling trade with a growing trade deficit, an increasingly corrupt, morally bankrupt, as well as financially bankrupt population and government, with Ponzi schemes operated both by the smallest street scum to the highest offices!
Ladies and gentleman, we are faced with a fucking crisis!
Apparently the Europeans, mainly the British, won the battles and the war in the complete suppression of Africa as a player in the world’s economy. Nkrumah's economic mismanagement spurred unrest and he was deposed by the army in 1966, plunging the country into several decades of military rule, with one coup following another”[xi].
As History Repeats itself, could this be the makings of an American tragedy that is unidentifiable from Africa’s?
As I contemplated this question and researched answers, I stumbled upon something so vast and pernicious; I was literally taken aback….
[i] Kwame Nkrumah - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kwame_Nkrumah
[ii] James Meredith – The Fate of Africa – Ghana Treasury Looted by British
[iii] “A number of Africa's post-colonial political leaders were poorly educated and ignorant on matters of governance; great instability, however, was mainly the result of marginalization of other ethnic groups and graft under these leaders.” – Post Colonial Africa - http://www.yourcountries.com/africa.html
[iv] “During the period from the early 1960s to the late 1980s Africa had over 70 coups and 13 presidential assassinations.” – Post Colonial Africa - http://www.yourcountries.com/africa.html, Patrice Lumumba News – The New York Times - Belgian government apologizes for its role in 1961 assassination of Patrice Lumumba, first prime minister of former colony Congo; creates $3.25 million fund - topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/l/patrice_lumumba/index.html?inline=nyt-per
[v] "I am a non-denominational Christian and a Marxist socialist:" - http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-112357733.html
[vi] “He wanted to change Ghana from an agricultural nation into an industrialized country. The result was the state borrowing heavily in order to subsidize big projects, like the Akosombo Dam. Although the Akosombo Dam was a grandiose project, most of the projects were wasteful and Ghana could not afford such projects.” - http://www.african-network.com/ghana/history.asp
[vii] Is there any gold inside Fort Knox, the world's most secure vault? – Chris Ayres – London Times – “For several prominent investors and at least one senior US congressman it is not the security of the facility in Kentucky that is a cause of concern: it is the matter of how much gold remains stored there - and who owns it.
They are worried that no independent auditors appear to have had access to the reported $137 billion (£96 billion) stockpile of brick-shaped gold bars in Fort Knox since the era of President Eisenhower. After the risky trading activities at supposedly safe institutions such as AIG they want to be reassured that the gold reserves are still the exclusive property of the US and have not been used to fund risky transactions. In other words, they want to be certain that the bullion has not been rendered as valueless as if a real-life Goldfinger had stolen it.”
[viii] Tia Goldenberg at African News: Preview: Ghana at 50 - www.monstersandcritics.com/news/africa/news/article_1272532.php/PREVIEW_Ghana_at_50_leads_a_new_African_renaissance
[ix] The Failed Experiment: Why Marxism Has Not and Will Not Work - (blog) –
- http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2132540/posts
[x] Obama calls for New World Order in Berlin – YouTube video - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0CV8Xt2VWvc
[xi] Ghana’s Rise And Fall – PREVIEW – Ghana at 50 - http://www.monstersandcritics.com/news/africa/news/article_1272532.php/PREVIEW_Ghana_at_50_leads_a_new_African_renaissance
Sunday, April 12, 2009
“The Truth & Nothing Barack The Truth”
Sunday, April 5, 2009
The Only Book Banned & Burned By The US Gov't
It might shock some to learn that at the same time The US emerged as the sole Nuclear superpower and the supposed torchbearer of liberty and justice, we were also banning and burning books which were written by American citizens and sympathizers.
The book was SECRETS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE By Eustace Mullins: The London Connection.
Dedicated to two of the finest scholars of the twentieth century, GEORGE STIMPSON and EZRA POUND, Who generously gave of their vast knowledge to a young writer to guide him in a field which he could not have managed alone.
I can't help but to stress that this book was made, become wildly popular in Germany, banned, and burned by the United states military while simultaneously espousing our supposed righteousness to the globe. It angers me to see that even today, after so much corruption and degredation has passed, where it's clear that there is an emerging number of nation states which clearly have more freedoms than us, more safeguards for individual property, and yet we continue to claim to be number one in all regards.
Below is a weblink to the entire webbook for free and it's sincerely hoped you will take it, learn from it, and realize the high cost at which this book was produced to be distributed to you.
http://www.whale.to/b/mullins1.html
The book was SECRETS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE By Eustace Mullins: The London Connection.
Dedicated to two of the finest scholars of the twentieth century, GEORGE STIMPSON and EZRA POUND, Who generously gave of their vast knowledge to a young writer to guide him in a field which he could not have managed alone.
I can't help but to stress that this book was made, become wildly popular in Germany, banned, and burned by the United states military while simultaneously espousing our supposed righteousness to the globe. It angers me to see that even today, after so much corruption and degredation has passed, where it's clear that there is an emerging number of nation states which clearly have more freedoms than us, more safeguards for individual property, and yet we continue to claim to be number one in all regards.
Below is a weblink to the entire webbook for free and it's sincerely hoped you will take it, learn from it, and realize the high cost at which this book was produced to be distributed to you.
http://www.whale.to/b/mullins1.html
Tuesday, March 24, 2009
My Response To MIAC Report by Chuck Baldwin, March 24, 2009
My Response To MIAC ReportBy Chuck BaldwinMarch 24, 2009
This column is archived at http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/c2009/cbarchive_20090324.html
By now, readers should be familiar with the Missouri Information AnalysisCenter (MIAC) report dated 02/20/09 and titled, "MIAC Strategic Report: TheModern Militia Movement."
In this dreadfully malicious and slanderous "lawenforcement sensitive" secret police report, Governor Jeremiah (Jay) Nixon;John Britt, Director of the Missouri Department of Public Safety; JamesKeathley, Colonel, Missouri State Highway Patrol; and Van Godsey, Directorof MIAC categorize certain citizens as being potential violence-prone"militia members."
I would venture to guess that more than 75% of the entirepopulation of the United States would fit the MIAC's broad definition ofsomeone who would fall into the aforementioned category. According to the MIAC report, if you oppose any of the following, you couldqualify for being profiled as a potential dangerous "militia member":
The United Nations
The New World Order
Gun Control
The violation of Posse Comitatus
The Federal Reserve
The Income Tax
The Ammunition and Accountability Act
A possible Constitutional Convention
The North American Union
Universal Service Program
Radio Frequency Identification (RFID)
AbortionI
llegal Immigration
Again, I would bet that at least 75% of the American people would oppose atleast one or more items on the above list. Well, according to the MIACreport, that is sufficient to make them potential dangerous "militiamembers." However, it is the following statement contained in the MIAC report that isparticularly disturbing to yours truly.
Under the heading "PoliticalParaphernalia," the report states, "Militia members most commonly associatewith 3rd party political groups. It is not uncommon for militia members todisplay Constitutional [sic] Party, Campaign for Liberty, or Libertarianmaterial. These members are usually supporters of former PresidentialCandidate [sic]: Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin, and Bob Barr."
The obvious inference of the above statement links Ron Paul, Bob Barr, andmyself to potential dangerous "militia members." The broader implication isthat the millions of people who supported Ron Paul, Bob Barr, or myself arelikewise categorized as potential dangerous "militia members."
This is a classic case of broad-brushed police profiling. Can you imagine the falloutof this preposterous report had the names Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, andMaxine Waters been used instead of the names Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin, andBob Barr? Accordingly, Ron Paul, Bob Barr, and I wrote a formal letter to theabove-named Missouri officials demanding "that the following-describeddocument be immediately removed from any and all websites associated with ormaintained by the state of Missouri or any agency thereof, including theMIAC; that the said document no longer be circulated by the state ofMissouri or any agency thereof or associated therewith; and that the stateof Missouri repudiate its references to the three of us contained therein."
To view the full text of our letter to Governor Nixon of Missouri, go here: http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/MIAC-Letter.pdf
Ladies and gentlemen, we simply cannot allow this kind of police profilingto continue.
I assure you, this phenomenon is not limited to the State of Missouri.
Every state that has a "Fusion Center" is being fed this kind ofnonsense on a regular basis. You and I are commonly referred to as"extremists" in these secret police reports. This has been happening inearnest for the past couple of months and is operating under the auspices ofthe federal Department of Homeland Security.
And people with a publicplatform (such as myself, Ron Paul, Bob Barr, and a host of others) are nowbeing singled out by name.
How long will it be before police agencies begin"picking up and hauling away" those people whose names are mentioned inthese reports? It may be sooner than we think.
To see if your state has a "Fusion Center," go here: http://www.dhs.gov/xinfoshare/programs/gc_1156877184684.shtm
The only thing that will stymie this nonsense is a huge public outcryopposing it. Yes, the people of this country (that means YOU) still have thepower to put a stop to this kind of totalitarian thinking.
If we do nothing,however, it will soon be too late to stop it. We either stop it now, or itwill quickly mushroom into a leviathan that will both monitor and controlthe personal opinions and speech of every man, woman, and child in this country.
No, I am not exaggerating. The Feds already monitor virtually every phone call, email, and publicspeech in the country. How long before these secret police reports will beused as justification to arrest and incarcerate people because of theirideas and opinions, labeling them as a "threat" or as "dangerous" to society?
Here is the contact information for the appropriate officials in Missouri:
Email address:
Brandon.middleton@mshp.dps.mo.gov
Missouri Information Analysis Center
Division of Drugs & Crime Control
P. O. Box 568Jefferson City, MO 65102-0568
Phone: 573-751-6422Toll Free: 866-362-6422
Fax: 573-751-9950
And while you are at it, you should also contact the state police agency aswell as the governor's office in your state, especially if your state has a"Fusion Center" (see web site above).
Mark it down: if you have everpublicly opposed any of the above-mentioned issues or organizations, or have ever publicly supported an independent Presidential candidate, YOU ARE BEING PROFILED RIGHT NOW!
We await the State of Missouri's response. In the meantime, what are yougoing to do? P.S. Even as this column is being distributed, we have just received a replyfrom the Director of the Missouri Department of Public Safety, John Britt.
Iwill analyze and respond to this statement in my next column. *If you appreciate this column and want to help me distribute theseeditorial opinions to an ever-growing audience, donations may now be made bycredit card, check, or Money Order. Use this link:
http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/donate.php (c) Chuck Baldwin NOTE TO THE READER: This email editorial cannot be considered Spam as long as the senderincludes contact information and a method of removal. To subscribe, click on this link and follow the instructions:http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/subscribe.php To unsubscribe, click on this link and follow the instructions:http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/unsubscribe.php Chuck Baldwin's commentaries are copyrighted and may be republished,reposted, or emailed providing the person or organization doing so does notcharge for subscriptions or advertising and that the column is copied intactand that full credit is given and that Chuck's web site address is included. Editors or Publishers of publications charging for subscriptions oradvertising who want to run these columns must contact Chuck Baldwin forpermission.
Radio or television Talk Show Hosts interested in scheduling aninterview with Chuck should contact chuck@chuckbaldwinlive.com Readers may also respond to this column via snail mail. The postal addressis P.O. Box 37070, Pensacola, Florida. When responding, please include yourname, city and state. And, unless otherwise requested, all respondents willbe added to the Chuck Wagon address list. Please visit Chuck's web site at http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com
----------------------------------------
UPDATED
ncn.blogr.com - stories - 2009-03-24-Missouri-Apologizes-Over-MIAC
Mar 24, 2009 ... http://www.infowars.com/missouri-apologizes-to-paul-barr-baldwin-over-miac-report/. The uproar that ensued as a result of our original story ...ncn.blogr.com/stories/2009-03-24-Missouri-Apologizes-Over-MIAC/ -
Missouri Apologizes to Paul, Barr & Baldwin Over MIAC Report
Mar 24, 2009 ... Paul Joseph Watson But “domestic terror” smears against anti-abortion, anti-gun control, bumper sticker political activists will remain.
www.infowars.com/missouri-apologizes-to-paul-barr-baldwin-over-miac-report/
This column is archived at http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/c2009/cbarchive_20090324.html
By now, readers should be familiar with the Missouri Information AnalysisCenter (MIAC) report dated 02/20/09 and titled, "MIAC Strategic Report: TheModern Militia Movement."
In this dreadfully malicious and slanderous "lawenforcement sensitive" secret police report, Governor Jeremiah (Jay) Nixon;John Britt, Director of the Missouri Department of Public Safety; JamesKeathley, Colonel, Missouri State Highway Patrol; and Van Godsey, Directorof MIAC categorize certain citizens as being potential violence-prone"militia members."
I would venture to guess that more than 75% of the entirepopulation of the United States would fit the MIAC's broad definition ofsomeone who would fall into the aforementioned category. According to the MIAC report, if you oppose any of the following, you couldqualify for being profiled as a potential dangerous "militia member":
The United Nations
The New World Order
Gun Control
The violation of Posse Comitatus
The Federal Reserve
The Income Tax
The Ammunition and Accountability Act
A possible Constitutional Convention
The North American Union
Universal Service Program
Radio Frequency Identification (RFID)
AbortionI
llegal Immigration
Again, I would bet that at least 75% of the American people would oppose atleast one or more items on the above list. Well, according to the MIACreport, that is sufficient to make them potential dangerous "militiamembers." However, it is the following statement contained in the MIAC report that isparticularly disturbing to yours truly.
Under the heading "PoliticalParaphernalia," the report states, "Militia members most commonly associatewith 3rd party political groups. It is not uncommon for militia members todisplay Constitutional [sic] Party, Campaign for Liberty, or Libertarianmaterial. These members are usually supporters of former PresidentialCandidate [sic]: Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin, and Bob Barr."
The obvious inference of the above statement links Ron Paul, Bob Barr, andmyself to potential dangerous "militia members." The broader implication isthat the millions of people who supported Ron Paul, Bob Barr, or myself arelikewise categorized as potential dangerous "militia members."
This is a classic case of broad-brushed police profiling. Can you imagine the falloutof this preposterous report had the names Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, andMaxine Waters been used instead of the names Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin, andBob Barr? Accordingly, Ron Paul, Bob Barr, and I wrote a formal letter to theabove-named Missouri officials demanding "that the following-describeddocument be immediately removed from any and all websites associated with ormaintained by the state of Missouri or any agency thereof, including theMIAC; that the said document no longer be circulated by the state ofMissouri or any agency thereof or associated therewith; and that the stateof Missouri repudiate its references to the three of us contained therein."
To view the full text of our letter to Governor Nixon of Missouri, go here: http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/MIAC-Letter.pdf
Ladies and gentlemen, we simply cannot allow this kind of police profilingto continue.
I assure you, this phenomenon is not limited to the State of Missouri.
Every state that has a "Fusion Center" is being fed this kind ofnonsense on a regular basis. You and I are commonly referred to as"extremists" in these secret police reports. This has been happening inearnest for the past couple of months and is operating under the auspices ofthe federal Department of Homeland Security.
And people with a publicplatform (such as myself, Ron Paul, Bob Barr, and a host of others) are nowbeing singled out by name.
How long will it be before police agencies begin"picking up and hauling away" those people whose names are mentioned inthese reports? It may be sooner than we think.
To see if your state has a "Fusion Center," go here: http://www.dhs.gov/xinfoshare/programs/gc_1156877184684.shtm
The only thing that will stymie this nonsense is a huge public outcryopposing it. Yes, the people of this country (that means YOU) still have thepower to put a stop to this kind of totalitarian thinking.
If we do nothing,however, it will soon be too late to stop it. We either stop it now, or itwill quickly mushroom into a leviathan that will both monitor and controlthe personal opinions and speech of every man, woman, and child in this country.
No, I am not exaggerating. The Feds already monitor virtually every phone call, email, and publicspeech in the country. How long before these secret police reports will beused as justification to arrest and incarcerate people because of theirideas and opinions, labeling them as a "threat" or as "dangerous" to society?
Here is the contact information for the appropriate officials in Missouri:
Email address:
Brandon.middleton@mshp.dps.mo.gov
Missouri Information Analysis Center
Division of Drugs & Crime Control
P. O. Box 568Jefferson City, MO 65102-0568
Phone: 573-751-6422Toll Free: 866-362-6422
Fax: 573-751-9950
And while you are at it, you should also contact the state police agency aswell as the governor's office in your state, especially if your state has a"Fusion Center" (see web site above).
Mark it down: if you have everpublicly opposed any of the above-mentioned issues or organizations, or have ever publicly supported an independent Presidential candidate, YOU ARE BEING PROFILED RIGHT NOW!
We await the State of Missouri's response. In the meantime, what are yougoing to do? P.S. Even as this column is being distributed, we have just received a replyfrom the Director of the Missouri Department of Public Safety, John Britt.
Iwill analyze and respond to this statement in my next column. *If you appreciate this column and want to help me distribute theseeditorial opinions to an ever-growing audience, donations may now be made bycredit card, check, or Money Order. Use this link:
http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/donate.php (c) Chuck Baldwin NOTE TO THE READER: This email editorial cannot be considered Spam as long as the senderincludes contact information and a method of removal. To subscribe, click on this link and follow the instructions:http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/subscribe.php To unsubscribe, click on this link and follow the instructions:http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/unsubscribe.php Chuck Baldwin's commentaries are copyrighted and may be republished,reposted, or emailed providing the person or organization doing so does notcharge for subscriptions or advertising and that the column is copied intactand that full credit is given and that Chuck's web site address is included. Editors or Publishers of publications charging for subscriptions oradvertising who want to run these columns must contact Chuck Baldwin forpermission.
Radio or television Talk Show Hosts interested in scheduling aninterview with Chuck should contact chuck@chuckbaldwinlive.com Readers may also respond to this column via snail mail. The postal addressis P.O. Box 37070, Pensacola, Florida. When responding, please include yourname, city and state. And, unless otherwise requested, all respondents willbe added to the Chuck Wagon address list. Please visit Chuck's web site at http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com
----------------------------------------
UPDATED
ncn.blogr.com - stories - 2009-03-24-Missouri-Apologizes-Over-MIAC
Mar 24, 2009 ... http://www.infowars.com/missouri-apologizes-to-paul-barr-baldwin-over-miac-report/. The uproar that ensued as a result of our original story ...ncn.blogr.com/stories/2009-03-24-Missouri-Apologizes-Over-MIAC/ -
Missouri Apologizes to Paul, Barr & Baldwin Over MIAC Report
Mar 24, 2009 ... Paul Joseph Watson But “domestic terror” smears against anti-abortion, anti-gun control, bumper sticker political activists will remain.
www.infowars.com/missouri-apologizes-to-paul-barr-baldwin-over-miac-report/
Monday, March 23, 2009
Death squad leader ‘was top CIA agent’
(Sunday Herald)
SERBIA: Gabriel Ronay
THE LATE President Milosevic's secret police chief and organiser of Serb death squads during the genocidal ethnic cleansing of disintegrating Yugoslavia was the United States' top CIA agent in Belgrade, according to the independent Belgrade Radio B92.
The claim that from 1992 until the end of the decade, Jovica Stanisic, head of Serbia's murderous DB Secret Police, was regularly informing his CIA handlers of the thinking in Milosevic's inner circle has shocked the region.
Stanisic is said to have loyally served his two masters for eight years. He is facing war crimes charges at the International Criminal Court at The Hague.
advertisement
In the terrifying years of Yugoslavia's internecine wars, he acted as the willing "muscle" behind Milosevic's genocidal campaigns in Croatia, Kosovo and Bosnia, including Sebrenica.
According to the charges he faces, Stanisic was "part of a joint criminal enterprise that included former Serbian president Slobodan Milosevic and other Serbian politicians".
Dermot Groome, The Hague's chief prosecutor, has specifically accused him of sending in the Serb Scorpion and Red Beret death squads into the states seeking independence from Belgrade. Stanisic has pleaded not guilty.
Like in a Cold War spy thriller, Serbia's secret police chief met his CIA handlers in safe houses, parks and boats on the river Sava to betray his master's action plans. He provided, it is claimed, information on the whereabouts of Nato hostages, aided CIA operatives in their search for Muslim mass graves and helped the US set up secret bases in Bosnia to monitor the implementation of the 1995 Dayton peace accord.
This has raised awkward questions for Washington. With Stanisic providing chapter and verse of the genocidal slaughter of Croats, Bosnians and Albanians from the early 1990s, should President Clinton have cut a deal with Milosevic at Dayton, Ohio, ending the Bosnian war on such equitable terms for the Serbs? Or, using Stanisic's evidence, should the Americans not have unmasked Milosevic and Radovan Karadzic, the then head of Republika Srpska, as genocidal war criminals and demanded their surrender?
From his prison cell at The Hague, Stanisic countered the charges facing him with an aide memoir portraying himself as "a person who had sought to moderate Milosevic and had done a great deal to moderate the crisis".
In an unusual move, the CIA has submitted classified documents to the court that confirm Stanisic's "undercover operative role in helping to bring peace to the region and aiding the agency's work. He helped defuse some of the most explosive actions of the Bosnian war."
In an interview with the Los Angeles Times, William Lofgren, his original CIA recruiter and handler, now retired, said: "Stanisic provided valuable information from Milosevic's inner circle. But he never took money from the CIA, worked with the agency on operations or took steps that he would have considered a blatant betrayal of his boss."
Thus the judges at The Hague are having to judge a man who allegedly sent the Scorpion death squads to Srebrenica to "deal" with men and boys fleeing the UN-protected Muslim enclave, while working with the CIA trying to end Milosevic's ethnic wars.
The way the CIA apparently viewed their Belgrade "asset" is revealed in an interview with Balkan Insight, a little known south-east European publication.
The emerging picture is a quaint reflection from a hall of mirrors. Greg Miller of the Los Angeles Times, writing about the links between the CIA and the Serb secret police chief, is quoted as saying: "As I said in the LAT story, the CIA do not see Stanisic as a choirboy. When you talk to people who work in espionage, this is often the case.
"Because of the nature of that job, of that assignment, they are working with people who do not have unblemished records, it would be difficult for them to be effective if they only worked with people who had unblemished records.
"People in Belgrade who have been following the career of Jovica Stanisic would say that this was a guy who was an expert in his field; he was a highly-trained and highly-effective spy. His motivation may have been that he wanted to know what the United States was up to.
"He did not believe that Milosevic was taking the country in the right direction - so he wanted to influence events. He saw himself as an important guy who could pull strings behind the scenes to make things happen in Belgrade."
Stanisic apparently did so on his own terms, while trying to remain a loyal Serb. He did not succeed.
Now he is having to account for his actions as Milosevic's loyal lieutenant at The Hague.
-----------------------------------------------------
SERBIA: Gabriel Ronay
THE LATE President Milosevic's secret police chief and organiser of Serb death squads during the genocidal ethnic cleansing of disintegrating Yugoslavia was the United States' top CIA agent in Belgrade, according to the independent Belgrade Radio B92.
The claim that from 1992 until the end of the decade, Jovica Stanisic, head of Serbia's murderous DB Secret Police, was regularly informing his CIA handlers of the thinking in Milosevic's inner circle has shocked the region.
Stanisic is said to have loyally served his two masters for eight years. He is facing war crimes charges at the International Criminal Court at The Hague.
advertisement
In the terrifying years of Yugoslavia's internecine wars, he acted as the willing "muscle" behind Milosevic's genocidal campaigns in Croatia, Kosovo and Bosnia, including Sebrenica.
According to the charges he faces, Stanisic was "part of a joint criminal enterprise that included former Serbian president Slobodan Milosevic and other Serbian politicians".
Dermot Groome, The Hague's chief prosecutor, has specifically accused him of sending in the Serb Scorpion and Red Beret death squads into the states seeking independence from Belgrade. Stanisic has pleaded not guilty.
Like in a Cold War spy thriller, Serbia's secret police chief met his CIA handlers in safe houses, parks and boats on the river Sava to betray his master's action plans. He provided, it is claimed, information on the whereabouts of Nato hostages, aided CIA operatives in their search for Muslim mass graves and helped the US set up secret bases in Bosnia to monitor the implementation of the 1995 Dayton peace accord.
This has raised awkward questions for Washington. With Stanisic providing chapter and verse of the genocidal slaughter of Croats, Bosnians and Albanians from the early 1990s, should President Clinton have cut a deal with Milosevic at Dayton, Ohio, ending the Bosnian war on such equitable terms for the Serbs? Or, using Stanisic's evidence, should the Americans not have unmasked Milosevic and Radovan Karadzic, the then head of Republika Srpska, as genocidal war criminals and demanded their surrender?
From his prison cell at The Hague, Stanisic countered the charges facing him with an aide memoir portraying himself as "a person who had sought to moderate Milosevic and had done a great deal to moderate the crisis".
In an unusual move, the CIA has submitted classified documents to the court that confirm Stanisic's "undercover operative role in helping to bring peace to the region and aiding the agency's work. He helped defuse some of the most explosive actions of the Bosnian war."
In an interview with the Los Angeles Times, William Lofgren, his original CIA recruiter and handler, now retired, said: "Stanisic provided valuable information from Milosevic's inner circle. But he never took money from the CIA, worked with the agency on operations or took steps that he would have considered a blatant betrayal of his boss."
Thus the judges at The Hague are having to judge a man who allegedly sent the Scorpion death squads to Srebrenica to "deal" with men and boys fleeing the UN-protected Muslim enclave, while working with the CIA trying to end Milosevic's ethnic wars.
The way the CIA apparently viewed their Belgrade "asset" is revealed in an interview with Balkan Insight, a little known south-east European publication.
The emerging picture is a quaint reflection from a hall of mirrors. Greg Miller of the Los Angeles Times, writing about the links between the CIA and the Serb secret police chief, is quoted as saying: "As I said in the LAT story, the CIA do not see Stanisic as a choirboy. When you talk to people who work in espionage, this is often the case.
"Because of the nature of that job, of that assignment, they are working with people who do not have unblemished records, it would be difficult for them to be effective if they only worked with people who had unblemished records.
"People in Belgrade who have been following the career of Jovica Stanisic would say that this was a guy who was an expert in his field; he was a highly-trained and highly-effective spy. His motivation may have been that he wanted to know what the United States was up to.
"He did not believe that Milosevic was taking the country in the right direction - so he wanted to influence events. He saw himself as an important guy who could pull strings behind the scenes to make things happen in Belgrade."
Stanisic apparently did so on his own terms, while trying to remain a loyal Serb. He did not succeed.
Now he is having to account for his actions as Milosevic's loyal lieutenant at The Hague.
-----------------------------------------------------
Tuesday, March 17, 2009
Global Warming: The Most Absurd Fiction
If Evidence for Global Warming Were Conclusive, I Would Waste No Time Supporting It: Therefore, Seeing as how the evidence is NOT forthcoming, and in fact contrary, why are so many people in Extreme vocal opposition AGAINST me?
125,000 years ago, the global temperature was 5 degrees Celsius warmer than it is now. There was still plenty of ice in Greenland. (We know because of ice cores.) Polar bears did not become extinct. Nor did penguins.
In short, the world did not come to an end when the temperatures were 5 degrees warmer than today.According to the global warming alarmists, if we do not act immediately and drastically, we risk a 2 degree Celsius rise in temperature over the next hundred years or so.
This prediction is based on models that virtually everyone admits are inadequate. (These models do not, for instance take cloud cover into account. They also assume that we have an infinitely thick atmosphere. They failed to predict the cooling cycle we are now in. In short, they are totally inadequate to serve as a basis for setting policy.)
However, let us, for the sake of argument, assume that these models are correct & that we will see a 2 degree rise in temperature over the next century or so. If five degrees warmer did not cause a crisis, then certainly two degrees won't. In fact, two degrees warmer would be a great benefit to the earth's populations (human & animal).
New England would have the climate of Virginia. Much of Canada & Siberia would be habitable. Increased temperatures would result in increased rainfall so the Sahara would once more be green.
Let us not run around like panicked children.
Let us think before we act & let us study the situation before we rush off making drastic policy changes.
Let us work on improving these models & when they are accurate enough that they predict the climate a decade or two in advance, then maybe we can trust them to make predictions a century or two in the future.
We have time.
We are not facing doom.
Global Cooling? [1998-2005 data shows cooling trend] Global cooling: the new kid on the block Sun Spot Cycle Prompts Fears of Global Cooling ...http://ideonexus.com/2008/02/13/sun-spot-cycle-prompts-fears-of-global-cooling/
More than 31000 scientists have signed a petition denying that man is responsible for global warming.http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/2053842/Scientists-sign-petition-denying-man-made-global-warming.html
Newsmax.com - Scientist: Earth Cooling, Not WarmingApr 24, 2008 ... A San Francisco-based scientist says that current solar activity strongly indicates that the earth is on the verge of a new ice age.http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/global_warming_ice_age/2008/04/24/90591.html
Ice In The Greenhouse: Earth May Be Cooling, Not Warminghttp://www.odu.edu/ao/instadv/quest/Greenhouse.html
Mars Melt Hints at Solar, Not Human, Cause for Warming, Scientist SaysFeb 28, 2007 ... Ice caps are melting on both Earth and Mars. According to one researcher's controversial theory, this suggests that global warming has ...http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/02/070228-mars-warming.html
Global warming on Mars, ice caps meltingNASA says the Martian South Pole's ice cap has been shrinking for three summers ... Jupiter's caught the same cold, because it's warming up too, like Pluto. ...http://www.skepticalscience.com/global-warming-on-mars.htm
Climate myths: Antarctica is getting cooler, not warmer, disproving global warming ...Ice flows are growing thicker, even more ice is being lost from the peripheries. ...http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11648
Nobody listens to the real climate change experts
telegraph.co.uk — Considering how the fear of global warming is inspiring the world's politicians to put forward the most costly and economically damaging package of measures ever imposed on mankind, it is obviously important that we can trust the basis on which all this is being proposed. Last week two international conferences addressed this issue.http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/4990704/Nobody-listens-to-the-real-climate-change-experts.html
Expanding Glaciers
Some glaciers are shrinking, but many others are growing. You can't just look at one set of data.http://www.iceagenow.com/Growing_Glaciers.htm
This is the graph of global ice area since 1979
http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/IMAGES/global.daily.ice.area.withtrend.jpg
Do you see any trend of global ice mass loss? No, neither does anyone else with a rational mind.
I'm not saying that Global Warming didn't happen, I'm saying it did, but also Global Cooling IS currently occurring, and hell, next, it might be GLOBAL STALING. But the culprit, like always, is the sun. A scientist mag might not admit it, take your pick out of those that do and don't, but the fact is, the results don't lie.
"Did my SUV cause the ice caps on mars to melt, then, when the sunspots on the SUN stop, did my SUV and factories cause the caps to melt back?"
I could go on and on. The fact is, we have no power over the main source of energy in our solar system, and the Earth has carried life for billions of years. I doubt it will stop.
The consensus is that we live in a constantly changing planet that goes from any extreme from a Jurassic heat up to an Ice Age cool down, life goes on. But on our immediate situation, yes, most of our allergies, skin and breathing conditions as well as diseases and cancers are caused by human sources.
Guess who though?
NOT THE PEOPLE.
The Bankers who supply and support the Corporations, you know, the ones with big Freemasonic/Pagan symbology like triangles and all seeing eyes everywhere. That's not a conspiracy is it? I didn't think so.
The conspiracy against mankind is real enough, and what most of you don't know is that the same people who openly oppose what you support, actually give contributions to those same institutions.
Carbon credit/carbon taxes are supported worldwide by politicians from across the board, and you can not deny any longer that carbon dioxide which we expel when we breath and plants inhale, is causing the Earth to go through these weather pattern farts.
http://infowars.com
125,000 years ago, the global temperature was 5 degrees Celsius warmer than it is now. There was still plenty of ice in Greenland. (We know because of ice cores.) Polar bears did not become extinct. Nor did penguins.
In short, the world did not come to an end when the temperatures were 5 degrees warmer than today.According to the global warming alarmists, if we do not act immediately and drastically, we risk a 2 degree Celsius rise in temperature over the next hundred years or so.
This prediction is based on models that virtually everyone admits are inadequate. (These models do not, for instance take cloud cover into account. They also assume that we have an infinitely thick atmosphere. They failed to predict the cooling cycle we are now in. In short, they are totally inadequate to serve as a basis for setting policy.)
However, let us, for the sake of argument, assume that these models are correct & that we will see a 2 degree rise in temperature over the next century or so. If five degrees warmer did not cause a crisis, then certainly two degrees won't. In fact, two degrees warmer would be a great benefit to the earth's populations (human & animal).
New England would have the climate of Virginia. Much of Canada & Siberia would be habitable. Increased temperatures would result in increased rainfall so the Sahara would once more be green.
Let us not run around like panicked children.
Let us think before we act & let us study the situation before we rush off making drastic policy changes.
Let us work on improving these models & when they are accurate enough that they predict the climate a decade or two in advance, then maybe we can trust them to make predictions a century or two in the future.
We have time.
We are not facing doom.
Global Cooling? [1998-2005 data shows cooling trend] Global cooling: the new kid on the block Sun Spot Cycle Prompts Fears of Global Cooling ...http://ideonexus.com/2008/02/13/sun-spot-cycle-prompts-fears-of-global-cooling/
More than 31000 scientists have signed a petition denying that man is responsible for global warming.http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/2053842/Scientists-sign-petition-denying-man-made-global-warming.html
Newsmax.com - Scientist: Earth Cooling, Not WarmingApr 24, 2008 ... A San Francisco-based scientist says that current solar activity strongly indicates that the earth is on the verge of a new ice age.http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/global_warming_ice_age/2008/04/24/90591.html
Ice In The Greenhouse: Earth May Be Cooling, Not Warminghttp://www.odu.edu/ao/instadv/quest/Greenhouse.html
Mars Melt Hints at Solar, Not Human, Cause for Warming, Scientist SaysFeb 28, 2007 ... Ice caps are melting on both Earth and Mars. According to one researcher's controversial theory, this suggests that global warming has ...http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/02/070228-mars-warming.html
Global warming on Mars, ice caps meltingNASA says the Martian South Pole's ice cap has been shrinking for three summers ... Jupiter's caught the same cold, because it's warming up too, like Pluto. ...http://www.skepticalscience.com/global-warming-on-mars.htm
Climate myths: Antarctica is getting cooler, not warmer, disproving global warming ...Ice flows are growing thicker, even more ice is being lost from the peripheries. ...http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11648
Nobody listens to the real climate change experts
telegraph.co.uk — Considering how the fear of global warming is inspiring the world's politicians to put forward the most costly and economically damaging package of measures ever imposed on mankind, it is obviously important that we can trust the basis on which all this is being proposed. Last week two international conferences addressed this issue.http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/4990704/Nobody-listens-to-the-real-climate-change-experts.html
Expanding Glaciers
Some glaciers are shrinking, but many others are growing. You can't just look at one set of data.http://www.iceagenow.com/Growing_Glaciers.htm
This is the graph of global ice area since 1979
http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/IMAGES/global.daily.ice.area.withtrend.jpg
Do you see any trend of global ice mass loss? No, neither does anyone else with a rational mind.
I'm not saying that Global Warming didn't happen, I'm saying it did, but also Global Cooling IS currently occurring, and hell, next, it might be GLOBAL STALING. But the culprit, like always, is the sun. A scientist mag might not admit it, take your pick out of those that do and don't, but the fact is, the results don't lie.
"Did my SUV cause the ice caps on mars to melt, then, when the sunspots on the SUN stop, did my SUV and factories cause the caps to melt back?"
I could go on and on. The fact is, we have no power over the main source of energy in our solar system, and the Earth has carried life for billions of years. I doubt it will stop.
The consensus is that we live in a constantly changing planet that goes from any extreme from a Jurassic heat up to an Ice Age cool down, life goes on. But on our immediate situation, yes, most of our allergies, skin and breathing conditions as well as diseases and cancers are caused by human sources.
Guess who though?
NOT THE PEOPLE.
The Bankers who supply and support the Corporations, you know, the ones with big Freemasonic/Pagan symbology like triangles and all seeing eyes everywhere. That's not a conspiracy is it? I didn't think so.
The conspiracy against mankind is real enough, and what most of you don't know is that the same people who openly oppose what you support, actually give contributions to those same institutions.
Carbon credit/carbon taxes are supported worldwide by politicians from across the board, and you can not deny any longer that carbon dioxide which we expel when we breath and plants inhale, is causing the Earth to go through these weather pattern farts.
http://infowars.com
Monday, March 16, 2009
Super Myths
In todays society, myths, conspiracy theories, and propoganda combine to produce our culture of ignorance. We have no idea what is true, except what we FEEL inside of ourselves, because there is simply so much CRAP that fills our senses in everyday news that we stop listening, except to the most passionate. Unfortunately, the most passionate turn out to be the most wrong (that, or scam artists - See: Miss Cleo).
What really got my attention was the global warming issue. It swept over America a few years ago when Al Gore took to his little electronic manlift with ruler in hand and showed us how we were all going to die if we didn't start throwing ice cubes in the ocean and paying a global authority carbon taxes... Or something like that.
Well, it turned out he was wrong when he was sued by dozens of scientists and had his reputation tarnished as 650 international scientists stood up against the claim that the Earth's warming was caused by humans, let alone that the Earth was warming at all.
In fact, in 2008, it came out that the Earth was COOLING, and who turned out the be the culprit? The Sun! Of course. *slaps head* Silly humans. Always taking responsibility for supposed calamities. Well, when you feel like the global financial crisis is your fault, feel free to immediately begin directing funds into my account. But while we wait for you to get a conscience, I'll allow you to wallow in thought from this list i've compiled exposing the biggest "Catastrophe's & Problems Facing man" which are in fact, myths.
----------------------------------------------------
Scientist: Warming Could Cut Population to 1 Billion
dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com — Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, the director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany, said that if the buildup of greenhouse gases and its consequences pushed global temperatures 9 degrees Fahrenheit higher than today — well below the upper temperature range that scientists project could occur from global warming.
ORLY?!!??
From Digg:
alanocu
The correct solution to "global warming" is to have the courage to do nothing.Global warmists are like misguided cultists eager to swallow the religion of environmentalism. Jonestown, here we come. Except on digg, we scoff at religion because it's "stupid" and pat ourselves on the back for being so "much more intelligent."
And obviously, our inconsistencies with respect to who is spreading the gospel proves our intelligence to be in tact and our criticism to be fair, as any beliefs not shared with our own are repressed, belittled, buried down (like this comment will be), attacked and deemed as "hate" speech.
I’ve yet to see environmental agencies like 'Go Green or Rot in Hell' consistently badger the government to do something substantial about alternative energies. It’s easier for them to jump on the global warming bandwagon and send copies of An Inconvenient Truth to schools. And seconds later, a deacon appointed by Al Gore is on the home page of Digg for his courage to scare the hell out of kindergartners by telling them we’re killing polar bears and butterflies.And seriously, the sound of bullshit detectors going off is not a strategy.
You can't say you're for the "little guy" when you side with activist judges over the will of the people and put the demands of tree-hugging eco-wackos ahead of working Americans.Do you identify better with Ben Affleck or JoeSixpack? Who is the "common man" and why are we always telling him what he's doing wrong?
Reply to alanocu :
gjokkel
climate change then the pollution
- If we stopped pollution then the lack of drinking water
- If we solved the problem of drinking water then the lack of fossil energy
- If we managed to switch to renewable energy then deforestation
- If we stopped deforestation then overpopulation... etc.
With my most positive attitude I must say that we won't be able to solve every one of these. We are simply too many.If we accept this, then the only question remains:
HOW can the human population be decreased to 20% of its current size in the next 50 years? wow...
Frnnkdlxx
You know, you bring up quite an interesting conundrum and conspiracy. All those issues you brought up that the Super reactionaries back have been proven incorrect:
- If not the climate change then the pollution (we found out that the earth was cooling, not warming - New Scientist http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11648 - So they had to move on pollution which Penn from PEnn and teller fame easily exposed as a scam by the corporations for the green revolution which they exploit to no end, when all the trash on the planet could fit into a nice sized city intexas and never bother anyone)
- If we stopped pollution then the lack of drinking water (as if the corporations and organizations who recognize that drinking water supplies are dwindling only because the military and big biz have been contaminating it on purpose! remember when the military dumped millions of tons of vx into the ocean? http://feww.wordpress.com/2008/11/21/oceans-where- ... - as if they've never heard of desalinization plants)- If we solved the problem of drinking water then the lack of fossil energy (and don't get me started on the scam of calling oil a fossil fuel, when it's not from fossils and not rare. In fact, it's an abiotic material, created sort of like magma and many texans will tell you how reserves that they thought had been deplenished strangely come back online after a few years: http://freeenergynews.com/Directory/Theory/Sustain ... - and don't forget that in prudhoe bay alaska, lindsey williams explained how they tapped it off and restrict mining their because there' are 3x's the amount of reserves there as in all of saudi arabia!)
- If we managed to switch to renewable energy then deforestation (deforestation, ahh. we all care about it, and if only they told you of how after they devestate an area, the trees GROW BACK....and guess what, TWICE THE THICKNESS. it becomes an environmental nightmare because they are too close to eachother and too thick because of the stumps http://www.umich.edu/~mrev/archives/1997/10-8-97/e ... )
- If we stopped deforestation then overpopulation... etc. (let's not get on overpopulation... ok, then let's. lol. Fact is, all of humanities 7 billion could fit into Texas and have a plot of about 100 acres and a mansion . Earth is friggin huge. Humans are friggin tiny. Sort of like we see the son as huge, but all those tiny dots you see in the night sky are usually much larger than ours. Also, we know that the global elite seek to reduce human population by about 80%, that's from henry kissingers evil self! http://www.schillerinstitute.org/food_for_peace/ki ... )
http://infowars.com
What really got my attention was the global warming issue. It swept over America a few years ago when Al Gore took to his little electronic manlift with ruler in hand and showed us how we were all going to die if we didn't start throwing ice cubes in the ocean and paying a global authority carbon taxes... Or something like that.
Well, it turned out he was wrong when he was sued by dozens of scientists and had his reputation tarnished as 650 international scientists stood up against the claim that the Earth's warming was caused by humans, let alone that the Earth was warming at all.
In fact, in 2008, it came out that the Earth was COOLING, and who turned out the be the culprit? The Sun! Of course. *slaps head* Silly humans. Always taking responsibility for supposed calamities. Well, when you feel like the global financial crisis is your fault, feel free to immediately begin directing funds into my account. But while we wait for you to get a conscience, I'll allow you to wallow in thought from this list i've compiled exposing the biggest "Catastrophe's & Problems Facing man" which are in fact, myths.
----------------------------------------------------
Scientist: Warming Could Cut Population to 1 Billion
dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com — Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, the director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany, said that if the buildup of greenhouse gases and its consequences pushed global temperatures 9 degrees Fahrenheit higher than today — well below the upper temperature range that scientists project could occur from global warming.
ORLY?!!??
From Digg:
alanocu
The correct solution to "global warming" is to have the courage to do nothing.Global warmists are like misguided cultists eager to swallow the religion of environmentalism. Jonestown, here we come. Except on digg, we scoff at religion because it's "stupid" and pat ourselves on the back for being so "much more intelligent."
And obviously, our inconsistencies with respect to who is spreading the gospel proves our intelligence to be in tact and our criticism to be fair, as any beliefs not shared with our own are repressed, belittled, buried down (like this comment will be), attacked and deemed as "hate" speech.
I’ve yet to see environmental agencies like 'Go Green or Rot in Hell' consistently badger the government to do something substantial about alternative energies. It’s easier for them to jump on the global warming bandwagon and send copies of An Inconvenient Truth to schools. And seconds later, a deacon appointed by Al Gore is on the home page of Digg for his courage to scare the hell out of kindergartners by telling them we’re killing polar bears and butterflies.And seriously, the sound of bullshit detectors going off is not a strategy.
You can't say you're for the "little guy" when you side with activist judges over the will of the people and put the demands of tree-hugging eco-wackos ahead of working Americans.Do you identify better with Ben Affleck or JoeSixpack? Who is the "common man" and why are we always telling him what he's doing wrong?
Reply to alanocu :
gjokkel
climate change then the pollution
- If we stopped pollution then the lack of drinking water
- If we solved the problem of drinking water then the lack of fossil energy
- If we managed to switch to renewable energy then deforestation
- If we stopped deforestation then overpopulation... etc.
With my most positive attitude I must say that we won't be able to solve every one of these. We are simply too many.If we accept this, then the only question remains:
HOW can the human population be decreased to 20% of its current size in the next 50 years? wow...
Frnnkdlxx
You know, you bring up quite an interesting conundrum and conspiracy. All those issues you brought up that the Super reactionaries back have been proven incorrect:
- If not the climate change then the pollution (we found out that the earth was cooling, not warming - New Scientist http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11648 - So they had to move on pollution which Penn from PEnn and teller fame easily exposed as a scam by the corporations for the green revolution which they exploit to no end, when all the trash on the planet could fit into a nice sized city intexas and never bother anyone)
- If we stopped pollution then the lack of drinking water (as if the corporations and organizations who recognize that drinking water supplies are dwindling only because the military and big biz have been contaminating it on purpose! remember when the military dumped millions of tons of vx into the ocean? http://feww.wordpress.com/2008/11/21/oceans-where- ... - as if they've never heard of desalinization plants)- If we solved the problem of drinking water then the lack of fossil energy (and don't get me started on the scam of calling oil a fossil fuel, when it's not from fossils and not rare. In fact, it's an abiotic material, created sort of like magma and many texans will tell you how reserves that they thought had been deplenished strangely come back online after a few years: http://freeenergynews.com/Directory/Theory/Sustain ... - and don't forget that in prudhoe bay alaska, lindsey williams explained how they tapped it off and restrict mining their because there' are 3x's the amount of reserves there as in all of saudi arabia!)
- If we managed to switch to renewable energy then deforestation (deforestation, ahh. we all care about it, and if only they told you of how after they devestate an area, the trees GROW BACK....and guess what, TWICE THE THICKNESS. it becomes an environmental nightmare because they are too close to eachother and too thick because of the stumps http://www.umich.edu/~mrev/archives/1997/10-8-97/e ... )
- If we stopped deforestation then overpopulation... etc. (let's not get on overpopulation... ok, then let's. lol. Fact is, all of humanities 7 billion could fit into Texas and have a plot of about 100 acres and a mansion . Earth is friggin huge. Humans are friggin tiny. Sort of like we see the son as huge, but all those tiny dots you see in the night sky are usually much larger than ours. Also, we know that the global elite seek to reduce human population by about 80%, that's from henry kissingers evil self! http://www.schillerinstitute.org/food_for_peace/ki ... )
http://infowars.com
Sunday, December 21, 2008
Patton, Jews, & NWO, OH MY!
**Let's start it off right here by stating I am not racist or hold anything against Jews or anyone for that matter. I am black and I know how ignorant it is for anyone to falsely persecute someone based on their heritage, skin color, or crimes of their fathers or countrymen. All I seek to do here is expose the truth. That's all I care about.
A synapse of this piece is that we find out that General Patton was actually assassinated by what we could call the CIA, and that we unearth in the process the fact that all the forces supposedly working against eachother were actually working in tandem with one another. Hitler, Roosevelt, Stalin, Eisenhower, Churchill, the majority of bankers involved, the Bushes, they are all Jewish, and all worked together in one way or another.
Examples: Bushes, Rockefellers, Morgans, other U.S bankers gave funds, expertise, training to Hitler, who was born of Jewish parents in the house of the Rothschilds, better known as kings of the Bankers, Eisenhower and many of the same banking apparatus in the U.S. transferred untold wealth accrued from the Great Deppression to Germany and Russia, and Eisenhower worked with Stalin to massacre many innocent souls, Jewish, German and otherwise, while at the same time, many in U.S. supported vigorously the Germans, Hitler in particular(Margaret Sanger, other Eugenecists). This just gets TOOO weird, and i'm the one who dug deeper than most, it seems.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/3869117/General-George-S.-Patton-was-assassinated-to-silence-his-criticism-of-allied-war-leaders-claims-new-book.html
General George S. Patton was assassinated to silence his criticism of allied war leaders claims new book
George S. Patton, America's greatest combat general of the Second World War, was assassinated after the conflict with the connivance of US leaders, according to a new book.
'We've got a terrible situation with this great patriot, he's out of control and we must save him from himself'. The OSS head General did not trust Patton
The newly unearthed diaries of a colourful assassin for the wartime Office of Strategic Services (OSS), the forerunner of the CIA, reveal that American spy chiefs wanted Patton dead because he was threatening to expose allied collusion with the Russians that cost American lives.
The death of General Patton in December 1945, is one of the enduring mysteries of the war era. Although he had suffered serious injuries in a car crash in Manheim, he was thought to be recovering and was on the verge of flying home.
But after a decade-long investigation, military historian Robert Wilcox claims that OSS head General "Wild Bill" Donovan ordered a highly decorated marksman called Douglas Bazata to silence Patton, who gloried in the nickname "Old Blood and Guts".
His book, "Target Patton", contains interviews with Mr Bazata, who died in 1999, and extracts from his diaries, detailing how he staged the car crash by getting a troop truck to plough into Patton's Cadillac and then shot the general with a low-velocity projectile, which broke his neck while his fellow passengers escaped without a scratch.
Mr Bazata also suggested that when Patton began to recover from his injuries, US officials turned a blind eye as agents of the NKVD, the forerunner of the KGB, poisoned the general.
Mr Wilcox told The Sunday Telegraph that when he spoke to Mr Bazata: "He was struggling with himself, all these killings he had done. He confessed to me that he had caused the accident, that he was ordered to do so by Wild Bill Donovan.
"Donovan told him: 'We've got a terrible situation with this great patriot, he's out of control and we must save him from himself and from ruining everything the allies have done.' I believe Douglas Bazata. He's a sterling guy."
Mr Bazata led an extraordinary life. He was a member of the Jedburghs, the elite unit who parachuted into France to help organise the Resistance in the run up to D-Day in 1944. He earned four purple hearts, a Distinguished Service Cross and the French Croix de Guerre three times over for his efforts.
After the war he became a celebrated artist who enjoyed the patronage of Princess Grace of Monaco and the Duke and Duchess of Windsor.
He was friends with Salvador Dali, who painted a portrait of Bazata as Don Quixote.
He ended his career as an aide to President Ronald Reagan's Navy Secretary John Lehman, a member of the 9/11 Commission and adviser to John McCain's presidential campaign.
Mr Wilcox also tracked down and interviewed Stephen Skubik, an officer in the Counter-Intelligence Corps of the US Army, who said he learnt that Patton was on Stalin's death list. Skubik repeatedly alerted Donovan, who simply had him sent back to the US.
"You have two strong witnesses here," Mr Wilcox said. "The evidence is that the Russians finished the job."
The scenario sounds far fetched but Mr Wilcox has assembled a compelling case that US officials had something to hide. At least five documents relating to the car accident have been removed from US archives.
The driver of the truck was whisked away to London before he could be questioned and no autopsy was performed on Patton's body.
With the help of a Cadillac expert from Detroit, Mr Wilcox has proved that the car on display in the Patton museum at Fort Knox is not the one Patton was driving.
"That is a cover-up," Mr Wilcox said.
George Patton, a dynamic controversialist who wore pearl handled revolvers on each hip and was the subject of an Oscar winning film starring George C. Scott, commanded the US 3rd Army, which cut a swathe through France after D-Day.
But his ambition to get to Berlin before Soviet forces was thwarted by supreme allied commander Dwight D. Eisenhower, who gave Patton's petrol supplies to the more cautious British General Bernard Montgomery.
Patton, who distrusted the Russians, believed Eisenhower wrongly prevented him closing the so-called Falaise Gap in the autumn of 1944, allowing hundreds of thousands of German troops to escape to fight again,. This led to the deaths of thousands of Americans during their winter counter-offensive that became known as the Battle of the Bulge.
In order to placate Stalin, the 3rd Army was also ordered to a halt as it reached the German border and was prevented from seizing either Berlin or Prague, moves that could have prevented Soviet domination of Eastern Europe after the war.
Mr Wilcox told The Sunday Telegraph: "Patton was going to resign from the Army. He wanted to go to war with the Russians. The administration thought he was nuts.
"He also knew secrets of the war which would have ruined careers.
I don't think Dwight Eisenhower would ever have been elected president if Patton had lived to say the things he wanted to say." Mr Wilcox added: "I think there's enough evidence here that if I were to go to a grand jury I could probably get an indictment, but perhaps not a conviction."
Charles Province, President of the George S. Patton Historical Society, said he hopes the book will lead to definitive proof of the plot being uncovered. He said: "There were a lot of people who were pretty damn glad that Patton died. He was going to really open the door on a lot of things that they screwed up over there."
---------------------------------------
As a major military history buff and lover of Patton, despite his misgivings(Bonus Army Fiasco), I think I speak for all when I say... WHOAAA.....
Umm... After a quick review, I found an obvious discrepency. It says in the article that Mr. Bazata died in 1999, yet it also says he served on the 9/11 commission and worked on John McCain's presidential campaign. Impossible. They didn't seem to be talking of Robert K. Wilcox, the historian who dug this up, and if speaking on Bazata, it's obvious that a discrepency this big draws criticism on the entire piece.
Wooow. check this out:"George Patton, a dynamic controversialist who wore pearl handled revolvers on each hip and was the subject of an Oscar winning film starring George C. Scott, commanded the US 3rd Army, which cut a swathe through France after D-Day.But his ambition to get to Berlin before Soviet forces was thwarted by supreme allied commander Dwight D. Eisenhower, who gave Patton's petrol supplies to the more cautious British General Bernard Montgomery.Patton, who distrusted the Russians, believed Eisenhower wrongly prevented him closing the so-called Falaise Gap in the autumn of 1944, allowing hundreds of thousands of German troops to escape to fight again,. This led to the deaths of thousands of Americans during their winter counter-offensive that became known as the Battle of the Bulge.In order to placate Stalin, the 3rd Army was also ordered to a halt as it reached the German border and was prevented from seizing either Berlin or Prague, moves that could have prevented Soviet domination of Eastern Europe after the war.Mr Wilcox told The Sunday Telegraph: "Patton was going to resign from the Army. He wanted to go to war with the Russians. The administration thought he was nuts."He also knew secrets of the war which would have ruined careers.I don't think Dwight Eisenhower would ever have been elected president if Patton had lived to say the things he wanted to say." Mr Wilcox added: "I think there's enough evidence here that if I were to go to a grand jury I could probably get an indictment, but perhaps not a conviction." "This reiterates Antony Suttons claims that forces behind the scenes were interested in creating a false atmosphere where as the American and Russian Juggernaughts would "appear" to be at odds with one another - when in reality, they both represented the establishment. Sutton claims that from start(Lenin's Russian Revolution) to finish(Stalin's purges and seizure of atomic bomb to collapse of Soviet Union), the U.S built and supplied Russia.
It gets better. Most of these people are related through bloodlines or are Khazarian, which is considered by some, codeword for a nationality you get called racist for pointing out.
Let's just say Stalin, Eisenhower, Churchill, and Roosevelt were the same.
"Eisenhower was responsible for " Operation Keelhaul " - where allied forces rounded over two million anti-Communists who escaped Stalin and tuned them over to Russian forces. Part of the Yalta Agreement between the Big Three — Stalin, Roosevelt, and Churchill — involved the repatriation of Russians to their respective homelands where they were either immediately executed or sent to die in the Gulag"
Wow. You start to see where I"m going from here. Check this out:
Churchill-Jacobson, Roosevelt-Rosenfelt, Stalin-Djugashvili, Eisenhower-Eisenhaur - They admit their lineages here:
http://judicial-inc.biz/Bush_Mossad11.htm
MESHUGENUH!
A synapse of this piece is that we find out that General Patton was actually assassinated by what we could call the CIA, and that we unearth in the process the fact that all the forces supposedly working against eachother were actually working in tandem with one another. Hitler, Roosevelt, Stalin, Eisenhower, Churchill, the majority of bankers involved, the Bushes, they are all Jewish, and all worked together in one way or another.
Examples: Bushes, Rockefellers, Morgans, other U.S bankers gave funds, expertise, training to Hitler, who was born of Jewish parents in the house of the Rothschilds, better known as kings of the Bankers, Eisenhower and many of the same banking apparatus in the U.S. transferred untold wealth accrued from the Great Deppression to Germany and Russia, and Eisenhower worked with Stalin to massacre many innocent souls, Jewish, German and otherwise, while at the same time, many in U.S. supported vigorously the Germans, Hitler in particular(Margaret Sanger, other Eugenecists). This just gets TOOO weird, and i'm the one who dug deeper than most, it seems.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/3869117/General-George-S.-Patton-was-assassinated-to-silence-his-criticism-of-allied-war-leaders-claims-new-book.html
General George S. Patton was assassinated to silence his criticism of allied war leaders claims new book
George S. Patton, America's greatest combat general of the Second World War, was assassinated after the conflict with the connivance of US leaders, according to a new book.
'We've got a terrible situation with this great patriot, he's out of control and we must save him from himself'. The OSS head General did not trust Patton
The newly unearthed diaries of a colourful assassin for the wartime Office of Strategic Services (OSS), the forerunner of the CIA, reveal that American spy chiefs wanted Patton dead because he was threatening to expose allied collusion with the Russians that cost American lives.
The death of General Patton in December 1945, is one of the enduring mysteries of the war era. Although he had suffered serious injuries in a car crash in Manheim, he was thought to be recovering and was on the verge of flying home.
But after a decade-long investigation, military historian Robert Wilcox claims that OSS head General "Wild Bill" Donovan ordered a highly decorated marksman called Douglas Bazata to silence Patton, who gloried in the nickname "Old Blood and Guts".
His book, "Target Patton", contains interviews with Mr Bazata, who died in 1999, and extracts from his diaries, detailing how he staged the car crash by getting a troop truck to plough into Patton's Cadillac and then shot the general with a low-velocity projectile, which broke his neck while his fellow passengers escaped without a scratch.
Mr Bazata also suggested that when Patton began to recover from his injuries, US officials turned a blind eye as agents of the NKVD, the forerunner of the KGB, poisoned the general.
Mr Wilcox told The Sunday Telegraph that when he spoke to Mr Bazata: "He was struggling with himself, all these killings he had done. He confessed to me that he had caused the accident, that he was ordered to do so by Wild Bill Donovan.
"Donovan told him: 'We've got a terrible situation with this great patriot, he's out of control and we must save him from himself and from ruining everything the allies have done.' I believe Douglas Bazata. He's a sterling guy."
Mr Bazata led an extraordinary life. He was a member of the Jedburghs, the elite unit who parachuted into France to help organise the Resistance in the run up to D-Day in 1944. He earned four purple hearts, a Distinguished Service Cross and the French Croix de Guerre three times over for his efforts.
After the war he became a celebrated artist who enjoyed the patronage of Princess Grace of Monaco and the Duke and Duchess of Windsor.
He was friends with Salvador Dali, who painted a portrait of Bazata as Don Quixote.
He ended his career as an aide to President Ronald Reagan's Navy Secretary John Lehman, a member of the 9/11 Commission and adviser to John McCain's presidential campaign.
Mr Wilcox also tracked down and interviewed Stephen Skubik, an officer in the Counter-Intelligence Corps of the US Army, who said he learnt that Patton was on Stalin's death list. Skubik repeatedly alerted Donovan, who simply had him sent back to the US.
"You have two strong witnesses here," Mr Wilcox said. "The evidence is that the Russians finished the job."
The scenario sounds far fetched but Mr Wilcox has assembled a compelling case that US officials had something to hide. At least five documents relating to the car accident have been removed from US archives.
The driver of the truck was whisked away to London before he could be questioned and no autopsy was performed on Patton's body.
With the help of a Cadillac expert from Detroit, Mr Wilcox has proved that the car on display in the Patton museum at Fort Knox is not the one Patton was driving.
"That is a cover-up," Mr Wilcox said.
George Patton, a dynamic controversialist who wore pearl handled revolvers on each hip and was the subject of an Oscar winning film starring George C. Scott, commanded the US 3rd Army, which cut a swathe through France after D-Day.
But his ambition to get to Berlin before Soviet forces was thwarted by supreme allied commander Dwight D. Eisenhower, who gave Patton's petrol supplies to the more cautious British General Bernard Montgomery.
Patton, who distrusted the Russians, believed Eisenhower wrongly prevented him closing the so-called Falaise Gap in the autumn of 1944, allowing hundreds of thousands of German troops to escape to fight again,. This led to the deaths of thousands of Americans during their winter counter-offensive that became known as the Battle of the Bulge.
In order to placate Stalin, the 3rd Army was also ordered to a halt as it reached the German border and was prevented from seizing either Berlin or Prague, moves that could have prevented Soviet domination of Eastern Europe after the war.
Mr Wilcox told The Sunday Telegraph: "Patton was going to resign from the Army. He wanted to go to war with the Russians. The administration thought he was nuts.
"He also knew secrets of the war which would have ruined careers.
I don't think Dwight Eisenhower would ever have been elected president if Patton had lived to say the things he wanted to say." Mr Wilcox added: "I think there's enough evidence here that if I were to go to a grand jury I could probably get an indictment, but perhaps not a conviction."
Charles Province, President of the George S. Patton Historical Society, said he hopes the book will lead to definitive proof of the plot being uncovered. He said: "There were a lot of people who were pretty damn glad that Patton died. He was going to really open the door on a lot of things that they screwed up over there."
---------------------------------------
As a major military history buff and lover of Patton, despite his misgivings(Bonus Army Fiasco), I think I speak for all when I say... WHOAAA.....
Umm... After a quick review, I found an obvious discrepency. It says in the article that Mr. Bazata died in 1999, yet it also says he served on the 9/11 commission and worked on John McCain's presidential campaign. Impossible. They didn't seem to be talking of Robert K. Wilcox, the historian who dug this up, and if speaking on Bazata, it's obvious that a discrepency this big draws criticism on the entire piece.
Wooow. check this out:"George Patton, a dynamic controversialist who wore pearl handled revolvers on each hip and was the subject of an Oscar winning film starring George C. Scott, commanded the US 3rd Army, which cut a swathe through France after D-Day.But his ambition to get to Berlin before Soviet forces was thwarted by supreme allied commander Dwight D. Eisenhower, who gave Patton's petrol supplies to the more cautious British General Bernard Montgomery.Patton, who distrusted the Russians, believed Eisenhower wrongly prevented him closing the so-called Falaise Gap in the autumn of 1944, allowing hundreds of thousands of German troops to escape to fight again,. This led to the deaths of thousands of Americans during their winter counter-offensive that became known as the Battle of the Bulge.In order to placate Stalin, the 3rd Army was also ordered to a halt as it reached the German border and was prevented from seizing either Berlin or Prague, moves that could have prevented Soviet domination of Eastern Europe after the war.Mr Wilcox told The Sunday Telegraph: "Patton was going to resign from the Army. He wanted to go to war with the Russians. The administration thought he was nuts."He also knew secrets of the war which would have ruined careers.I don't think Dwight Eisenhower would ever have been elected president if Patton had lived to say the things he wanted to say." Mr Wilcox added: "I think there's enough evidence here that if I were to go to a grand jury I could probably get an indictment, but perhaps not a conviction." "This reiterates Antony Suttons claims that forces behind the scenes were interested in creating a false atmosphere where as the American and Russian Juggernaughts would "appear" to be at odds with one another - when in reality, they both represented the establishment. Sutton claims that from start(Lenin's Russian Revolution) to finish(Stalin's purges and seizure of atomic bomb to collapse of Soviet Union), the U.S built and supplied Russia.
It gets better. Most of these people are related through bloodlines or are Khazarian, which is considered by some, codeword for a nationality you get called racist for pointing out.
Let's just say Stalin, Eisenhower, Churchill, and Roosevelt were the same.
"Eisenhower was responsible for " Operation Keelhaul " - where allied forces rounded over two million anti-Communists who escaped Stalin and tuned them over to Russian forces. Part of the Yalta Agreement between the Big Three — Stalin, Roosevelt, and Churchill — involved the repatriation of Russians to their respective homelands where they were either immediately executed or sent to die in the Gulag"
Wow. You start to see where I"m going from here. Check this out:
Churchill-Jacobson, Roosevelt-Rosenfelt, Stalin-Djugashvili, Eisenhower-Eisenhaur - They admit their lineages here:
http://judicial-inc.biz/Bush_Mossad11.htm
MESHUGENUH!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
