Sunday, December 21, 2008

Patton, Jews, & NWO, OH MY!

**Let's start it off right here by stating I am not racist or hold anything against Jews or anyone for that matter. I am black and I know how ignorant it is for anyone to falsely persecute someone based on their heritage, skin color, or crimes of their fathers or countrymen. All I seek to do here is expose the truth. That's all I care about.

A synapse of this piece is that we find out that General Patton was actually assassinated by what we could call the CIA, and that we unearth in the process the fact that all the forces supposedly working against eachother were actually working in tandem with one another. Hitler, Roosevelt, Stalin, Eisenhower, Churchill, the majority of bankers involved, the Bushes, they are all Jewish, and all worked together in one way or another.

Examples: Bushes, Rockefellers, Morgans, other U.S bankers gave funds, expertise, training to Hitler, who was born of Jewish parents in the house of the Rothschilds, better known as kings of the Bankers, Eisenhower and many of the same banking apparatus in the U.S. transferred untold wealth accrued from the Great Deppression to Germany and Russia, and Eisenhower worked with Stalin to massacre many innocent souls, Jewish, German and otherwise, while at the same time, many in U.S. supported vigorously the Germans, Hitler in particular(Margaret Sanger, other Eugenecists). This just gets TOOO weird, and i'm the one who dug deeper than most, it seems.
General George S. Patton was assassinated to silence his criticism of allied war leaders claims new book
George S. Patton, America's greatest combat general of the Second World War, was assassinated after the conflict with the connivance of US leaders, according to a new book.
'We've got a terrible situation with this great patriot, he's out of control and we must save him from himself'. The OSS head General did not trust Patton
The newly unearthed diaries of a colourful assassin for the wartime Office of Strategic Services (OSS), the forerunner of the CIA, reveal that American spy chiefs wanted Patton dead because he was threatening to expose allied collusion with the Russians that cost American lives.
The death of General Patton in December 1945, is one of the enduring mysteries of the war era. Although he had suffered serious injuries in a car crash in Manheim, he was thought to be recovering and was on the verge of flying home.
But after a decade-long investigation, military historian Robert Wilcox claims that OSS head General "Wild Bill" Donovan ordered a highly decorated marksman called Douglas Bazata to silence Patton, who gloried in the nickname "Old Blood and Guts".
His book, "Target Patton", contains interviews with Mr Bazata, who died in 1999, and extracts from his diaries, detailing how he staged the car crash by getting a troop truck to plough into Patton's Cadillac and then shot the general with a low-velocity projectile, which broke his neck while his fellow passengers escaped without a scratch.
Mr Bazata also suggested that when Patton began to recover from his injuries, US officials turned a blind eye as agents of the NKVD, the forerunner of the KGB, poisoned the general.
Mr Wilcox told The Sunday Telegraph that when he spoke to Mr Bazata: "He was struggling with himself, all these killings he had done. He confessed to me that he had caused the accident, that he was ordered to do so by Wild Bill Donovan.
"Donovan told him: 'We've got a terrible situation with this great patriot, he's out of control and we must save him from himself and from ruining everything the allies have done.' I believe Douglas Bazata. He's a sterling guy."
Mr Bazata led an extraordinary life. He was a member of the Jedburghs, the elite unit who parachuted into France to help organise the Resistance in the run up to D-Day in 1944. He earned four purple hearts, a Distinguished Service Cross and the French Croix de Guerre three times over for his efforts.
After the war he became a celebrated artist who enjoyed the patronage of Princess Grace of Monaco and the Duke and Duchess of Windsor.
He was friends with Salvador Dali, who painted a portrait of Bazata as Don Quixote.
He ended his career as an aide to President Ronald Reagan's Navy Secretary John Lehman, a member of the 9/11 Commission and adviser to John McCain's presidential campaign.
Mr Wilcox also tracked down and interviewed Stephen Skubik, an officer in the Counter-Intelligence Corps of the US Army, who said he learnt that Patton was on Stalin's death list. Skubik repeatedly alerted Donovan, who simply had him sent back to the US.
"You have two strong witnesses here," Mr Wilcox said. "The evidence is that the Russians finished the job."
The scenario sounds far fetched but Mr Wilcox has assembled a compelling case that US officials had something to hide. At least five documents relating to the car accident have been removed from US archives.
The driver of the truck was whisked away to London before he could be questioned and no autopsy was performed on Patton's body.
With the help of a Cadillac expert from Detroit, Mr Wilcox has proved that the car on display in the Patton museum at Fort Knox is not the one Patton was driving.
"That is a cover-up," Mr Wilcox said.
George Patton, a dynamic controversialist who wore pearl handled revolvers on each hip and was the subject of an Oscar winning film starring George C. Scott, commanded the US 3rd Army, which cut a swathe through France after D-Day.
But his ambition to get to Berlin before Soviet forces was thwarted by supreme allied commander Dwight D. Eisenhower, who gave Patton's petrol supplies to the more cautious British General Bernard Montgomery.
Patton, who distrusted the Russians, believed Eisenhower wrongly prevented him closing the so-called Falaise Gap in the autumn of 1944, allowing hundreds of thousands of German troops to escape to fight again,. This led to the deaths of thousands of Americans during their winter counter-offensive that became known as the Battle of the Bulge.
In order to placate Stalin, the 3rd Army was also ordered to a halt as it reached the German border and was prevented from seizing either Berlin or Prague, moves that could have prevented Soviet domination of Eastern Europe after the war.
Mr Wilcox told The Sunday Telegraph: "Patton was going to resign from the Army. He wanted to go to war with the Russians. The administration thought he was nuts.
"He also knew secrets of the war which would have ruined careers.
I don't think Dwight Eisenhower would ever have been elected president if Patton had lived to say the things he wanted to say." Mr Wilcox added: "I think there's enough evidence here that if I were to go to a grand jury I could probably get an indictment, but perhaps not a conviction."
Charles Province, President of the George S. Patton Historical Society, said he hopes the book will lead to definitive proof of the plot being uncovered. He said: "There were a lot of people who were pretty damn glad that Patton died. He was going to really open the door on a lot of things that they screwed up over there."


As a major military history buff and lover of Patton, despite his misgivings(Bonus Army Fiasco), I think I speak for all when I say... WHOAAA.....

Umm... After a quick review, I found an obvious discrepency. It says in the article that Mr. Bazata died in 1999, yet it also says he served on the 9/11 commission and worked on John McCain's presidential campaign. Impossible. They didn't seem to be talking of Robert K. Wilcox, the historian who dug this up, and if speaking on Bazata, it's obvious that a discrepency this big draws criticism on the entire piece.

Wooow. check this out:"George Patton, a dynamic controversialist who wore pearl handled revolvers on each hip and was the subject of an Oscar winning film starring George C. Scott, commanded the US 3rd Army, which cut a swathe through France after D-Day.But his ambition to get to Berlin before Soviet forces was thwarted by supreme allied commander Dwight D. Eisenhower, who gave Patton's petrol supplies to the more cautious British General Bernard Montgomery.Patton, who distrusted the Russians, believed Eisenhower wrongly prevented him closing the so-called Falaise Gap in the autumn of 1944, allowing hundreds of thousands of German troops to escape to fight again,. This led to the deaths of thousands of Americans during their winter counter-offensive that became known as the Battle of the Bulge.In order to placate Stalin, the 3rd Army was also ordered to a halt as it reached the German border and was prevented from seizing either Berlin or Prague, moves that could have prevented Soviet domination of Eastern Europe after the war.Mr Wilcox told The Sunday Telegraph: "Patton was going to resign from the Army. He wanted to go to war with the Russians. The administration thought he was nuts."He also knew secrets of the war which would have ruined careers.I don't think Dwight Eisenhower would ever have been elected president if Patton had lived to say the things he wanted to say." Mr Wilcox added: "I think there's enough evidence here that if I were to go to a grand jury I could probably get an indictment, but perhaps not a conviction." "This reiterates Antony Suttons claims that forces behind the scenes were interested in creating a false atmosphere where as the American and Russian Juggernaughts would "appear" to be at odds with one another - when in reality, they both represented the establishment. Sutton claims that from start(Lenin's Russian Revolution) to finish(Stalin's purges and seizure of atomic bomb to collapse of Soviet Union), the U.S built and supplied Russia.

It gets better. Most of these people are related through bloodlines or are Khazarian, which is considered by some, codeword for a nationality you get called racist for pointing out.

Let's just say Stalin, Eisenhower, Churchill, and Roosevelt were the same.

"Eisenhower was responsible for " Operation Keelhaul " - where allied forces rounded over two million anti-Communists who escaped Stalin and tuned them over to Russian forces. Part of the Yalta Agreement between the Big Three — Stalin, Roosevelt, and Churchill — involved the repatriation of Russians to their respective homelands where they were either immediately executed or sent to die in the Gulag"

Wow. You start to see where I"m going from here. Check this out:
Churchill-Jacobson, Roosevelt-Rosenfelt, Stalin-Djugashvili, Eisenhower-Eisenhaur - They admit their lineages here:


Wednesday, December 10, 2008

incomplete trasnscript of hamid guls interviews. cnn and alex jones

interview on cnn 12/7/08

ZAKARIA: General Gul, you know that the United States has given four names to the United Nations of ISI officers whom it would like to place on an international terrorist list. You are one of those four names.What's your reaction to that.GEN. HAMID GUL, FORMER PAKISTANI INTELLIGENCE CHIEF (via broadband): I think this is a frame-up, a total frame-up. I have - I have my own (ph) voice. And I raise. I have a position which I express freely, openly. I'm like an open book.This is preposterous. This is wrong. This is fallacious. And if my government does not ...ZAKARIA: What are the charges against you?GUL: ... XX me, they ...ZAKARIA: What are the charges against you?GUL: Their charges are that I am helping the Taliban and al Qaeda. And what - this is so generalized. And particularly, there is the mention of Sarajo Din Nohani (ph), whom I have never seen in my life. I don't know who he is. I knew his father, Jalal ud-Din Nohani (ph), way back when I was D.G. ISI. But that's been a long time ago.I have nothing to do - I have no means to help them. But, of course, my position is that Americans have aggressed in Afghanistan. And whoever is resisting, the resistance there is justifiable.So, that is my position. I will maintain that position. If that becomes the basis of dubbing me as terrorist, then I would say, it's all right.But other than that, to say that I'm practically involved in any kind of help - absolutely wrong. I am not that at all. ZAKARIA: General Gul, when you read about these attacks in Mumbai, and you see - when you read about the attacks in Mumbai, this is a three-stage, amphibious assault in which the boats were commandeered, the captain and crew then killed.They maintained radio silence. They split up into pairs. They know their locations. They make a few false targets to draw the first responders there.This seems like a military operation.Isn't it likely that there was some special forces or intelligence assistance given to these attackers?GUL: Indeed. I think that this was a very sophisticated operation. There is no doubt about it. It has rocked the - and I have all my sympathies for India - they rock this huge country for 72 hours. And they really don't know how to react and respond to this.But when you look at the full spectrum of possibilities, who could have done it, then one knows that Samjhauta Express was a similar case, in which Pakistan ISI was accused. But it turned out that it was the militant Hindus themselves who had killed 68 passengers in that train, and that it was an inside job.Now Colonel Srikant Purohit, who is a serving army officer, he has been caught in this particular case. And the whole thing has turned around.So, obviously, there is an inside job.ZAKARIA: If it turns out, as the one surviving terrorist says, that these people were trained in Pakistan in four separate locations, do you think it would be retired ISI people? Who would be training these groups?GUL: Not necessarily. It is a question of motivation only. If somebody is motivated, then it is - because what kind of weapons did they use? That's very important. They used flashing (ph) calls (ph). They used the hand grenades. And this is - this doesn't require a great deal of training. And, of course, these weapons are also available in the open market.If the evidence is there, then I am one of the people who would say, yes, India really has been done a great deal of wrong. We have said - and Pakistan government policy has been very clearly enunciated - that we will punish them. Bring the evidence, we'll take them to task. But so far, no bodies have been shown, no faces have been shown. And this man has not also been brought before the cameras.I think the evidence has to be, because you cannot, on the basis of accusation alone, start taking actions which can unleash historical kind of changes. And this would be a watershed in the relationship between India and Pakistan, and we have to be very careful about it.ZAKARIA: But are you confident that the ISI does not have links, formal or informal, with Lashkar-e-Taiba?GUL: I have no linkages with them. But I do understand the character of an organization. It's a highly disciplined organization, unlike the other organizations. Their political appointees can be infiltrated.In the ISI, it is only the uniformed personnel who come and serve for two to three years. And then they revert back to their parent services. So, they are bread-and-butter. Their career advancement, their promotion chances - they all lie with the three armed services, that is, navy, army and the air force.So, there is one organization, intelligence organization, which would remain absolutely on the line. That would be the ISI.Unless you say that, OK, the army is behind it, the Pakistan government's policy is this. ISI cannot do a maverick job like this. It is unbelievable.ZAKARIA: The president of Pakistan, Mr. Zardari, the day after the attacks, said that he would send the head of the ISI to India to cooperate. The next day it was revealed that, effectively, the army chief of staff had overruled him.Is that appropriate for the elected head of state to be overruled by the head of the army?GUL: Well, I think it was a good thing that they withdrew their decision. And besides, sending the D.G. ISI is something totally - Indians should not have demanded this, and Pakistan should not have accepted to send him, because it was only an accusation at that time.And it was not a question of cooperation, it was a question of interrogating, summoning him. In fact, the word "summon" was used. And that was an affront to the national honor of Pakistan and that of the Pakistan armed forces.ZAKARIA: Do you think we should be thinking of al Qaeda as a terrorist group? I know that there was a conference in January 2001, which you attended, at which you felt that bin Laden was better described as a religious warrior, and should not actually be thought of as a terrorist.GUL: No. We said, unless the evidence is brought up against him, then he is not a terrorist. It's wrong. 9/11's full evidence has still not emerged. It is still shrouded in mystery.A lot of people have a lot of misgivings about that. And it's not only me. I think a lot of people in America would be thinking the same way. There are scientists, there are scholars, who have written articles on it.So, I think to dub a man as terrorist - because I know, I heard him twice say on radio, or something like that, and I think it was Osama - not only that, but Mullah Omar also said that he did not believe that Osama had carried out that act. So, that is still a mystery, and it needs to be resolved. Americans have still to set up a proper commission, an inquiry commission, into this event. I think that's very important. And I think President-designate Obama would do well to set up an inquiry commission into this.ZAKARIA: What is your hunch as to who did - who perpetrated the 9/11 attacks?GUL: Well, I have been on record, and I said it is the Zionists or (ph) the neocons. They have done it. It was an inside job.And they wanted to go on the world conquerors. They were looking upon it as an opportunity window, when the Muslim world was lying prostrate. Russia was nowhere in sight. China was still not an economic giant that is has turned out to be.And they thought that this was a good time to go and fill (ph) those strategic areas, which are still lying without any American presence. And, of course, to control the energy tap of the world.Presently, it is the Middle East, and in future it is going to be Central Asia. So, there are many, many XX. And, of course ...ZAKARIA: But you think ...GUL: ... XX.ZAKARIA: But you think who would be ...GUL: That's what I also think, yes.ZAKARIA: Who is at the heart of - who do you think was at the heart of plotting 9/11?GUL: At the - it's very difficult, really. I wouldn't point my finger at it.But I think it was planned in America. And at least one knows that it was done in Germany, as far as the reports go.But I think the heart of planning was inside America, because the job was done there. But not a single person so far has been captured, caught, interrogated inside America, even though this entire episode took place there.ZAKARIA: But you've said that the people behind it were the Zionists, neocon conspiracy. Do you mean by that American Jews? Do you mean Israel?GUL: No Israel. I will not - because Jews are also divided into - not all Jews are bad. Of course, there are a lot of things common between Jews and Muslims.In fact, they are the closest to us religion-wise, because some of their scriptures are respected by us. Their prophets are our prophets. They have the injunctions in Torah are very much similar to injunctions in the Holy Quran. So, there are things which are very common.But there are those people who are very ambitious, who have a certain agenda of their own. And I think they have turned the world upside-down, because of those ambitions or their fears.So, fear and ambitions are two things which have come together as far as Zionists are concerned. And they are trying to drive the policies of America. And unfortunately, the American people are suffering because of that.(END VIDEO)

alex jones interview 12/9/08

Minutes correlate to frnnkeducation youtube channel upload.
Lots of errors in capitalization and whatnot. Let's just say I don't have a career in trasnscribing.

and please, don't bitch to me about the errors. i only did this because alex said to. and i know most of you are too lazy to even try.

5-8 minutes - tragedy in Bombay and 9/11 inside jobs

"Well at the moment, we have to look at this as a great human tragedy that took place in Mumbai (Bombay). I sympathize with India, they've been rocked a bit badly. And the response is a bit nervous. They want to go to war with Pakistan. if Pakistan does not behave, or does not handle whatever they want from us. they've given a list of people. but I think there's been a longer of Indians accusing Pakistan whenever something like this happens. and they always turn out to be wrong. of course Pakistan is willing to cooperate and I think that's a good position that president alzwary has taken, that you provide the evidence, and we try them out, we will arrest them, we will put them through trial, and you can come and watch. let the international cameras come and see. there should be transparency, open trial, and if that doesn't satisfy you, what else will? so this is a situation where we stand today, where there is an ominous threat from India and America seems to be quietly patting them on the back and asking Pakistan to do whatever India is demanding. this is an unfair position, because India is not like America, America demanded from Pakistan after 9/11 to cooperate anybody that Pakistan could lay their hands on. 700 or so people were caught in Pakistan they war sent to gonthrama bay, to bagram, and to gucanpar yale, and nothing came out, except Muhammad, is the only one who is being tried for that case, all others have been let off. to get innocent people like that, just because you accuse them and you don’t even provide the evidence, to pick them up and throw them in jail, this is not on, the human values that particularly democracy upholds and talks about. so I think Pakistan offer isn't good enough and today Pakistan cracked down on some of the defunct organization and in fact these were banned in year 2000 and through immediately after 911 but there could be some maverick elements among them who I won't rule out who could carry out on their own or in conjunction with some other elements some kind of atrocities which I will not rule out. "

10-14 minutes - 9/11 inside job

"Are you talking about 9/11? Well, I have my own reasons, you know, rodnolan was a senior reporter here. I think he was based in Islamabad at that time, and he came to me immediately after 911, and his version that I put out was given to Newsweek and unfortunately it was blocked, but it appeared on the internet on the site of Newsweek and you can see it, I think it's dated 16 or 17th of 2001, and in that I had said the same thing, and I maintain my position. a. that 9/11 took place on American soil, not a single person was caught inside America, even though for doing such a job, I think a huge amount of logistic support is required in the area where such operation is carried out. secondly, the air traffic control, when they ordered 4 aircraft were giving some direction going from east to coast, to west coast where they were headed they started going in different direction. and it is quite amazing that for a l9ong period of time air traffic control did not report this. nor did the us. airforce act in time. if one were to calculate from the 1st flight that it took off from Logan, where the f-16 where it took off from Langley which is ciao headquarters, instead of one of the operational bases where many of them are available in that area. and then a single aircraft never takes off because we're told wherever the aircraft is scrambled, it's scrambled in twos. and that time that it took was enormous, it was 112 minutes, 112 minutes is a very long time in which to act. was the us air force sleeping and if so, which heads were rolled. 2nd it was a huge intelligence failure, and no heads have been rolled, nobody has been taken to task, not a single person has resigned for this . 3rdly, the act should have been rehashed, turned inside out, yet nothing has happened. and finally, how come this is a coincidence that 4 transponders did not work, and it is not possible, the direction is changed and it is not noted. 2ndly, the U.S. air force, has the ability, because in the past whenever a plane has been hijacked, within 7 minutes a plane is on the side of the aircraft, in this case, it did not happen. the us. alert system is so high and so sophisticated that if a missile was to take off from Moscow and head towards new York, it takes about 18 minutes, and the us. airforce and missile system is supposed to intercept it within 9 minutes, that means on the Atlantic or pacific it must stop that missile from coming in. the missile system is in place but it did not work and nobody tried to question this. lastly no inquiry has been held formally into the incident. unfortunately, so the whole world has been turned upside down, so many people have been killed American economy is going into a meltdown and everything has gone wrong with the world and yet no formal inquiry has been held by the us. gov.t , so I really don’t' know there are so many question that hang in the balance. and then to top it all, they say that Amoud who took training with a light aircraft in the army for 6 months that he could have maneuvered a jumbo of 757 from a height of where it was traveling of 9,000 and it came within seconds to a height of 1,000 and then went straight into its target, this is not possible for a person who has been trained on a light aircraft to do this. and then there's no mention of 2nd aircraft. so threes a number of things which remain unanswered whenever a jo8urnalist comes and visit me here and I ask them these question. that why haven't you taken the answer about these things. they say that patriotic act comes in the way and we are not supposed to ask such question. "

16-18 minutes- why is the us./Israeli gov'ts seeking dominance

"Well I think that after the cold war when Reaganomics it was known as, it was known that inflation was very high and the domestic issues had to be addressed. but bill Clinton administration they amassed a lot of money and the American economy went booming and he left a lot of money and the hot war cold warriors, they came in and the found that the situation was ready and they had a lot of money and resources and they looked at the bankers of the world for which there was an opportunity/window , the Muslim world was lying prostrate, Russia was not picking up from its fallen position, china was not ready yet, therefore they looked at it as an opportunity to go and do the following, and in this , I’m a soldier, and I know that there has to be a single aim, but they have =mixed up the aims, and they have botched up everything. first they said that they would go into strategic areas, where there was no us presence before. threaten the western Asia and south Asia where there was no America physical presence. they had to keep the Chinese off from getting the middle east. they had to get their hands on the energy tap of the world which presently lies in the middle east, but in future it will be in central Asia, and so Afghanistan is the gateway into central Asia, and finally to suppress any resistance, particularly which could threaten the state of Israel. now that is where they , instead of fulfilling ht American objective, they started, pursuing the Israel objective and that is where they went wrong. you have to pick up a single aim. this is the first principle of war, and I don’t know why the generals and politicians of America could be so naive and ignorant that they could start maligning in and they could go into this war without wisdom, without particular preparation and without the American support behind them. because if they had gone to war and asked for support from the American people they would never have given them that support and this was the pretext that they created."

21- 26 minutes - American/Israeli political manipulation, Bombay attacks false flag

"Well the motive is very simple. that America wants India to come aboard with them, especially in their war on terror, especially when they run out of troops in Afghanistan, the natal allies are pulling out, they are dragging their feet, they're not prepared to fight there. but they want to make it an Indian cause, and they want nearly 150,000 troops in Afghanistan. that is one reason, where there is an American motive. there is an Israeli motive that Americans should not pull out of Afghanistan just because they are short of troops. so they must have more troops there. because if they go away without denuclearizing Pakistan, state of Israel will remain under perpetual danger, so they have an innate fear that Americans may lose heart and pull out of this region. they're already going out of Iraq. and if they were to go o0ut of Afghanistan, this will be an unfinished agenda, and Israel would be at the losing end. so the neurons and Zionists together want to hatch a conspiracy so that Obama gets trapped into a situation where for next four years he'll keep on sorting out this embroil. as far as the ability is concerned which is the other element, can you imagine that people traveling from Karachi in two rickety boards that they can travel all the way to Bombay and fight a battle immediate for seventy two hours, and there are just ten of them, and in each group there are two. this is impossible, they were carry8ing so much of munitions with them, and that munitions lasted. they were fighting the crack troops of India army for so long, and you know that in marina house ,the five babushka hospitals, they were killed by the Indian commandoes. they were not killed by these people. so why would the Indian commandoes kill them. and Israelis suppressed this info, it initially came out in Indian daily, but then it was suppressed. so if you go by the record of the Indian accusations against Pakistan in the past year in 2001 Dec 13 there was an attack on the Indiana locrsiba, and they blamed Pakistan and loscribans for that but it turned out that it was Indian Kashmir’s themselves. and because India is committing so many atrocities in Kashmir, therefore threes a good reason for them that they would carry out something like that. then again in 2006, there was the Sunjata express case in which 68 express passengers mostly Pakistani war killed, and this train was stopped at an obscure railway station in Haryana and then over locked and then the train was set on fire and then it was claimed that it was Pakistani leshperitibaa, and that they had done it because they wanted to derail the peace process. but now colonel proho, of citicon proho has caught in it, and there are other Indian officers his accomplices and he has a big network
, that took ardiac(explosive) from the orally depot, which is a military depot, so one could say that there is a deep penetration of the militant Hindu in the military and intelligence organization in India. and why would they do that? because they want to derail the peace process. and what Obama says is that he will mediate on Kashmir, and then as the Kashmir political movement is picking up movement, he said with this situation, he said he would send bill Clinton as the political mediator. obviously the militants of India do not want t his to happen and they had to preempt it.
so Pakistan doesn’t gain, the Pakistani ISI does gain anything from it. net benefit either the militant Hindu on the next election....(interrupted for break)"

26-29 minutes - aggressive policy us. and India towards Pakistan prelude to central Asian dominance

"Yes indeed, I think the Americans and the Indians have both been very responsible about it because Condoleezza Rice's statements in America in India when she went and visited Delhi, they were very threatening towards Pakistan, and it was sort of a dictation that you have to satisfy India. and this is amazing that Pakistan has to satisfy India. on what score? Indians have failed to come up with evidence. and this one man that they've got, who knows that he is not a bogey? and that this man was loitering around somewhere, there are lots of Pakistani who cross the border, who cross around illegally or legally, and he could have been picked up and become the front man for all those stories. so one doesn’t really know, it’s too early to be threading war against Pakistan, because Pakistan is a nuclear country, and if they brandish their power, in a conventional power, I will assure you that as a soldier, I will say that a dimensional war, limited war, within the nuclear environment is not possible in the subcontinent. and if it comes to an exchange of nuclear weapons, then this becomes the third world war. china cannot stay out, Russia will not stay out, Russia is already showing its belligerence towards the America and European china of course is a very major economic power, they are a nuclear power, and if this kind of thing happens in their backyard, they will not accept it,. so this is a very dangerous situation. I think its playing with fire. so the whole thing could get out of hand. it is, again, as I told you, the part of the unfinished agenda, that the neurons had in their minds. And they think that Obama will now carry it out, even though the Americans wanted change. But let’s look at what change means, I mean, Obama has not clearly enunciated what change would be. but one can assume that change means focusing on domestic issues, there is an economic meltdown, the car industry is going sick, and many other things are happening inside America the social welfare and the Medicare infrastructure, so all these things, there is a need for the new admin, to focus entirely on the domestic issues, and for that they will have to disengage externally."

30-32 minutes - global domination by us./ Zionists

"Yes indeed, you're right. because, there is a whole theory, which us, military first put out by Mckinder, and then Mahan, who was an admiral in the us. navy. that this is the rim land, you have to first control the rim land of Asia, before you can strike in the heartland of Asia. so this heartland, rim land thing, I think it fits into the picture, that if they have a conflict in the rim land, and they can control it, and then it becomes so much easier to penetrate into the heartland. it is really asking so much when America is not really in a very healthy economic condition, so I think that this is brinkmanship of the highest order. and if they enlarge the area of conflict in this war against terrorism. and if they prolong the period of conflict, that America will definitely lose. because I know that when you are fighting the irregular fighters, then area of conflict is enlarged, let’s say it is extended into tribal area of Pakistan, of its pushed into Kashmir as well, so that china can be watched and monitored quite easily. then the area will become larger, and the us. simply does not have the troops. and there is not a moral cause strong enough for the American people to babe mobilized behind it. so it is shear madness to be thinking about this at such a time. "

32-36 minutes - meeting Osama,

"Well, I was actually in charge of occupation against the soviet occupation of Afghanistan and the Americans were providing the logistic support. and the Saudi’s were sharing 1/2 of the budget for this war. and it was a cheap war, because in all the 10 years we were fighting the Russians, we spent not more than 5 billion from American exchequer to have defeated the Russian and rid the whole of the west of the threat, managed that they used to call. so at that time, Osama bin laden, and his colleagues, they were admired and romanticized by cia operations,. I had never met him then. I had nothi8nhg to do with him. because I was busy training the afghans. we had to win a war, we had a task on our hands , it was a very big task. and we were so occupied with the training, only the afghans, no other national was trained by the isi, I can vouch on that, not a single person, not even , a Pakistani was trained by hem. Osama bin laden, I had never met him, but the these people used to come and talk glowingly about him. I met Osama bin laden after my retirement from the army. in 1993, December in fartoum, and then again, in 1994, November, when I was there and invited by azrabi, to an international conference, and then during that conference, Osama invited us into a banquet, and it was all in an open place, and there were many other people present. he struck me as a very normal human being. not a bloodthirsty animal that he's presented to be by the CIA now. at that time, no conversation between him or =me took place. I don't know if he's living or dead. but so far, amand zowari has been giving, presenting him in various interviews of Osama that has been put out. so one doesn't really know. but the last interview, which was the worst interview. in that, to the CIA and the other us intelligence agencies, authenticated that it was Osama’s voice. so one doesn’t' really know whether he's living or dead. but even if he's not living, he is now a symbol. al Qaeda is a franchise. whoever created that, and for whatever reason they created it, I think it wasn't there until 1996 when he was launched in fartoum, later on he was invited by rabhani, who is now part of the northern alliance in Kabul, and he came over and set up his headquarters in a place called torah Bora in Jalalabad, but that’s where one started hearing of al Qaeda and the activities of Osama bin laden, and also that his commanders were responsible for bringing the Blackhawk down, in the famous operation in Mogadishu. where an American aircraft was brought down by a stinger, which was probably supplied in Afghanistan to support mujahedeen. "

37-38 minutes - fake Osama

"Yes there is no doubt about it that this video which was put out in November which was put out by George bush and said this was Osama bin laden, he was a high cheekbone like the mongoloid features, he wasn't as tall as Osama was, and one could clearly make out that this was doctored, it had been created on purpose, just to justify the attack on Afghanistan. I think there are many things that are going wrong or being done at the behest of the CIA which are not correct. the CIA used to be good when they were working with us. I think it is their overarching ambition or fear that America will lose its clout. whatever the reason or it is perhaps that the Israelis fear that they are surrounded by a sea of hostile enemies who if the Americans don’t deliver fatal blow to all their enemies, then they will probably not exist. "

39 -40 min - state of Israel, belligerent Zionist/Neocon policies

"Yes indeed, and I think this 2006 sept experience if it is any indicator for them when they went into southern Lebanon, and they got such a buffering from Hezbollah I think that they're not going to do such thing like that because it would mean annihilation of Israel, and in any case, the Palestinian question is a very poignant question, and I don’t know why the us admin is not addressing it diff. instead of two different states it should be one Abrahamic state of Palestine because all the 3 religions would claim that they are divine religion have their origin in Palestine and something new has to be though about. but unfortunately bush admin in its very abhorrent overages of its seniority, it turns out they will sort out this Palestinian issue by creating two states. after 8 years we have gotten nowhere at all. "

40- 42minutes - false terror

"Yes., I think they are simply afraid of me because I’ve worked with them, I understand them, I can mayor them up and I talk loudly about it, I mince no words, I pull no punches, and they are afraid I preempt whatever feelings they do. and I am loud voice, there is no doubt about it. and they are trying to frame me, there is no truth about it. if they had anything about me, when I applied for a renewal of my visa to America why did they not give it to me? because if they have something, they are looking around for terrorists hwy do this terrorist want to come over and visit America, nab me, interrogate me, take me to task, take me to court, do whatever you like. it only shows that they have something to hide. as far as bombings is concerned, it is their habit, is a very bad habit, they cultivate friends who become like Pervez Musharraf, dictators, and then they make use of them, and then they turn on them in condemnation because of their policies. And what was your last question?"

42- 44 minutes - west using false mujahedeen to try to overthrow Pakistan

"No, Benazhir was not killed by any of the terrorists. she was removed by Americans because she had violated her agreement, because they wanted to keep Pervez Musharaff there, and he's left (unintelligible) in Pakistan. so she had become rebellious, and such a person who is a popular leader of third world country, head of the largest political party a woman who they could not attack as fundamentalist because she was so westernized so, therefore it was very important to remove her, because they had a mysterious plan they wanted to put through. so they have installed instead Mr. zarvari, who they can blackmail very easily, but have allowed him to keep the powers of a dictator, in fact he is the one calling all the shots in Pakistan. so all Pakistani is already destabilized politically. our judicial institution does not exist. because there is a judicial crisis. recently the dethroned chief justice of Pakistan---(interrupted)"

44-45 minutes - who's staging the terrorist attacks in Pakistan and India?

"No, no, no, this is because landmassiff was attacked, and I think George bush addressed his nation on radio after that. said this was part of our plan in war against terrorism, because they were suspecting that Pakistani army and isi was not fully cooperating and because they did not consider that it was their war and therefore they created this situation where the terrorist out of sheer revenge, this is a tradition, it has nothing to do with Islam, it is (?), beholding to this tradition, long before they became Muslim, and they are still carrying it out. when you take action against a awhan, kill his daughter or his wife or his sister, he will take revenge no matter what happens. and he does not behave like a Muslim or any other entity, so this was a thing that was created, and of course Pakistan is in a very difficult position, we have a stable military institution which can control the situation, we have an isi, but the Americans are almost everywhere, attacking the isi, and attacking the military saying the this is not in the control of the political party, political power, but what is political power when parliament is signing the order, it does not work, it has no authority at all. "

46- minutes- was gen amud controlled by CIA? did he wire money to Muhammad Atta?

"Not at all, Mahmud is a friend of mine, I met him very recently in Lahore and he categorically denied this. I think this is all disinformation which has been adopted as a very sophisticated intelligence operation. "

46- minutes - terror attacks false flag in central Asia?

"This is reality, and they will retaliate. I can tell you that Afghanistan , in over 5,000 years nobody has won against them, and I think Americans cannot win, unless American intention is to stir up 3rd world war from this point. I think there is no point in staying in Afghanistan. you should negotiate with the opposition which is a national resistance now, it is no longer Taliban specific, it is afghan nation, true to their tradition, they are resisting ferociously

47 -minutes -west opium control

"Well he is a puppet of Kabul, and he will not stay very long, I can assure you, he's already started showing signs of openness, he wants to reach out to the Taliban, but the Taliban will not even throw a crumb at him. I can assure you, the Taliban or any other resistance fighters, they will have nothing to do with him."

48 min - Reuters exposes Taliban dominance in afghan

"I have no idea, but I think light has started coming out, like Robert kagans article in Washington post dec 2, it echoes the world at risk repot, it is similar. they are focusing on Pakistan, because nuke capability is unacceptable by Israel and India, and there is every possibility that Pakistan becomes a target. "

49 minutes - future possibilities

"No one is so stupid. we've been through the game. far leftist parties in India are very strong. India is slowly turning the world to its own problems. they signed India, feel good Indian, this is all make believe. propaganda. India is in a miserable state. economy is dwindling, 400 million living on less than $1 a day. this is beginning to have an effect because 108,000 farmers committed suffice, and this is not born out of 608 districts of India, 231 in turmoil, mostly under control of dictators. "

--End statements.

"Thank you sir. Oh, I don't have a website, unfortunately, but I think you have a website, they can read my (statements there)" INFOWARS.COM!!!

YEAAAHH!!!<<---I added the yeah.

Friday, November 7, 2008

Obama Exposes Elite Secret Psuedo-Religious Cults

In an article exposed on, Obama is quoted as saying "I didn't want to get into a Nancy Reagan thing... doing any seances."

Many societal elites in America and Europe have been known to follow many strange, often anti-Christian, but usually ridiculous religious practices. It could be said that some of these practices, ideologies, have to be exposed to the public before the elites act on the "messages" they recieve (I.e Bush and his talks with God), but some are generally wacky or even frightening, (i.e. Tony Blairs writhing on the floor in prayer on top of a pentagram in a dark, candlelit room).

There are strong undercurrents that the new "global" religion that will sweep the world will be under the guise of Environmentalism, Mother Earth, Gaia worship, but the real scary thing is this global "carbon tax" that will be what the Enviro-preachers will be bringing their collection baskets to your pockets for.

Enough of my ramblings, here's the article:

Obama apologizes to Nancy Reagan for seance remark

CHICAGO, Illinois (CNN) -- President-elect Barack Obama called Nancy Reagan on Friday to apologize for a remark about seances he made during his first news conference earlier in the day.

When a reporter asked Obama if he had spoken with any ex-presidents since his election on Tuesday, he responded that he had spoken to all former presidents "that are living."

"I didn't want to get into a Nancy Reagan thing about, you know, doing any seances," he said.

Nancy Reagan, wife of 40th President Ronald Reagan, was derided in 1988 when his former chief of staff Donald Regan revealed in a book that the first lady had consulted an astrologer to determine the president's schedule.

Obama apologized to Reagan "for the careless and offhanded remark," Obama transition team spokeswoman Stephanie Cutter said.

"The president-elect expressed his admiration and affection for Mrs. Reagan that so many Americans share and they had a warm conversation," Cutter said.

President Reagan died in 2004 at 93.

Other first ladies have reportedly used spiritual advisers.

In his 1996 book, "The Choice," Washington Post editor and writer Bob Woodward said that as first lady, Sen. Hillary Clinton had seance-like sessions at the White House during which she conversed with late first lady Eleanor Roosevelt. At the time, the White House said the sessions were not seances.

Abraham Lincoln's wife, Mary Todd Lincoln, was rumored to have held seances at the White House in order to contact her two dead sons, Eddie and Willie. She also reportedly went to seances under an assumed name after the president's death to attempt to contact him.

Immediately after the seance remark, Obama said he had "re-read some of Lincoln's writings, who's always an extraordinary inspiration" and mentioned that former Presidents Jimmy Carter and George H.W. Bush and current President George W. Bush "have all been very gracious and offered to provide any help that they can in this transition process."

Friday, May 23, 2008

The Straw That Broke the Camels Back

by Antonio Franklin


Before I start venting and losing grip of what i'm truly pissed about, let's simply explain the details of the event.

A year ago, I recieved numerous tickets for fare evasion on the train and was given a fine that I obviously couldn't pay off, given the fact that I had to evade the fare in the first place. Fastforward to last night, as for the third time, i'm pulled over, on the sidewalk, coming from work and boxing classes by LAPD by motorcycle. They've stopped me numerous times for not having a light. With that squared away, now, my crime is simply riding my bike on a completely empty sidewalk. I am completely polite and answer all their unconstitutional questions to help the process go faster. I discover that I have a bench warrant for my arrest because of the ticket fines and because my patience is wearing thin, I DEMAND to just speed the process up and take me in.

I've never been in jail, nor did I ever expect to go. As a completely hardcore wimpy law abiding citizen, why should I see it in my future... Oh, that's right - because I'm a young, black male in America. Or should I put it as, a proletariat underclass neo-slave in a fascist dictatorship. Let's not mince words.

I am interrupted and found to have a warrant because I rode my bike on the sidewalk? What's next? Arrested and held for a year for not having a helmet and bike seatbelt? This is getting ridiculous, and I simply can't take it anymore.

We're all boiling in this melting pot and I for one, want out. I remember the days when you'd say that to another typical ignorant, uneducated white American male and they'd say, "WELL GOOD! LEAVE THEN!" Today that smugness is slowly being replaced with silence. As they morph into their proper slave masks of compliant little automatons as this country becomes the dreaded dictatorship it was always destined to become - see: Antony Sutton.

I think I'm done here. My rant should be kept simple and direct, yet as in almost all cases, the story is so deep and unnappealing that everyone should hear it. So let's rewind and provide the gory details about this soon to be American dictatorship escapee.

My whole life has been filled with a certain clarity of who and where I am, and how I came to be in the position that I'm in. I discovered that I was a black lower class heathen at 13 and as a highly advanced student/bookworm/nerd/hermit, whatever you want to call it, I soon came to deeply despise this nation, built entirely upon lies. Who propogated the lies? Obviously the media and "traditional" American family, as a quick glimpse into a history book, ANY HISTORY BOOK, PLEASE! - will give you a contrary story of just how equal every human being truly is. All our histories are just as bloody, complex, and riddled with slavery, strife and hardship as the next, but try explaining that to your average day Joe, and if you have any success, please blog it and allow me to review. I learned to keep my mouth shut early on and allow those ignorant, soulless blokes to wallow in their own devoid-of-curiousity filled days. It became quite the burden, sure, as the days turned into years and the bigotry, backwardsness and ignorance became so rampant and loud and in-my-face that I could burst with torture.... But I didn't.

I just wanted to live my life and let them live theirs, but see how far society can crumble in a matter of a decade? My journey from central Indiana to Southern California came, of course, against the wishes of my family, yet I was never an individual that could be kept from doing exactly as I wished. With barely a penny in my pocket and minimal help from distant relatives living in the area (and by minimal, I mean basic starvation) I achieved that which could be considered independence. In three months I had a job, an apartment (share) and a chunk of manhood I could call my own, yet at 18, curiousity got the best of this cat. After a string of quitting jobs, losing a place to stay, finding odd jobs and odd living arrangements, I learned how to become comfortably independent in Los Angeles, and was it grand! Of course it didn't last as my desire for continued upward mobility drove me to all corners of this lively city. That traveling on pressed pennies, infinite dreams, tumultuous gasps of a fuller, richer life are what life is about, but they also brought me the tickets.

People don't comprehend that the LA Metro System is a merit/trust system, with open spaces and minimal police presence. With such a vast landscape, of course there will be those who don't have the currency to pay, and so if you're trying to hold on to job and home, it is a God-send, guarded at times by angels in bulletproof vests, of course. And so, after a year of relative freedom, and a move back to North Hollywood, where transportation of any sort other than the foot is MANDATORY, I found myself in a police state, with sharks for police cars, four or more to a street, where in my 15 minutes home every night, I could count on spotting roughly seven.

We know they have quota's, the veritable stock option put on the future of criminality by the police, which ironically turns police from defending crime to enforcing it. The trick is to recognize that they're forced to make a quota, of say 4 arrests a night, which will translate at the end of day to them being FORCED to "FIND" "criminals", i.e. blacks, latinos, skaters, homeless, drug abusers, anyone in plain sight who the general public won't raise a fuss about being disproportionately detained or abused. This translates to a rise in the percentage of crime, which, the same police force who enforced a quota will decry the lack of personel/capital and demand that the local corrupt/inept politician will throw on a couple hundred million onto the back of the taxpaying public. The game is disgusting, but let's not pretend it's not easily readable and not entirely the fault of the complacent public, meaning that nothing will ever come to it, because that which is in place view will fail to be spotted every time.

This is why I love America.

And so I happen to be a victim of the police state, which appears as the snake which eats its own tail, and I found myself in a hellhole for one night which If ever faced with again, you can surely count on my unwillingness to cooperate (Tupac Shakur, anyone?)

The conditions of this "police department" were horrendous, large numbers of hispanic and black vagabonds, domestic abusers, angry, trashy, wreched, old, urinals in the open, inneficient police offices, a 5 hours waiting period to be simply processed before placed into a cell, personal items disposed of or misplaced, rude, pompous "officials", lack of proper sanitary conditions ('want something to eat?' 'while staring at the feces on the floor and the urine in my nose, no thanks' 'no thanks what?' '*sighs* no thanks supreme almight official who i've seen beat people in wheelchairs to death on youtube'), horror stories, abuse - generally a cornicopia of everything right in our "justice system". Afterwords, after another four hours of sleep, two hours transport to a facility 20 miles away, two more hours waiting for a judge to say something and nothing at the same time and to find out that this "holding cesspool" was the actual punishment, I was let out.

Ahhh... The sweet smell of fresh air...

Of course the fresh air loses its luster once you discover that all your belongings, keys, wallet, shoelaces, belt, glasses, are all at the facility you were processed at, and you'll need to take a bus to get there, but don't worry, there's a group of taximen waiting for you.... even though they can't seem to comprehend that they're right in front of a holding facility with people who have to wait hours to have their belongings returned or recieve tokens to travel the hours back to retrieve those said belongings. And so, here I am, a victim, yet again, of more police ineptness, type-type-typing this away on a library computer, with another two hours of waiting time before I can get my keys, to my beloved bicycle, so that I can travel to where I need to go to retrieve the rest of my belongings, which won't be brought to me.

That's the wondrous American penal system at work. With 5% of the worlds population and gaining on 35% of it's prison population, America is the quintesential beacon and idea of freedom and justice. Ignore that China, with roughly four times our population has only 75,000 prisoners.... With over 4 million within its walls at any one time, and record instances of police brutality, there is no better place in the world to call home than America, which is exactly why our tourism industry is flourishing, our standard of living is approving, and the peaceful pot smokers are staying here and not immigrating to the Netherlands.

Thank you so much for my freedoms, officer.

Oh... and How low do you want me to bend?

Noooo!!! Please! Don't go to, you might learn something.

Sunday, April 13, 2008

Wealthy Whites Spit in Poor Black America's Face

Sludge fertilizer program spurs concerns

By JOHN HEILPRIN and KEVIN S. VINEYS, Associated Press Writers
Sun Apr 13, 3:48 PM ET

BALTIMORE - Scientists using federal grants spread fertilizer made from human and industrial wastes on yards in poor, black neighborhoods to test whether it might protect children from lead poisoning in the soil. Families were assured the sludge was safe and were never told about any harmful ingredients.

Nine low-income families in Baltimore row houses agreed to let researchers till the sewage sludge into their yards and plant new grass. In exchange, they were given food coupons as well as the free lawns as part of a study published in 2005 and funded by the Housing and Urban Development Department.

The Associated Press reviewed grant documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act and interviewed researchers. No one involved with the $446,231 grant for the two-year study would identify the participants, citing privacy concerns. There is no evidence there was ever any medical follow-up.

Comparable research was conducted by the Agriculture Department and Environmental Protection Agency in a similarly poor, black neighborhood in East St. Louis, Ill.

The sludge, researchers said, put the children at less risk of brain or nerve damage from lead, a highly toxic element once widely used in gasoline and paint. Other studies have shown brain damage among children, often in poor neighborhoods, who ate lead-based paint that had flaked off their homes.

The idea that sludge — the leftover semisolid wastes filtered from water pollution at 16,500 treatment plants — can be turned into something harmless, even if swallowed, has been a tenet of federal policy for three decades.

In a 1978 memo, the EPA said sludge "contains nutrients and organic matter which have considerable benefit for land and crops" despite the presence of "low levels of toxic substances."

But in the late 1990s the government began underwriting studies such as those in Baltimore and East St. Louis using poor neighborhoods as laboratories to make a case that sludge may also directly benefit human health.

Meanwhile, there has been a paucity of research into the possible harmful effects of heavy metals, pharmaceuticals, other chemicals and disease-causing microorganisms often found in sludge.

A series of reports by the EPA's inspector general and the National Academy of Sciences between 1996 and 2002 faulted the adequacy of the science behind the EPA's 1993 regulations on sludge.

The chairman of the 2002 academy panel, Thomas Burke, a professor at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, says epidemiological studies have never been done to show whether spreading sludge on land is safe.

"There are potential pathogens and chemicals that are not in the realm of safe," Burke told the AP. "What's needed are more studies on what's going on with the pathogens in sludge — are we actually removing them? The commitment to connecting the dots hasn't been there."

That's not what the subjects of the Baltimore and East St. Louis research were told.

Rufus Chaney, an Agriculture Department research agronomist who co-wrote the Baltimore study, said the researchers provided the families with brochures about lead hazards, tested the soil in their yards and gave assurances that the Orgro fertilizer was store-bought and perfectly safe.

"They were told that their lawn, as it stood, before it was treated, was a lead danger to their children," said Chaney. "So that even if they ate some of the soil, there would not be as much of a risk as there was before. And that's what the science shows."

Chaney said the Baltimore neighborhoods were chosen because they were within an economically depressed area qualifying for tax incentives. He acknowledged the families were not told there have been some safety disputes and health complaints over sludge.

"They were told that it was composted biosolids that are available for sale commercially in the state of Maryland. I don't think there's any other further disclosure required," Chaney said. "There was danger before. There wasn't danger because of the biosolids compost. Composting, of course, kills pathogens."

The Baltimore study concluded that phosphate and iron in sludge can increase the ability of soil to trap more harmful metals including lead, cadmium and zinc, causing the combination to pass safely through a child's body if eaten.

It called the fertilizer "a simple low-cost" technology for parents and communities "to reduce risk to their children" who are in danger of lead contamination. The results were published in Science of the Total Environment, an international research journal, in 2005.

Another study investigating whether sludge might inhibit the "bioavailability" of lead — the rate it enters the bloodstream and circulates to organs and tissues — was conducted on a vacant lot in East St. Louis next to an elementary school, all of whose 300 students were black and almost entirely from low-income families.

In a newsletter, the EPA-funded Community Environmental Resource Program assured local residents it was all safe.

"Though the lot will be closed off to the public, if people — particularly children — get some of the lead contaminated dirt in their mouths, the lead will just pass through their bodies and not be absorbed," the newsletter said. "Without this iron-phosphorus mix, lead poisoning would occur."

Soil chemist Murray McBride, director of the Cornell Waste Management Institute, said he doesn't doubt that sludge can bind lead in soil.

But when eaten, "it's not at all clear that the sludge binding the lead will be preserved in the acidity of the stomach," he said. "Actually thinking about a child ingesting this, there's a very good chance that it's not safe."

McBride and others also questioned the choice of neighborhoods for the studies and why residents were not told about other, possibly harmful ingredients in sludge.

"If you're not telling them what kinds of chemicals could be in there, how could they even make an informed decision. If you're telling them it's absolutely safe, then it's not ethical," McBride said. "In many relatively wealthy people's neighborhoods, I would think that people would research this a little and see a problem and raise a red flag."

The Baltimore study used a compost of sludge mixed with sawdust and wood chips packaged as "biosolids," the term for sludge preferred by government and the waste industry.

"What we did was make the yards greener," said Pat Tracey, a Johns Hopkins University community relations coordinator who recalled helping with the lawn work. "They were bald, bad yards. It was considered sterile fertilizer."

Baltimore environmental activist Glenn Ross says choosing poor neighborhoods destined for demolition makes it hard to track a study's participants. "If you wanted to do something very questionable, you would do it in a neighborhood that's not going to be there in a few years," he said.

HUD documents show the study's lead author, Mark Farfel, has pursued several other studies of lead contamination including the risks of exposure from urban housing demolitions and the vacant lots left behind.

Farfel has since moved to New York, where he directs the World Trade Center Health Registry surveying tens of thousands of victims of the Sept. 11 attacks. He denied repeated requests for interviews and referred questions to Baltimore's Kennedy Krieger Institute, the children's research facility that was the recipient of HUD grants with Farfel as project manager.

The institute referred questions to Joann Rodgers, a spokeswoman for Johns Hopkins. She said a review board within its medical school approved the study and the consent forms provided to families that participated. "The study did not test children or other family members living in the homes," she said.

Some of Farfel's previous research has been controversial.

In 2001, Maryland's highest court chastised him, Kennedy Krieger and Johns Hopkins over a study bankrolled by EPA in which researchers testing low-cost ways to control lead hazards exposed more than 75 poor children to lead-based paint in partially renovated houses.

Families of two children alleged to have suffered elevated blood-lead levels and brain damage sued the institute and later settled for an undisclosed amount.

The Maryland Court of Appeals likened the study to Nazi medical research on concentration camp prisoners, the U.S. government's 40-year Tuskegee study that denied treatment for syphilis to black men in order to study the illness and Japan's use of "plague bombs" in World War II to infect and study entire villages.

"These programs were somewhat alike in the vulnerability of the subjects: uneducated African-American men, debilitated patients in a charity hospital, prisoners of war, inmates of concentration camps and others falling within the custody and control of the agencies conducting or approving the experiments," the court said.


On the Net:

Baltimore study:

East St. Louis project:

Maryland lead lawsuit:

National Academy of Sciences' report:



Some evil fucker, somewhere is laughing his balls off.
Oh sure! To offset the toxic lead we've spilled off from our factories into your water and land, we're going to spend money developing a new technology to give you something that we say is beneficial... Never mind that we've never been generous to you before!

What's the gift? Get this: We're going to clean toxic lead, WITH TOXIC SLUDGE! Not just toxic sludge! We're going to sprinkle a little human shit in there too!!! HEY! LET ME ADD MY OWN!!!!!

First it was King Louis VII in the Congo - 20 million blacks
Then it was the Portuguese, English, and Jewish traders selling blacks to the Americas - 100 million blacks
Then we have the epic of institutionalized slavery - 10 million or so (don't want to destroy precious property)
Then we get Margaret Sanger style Eugenics and our own personal abortion clinic. For those who still like Planned Parenthood, consider that they gave Hitler awards for his handling of Eugenics in Germany... Yeah... exactly... 30 million black abortions
Oh, let's not forget, AIDS was engineered in a U.S Navy lab, exposed by Dr. Boyd E. Graves. And don't give me that bullshit of "NO WAY! WE'D NEVER DO THAT! IT'S IMPRACTICLE AND EVIL!" Well I just gave you the numbers on what you've done before!

I'm so pissed right now. I could... I could.... go ballistic writing a rant in my blog..... *sighs*

Thanks for the flouride, reducing my interest in getting so pissed off, btw.
Reply to this comment
+1 diggs by Frnnkdlxx 6 hours ago
Where are my sources for my claims? History is my fucking source. ... ...

I know, i'll get dugg down for being so angry at America and the European worlds past crimes, but can you blame a man for not liking a certain subgroup of humans being responsible for over 100 million deaths of just ONE single subgroup? How about the other 100 to 100's of millions for the others? Let's get real. There are no excuses. But i know you'll make up one.
Hide 1 reply to this comment (most popular has 1 digg)
[you have blocked whoreable, hide comment] +1 digg by whoreable 4 hours ago
You portray blacks as helpless little animals who can't help themselves, and procreate on instinct alone. You think you are standing up for them because nobody else will. They are a very smart and strong people. I think they can handle it.
Hide 1 reply to this comment (most popular has 1 digg)
+1 digg by Frnnkdlxx 4 hours ago
Compared to the Hyper Power, far above a superpower with new weapons like emp pulse tech, nuetron bombs, the largest arsenal of smart weaponry, advanced tanks and heavy machinery that allow it to touch any target on the globe within hours(coming on minutes soon with the space forces developed in the early 2000's , information for which can be found on nasa's website), jets that can leave atmosphere and therefore more swiftly reach a target anywhere else on the globe, high energy projectile laser weaponry... the list goes on. Do you really think ANYONE not U.S. establishment can defend against a fascist dictatorship that wants them dead? Oh, there is no conspiracy?: ...
or this: ...

I don't know about you, but yes,, I think every single individual not a part of this system is threatened by it. Blacks in America do as they can, after being raped by this dictatorship for 400 years to this day, apparently. And what are you talking about? I'm black! You speak as if I speak from a foreign platform. This is an assault on me directly, which is why I speak with such urgency, vigor, and fear. We are weak, exposed and helpless animals compard to the machinery and powerhouse which is this nation.

Do you think we could revolt? We could escape? We could find a way to get out of the wreched decay and repression forced upon us. Yes! Forced. Or should I link another cointelpro video?

Who can stand against this nation successfully? No nation has ever succeeded, no subgroup has every achieved true independence without the say so of the higher powers which govern this nation, which, coincidentally, reside in Europe. Not Vietnam, which suffered about 2 million(really much MUCH more) deaths and claims to have "defeated" America, but if you look at the conspiracy behind the whole mess, it was simply a plan to keep America bogged down in a war so that foreign bankers could reap enormous profits from the u.s. Government to be repaid with enormous interests that turn into tax on the u.s. citizens, which, incidentally, blacks end up paying a portion for as well. So not only are we raped, pillaged, and pilloried, we are told that everything is just fine, please help us fight these fake wars for us, here's your "freedom" and please pay us for it.
Hide 1 reply to this comment (most popular has 1 digg)
[you have blocked whoreable, hide comment] +1 digg by whoreable 2 hours ago
So, hows the Kool-Aid?
Hide 1 reply to this comment (most popular has 1 digg)
+1 digg by Frnnkdlxx 14 minutes ago
So you agree that nothing I said was innacurate then?


I only drink water after i've made sure there is no flouride or chlorine in it. But by all means, you can eat the aspartame and wonder why you're having trouble concentrating because your iq is plummeting, my fellow America.

F'ing D-butt.

Thursday, February 21, 2008

Tampa Bankruptcy: Rebuilding Credit

Tampa Bankruptcy:
Rebuilding Your Credit Quickly and Efficiently
After Bankruptcy

Those considering bankruptcy should always have a checklist to run through before making such a substantive move.
File a Credit Report
Your credit report has information which affects whether you can get a loan – and how much you will have to pay to borrow money. You want a copy of your credit report to:
make sure the information is accurate, complete, and up-to-date before you apply for a loan for a major purchase like a house or car, buy insurance, or apply for a job.
help you to guard against identity theft.

2. Examine Your Credit after bankruptcy
Those considering bankruptcy frequently worry that they will never get credit after a bankruptcy, or that it will be 10 years before they can get credit. Neither is true.

Can I keep a credit card out of the bankruptcy for use later?
If you owe money on a credit card at the time you file bankruptcy, you must list the card as a debt.
If you don't owe anything on the card, you don't have to give the credit card company notice of your bankruptcy. Note, however, that they may find out through other means and cancel the card as a precaution.

Can I get new credit after bankruptcy?

In today's competitive lending environment, credit is available to the recently bankrupt. It may be more expensive than before, and available with lower limits, but it will be offered. A secured credit card is usually available post bankruptcy at lower rates than unsecured cards.
Can I buy a house after filing bankruptcy?
Absolutely. Studies show that 18-24 months after a bankruptcy discharge, bankruptcy debtors can qualify for a loan on the same terms as if they had not filed bankruptcy
Is my credit record ruined by filing bankruptcy?
Bankruptcy in reality is no more harmful to your credit record than the financial circumstances that lead to the bankruptcy filing. It is much more important for your future financial health to look at your net worth (assets minus debts) than at your ability to borrow in the future.

Credit in Tampa
Tampa has made a name for itself in regards to streamlining the process from credit awareness to credit reconstruction. Here is one website in particular that easily spells out the steps towards securing oneself onto the path of credit stability:

The website spells out in 5 steps how to improve your credit rating. Here are a few:

Examining your reports carefully
Nearly every consumer has an error on at least one credit report from one of the major credit bureaus. Credit bureaus generate your report on information they receive from your creditors; they don't verify.
Keeping your credit report a true reflection of you is your responsibility. Get ready to clean and polish. Carefully look for everything from typing errors, outdated and incomplete information to inaccurate account histories. Make a thorough list of items you dispute and why.

Monday, February 18, 2008

Latest Message from Ron - Please Donate!

February 18, 2008

The DC neocons think their old dream is about to come true. They think they can defeat me in the Republican congressional primary in Texas on March 4th. And you know what? They may be right.

My opponent, who describes himself as a traditional conservative, is a dedicated servitor of all the special interests who have given us the disaster of recent years, from unconstitutional wars to a looming recession, from huge deficits to massive new welfare programs. A Republican operative allied with the worst forces in DC recently said: "Give what you can [to Ron Paul's opponent]. Ron Paul is running scared -- using his Presidential campaign's donors' money to subsidize a desperate last-minute attempt to save his Congressional seat." That is a lie, of course. It is illegal to use presidential campaign donations in my congressional race. The congressional campaign has to stand on its own. But so far, we have raised only about a third of what a well-funded effort would need. In my 10 terms in Congress, I have not only been able to serve my constituents, and help them, for example, negotiate federal red-tape. I have also been able to defend our principles of less spending, lower taxes, no inflation, and strict adherence to the Constitution.

Some people in DC laugh at the idea that I should obey my oath of office, and ask first of any proposed legislation, is it constitutional? But I know that you share my support for the vision of the framers. My friend Congressmen Wayne Gilchrest (R-Maryland) was just defeated in his primary election by a neocon fraud similar to the one I face. My friend Walter Jones (R-North Carolina) is under heavy pressure as well. People like our hand-picked opponents will do anything to gain and keep power. They represent everything that is wrong with DC. If I am defeated in the upcoming congressional primary, our ideas will be held to have been defeated as well. It will be proclaimed from the rooftops in DC that such "ridiculous and outmoded notions" as the free market, sound money, personal liberty, limited government, and a pro-American foreign policy are through. I am determined not to let this happen. All that you and I believe in is far too important to the future of our country, and to everyone and everything we love, to let the neocons dance on its grave. Please, help me stop the lies, the distortions, the pressure groups, the special interests that benefit from DC rip-offs.

There is still time to run radio and tv ads, to set up phone banks, to get out the vote. But unless you help, my reelection to Congress may be in jeopardy. Please help me return to Congress to fight for the people of my district, and for the ideas that can save our country from the path to trouble we are now on. I hesitated to ask you, since you have already done so much. But my wife Carol said, "When you need help, you ask your best friends." So I do ask you, to hold out your hand in support.

Please give today, as generously and as quickly as you can.


Sunday, February 17, 2008


Monday, February 11, 2008

Who does the Media Adore?

A Statistical Analysis of Media coverage for the candidates:
Very Revealing. Notice how there is 0% for Ron Paul across the board and McCain gets more coverage than Barack Obama, when Barack is clearly the frontrunner of the entire pack?

PEJ Campaign Coverage Index: Jan. 28 - Feb. 3, 2008McCain Wins the Coverage Battle as Media Move to Anoint Him
Printer-Friendly PDF Version E-mail The media’s coverage of the campaign last week seemed to reflect a growing consensus that the Republican and Democratic nomination fights were moving along two distinctly different trajectories.
With Florida winner John McCain getting about 75% more coverage than Mitt Romney, and with Mike Huckabee almost invisible, the press appeared conspicuously close to turning McCain into the presumptive nominee last week. In that Jan. 28-Feb. 3 period, which ran from the day before the Florida primary to two days before Super Tuesday, McCain generated more coverage than any candidate. And that coverage suggested a media “tiering” of the race, with McCain a heavy favorite over several also-rans. McCain had not necessarily put Mitt Romney away, but the press nearly had.
On the Democratic side—where Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton were virtually equal in media attention for the third consecutive week—the tone and level of coverage anticipated a long and intense battle. The message here, which began two days after Obama’s victory in South Carolina, was that there would be no verdict soon. And for the second week in a row a non-candidate (this time, Massachusetts Senator Edward Kennedy) played an important role in the Democratic narrative.
Two candidates called it quits last week, and they also generated quite different coverage. Republican Rudy Giuliani, the early frontrunner whose candidacy expired in Florida, generated twice as much coverage as Democrat John Edwards, who was never able to crack the media’s “two company, three’s a crowd” view of the Democratic contest. But much of Giuliani’s coverage was a schadenfreude-saturated post-mortem attacking his candidacy.
These are some of the findings from Project for Excellence in Journalism’s fourth edition of the Campaign Coverage Index, a measure of which candidate is winning in the all-important race for media exposure. The Project will run the Index until nominees are selected in each party.
Last week was a big one for McCain. He beat Romney in Florida, and won the endorsements of Giuliani and California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger. In the first three weeks of the CCI, the gap between McCain and Romney never exceeded five points. Last week, however, McCain was a significant or dominant newsmaker in 37% of the campaign stories compared with only 21% for Romney. Both totals were up from the previous week, but McCain’s more than doubled—from 17% to 37%.
Giuliani, at 14%, matched his coverage from the week before. But Huckabee, who had earned a respectable 14% of coverage as recently as the week of Jan. 19 South Carolina primary, was down to just 2% last week, even though he is still running.
The parties’ overall battle for coverage was close, with the Democrats featured in 46% of the stories compared to 42% for the GOP.
One story line was also answered in the coverage last week: would the press consider the Democratic vote in Florida important? The Clinton campaign hoped they would, and she talked about the significance of the turnout there to make that happen. The answer was the press generally did not, leading MSNBC talk host Dan Abrams—who often accuses the media of anti-Clinton bias—to ask “how can so many ignore the results in Florida?” The Republican Florida primary was much more important to the media than the Democrats’ contest where no delegates were at stake. But if Florida was not a key part of the Democratic coverage last week, Clinton and Obama did attract major attention
For the week, Obama was a significant or dominant newsmaker in 34% of the campaign stories compared to 32% for Clinton. (Both candidates’ coverage dropped from the previous week when Obama nipped Clinton, 41% to 40%.) And Edwards was at 7% in his swan song week.
The wild card was Kennedy, who with his niece Caroline, delivered Obama a symbolically significant endorsement on Jan. 28. As a result, Kennedy was a dominant newsmaker (50% or more of the story) in 7% of the campaign stories last week.
During the week of the Democrats’ Jan. 26 South Carolina primary, the non-candidate newsmaker was Bill Clinton, whose aggressive campaign role made him a significant or dominant figure in 18% of the stories and generated numerous suggestions that he lower his profile. Last week he did, registering at only 6% on the Coverage Index.
The Campaign Coverage index, which will appear weekly until nominees are selected in each party, is an addition to PEJ’s NCI report, which tracks what stories the media covered in the previous week. The CCI offers a greater level of detail of the campaign coverage. That includes the percentage of stories in which a candidate played a significant role (as a subject of between 25% and 50% of the story) or a main newsmaker role (making up at least 50% of the story). The Index also identifies the key narratives in the reporting and the “Line of the Week,” a statement from a journalist or source that in our researchers’ estimation seems either to capture the story or is particularly colorful. PEJ’s News Coverage Index will not disappear. It will come at the bottom of the CCI.
The campaign also continued to overwhelm all other news in the national press. The story accounted for 51% of all the news measured by PEJ’s News Coverage Index in the week of Jan. 28-Feb. 3. That was the highest level for the campaign since that Index began in January 2007. The race for the White House consumed 49% of the network news airtime, 59% of the radio time, and 76% of the cable newshole. Since the beginning of the year, the campaign has swamped all other news, averaging 46% of the newshole per week. In all of 2007, only one story ever reached that level and that was the Virginia Tech massacre, which accounted for 51% of the coverage for just one week.
For McCain, the media narrative began with him locked in a tight race with Romney in Florida. The Jan. 29 New York Times described both candidates “trading attacks [and] aggressively courting voters across the Florida peninsula in a primary battle that could producer a clear front-runner…” The Florida win then cemented the idea of McCain as a frontrunner, if not a steamroller. A Jan. 30 report on Google News described the Arizona Senator’s “wave of political momentum” in his race.
The next morning NBC’s Today show codified that momentum. “John McCain is very quickly consolidating Republican support,” correspondent David Gregory noted. “Mitt Romney’s only play left is to appear as the conservative alternative to John McCain, a job more difficult with Mike Huckabee still in the race…” By the time the weekend polls had hit, the press was portraying McCain on the cusp of victory. A Feb. 3 Washington Post story showed him up by 24 points over Romney in a national poll, a lead, the article concluded, that “gives him the opportunity to effectively wrap up the nomination with a strong showing Tuesday.”
In a week, the narrative had taken McCain from the Florida nail biter to the Super Tuesday Promised Land, a considerable journey.
As for Giuliani, his departure finally generated a fair amount of attention, just as his expected departure had a week earlier. (He had a lot more trouble generating attention before that). But the narrative was blunt and pretty universal.
“He was a terrible candidate,” Mark Shields put it on the Jan. 30 edition of PBS’ NewsHour. “The more he campaigned, the worse he did in every state…He didn’t seem very comfortable with people.”
As seems to be the case every week, Clinton and Obama were locked in the same one-on-one story line. The Kennedy endorsements, complete with the fiery rhetoric of the silver-maned Massachusetts Senator, generated plenty of coverage, with ABC’s Kate Snow speculating that “the Kennedy name could help in heavily Hispanic states, like New Mexico and Arizona.” Her ABC colleague David Wright went considerably farther, rhapsodizing that “today, the audacity of hope had its rendezvous with destiny.” But the most eagerly awaited event was the Jan. 31 debate, the first chance for the African-American and female candidate to square off directly. When it was over, the media verdict was summed up by CNN’s Bill Schneider. Writing for on Feb. 1, he described it as an encounter that settled little. “In all, it was an unhelpful debate,” Schneider wrote. “They minimized their differences. Last night’s showdown will rally Democrats…but won’t help them make a decision.”
Perhaps, but media polls still showed Obama closing the gap. The new Washington Post-ABC survey found Clinton narrowly leading Obama nationally, 47% to 43%.
“Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.) and Barack Obama (Ill.) are running roughly even nationally as the battle for the Democratic nomination heads into Tuesday's big round of primaries and caucuses,” the Feb. 3 Post story declared. “The Democratic contest is likely to keep going.”
And now, in the rest of the week’s news:
In other news, for the third week in a row, the troubled U.S. economy was the second-biggest story behind the campaign, as measured by the News Coverage Index for Jan. 28-Feb. 3. But at 7% of the newshole, it was down significantly from 19% the previous week. That was followed by President Bush’s State of the Union address at 6%. (In contrast, last year’s State of the Union was at 13% and tied for top story of the week.)
Rounding out the top-five story list was violence in Kenya (2%) and the conflict in Afghanistan (also at 2%). Once again, with the primary season reaching its peak, there is little oxygen for other news.
Mark Jurkowitz of PEJ

Media Exposure by Candidate
Main Newsmaker
Significant Presence
Total Percent of Campaign Stories
John McCain
Barack Obama (D)
Hillary Clinton (D)
Mitt Romney (R)
Rudy Giulaini (R)
John Edwards (D)
Bill Clinton
Mike Huckabee (R)
Bill Richardson (D)
Ron Paul (R)
Total Number of Campaign Stories = 597

Top Overall Stories of the Week
Percent of Newshole
2008 Campaign
U.S. Economy
State of the Union
Kenya Elections and Violence
Events in Iraq
Super Bowl
War on Terror
Click here to see the top ten stories for each media sector.
Click here to see the methodology for the Campaign Coverage Index.

Some Bastard Is Trying to Steal Ron Pauls Seat

Let's turn our gaze to him, and bomb his email until it bleeds black. >:(_(

Scumbags think that because we got raped by the MSM that they can come in and clean sweep us. Well think again. Let's go army.
"February 09, 2008Read More: Ron Paul
Ron Paul pivots to his reelection
Ron Paul appears to have had a Dennis Kucinich moment.Just as the liberal Ohio congressman realized last month that his long-shot presidential campaign was imperiling his prospects for keeping his House seat, Paul appears to be choosing the comfort of incumbency over a continued effort to win a nomination that he has virtually no shot at capturing.Last night, the libertarian-leaning Texas congressman sent a message to his supporters signaling that he was scaling back his presidential bid. The most telling passage:
"I also have another priority. I have constituents in my home district that I must serve. I cannot and will not let them down. And I have another battle I must face here as well. If I were to lose the primary for my congressional seat, all our opponents would react with glee, and pretend it was a rejection of our ideas. I cannot and will not let that happen."
Same as Kucinich, Paul has seen a real primary threat emerge back home. In both cases -- and see my colleague Josh Kraushaar's piece as a primer -- the challengers have made the case that the local congressman is gallivanting around the country on a quixotic quest, has lost touch with the folks back home and has taken stances out of line with the district.The key difference, of course, is that Paul has millions of dollars socked away and could be a significant threat were he to run a third-party campaign in the fall.But Paul reitereated in his message that that won't happen."Of course, I am committed to fighting for our ideas within the Republican Party, so there will be no third-party run," Paul said. "I do not denigrate third parties -- just the opposite, and I have long worked to remove the ballot-access restrictions on them. But I am a Republican, and I will remain a Republican."