Supposedly, by author "CHECKMATE!"
- A 9/11 CHECKMATE - BY TvNewsLIES.ORG - April - 2005
Some things are so disturbing that they are almost impossible to believe. That is why, in the 9/11 enigma, less is more.
Until these questions are answered there is no need to establish more doubt. What we have here is solid undisputed evidence that we were never told the truth.
Before you read this article, conduct this test. Try to purchase some stock, or some futures, a mutual fund or some put options, without providing your identity. Go ahead and try it! See if you get anywhere. Find out what happens when you tell the investment firm that you want to make a huge investment anonymously. It can’t be done.
Then ask yourself this question: How could someone have placed anonymous put options on American Airlines and United Airlines just prior to the attacks of 9/11? Then ask yourself why no one has investigated this suspicious deal. Ask yourself why there has been no attempt by the US government to identify the person who anticipated huge profits from a disaster that was yet to occur. Is it because the trail possibly leads to the CIA?
Then wonder about the collapse of Building 7 on the day of the attacks. Ask yourself why the owner of the building allowed the building to be pulled down (intentionally demolished) hours after the Twin Towers fell. Pulling down a building takes weeks of planning and preparation so that explosives can be safely positioned and wired. Not so in this case. Wonder why.
If you have any doubts at all about the official 9/11 story, then the answers to these questions are all the proof you need that something is very, very wrong!
Independent 9/11 researchers have worked nonstop since the events to examine the events of 9/11 and they have uncovered enough information to seriously challenge the official versions of what happened on that fateful day. But maybe, just maybe, the very fact that massive amounts of information are available is a problem in itself. There may be far too much evidence for most Americans to face.
The challenges to the official stories may be too devastating to be processed by the average American who has spent a lifetime believing in the system. Many people can deal with the minor violations that are part of the political scene, but cannot possibly fathom a government that might be complicit in an attack on its own people. They are not unlike the parents who eventually come to terms with a child’s shoplifting spree. The same parents would do anything to deny far more serious accusations. Imagine the response of parents whose son turns out to be a Timothy McVeigh.
Some things are so disturbing that they are almost impossible to believe. That is why, in the 9/11 enigma, less is more. There is a real danger of frightening everyone off by offering too much information. Therefore, if we think of the problem as a chess game, two strategic moves can lead to checkmate.
There are two pieces of the 9/11 puzzle that on their own expose the lies of the administration.
Two questions must be raised so that even the most diehard Bush supporters realize they have been deceived. These are issues that no one can debate or dismiss. These are not conspiracy theories. They are fact-based questions that can lead to exposing the deceptions in the official reports. The apologists have no way to explain these away or justify them. Basically, they offer clear evidence that the official explanations of 9/11 are meaningless.
There is a mountain of unanswered questions concerning the events surrounding the 9/11 attacks. Anyone willing to listen or look at the inconsistencies would have to draw an obvious conclusion: the official explanation of the events of 9/11 is nothing more than a desperate attempt to distract the American people from investigating the truth. There can be no denying that there are a number of strange and puzzling occurrences that have never been, and seemingly cannot be explained.
Perhaps the abundance of startling and damning information is too incredible to be accepted easily by the millions of Americans who have bought into the corporate media's version of the events. So many people in this country can not deal with, or accept any real challenge to the official explanation that allows for no foreknowledge or cover up by their government. Even if most Americans were to be presented with clearly corroborated facts or cold evidence, they would probably refuse to even consider the involvement of their elected leaders in a tragedy of such huge proportions.
The official story, however, collapses after an examination of the two questions just raised. Very simply put, case closed. We do not need to pull an OJ here and bury the obvious under more evidence than the jury can handle. Show the Bronco chase and the blood evidence, and rest the prosecution. Otherwise we risk badly confusing a jury of the uninformed.
It is vital that the evidence based community encourage the American public to question the events for themselves. Two questions of this magnitude are enough to raise reasonable doubt. Two such questions that have gone uninvestigated and unexplained are enough to arouse curiosity,
We’re in a very dangerous game, here, and all of us are players. Much of what happened on September 11th remains at best unclear, and at worst terribly suspicious. The reality that the President of the United States spent more than 18 months resisting an official investigation into the most devastating tragedy in our history is in itself an outrage. But the reality that there is no official body still seeking answers to vital questions is an even greater outrage.
And if that remains the case, we all will have been checkmated, en masse.
Editor's NOTE: People might comment on this article by calling it a conspiracy theory. This is their usual way of dismissing the facts. I ask you, where exactly is there "theory" on this page? What elements of this article are in dispute? This is not a theory, this article poses questions that have not been answered and the people who call the results of the independent 9/11 research community "conspiracy theories" have yet to qualify their assertion. You can not simply call something a "theory" just because you have not looked closely enough to see the facts that have been presented. If you call this a theory you are in denial. Very simply put, you can not debate this issue. Many people will dismiss this, as they do all evidence that goes against what they want to believe, yet when asked what their criteria is for discerning between theory and fact, they will not have a logical answer. This is not theory and neither are the facts that have been brought to light by the many people involved in the legitimate independent 9/11 research community.
Watch Loose Change Second Edition On Line Free - Click Here! - This is a MUST watch video for anybody who wants to know more about the events of 9/11 than you have heard on your TV sets!
An URGENT Message from the Editor!
9/11 Truth Calling Oprah! - I submit to my fellow 9/11 truth seekers and truth bearers that our effort to alert the public will be victorious if Oprah Winfrey gets on board.
TvNewsLIES Challenges Believers of the Official Version of 9/11: - Where the Hell is YOUR proof?
They Are Not "Conspiracy Theories" - They Are, in Fact, "Discoveries"
9/11-PNAC, 9/11-PNAC - SHOULD BE THE #1 TOPIC OF DISCUSSIONA WAKE-UP CALL THE ALTERNATIVE AND LIBERAL MEDIA:TO STOP IGNORING 9/11 AND THE PROJECT FOR A NEW AMERICAN CENTURY
WHY AMERICANS REFUSE TO BELIEVE THE 9/11 EVIDENCE!!! - The attacks of 9/11 were so unthinkable that most Americans would refuse to believe the complicity of their own government, even if presented with a mountain of evidence. - Very simply, it is possible to escape blame if you do something that nobody in the world believes you could do.
DAVID RAY GRIFFIN: ALMOST PERFECT ABOUT 9/11!
Before you call this a "Conspiracy Theory" read this! Learn the difference between theory and fact!
Close-Up of WTC-7 Collapse Footage Shows Unmistakable Demolition Charges
Professional Demolition of World Trade Center Building 7 - On-line videos and in depth analysis.
9/11 Video Selection
How Building Implosions Work
---movies and documentaries detailing accounts - loose change, 9/11: the press for truth,
----OTHER ALTERNATIVE THEORIES-
--- 1. That Bush doesn't really know all that's going on. He's not so intelligent. Cheney forced this upon him for Cheney's own personal gains. also, I've heard that after 9/11 or other instance, Bush received a letter on his desk signed by both Rumsfeld and Cheney telling him that he should go along with something or else. *** research ***
--- 2. (http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3857917663523144457&q=how+illegal+drugs+fuel+the+economy&hl=en)
WKJO: Who Killed John O'Neill? - One Actor, One Room, Seven Characters: 9/11. - Traumatized by the September 11th attacks, one man struggles to dismantle official history, ... all » at the expense of his sanity and even his life. Grappling with multiple realities - and multiple personalities - he must retreat into his mind in pursuit of the truth. In a fictional film about non-fictional events, there is a place where belief and faith will blind you, where nothing is sacred, and to get there all you have to do is ask: "Who Killed John O'Neill?" - A dead art film by ty rauber and ryan thurston «
WHY WOULD THEY DO THIS TO THEIR OWN PEOPLE! WOULD THEY DO THIS TO THEIR OWN PEOPLE? !!!
- Funny that you ask that question. This manual specifically outlines how or why an agent trained should kill their own people to aid the nation.
--- (http://www.geocities.com/SoHo/Opening/7482/cia1.html) - [Introductory text, as printed in the 1999 publication;]
The original document on which this one is based was a sabotage manual produced by the United States Central Intelligence Agency for distribution in Nicaragua in the 1980’s. It was hoped that if enough disenfranchised individuals undertook activities that subverted economic stability, the Leftist government would be more easily overthrown. The manual described itself as "a practical guide to... paralyzing the military-industrial complex... without having to use special tools and with minimal risk for the combatant."
It continues, "Some might think that today’s armed struggle requires military supplies and economic resources only available to states or terorist bands... There is an essential economic infrastructure that any government needs to function, which can easily be disabled or even paralyzed without the use of armaments or costly and advanced equipment, with the small investment of resources and time.
The folowing pages present a series of useful sabotage techniques, the majority of which can be done with simple household tools such as scissors, empty botles, screwdrivers, matches, etc. These measures are extremely safe and without risk for those who use them, as they do not require equipment, skill or specialized activities that can draw attention to the doer.
One combatant can perform many of them, without having to turn to collaborators or having to make a detailed plan beforehand. These are acts that can be done practically in an improvised way every time an occasion presnts itself. Our sacred cause needs to have more men and women join its ranks in order to perform these sabotage tasks. However, necessary caution should be taken, and only when the task requires it, should another person or persons participate in or have knowledge of a given act."
While the original document was intended to facilitate subversion of the Nicaraguan government, the techniques may be applied to any other state or ‘military-industrial complex’ with which the individual is aggrieved. NB: not only are some of these activities illegal, but encouraging people to engage in them is also illegal. With this in mind, this text is presented as a snapshot of the cold war mentality of intelligence agencies, and not as a practical guide to acts of sabotage.
---LETS ALSO TRY TO DEBUNK MYSELF! I'M NOT AFRAID TO TAKE THE CHALLENGE - different angles and approaches
Debunking 911 Conspiracy Theorieshttp://www.geocities.com/debunking911911 Mythshttp://www.911myths.comLoose Change Viewer Guidehttp://www.ccdominoes.com/lc/LooseChangeGuide.htmlCounter-video of Loose Changehttp://www.lolloosechange.co.nr911 Conspiracy Smasherhttp://911conspiracysmasher.blogspot.com
-------antiklaus (5 months ago)
Bush was not directly involved. It's a matter of intelligence. Bush has had a steady supply of cocaine, alcohol, and gay or underage hookers in the white house since he took over, and this neverending party lifestyle is taking it's toll.That's a bold statement that many might not believe, but the evidence is prolific if you bother to look.(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeff_Gannon)
- Please... what if I told you that the CIA was a main source BEHIND Al qaeda, not against with guns blazing... In fact.. I just have to say, that everyone has their hot button when it comes to 9/11.
- "ITS FAKE MAN! NO DUDE! SHUT UP! MY AUNT DIED MAN! SCREW YOU! THOSE TERRORISTS NEED TO DIE!" -
- Everyone has an stance and for those who can be told the truth, its usually just one issue that they need to hear to truly feel that pang... that feeling deep in the middle of your chest... slowly burning your gut... it's a feeling that apparently only a few of us have gotten. because you haev to remember. we're american too, we want this country to be its strongest, healthiest, proudest. But we want more than anything the truth... when we find out without a doubt that we've been lied to on a massive scale, the feelings we get are painful. I dont know what it really is that we feel, embarassment at being fooled so long, intense anger, fear, confusion. The point is, its usually that 1 big issue that sets us up like domino's.... I've found that for most people, its the osama bin laden issue.. Yes, that's right... That #@$%! That bane to your existense, the one who funded those Turban wearing rats!.... but...... really? what if i told you that... contrary to popular belief... it actually wasn't him that was behind it.... what if i told you that indeed. it was our gov't..... but back to osama right? what if i told you that the man we all hate, was dead...... and has been dead for over 5 years now? what if i told you that he died anywhere from before september of 9/11, or the following october due to his health or wounds from american attacks? For those who still can't really believe it, here's my coup de' etat.
What Really Happened - The History the Government Hopes You DON'T Learn!
Bin Laden's voice was detected regularly until [14 December 2001] by intelligence operatives monitoring radio transmissions in Tora Bora, according to the Pentagon [details]. Since then, nothing has been heard from the al-Qa'eda leader and President Bush has hinted in private that bin Laden's silence could mean he has been killed. [Telegraph, 12/28/2001]
Osama bin Laden:
Osama Bin Laden As A Teenager
Apparently this picture (click to enlarge) has been circulating around for quite a while (over three years), but I've just seen it. It shows a happy group portrait of twenty-two brothers and sisters posing for the camera while on a family holiday, but the grinning kid whose face is circled is none other than Osama bin Laden. This picture appeared in the Sun with the caption:the 14-year-old is Osama bin Laden - and within a few years the grinning schoolboy was on his way to becoming the world's most cold-hearted mass murderer. The bin Laden children lined up next to a pink Chrysler Imperial for this snapshot on a trip to Falun, Sweden, in 1971. The holiday was paid for by their father Mohammed, a billionaire building tycoon. Osama inherited a fortune when his dad died soon afterwards - and used it to build a worldwide network of terror.Is it just me, or does young Osama look a tiny bit like Bill Gates? Also, I had no idea he was only 47-years-old. He looks like he's nearing 60.
A dead nemesis perpetuated by the U.S. government
--- Osama bin Laden is dead. The news first came from sources in Afghanistan and Pakistan almost six months ago: the fugitive died in December  and was buried in the mountains of southeast Afghanistan. Pakistan's president, Pervez Musharraf, echoed the information. The remnants of Osama's gang, however, have mostly stayed silent, either to keep Osama's ghost alive or because they
have no means of communication
--Bin Laden's voice was detected regularly until [14 December 2001] by intelligence operatives monitoring radio transmissions in Tora Bora, according to the Pentagon [details]. Since then, nothing has been heard from the al-Qa'eda leader and President Bush has hinted in private that bin Laden's silence could mean he has been killed. [Telegraph, 12/28/2001] - Osama bin-Laden:A dead nemesis perpetuated by the US government
Bin Laden has often been reported to be in poor health. Some accounts claim that he is suffering from Hepatitis C, and can expect to live for only two more years. According to Le Figaro, last year  he ordered a mobile dialysis machine to be delivered to his base at Kandahar in Afghanistan. [Guardian]
Peter Bergen: Bin Laden has aged 'enormously' This is a man who was clearly not well. I mean, as you see from these pictures here, he's really, by December  he's looking pretty terrible.
But by December, of course, that tape that was aired then, he's barely moving the left side of his body. So he's clearly got diabetes. He has low blood pressure. He's got a wound in his foot. He's apparently got dialysis ... for kidney problems. [CNN]
The [December 27, 2001 video] was dismissed by the Bush administration ... as sick propaganda possibly designed to mask the fact the al-Qa'eda leader was already dead. "He could have made the video and then ordered that it be released in the event of his death," said one White House aide. [Telegraph]
Pakistan's Musharraf: Bin Laden probably dead
Pakistan's president says he thinks Osama bin Laden is most likely dead because the suspected terrorist has been unable to get treatment for his kidney disease.
[A Bush administration official] said U.S. intelligence is that bin Laden needs dialysis every three days and "it is fairly obvious that that could be an issue when you are running from place to place, and facing the idea of needing to generate electricity in a mountain hideout." [CNN]
Renal dialysis -- talking about hemodialysis -- is something that really is reserved for patients in end-stage renal failure. That means their kidneys have just completely shut down. The most common cause of something like that would be something like diabetes and hypertension. Once that's happened, if you're separated from your dialysis machine -- and incidentally, dialysis machines require electricity, they're going to require clean water, they're going to require a sterile setting -- infection is a huge risk with that. If you don't have all those things and a functioning dialysis machine, it's unlikely that you'd survive beyond several days or a week at the most. [CNN]
Karzai: bin Laden 'probably' dead
Osama bin Laden is "probably" dead, but former Taliban leader Mullah Omar is alive, Afghan President Hamid Karzai has said. [CNN]
FBI: Bin Laden 'probably' dead
The US Federal Bureau of Investigation's counter-terrorism chief, Dale Watson, says he thinks Osama bin Laden is "probably" dead. [BBC]
Magazine runs what it calls bin Laden's will
The editor-in-chief of a London-based Arab news magazine said a purported will it published Saturday was written late last year  by Osama bin Laden, and shows "he's dying or he's going to die soon." [CNN]
Usama bin Laden has died a peaceful death due to an untreated lung complication, the Pakistan Observer reported, citing a Taliban leader who allegedly attended the funeral of the Al Qaeda leader. "The Coalition troops are engaged in a mad search operation but they would never be able to fulfill their cherished goal of getting Usama alive or dead," the source said. [FOX News]
Translation of Funeral Article in Egyptian Paper:al-Wafd, Wednesday, December 26, 2001 Vol 15 No 4633
News of Bin Laden's Death and Funeral 10 days ago
A prominent official in the Afghan Taleban movement announced yesterday the death of Osama bin Laden, the chief of al-Qa'da organization, stating that binLaden suffered serious complications in the lungs and died a natural and quiet death. [Welfare State]
Osama bin who?
Israel does not view bin Laden as a threat. [Janes]
Israeli intelligence: Bin Laden is dead, heir has been chosen
Israeli sources said Israel and the United States assess that Bin Laden probably died in the U.S. military campaign in Afghanistan in December. They said the emergence of new messages by Bin Laden are probably fabrications, Middle East Newsline reported. [World Tribune]
[See also The Fake bin Laden Audio Tape]
When you hear a threat which is "probably" made by bin Laden, just remember that he's "probably" dead.
Also think about who benefits from your believing he's alive.
fitter than ever in 2004
The Central Intelligence Agency has closed a unit that for a decade had the mission of hunting Osama bin Laden and his top lieutenants, intelligence officials confirmed Monday. The unit, known as Alec Station, was disbanded late last year and its analysts reassigned within the C.I.A. Counterterrorist Center, the officials said. [New York Times 07/03/06]
No use hunting for a dead guy, right?
--- NFL REWIND ON PRE 9/11 INFO --- If that's a bit too much to take in, again, lets look at the fact that our gov't had to have had warnings, HAD to have had a definite idea of what was coming: consider this my nfl rewind:
9/11: Bush Knew - A collection of compelling articles, which refute, or, at the very least, call into question, the assertions that Bush and his administration had no prior knowledge of events that would lead to the 9-11 tragedy.
A note about the articles.
* * *
Meacher sparks fury over claims on September 11 and Iraq warSeptember 6, 2003
"...the war on terrorism is a smokescreen and that the US knew in advance about the September 11 attack on New York but, for strategic reasons, chose not to act on the warnings."[LINK]
Who Knew? The unanswered questions of 9/11September 3, 2003
U.S. Was Aware on bin Laden ThreatSeptember 19, 2002
"CBS reporter David Martin revealed that weeks before the attacks, the CIA had warned Bush personally of Osama Bin Laden’s intent to use hijacked planes as missiles. That followed the damaging exposure by The Associated Press’s John Solomon of a pre-9/11 FBI memo from an officer in Phoenix warning of suspicious Middle Eastern men training at flight schools—a warning that went unheeded." [LINK]
U.S. Clamps Secrecy on Warnings Before 9/11August 7, 2003
"The committee managed, 'inadvertently,' it says, to get some contents of a key briefing Bush received in August 2001. It included 'FBI judgments about patterns of activity consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks; as well as information acquired in May 2001 that indicated a group of Bin Ladin (sic) supporters was planning attacks in the United States with explosives.'"[LINK]
Bush's 9-11 SecretsJuly 31, 2003
"The U.S. government had received repeated warnings of impending attacks—and attacks using planes directed at New York and Washington—for several years. The government never told us about what it knew was coming." [LINK]
9/11 report, Rice remarks in conflict; Investigators say Bush got specific data on threatsJuly 29, 2003
"...the briefing given to the president a month before the suicide hijackings included recent intelligence that al-Qaida was planning to send operatives to the United States to carry out an attack using high explosives." [LINK]
The Secret Saudi Flight on 9-13 Could be the Key to the Bush-Saudi-Al Qaeda ConnectionMay, 2003
"One has to wonder when George W. said, "You're either with us or against us" - just exactly who he meant by "us." "Us" is beginning to look like a Bush-Saudi-Al Qaeda conspiracy, especially when one includes the well-known business ties between George H. W. Bush, James Baker, and the Bin Laden family through the infamous Carlyle Group."[LINK]
The Secrets of September 11April 30, 2003
"One such CIA briefing, in July 2001, was particularly chilling and prophetic. It predicted that Osama bin Laden was about to launch a terrorist strike 'in the coming weeks,' the congressional investigators found. The intelligence briefing went on to say: 'The attack will be spectacular and designed to inflict mass casualties against U.S. facilities or interests. Attack preparations have been made. Attack will occur with little or no warning.'"http://www.msnbc.com/news/907379.asp?0cv=CB10
Is Bush A Liar - or is memory serving him badly?Posted October 10, 2002
FBI Warned D.C. It Was A TargetSeptember 25, 2002
"A Minnesota FBI agent investigating Zacarias Moussaoui testified yesterday that he notified the Secret Service weeks before Sept. 11 that a terror team might hijack a plane and 'hit the nation's capital.'" http://www.nypost.com/news/nationalnews/57848.htm
Moussaoui Warnings IgnoredSeptember 24, 2002
"An FBI supervisor, sounding a prophetic pre-Sept. 11 alarm, warned FBI headquarters that student pilot Zacarias Moussaoui was so dangerous he might 'take control of a plane and fly it into the World Trade Center,' a congressional investigator said in a report Tuesday."http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=512&ncid=716&e=4&u=/ap/20020924/ap_on_go_co/attacks_intelligence
America had 12 warnings of aircraft attackSeptember 19, 2002
"American intelligence received many more clues before the 11 September attacks than previously disclosed, that terrorists might hijack planes and turn them into weapons, a joint congressional committee was told yesterday."http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/story.jsp?story=334633
"Basically, we know that bin Laden had the means and the intent to attack Americans, both at home and abroad."http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=512&ncid=716&e=5&u=/ap/20020919/ap_on_go_co/attacks_intelligence
9/11 Probers Say Agencies Failed to Heed Attack SignsSeptember 19, 2002
"U.S. intelligence agencies received many more indications than previously disclosed that Osama bin Laden's terrorist network was planning imminent "spectacular" attacks in the summer of 2001 aimed at inflicting mass casualties."http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A36754-2002Sep18.html
9/11 report documents credible cluesSeptember 18, 2002
"The U.S. intelligence community received a surprising number of credible reports of a likely terrorist attack prior to Sept. 11, including some threats to domestic targets, according to a congressional report to be unveiled today."http://www.msnbc.com/news/809370.asp?pne=msntv
U.S. knew of 12 plots for jet attacksSeptember 18, 2002
"Plan to attack WTC was among warnings that preceded 9/11, panel told."http://www.msnbc.com/news/809484.asp
Panel Presents 9/11 Intelligence September 18, 2002
"An intelligence briefing two months before the Sept. 11 attack warned that Osama bin Laden ( news - web sites) would launch a spectacular terrorist attack against U.S. or Israeli interests, congressional investigators said Wednesday."http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=542&ncid=703&e=1&u=/ap/20020918/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/attacks_intelligence
Spy Agencies Had Pre-9/11 Threats on U.S. SoilSeptember 17, 2002
"U.S. intelligence agencies picked up threats of attacks inside the United States and of using airplanes as weapons during the spring and summer before last year's Sept. 11 attacks, but were more focused on the possibility of an assault overseas, a congressional source said on Tuesday."http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=578&ncid=578&e=1&u=/nm/20020917/ts_nm/attack_congress_intelligence_dc
Ashcroft Flying HighJuly 26, 2001
"In response to inquiries from CBS News over why Ashcroft was traveling exclusively by leased jet aircraft instead of commercial airlines, the Justice Department cited what it called a "threat assessment" by the FBI, and said Ashcroft has been advised to travel only by private jet for the remainder of his term."http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/07/26/national/printable303601.shtml
Bush briefed on hijacking threat before September 11May 16, 2002
"President Bush's daily intelligence briefings in the weeks leading up to the September 11 terror attacks included a warning of the possibility that Osama bin Laden's al Qaeda network would attempt to hijack a U.S.-based airliner, senior administration officials said Wednesday." http://www.cnn.com/2002/US/05/15/bush.sept.11/index.html
Revealed: The Taliban minister, the US envoy and the warning of September 11 that was ignoredSeptember 7, 2002
"Weeks before the terrorist attacks on 11 September, the United States and the United Nations ignored warnings from a secret Taliban emissary that Osama bin Laden was planning a huge attack on American soil."http://news.independent.co.uk/world/politics/story.jsp?story=331115
Why would Osama bin Laden want to kill Dubya, his former business partner?July 3, 2001
"A plot by Saudi master terrorist, Osama bin Laden, to assassinate Dubya during the July 20 economic summit of world leaders, was uncovered after dozens of suspected Islamic militants linked to bin Laden's international terror network were arrested in Frankfurt, Germany, and Milan, Italy, in April."http://www.onlinejournal.com/Special_Reports/Hatfield-R-091901/hatfield-r-091901.html
Bin Laden’s Relatives Evacuated From NYC October 2, 2001
"Patrick Tyler of the New York Times is reporting from Washington: 'In the first days after the attacks on Sept. 11, the Saudi Arabian ambasador to Washington, Prince Bandar ibn Sultan, supervised the urgent evacuation of 24 members of Osama bin Laden's extended family from ther United States fearing they might be subjected to violence.'"http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0110/S00008.htm
Our Pearl Harbor: The latest NSA revelations suggest the 9-11 plot could have been foiled. June 21, 2002
"Recent news that the National Security Agency (NSA) intercepted two messages the day before the World Trade Center and Pentagon attacks -- messages that indicated imminent action -- obliges us to reconsider whether the airliner hijackings that led to 3,000 lost lives and $20 billion in property damage could have been foiled."http://www.prospect.org/webfeatures/2002/06/prados-j-06-21.html
Al-Qaida monitored U.S. negotiations with Taliban over oil pipelineJune 5, 2002
"A memo by military chief Mohammed Atef raises new questions about whether failed U.S. efforts to reform Afghanistan's radical regime -- and build the pipeline -- set the stage for Sept. 11."http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2002/06/05/memo/index_np.html?x
U.S. had agents inside al-QaedaJune 4, 2002
"U.S. intelligence overheard al-Qaeda operatives discussing a major pending terrorist attack in the weeks prior to Sept. 11 and had agents inside the terror group, but the intercepts and field reports didn't specify where or when a strike might occur, according to U.S. officials. The disclosures add to a growing body of evidence to be examined in congressional hearings that open today into how the CIA, FBI and other agencies failed to seize on intelligence pointing to the deadliest terror attack in U.S. history."http://www.usatoday.com/news/attack/2002/06/03/cia-attacks.htm
Heads-Up To Ashcroft Proves Threat Was Known Before 9/11June 3, 2002
"Don't let them fool you, folks: They knew.
They might have been surprised by the ferocity of the attacks, but the highest-ranking members of the George W. Bush administration knew before Sept. 11 that something terrible was going to happen soon."http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/gate/archive/2002/06/03/hsorensen.DTL
Egypt Warned U.S. of a Qaeda Plot, Mubarak AssertsJune 3, 2002
"Egyptian intelligence warned American officials about a week before Sept. 11 that Osama bin Laden's network was in the advance stages of executing a significant operation against an American target, President Hosni Mubarak said in an interview on Sunday."http://www.nytimes.com/2002/06/04/national/04WARN.html
U.S. Ignored Warnings From FrenchMay 28, 2002
"A key point in unraveling why the FBI failed to follow up leads on Al Qaeda terrorism now centers on the Bureau's contemptuously brushing aside warnings from French intelligence a few days before 9-11."http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/0222/ridgeway2.php
Whopper of the Week: Condoleezza Rice Abroad at home.May 23, 2002
"The overwhelming bulk of the evidence was that this was an attack that was likely to take place overseas."- White House National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, in a May 16 news briefing.
"Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S."- Title of the CIA's Aug. 6 briefing memo to President Bush . . .
Tracking a Counterterrorism BreakdownTimeline Shows Failure to Connect Key Clues Before Sept. 11 May 23, 2002
"Lawmakers are questioning what the administration knew and when. NPR's Mike Shuster reports on Morning Edition that government agencies had several clues that might have triggered alarms in the months before Sept. 11. But no one put them together."http://www.npr.org/programs/morning/features/2002/may/timeline/index.html
U.S. was warned that Moussaoui had close ties to al-Qaida, analyst saysMay 23, 2002
"Who knew what, and when? Could the FBI have prevented the Sept. 11 attacks?"http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2002/05/23/warning/index_np.html
Poppies for planes: White House hides behind veil of executive privilegeMay 22, 2002
"Clinton National Security Advisor Samuel R. "Sandy" Berger was "totally preoccupied" with the prospect of a domestic terror attack. He warned his replacement, Condoleezza Rice, "You will be spending more time on this issue than on any other." Problem was, she didn't."http://www.workingforchange.com/article.cfm?ItemId=13365
The U.S. ignored foreign warnings, too May 21, 2002
"When the hubbub about what the White House did or didn't know before Sept. 11 dies down, Congressional or other investigators should consider the specific warnings that friendly Arab intelligence services sent to Washington in the summer of 2001."http://www.iht.com/articles/58269.html
Bush knew of terrorist plot to hijack US planesMay 20, 2002
"George Bush received specific warnings in the weeks before 11 September that an attack inside the United States was being planned by Osama bin Laden's al-Qaeda network, US government sources said yesterday."http://www.guardian.co.uk/september11/story/0,11209,718312,00.html
Britain warned US to expect September 11 al-Qaeda hijackingsMay 19, 2002
"Britain gave President Bush a categorical warning to expect multiple airline hijackings by the al-Qaeda network a month before the September 11 attacks which killed nearly 3000 people and triggered the international war against terrorism."http://www.sundayherald.com/24822
U.S. planned for attack on al-QaidaMay 16, 2002
"President Bush was expected to sign detailed plans for a worldwide war against al-Qaida two days before Sept. 11 but did not have the chance before the terrorist attacks in New York and Washington, U.S. and foreign sources told NBC News."http://www.msnbc.com/news/753359.asp
Bush Was Warned bin Laden Wanted to Hijack PlanesMay 15, 2002
"The White House said tonight that President Bush had been warned by American intelligence agencies in early August that Osama bin Laden was seeking to hijack aircraft..."http://www.nytimes.com/2002/05/16/politics/16INQU.html?
US agents told: Back off bin LadensNovember 7, 2001
"US special agents were told to back off the bin Laden family and the Saudi royals soon after George Bush became president, although that has all changed since September 11, it was reported today." http://www.old.smh.com.au/news/0111/07/world/world100.html
Hijackers reportedly made test runsOctober 11, 2001
"During a six-hour flight from Boston to Los Angeles in August, movie actor James Woods said te only passengers besides himself seated in first-class were four men who he said appeared to be Middle Eastern in origin. Woods said the four neither ate nor drank, did not read or sleep and talkedto each other in whispers.
On Sept. 12, Woods called the FBI to tell investigators about his experience. He was interviewed by agents on Sept. 13, but has had no comment."http://www.gazettenet.com/americantragedy/10112001/7363.htm
Bush: ‘We’re At War’September 24th, 2001
"On Sept. 10, NEWSWEEK has learned, a group of top Pentagon officials suddenly canceled travel plans for the next morning, apparently because of security concerns."http://www.msnbc.com/news/629606.asp
US 'planned attack on Taleban'September 18, 2001
"A former Pakistani diplomat has told the BBC that the US was planning military action against Osama Bin Laden and the Taleban even before last week's attacks."http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/south_asia/newsid_1550000/1550366.stm
Israeli security issued urgent warning to CIA of large-scale terror attacksSeptember 16, 2001
"ISRAELI intelligence officials say that they warned their counterparts in the United States last month that large-scale terrorist attacks on highly visible targets on the American mainland were imminent."http://news.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;$sessionid$52PMOXQAADW5PQFIQMGSFFOAVCBQWIV0?xml=/news/2001/09/16/wcia16.xml&sSheet=/news/2001/09/16/ixhome
Willie Brown got low-key early warning about air travelSeptember 12, 2001
For Mayor Willie Brown, the first signs that something was amiss came late Monday when he got a call from what he described as his airport security - - a full eight hours before yesterday's string of terrorist attacks -- advising him that Americans should be cautious about their air travel.http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/09/12/MN229389.DTL
Commission warned BushSeptember 12, 2001
"But on Wednesday, two former senators, the bipartisan co-chairs of a Defense Department-chartered commission on national security, spoke with something between frustration and regret about how White House officials failed to embrace any of the recommendations to prevent acts of domestic terrorism delivered earlier this year."http://www.salon.com/politics/feature/2001/09/12/bush/index.html
Jeb Bush signs Executive Order allowing him to declare martial law in Florida... September 7, 2001
"Based on the potential massive damage to life and property that may result from an act of terrorism at a Florida port, the necessity to protect life and property from such acts of terrorism..."http://sun6.dms.state.fl.us/eog_new/eog/orders/2001/september/eo2001-261-09-07-01.html
* * *
The article link is the last known location of the article (unless otherwise noted). We cannot guarantee the accuracy of the links -- online publications often archive their articles in password-protected areas. If you know where an article has been moved to, and that location is viewable by anyone, we would appreciate your letting us know.
--- This is the last statement about trying to prove 9/11 was definitely orchestrated by the U.S. government, or at least completely forewarned.
- After the planes hit and bush was recorded on tape, he said "...When I saw the first plane hit, I thought, boy, that's a bad pilot".... but.... in fact, the camera's only recorded the 2nd plane hitting, there are absolutely no recorded images of the 1st plane hitting the towers. Bush LIED! L.I.E.D! ... And we all know he can get a little tongue-tied, or lose his frame of mind and thought for a second, but, it's still incriminating for anyone on the side of those who believe it was self inflicted or allowed. But for those who still don't believe, probably won't, and i'm not after them. I'm after those who won't stand as stone blocks in the way of the road to openness and in the end, truth. The most important thing I wish to accomplish in this essay, is to open your eyes to the possibility that things may not be as easy to determine as your single observation. Opening your eyes to the incosistencies of the 9/11 attack is our version of the black sheep awakening to his doom at the end of the cliff. We haven't reached it yet, but you can rest assured that there's a greater probability we won't completely stop in time, than we will. The only way to stop is to see that their is a cliff's edge, and we're heading towards it. All I can say, is... Welcome to more questions, I hope that after this, you'll be asking more for the rest of your life.